Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

ilyusha Blog

  • A delightful fantasy

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Stardust  (2007)

    As an admitted fan of fantasy, I was very much looking forward to finally seeing Stardust.  It did not disappoint.  Engaging plot, a universe populated by well-developed characters, a healthy sprinkling of magic - it all comes together to serve as a wonderful stage to explore The Big Idea.  Which happens to be not about an affirmation of some philosophical credo or a celebration of the triumph of good over evil, - make no mistake, the good does prevail, - but a simple lovely truth.

    A young man sets out to capture a fallen star, so that he can win the hand in marriage of the fairest girl in his village.  Little does he know that the star - who turns out to be a beautiful, if slightly neurotic, young woman - is greatly prised by two less-then-good forces: A clan of old witches who seek to recover their youth and the remaining members of a family of fratricidal princes who seek to assert each of their claims to the vacant throne.  Many perilous adventures ensue, the boy transforms himself - with a little help from an unconventional captain of the flying pirate ship - from a naïve shop assistant to a strapping romantic hero, and discovers that true love is about lighting up when the person that you love is with you.

    That the story is delivered in light tones makes it all the more entertaining - there is plenty of comical happenstance and dialogue interspersed with all sorts of wickedness.  It also makes the movie seem less than serious at times, which could be viewed as a negative.

    The heavyweights, Michelle Pfeiffer and Robert DeNiro - the latter, especially, - steal the show on more than one occasion, but the rest of the cast gives convincing performances all around.  The supporting characters, among them the devotedly protective pirate crew, the goat turned into a man, the fast-talking trader in magic goods, and the improbably good-natured troupe of specters, contribute their share to the delightful narrative, adapted from the novel of a contemporary fantasy luminary Neil Gaiman.

    One for my DVD collection, surely.

    This review is also posted on my personal website.


  • A great romcom

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    A Good Year  (2006)

    I admit that I am biased when it comes to travel flicks. Show me a knockout beauty with the backdrop of gorgeous vistas, and I start salivating. Sprinkle in some cultural subtext, fortified by the prominent role of local food and wine, and I am so ready to live vicariously through the on-screen characters, that the actual plot becomes rather unimportant. Make the locale one of my favorite places on Earth, and I will invariably give you a thumbs up.

    The events in A Good Year occur in Provence (Favorite place? Check! Vistas? Check!). The female lead is the ravishing Marion Cotillard (now, a newly-minted Oscar winner for her role in La Vie en Rose). The setting is nothing less than a vineyard estate. Everything is properly aligned for my enjoyment.

    And the movie is enjoyable, despite certain lack of believability around Russell Crowe as a romantic lead. He is, on the other hand, just flawless as a ruthless and haughty trader Max Skinner. Several members of the cast produce no less delightful performances, especially Archie Panjabi as Gemma, Max's witty assistant. Ms Cotillard shines as the local Provençal goddess, even though there is something inexplicably "only in a movie" about how she lets Max win her over.

    Flashbacks of Max's childhood that he spent with his late uncle at the estate, are seamlessly interwoven with current events and provide an insightful backstory to Max's [re]awakening from the world of cutthroat corporate finance to the world of unhurried country living (inheriting a vineyard does not hurt in this kind of journey). London, with its drab weather, acts as a perfect contrasting setting to the bliss of the sunny southern France, making an answer to the question "Which of the two places would you rather be at right now?" quite obvious.

    As behooves a romantic comedy, the movie is quite funny with enough situational mishaps supported by crisp dialogue. The exclamation of "Lance Armstrong!" may sound a bit incongruous coming from an Englishman (but then, who else can a Brit refer to in order to annoy a bunch of French cyclists?), but you'll feel an urge to cheer. "Remember: In France, the customer's always wrong" reinforces such a strong American-held stereotype that you won't be able to hold a snort. And "McDonald's - in Avignon. Fish and chips - in Marseille. Allez!" in response to insufferable American tourists doing their lamentable change-everything-on-the-menu-to-our-specific-tastes ordering routine is nothing short of priceless, an instant winged phrase.

    I suppose the credit for the dialogue goes to the author of the book on which the movie is based, Peter Mayle. Then, this is one of those movies that make me want to read the book.


    This review is also posted on my personal website.


  • Disturbing but beautifully made

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I should note right from the start that I probably would not pick up the book on which this movie is based.  Nonetheless, I came across its showing on cable completely by accident and one fleeting look was enough for me to record its subsequent re-run and watch it beginning to end.  Despite my natural aversion to these types of stories, I am a bit surprised to admit that Perfume: The Story of a Murderer is one of the best dramas that I watched in a long time.

    A young man in mid-eighteenth-century Paris develops unparalleled olfactory abilities while growing up in an orphanage and then slaving away in a tannery.  His sense of smell is the guiding force in his life, to the extent of stunting his other senses and feelings.  Upon an unfortunate encounter with a young and presumably full of fantastic smells woman, he becomes obsessed with capturing the essence of virginal beauty, and to that effect first seeks instruction from an accomplished perfumer and later engages in murdering beautiful women all over the famous perfume town of Grasse to gather their scents in his quest.  He achieves his life's ambition just as he is caught, but with a few drops of his concoction he manages to bewitch the entire town and escape the execution.  Observing the effects of his perfume on the townsfolk, he realizes how empty and devoid of love his life has been, and, instead of using the elixir for power and riches, he uses it to leave the world.

    Ok.  As fables go, this one is rather too disturbing and messianic for my taste, but it is, after all, a fable.  I keep wondering how a sensitive nose can operate and continue to be refined in constant conditions of grime and slime (and whether a woman of less than noble descent would, in fact, smell wonderfully in the 18th century France), but again, this is meant to be a legend, not a factual history lesson.  And it is a legend quite beautifully made.

    Everything from recreation of the times to depiction of the single-minded obsession of the  unfortunate Jean-Baptiste Grenouille, to visual clues of the plethora of smells that influence him is done magnificently.  The graphic palette that accompanies the development that we cannot ourselves, pardon the pun, get a whiff of, is simply breathtaking.  Conversely, the murders are pretty much all implied, rather than acted out, and the victims are never savaged, which allows the notion of the magical perfume that is harvested from their bodies and ultimately brings joy to people to remain untainted. 

    Heretofore unknown to me Ben Whishaw, who plays the main character, projects anguish, maniacal obsession and absence of moral values in a powerful and restrained way.  You cannot help but want Jean-Baptiste to be thwarted in his pursuit of his innocent prize victim, yet at the same time, you want to know what the ultimate perfume will be about. 

    I liked Dustin Hoffman's turn as a declining master of perfumery, but less so Alan Rickman's as a wealthy Grasse merchant.  But the acting, in the end, is secondary in this picture, overtaken by the portrayal of smells that surround us, not least of them the scent of a woman.

    If you cannot get past the turns of the plot, you will not think highly of this movie.  But this is a case where you need to stop thinking and start sensing... 


    This review is also posted on my personal website.


  • Hot Fuzz - Entertaining, a bit too grotesque

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hot Fuzz  (2007)

    A cop par excellence is re-assigned from his London beat to a small town in England's West.  He arrives to find a serene and tight-knit community and a lax and not exactly competent police force service.  As he follows his policeman instincts, he causes a lot more disturbance than the town is used to.  Of course, nothing is what it seems in this sleepy place, and very soon a string of gruesome deaths ensues... 

    Hot Fuzz starts nothing short of brilliant.  Simon Pegg projects both single-mindedness of Sgt Nicholas Angel and his general bafflement over why other people do not share his attitude with the perfect blend of body language, facial expressions and quietly impeccable speech.  I love the quick cuts that bridge the narrative.  Angel's equanimity, coupled with the haplessness and indolence of his new comrades-in-arms, makes for great situational comedy.

    Unfortunately, when the plot picks up speed, the movie slides into grotesque and loses its brilliance.  Nicholas starts questioning his sanity, showing emotions, and that process somehow looks very formulaic and not entirely convincing.  The murder scenes are very brief and perfectly in line with the quick-cut technique, but at least one of them is graphic enough to leave a lasting image, which is hardly a desirable outcome for what is essentially a comedy.  The climactic gunfight is splendidly staged and brilliantly results in not a single death; but the effect is somewhat negated by a follow-up penultimate scene, which has Nick Frost's big-child Danny Butterman complete his conversion to Nicholas's cause by taking a bullet for him.  Completely unnecessary plot twist, for my money.  At least, Danny's loyalty is largely based on the bond that he developed with Nicholas over time; the other members of the police department - who have dismissed and ridiculed the sergeant throughout the movie, - radically turn to the two partners' help in a span of 60 seconds.

    Despite these shortcomings, the movie is worth watching.  Think of it as a live-action cartoon, and you will be quite entertained.

    This review is also posted on my personal website.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<December 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789

Dig through the archives

Categories
 


Advertisement