Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Film for the Soul

  • The Dark Knight - Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Dark Knight  (2008)

    (Christopher Nolan, 2008)

    Following on for the international success that was Batman Begins, British director Christopher Nolan continues his revision of the caped vigilante Batman with The Dark Knight. Unlike the microcosm of Nolan's first foray, which worked basically as an origins story, filling in the background as to why and how Bruce Wayne, Batman's alter ego, choose a life of fighting crime from the shadows', The Dark Knight casts its net wider to implicate the ramifications of a society in decay.

    Long gone are the campy musings of Joel Schumacher, or the cartoonesque romanticism of Tim Burton, no room for nipple accommodated bat-suits or Prince soundtracks here. Batman now reflects the dark, brooding presence often associated in the graphic novel adaptations of Jeph Loeb, Frank Miller and Alan Moore, amongst others. Ambitious and epic, The Dar
    k Knight is something of an opus, the 'Godfather' of superhero adaptations, a musing of the darker side of human nature, of how close a man must skirt the boundary of good and evil for the 'greater good', of duality, of what constitutes a good man.


    Large themes indeed in what should be, by summer season standards, an open invitation for popcorn fodder, the brainless blockbuster and the family film, all of which The Dark Knight was (over) marketed at but doesn't neatly fall into any one of these cosy demographics. Large themes call for a large palette and The Dark Knight has that in spades, Gotham for instance, our heroes home and, without doubt, as luminary and significant as Batman himself, has never looked this grandiose, the city's landscape, filmed on IMAX technology, filling the screen with chrome, glass and smog.

    Set
    some time after the events of the previous film, we join The Dark Knight at a crossroads , having helped clear Gotham city of it's criminal element with the remaining mobsters being forced underground, Batman (Christian Bale) continues in the vain hope that he's making a difference but in reality the city needs more than a masked vigilante; something the opening scene does well to address with it's array of copy-cat crusaders.


    On opposing forces, two new bucks stride into town, one a white knight of hope and change, Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart), a young, clean cut council man running for town mayor, the other, a sociopath, amoral and demonic, a man with no background or agenda, other than 'to watch the world burn', called 'The Joker' (Heath Ledger); both of whom want to challenge and shake up the status quo, one for the good of the city, for the good of the people, the other, just to cause as much mayhem and madness as he possibly can.


    Nolan, along with his brother Jonathan Nolan, once again take up the writing reins and have delievered a dark and complex film, successfully transporting the theatrical comical elements in to a real world template. It's this 'realism' that really sets The Dark Knight, and Batman Begins, apart from it's contemporary 'comic book adaptations' that seem to litter the cinema screens these days. By setting Batman in a world we, almost, recognise it becomes all the more threatening and disturbing, The Joker, despite his OTT attire, outlandish, fiendish plans and make-up, becomes an everyday evil that we, unfortunately, relate to.


    How depressing it is then to relate to a film that paints our society with broad nihilistic brush strokes, full of casual violence, polluted by an apathetic, fearful society ready to put one over the next guy. It's a damning portrait of society today but The Dark Knight does have it's bright side, apart from Batman's constant stab at vigilante justice, Harvey Dent is attempting to put the entire mob behind bars whilst cleaning up the city, Lt. Jim Gordon (Gary Oldham) is his man on the front line, a fine upstanding family man trying to do the right thing and Rachael Dawes (Maggie Gyllenhaal) a bombastic, feisty young district attorney, torn between her love for Wayne and Dent, attempts to fight the mob in court.

    It's against this backdrop, that 'The Joker', a criminal mastermind, makes his move, willing to take out these forces of good, for a price and for the sheer pleasure it will bring him. For 'The Joker' is an agent of chaos, willfully destroying and testing those around him, forcing all involved to make moral decisions, pushing their resolve and their limits of empathy. The Joker acts as a barometer, a measure,a symbol, to what depths society would reduce itself to in order to serve their own selfish needs, wants and desires, if chaos was allowed to rule. It's a repeated motif throughout The Dark Knight and one that serves the main narrative, tough decisions and morally questionable actions are constantly having to be made, giving the audience tough, unrelenting answers in the process.


    So dark then? And some. However, the relentless regurgitation of these underlying themes, the senseless, endless, brooding (Christian Bale has mastered the pout) and pontificating, felt extremely heavy-handed, as if I was being repeatedly bashed over the head by it all. At two and a half hours this can begin to feel rather laboured, I shifted uncomfortably in my seat actually willing for the ending, not because I was no longer enjoying it but rather that I had seen enough, someone should have been strong enough to omit several unnecessary drawn out scenes and given it a tighter edit.

    Overall, not your average run of the mill, normal summer blockbuster, although it still delivers the obligatory thrills and spills with some nice set pieces; you can't help feeling that action scenes aren't exactly Nolan's forte, but still an extravaganza all the same. Doom ladened, nihilistic and morose; Heath Ledgers untimely death helps to lend the film a sinister and fateful air, The Dark Knight, despite the flaws, is something of a success. It's by no means the masterpiece that fan boys, across the globe, will have you believe, but it's still a very welcome addition to a season generally bristling with mediocrity and pap. Although, I feel I should question one of it's tag lines in asking 'Why so serious?'



    Note: I've attempted to stay clear of highlighting Heath Ledger's 'The Joker' but I just can't leave without acknowledging just what an wonderful, raw and untainted performance it really was. So let's revel in one of his finest moments with the clip above.

    Originally posted on:Film for the Soul

  • El Topo - Watching the 1000 Greatest Films

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    El Topo  (1970)

    As voted by the Film for the Soul community.

    No. 18
    - El Topo (Alejandro Jodorowsky, 1970)
    Ranked #688

    I'm not God, I'm a man - El Topo

    Dressed head to toe in black leather, accompanied by a naked seven year old boy (Brontis Jodorowsky), El Topo (Alejandro Jodorowsky) rides into shot on a horse. Shielded by an umbrella, protecting himself from the searing heat of the desert sun, he instructs the child to bury a portrait of his mother and his favourite toy because 'now, you are a man'. It's an unnerving and surreal opening to what proves to be a visual assaulting, ultra-violent acid-western, dripping with religious allegories, pretentious, sardonic dialogue, adorned with freaks and body transgression. Labeled the first 'midnight movie', El Topo became a cult favourite with the hipster, bohemian crowd of its day, gaining a word of mouth reputation, it somehow captured the spirit, an ideal, a certain moment in time and played it out in a bizarre, but totally bewitching, style.

    The film doesn't lend itself to easy translation, playing, as it does, on shocking visuals, symbolism, mysticism, mind-bending sound effects, cartoonish, often disturbing violence, spoof and homage. El Topo can really be separated into two chapters, the first finds El Topo, accompanied by his son, seeking vengeance for a village, where the inhabitants have been mercilessly slaughtered. A blood strewn street lined with the remains of people and animals, lie scattered, some with the guts hanging out, walls are stained the colours of crimson and claret, whilst a red river, the blood of the innocents, trickles through the village. This alarming scene, with it's uber-violent mise-en-scene, is at the heart of what makes El Topo such a contradictory experience; the feeling of revulsion goes hand in hand with admiration, nausea, disbelief and amazement, it's a true battle of the senses as to what feeling you should go with first.


    El Topo tracks town the murderers, a stereotypical bunch of bandits, who we witness, randomly shooting people, taking refuge in a monastery and harassing their Franciscan monk hostages; lewd sexual gratuity and religious symbolism run tandem throughout Jodorowsky's pseudo-philosophical tome. El Topo castrates the leader of the group, a generalissimo figure, full of pomposity and pout, then rescues the now dead leader's woman, Mara before leaving his son with the monks and taking up his spiritual quest to kill the 'four masters of the gun'. Despite the surreal nature of these events within this imaginary realm, Jodorowsky plays it for real and through an array of accomplished camera work, editing, visual and audio techniques, is able to add a viable touch of 'realism', to this otherworldly environment.

    The second half witnesses a re-birth, a resurrection if you will, of our protagonist, after his near death at the end of the first chapter. Saved by a bunch of social outcasts disfigured by rampant incest, now cave dwellers, El Topo reawakens, wearing robes resembling the garb of Buddhist monks, sitting in the lotus position, white bearded and humbled. It's just one of a plethora of religious allegories, assembled and taken from a number of religions, myths and fables, that are thrown together into a melding pot and, although aesthetically arresting, do nothing for any sort of semblance or coherence for the casual viewer. Yet this was the intension, El Topo is akin to a spiritual journey, for both the audience and lead protagonist, which through the violent actions and recriminations of the first half, he awakens enlightened and ready to change the world for the better through his rebirth.


    It's this sense of spiritual identity, an awakening, that seems to be a preoccupation for Jodorowsky, bombarding the viewer with an endless stream of symbolism, aphorisms and mysticism. El Topo literally means 'the mole' and the film opens with a voice over stating that "the mole
    spends its live digging tunnels, trying to find its way to the sun, but when it finally emerges from the darkness, the sunlight blinds the poor creature". The opening summation spells out our protagonists attempted spiritual quest; his journey to find enlightenment through fighting, and killing, the four masters of the gun, his messiah like death and re-birth, the task he sets himself to help the disfigured and the deformed only to find the world corrupted and beyond approach before his own self-sacrifice.

    El Topo is by far a subtle piece of work, heavy handed, with it's tongue firmly set in cheek, some of the set-pieces and symbolism are bombastic to say the least. The 'eye set in the pyramid' banners that adorn the vastly wealthy and chubby peopled town during the film's second half, are obviously taken from the American dollar in an attempt to lampoon the United States, which depicts a society ravished by opulence and arrogance. A church claiming miracles in a rigged game of Russian roulette, is blatantly shouting down at organised religion and depictions of rape and bawdy sexual innuendo (phallus shaped rocks, vaginal shaped fruit) are cumbersome to say the very least.


    The sheer number of ideas and images on display can be slightly overwhelming and in the effort to impress and inspire, it sometimes fails to translate to the screen. If I'm honest I really don't know where I stand with it, sometimes I found it pretentious and preachy, whilst at other times it was lyrical and exciting. What we're supposed to make of it all, only Jodorowsky knows, or does he? Jodorowsky is something of a personality, infamous for the odd pretentious quote and for self-aggrandising, maybe he summed it up best when he claimed "most directors make films with their eyes; I make films with my testicles". Which neatly sums up my experience of watching El Topo better than any conclusion could claim to do, so, with that, I shall take my leave.


    El Topo Trailer

    Previous 'Watching the 1000 Greatest Films' posts - No. 17 - Distant Voices, Still Lives
    No. 16 - Bridge on the River Kwai
    No. 15 - Pat Garret and Billy the Kid


    Originally posted on:Film for the Soul

  • There Will Be Blood - Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Paul Thomas Anderson, 2007

    There Will Be Blood opens with an, almost wordless, scene in which Daniel Plainview (Daniel Day Lewis), the all encompassing, all consuming, monster of a man, that we will come to intently dislike over the next 2 hours, scrabbles around in a dark cave, deep underground in a makeshift mine. There's this noise, a doom ladened tune, wonderfully scored by Johnny Greenwood, playing over the images, foretelling this epic of greed, of envy, of the dark undertone of the American success story. Plainview, initially mining for silver, finds oil in the cave and so begins Anderson's opus, loosely based on the Upton Sinclair novel of 1927, 'Oil!', chronicling Plainview's rise to riches, the oil boom of the early 20th century and the price paid for a life seeking only money.

    For followers of Anderson's work, There Will Be Blood, seems something of a departure, as it follows a more classical narrative strand, as opposed to his vast ensemble epics Boogie Nights (1997) and Magnolia (1999). His newest film feels more in line with the great tomes of Hollywood classics than say his last film, Punch-Drunk Love (2002), which thrived on the outskirts of mainstream cinema. Here we see Anderson, although strictly on his terms, embrace the 'American Dream' picture, it's the ultimate canvas to display the visual flair, originality and style that has deservedly gained acclaim from audiences and critics alike. Winner of two Oscars, Best Actor for Daniel Day Lewis and Best Cinematography for Robert Elswitt, There Will Be Blood witnesses Anderson's rise from the shadows to the main players table.

    H.W(.) and Daniel Plainview (Daniel Day Lewis)

    After that mind altering opening gambit, we settle with Plainview's good fortune, his budding company starts to thrive and the oil starts to gush. He builds his reputation by branding himself 'a family man', often with his young, adopted son, H.W (Dillon Freasier), by his side; the young boy came into his care by chance, his father dying in the very oil his son appears to be born in, H.W is even faux-anointed by the black gold, with the oil daubed on his forehead when cradled by his father as a baby. H.W becomes Plainview's only link to the human world, so obsessed by the oil, the money, that he divorces himself from people, often finding nothing good about them, admitting that 'when I look at people, I see nothing to like'.

    The years pass by and before the wealth and the oil engulf him, Plainview is approached by Paul Sunday (Paul Dano), a young farm hand, offering him a rich find of oil, on his family's land in Little Boston, California, for a price. Under the pretense that they're 'quail hunting', Plainview and H.W set out to scan the claim, they come across the Sunday family ranch, situated in the middle of barren, desert land, enshrouded in poverty and destitution, taking the family up on their offer of food, they pitch a tent and take up the search for oil. It's here we meet Eli Sunday (Paul Dano, again) and, like Plainview and H.W, we wonder if we've been hoaxed; Paul Sunday never reappears and this quandary is never resolved, claiming to be Paul's brother and a practicing local preacher, Eli acts as Plainview's mirror image, his nemesis, as the two lock horns from the start.

    Eli Sunday (Paul Dano)

    In obtaining the land, Eli manages to coax more money from Plainview under the banner that it's 'for his church', Plainview goes about setting up oil rigs and camps, telling the people of the town that he intends to help the community with roads, schools and water. Eli begins to fight Plainview for the hearts and minds of the people; the big business man and the preacher, one through the power of commerce and the other through the power of religion. Anderson plays one of against the other, both objecting to the others methods and intension, Plainview believes Eli to be a fraud, whilst Eli believes Plainview to be corrupt and the devil incarnate. It's classic territory, wealth and faith, and Anderson finds nothing good to say in either; both are equally abhorrent as the other, both are to blame for the state of society, neither offer anything tangible or real and both will succumb to their false beliefs.

    Up until a certain point, Plainview's churlish and forthright attitude is something akin to charming, his love for H.W keeps him grounded and, even, likable. The scene in which the layers of the onion start to peel can be seen in the awesome oil rig burning sequence, where H.W, getting to close too the action, has his eardrums destroyed by an erupting geyser. Anderson has always been something of a master when it comes to sound and here he demonstrates a masterful execution, of not only the lack of sound, but the revelation of character. With H.W now deaf, Plainview can't keep the smile of his face as he witnesses the scene before him, the oil rigs burning bright orange in the dark black sky, his love is not for the child but for the wealth. Soon he tires of the boy's needs, he has no time for him now he's deaf and dispenses with him when the opportunity beckons.


    Daniel Day Lewis, who incidentally is creepily brilliant here, as Plainview is nothing if not a meat slab of rage and hate, of money and wealth, of great love and great pain, a searing, apocalyptic mess, of contradiction and hurt. You could easily feel sorry for him, those eyes are that of a 8 year old boy; possibly why his strongest relationship is with his adopted son, they appear moist, ready to bawl, yet look closer and you can see flames burning in them. Disquieting, abstract but all too real, Plainview is the American success story incorporated, a none to subtle but frightening harbinger of things to come, a messenger made from blood stained money. In him you see Charles Foster Kane, without doubt a reference not far from Anderson's conception, a man who has neither the capacity or will for human weakness, in the end he'll lose everything, obvious from the first notes of Greenwood's score.

    A film of scale; landscapes that engulf the screen, oil rigs that burn as bright as the sun, the looming and over-powering performances of Lewis and Dano; who the latter, on holding his own against a formidable lead role, shows real promise for this fine young actor, There Will Be Blood displays a real signifier of intent from Anderson. This is a film of biblical proportions, playing with the great American cinematic themes of money, greed, religion, wealth and society; reminiscent of those auteur films of 70's and along side those films, Anderson's film can be read as an allegory for the current climate, intentional or otherwise. A film that needs to be seen more than once, I can only highly recommend this film but don't imagine for a second that everyone will like it; to be honest I wasn't sure for a good day or two, but those themes, images (startling) and words play on you, over and over, until you find yourself muttering to yourself - 'I drink your milkshake' - and then, it all makes sense.


    There Will Be Blood - Trailer

    Originally posted on:Film for the Soul

  • Celebrating the Best of British - Withnail and I

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Withnail & I  (1987)

    Continuing my quest to bring you the best of British cinema.

    Withnail and I (Bruce Robinson, 1987)


    Withnail and I is Bruce Robinson's semi-autobiographical tale of living a hand to mouth existence, fueled by drugs and alcohol, as trained actors waiting for the big time, living a life of destitution and squalor in a dilapidated house in Camden, London. Robinson just found the source material too overwhelming to ignore, the whole idea of 'struggling actors in crisis' seemed to him both hilarious and absurd yet richly tragic which resonated with the changing times. Withnail and I takes place in 1969, with the 70's looming, and the air of change and missed opportunities radiate the film, the line 'the greatest decade in the history of mankind is over and we have failed to paint it black', spoken by the seller of narcotics Danny (Ralph Brown), speaks volumes about the failures of this generation and their inability to leave their mark.


    'I'm a trained actor reduced to the status of a bum'


    It's this air of 'times are a changing' that also fuels our protagonists, the erstwhile forever drunk Withnail, played with gleeful menace by Richard E. Grant; who as a life long tee-total had never been drunk in his life and I (marked in the script as Marwood but the name is never given on screen), his humble and 'perfumed pounce' house mate played by an effeminate looking Paul McGann, and their desire to get out of the city for a while, 'to get away from all this hideousness'. This course of action leads them to the wonderful Uncle Monty, a 'rampant homosexual', obese and barking mad, played with relish by Richard Griffiths, who, as Withnail's uncle, is able to give them keys to his house in the countryside, which leads to a clichéd, but genuinely crafted, clash of cultures as our thespians (in waiting) bump heads with country folk.'

    Richard E. Grant's super charged drinking machine is actually based on Robinson's real life friend, Vivien MacKerrell, a talented, intelligent young actor who succumb to the world of easy vice and virtue. Despite Withnail being a first class coward, waif and in some cases, a total and utter shit, the viewer can't help but love him, those deep eyes shine with affection and loss; especially in the films wonderful ending, just watch that look Withnail gives I' as they say goodbye, knowing it'll be the last time (without actually saying it), it'll break your heart. The 'I' figure is loosely based on Robinson himself, who acts as the narrator with a soft voice-over reading excerpts from his diary, and the story is of their time together, a period of some five years, condensed into a two week plot line; Robinson often wonders how he made it out of this time alive.


    'Once again that beastly oaf has ruined my day!'


    Financed by George Harrison's influential, but now sadly defunct, production company, Handmade Films, the same company behind such classics as Time Bandits, The Long Good Friday and those hilarious Monty Python films, infamous for its carte-blanche attitude to giving directors full control, Withnail and I was given a relatively healthy budget of 1.1 million pounds, not bad going for a first time director. Originally conceived as a novel, Robinson was paid to adapt the budding tale into a script, which in turn led to Handmade Films nvolvement. Despite reservations that the film looked too dark, lacked humour and received terrible test screenings, Withnail and I has grown in stature over the years, often cited as one of Britain's greatest films of the past 20 years.


    'Don't threaten me with a dead fish'

    Amongst the vast copious amounts of alcohol, the most quotable lines of dialogue this side of The Big Lebowski and general hilarity, Withnail and I is full of pathos, remorse and longing. The relationship between our two protagonists for example are some of the finest foray's in to friendship ever put to film, the necessity and madness of people struggling with life; both blinking and shimmering into the light of adult responsibilities and leaving their youth behind. Then there's Uncle Monty, eccentric and lecherous he may well appear but beneath the veneer lies a deeply battered man, bruised by homophobia and nursing a massive broken heart. His attempts to bed the positively frightened 'I' are both hilarious and utterly tragic, his face when told (lied to) that I and Withnail are lovers is just down right sad.

    Pretty deep stuff for what is essentially a story, a light hearted romp, about two actors, drunk and jobless, taking a break in the countryside, or as Withnail hysterically puts it, 'we've gone on holiday by mistake'. Thankfully, Robinson handles the deft change in tone and atmosphere with verve, carefully judging the pace and timing of each joke and moment of tragi-comedy. It's this tone and visual style that gives Withnail and I flair and grace, its fixed point of identity feels authentic yet exaggerated, real yet otherworldly. The use of music, a wonderful scene of a Camden being slowly demolished to the Hendrix's mighty 'All Along the Watchtower' for example, adds to the overall feel of a surreal, changing Britain.


    I feel like a pig shat in my head


    There's also a distinct Edwardian fare in the characteristics of Englishness, exposed in the caricatures of rural English life; the pissed ex-army colonel, now Landlord of a run down pub, the quaint old ladies littering tea-shops and the passive-aggressive poacher, who himself believes Withnail to be an affront to all that’s good and proper about Britain, that are wonderfully imagined, exaggerated, but like all good satire, are fixed in the real world. Just as Danny, the resident drug-dealer with the monotone voice and frazzled mind (armed with camberwell carrot), is wildly histrionic and fevered, the portrayal is something akin to a specific time and space, a recognisable, and all too understandable, entity that you know existed in Robinson's life.

    Withnail and I falls into that bracket, of a small percentage of films, that you either love or hate , either your at one from the very start, laughing like a person possessed, or you'll stare in wonder, disbelief and astonishment that anyone could ever find this funny. For me, this is a quintessential British film, one so fixed in the cultural landscape that it's impossible to vision this film being made anywhere else. Like a good bottle of wine, Withnail and I matures as it ages, still as funny as when it first hit the screen and finally getting the kudos it deserves, not only as a great comedy but as a great film, it's fast outgrowing it's cult status label and weaving itself into the fabric of British cinema.



    What f****r said that?

    Previous post in this series - Get Carter

    Originally posted on:Film for the Soul

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<October 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2829301234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678


Categories
 


Advertisement