Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Film for the Soul

  • Distant Voices, Still Lives - Watching the 1000 Greatest Films

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    No.17 Distant Voices, Still Lives - Terrence Davies, 1988
    Ranked #420

    He was a bastard and I bleedin' hated him. - Maisie

    Filmed two years apart, using two different crews, 'Distant Voices' and 'Still Lives' are expertly melded together with deft craft and care by one of Britain's best living directors, Terrence Davies. In what eventually became his breakthrough film, winning several international awards on the festival circuit and universally applauded by critics alike, Distant Voices, Still Lives is the autobiographical tale of the directors upbringing, in a working class family, set in Liverpool during the late 40's and early 50's. Weaving a tapestry of music, smoke, slow pans and still frames, Davies builds a tableau of memory and community, of violence and recriminations, of love and regret, so rich and deep it evokes years of incident and history from one seamless reel to the other.

    Distant Voices, Still Lives plays out in the same fashion that memories are triggered by sights, sounds and smells; certain things, locations and noises that transport you back to a certain place and time in your life, which is then easily married into another memory of a differing time yet still sweep into one another with ease. In using this technique Davies' moving account dispels with some of the more traditional narrative devices, yet through the skill of threading images and music, the suture of themes, colours and characters, there remains a cohesion, a story and a beautiful rendition of life in working class Liverpool.


    Two years passed between the films being made and it's this passage of time which really gives Distant Voices, Still Lives a massive dose of authenticity. Despite the changing crews there isn't so much to distinguish between the films other than that of tone, whereas Distant Voices feels more threatening, mostly from the looming presence of Tommy (Pete Postlethwaithe) as the violent, wife-beating father, Still Lives opens itself up to more serene imagery, happiness and the chance of a better tomorrow. Abandoning a linear narrative structure, the two parts of the film work in tandem as a whole, recycling memories, playing against and, at once, with each other to form a picture dysfunctional, normal, everyday lives.

    Visually, Davies fills the screen with sombre colours, dull greys and browns dominate the frame, sepia tinged, almost appearing frayed at the edges, each shot feels like a photograph, dusty and well thumbed that now sits in the attic. Shots linger, things go unsaid and characters remain still, adding to the illusion and attaining to the title 'still lives'. Perfectly composed, most shots are painstakingly free of thrills and gimmicks; tracking shots are kept to a minimum and move with grace when they do, gently hovering over it's subject with care and precision. It's this graceful movement, unhurried and clutter free, that manages to marry those images so effortlessly as if they were random thoughts and memories.


    We witness our main characters, the father, Tommy, his wife (Freda Dowie) and mother to, Eileen (Angela Walsh), Maisie (Lorraine Ashbourne) and Tony (Dean Williams), through an array of eclectic set pieces and moments, pieced together with deliberate care, as if the curator would map out the walls of an exhibit, as they age, marry, reminisce; as well as recreate the past, and eventually, for some of them, die. Major events, celebrations and the everyday are mixed together, weaving in and out of time, playing off each other and triggering new paths to follow. Holding together these vastly eclectic and mirroring images is the ever presence of music, in all it's glories; popular and classical, from the pub sing-song to the hit of the time.

    Music is not only important as a way of marrying images, it acts as signifier to our protagonists cultural identity, tinged with raw emotion and some rose tinted nostalgia. In Distant Voices, Still Lives, communities are brought together by collective singing, mostly gathered around a table in a pub, it can also act as a conduit to letting out some bottled up, and frustrated, feelings; note for instance Eileen's choice of song when ordered around by her husband. The use of music is at it's most powerful when Davies uses the same piece over widely contrasting moments; those hard to watch scenes that, for example, can move from an innocent child fretting about their mother washing the upstairs window to domestic violence, all edited together in a three minute shot, marked by the same beautiful, jovial song.


    Music, the rise of popular culture, such as the local dance or the cinema, and the communal act of singing are strong escapists themes throughout Distant Voices, Still Lives and solely acted on by the whim of women. Men on the other hand feel displaced and threatened, often lashing out, either physically or mentally, trying to control their women. Despite his death, Tommy's spirit looms large, an omnipotent presence, the 'Distant Voice', that keeps his family, his women, in check. Tony, the only boy, never feels like part of this equation and maybe this is the Davies figure, a young man alone, unloved and foreign to the culture around him, never really finding his place to fit in.

    Realistic, poetic and deeply affective, Distant Voices, Still Lives could have easily sunk in to a well of self-indulgence and lofty pretentiousness, nothing could be further from the truth. With understated grandeur, Davies has produced a British classic, one that despite it's fixed identity of place will resonate with people all over. You can't help but wince though when you realise that this sort of film would never be financed today, not in the current British Film industry climate. Such an auteur film could not be tolerated, where's the market in that? Depressing. However none of this can take away from, what is surely, a masterpiece, not only in Britain, but the world over.



    I'm can't finish this piece without acknowledging, and sharing, the breathtaking scene above. Davies, as a young man, like the women in his film, found solace and peace through the popular arts and nowhere was this more resonant than the cinema. From the umbrellas in the rain, to the smoke lofting through the air to the pure, undiluted, joy and tears on the young women's faces - everything about it sums up my love of cinema. Enjoy.
    Originally posted on:Film for the Soul

  • Now, That's How You Open a Movie #7

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Apocalypse Now  (1979)

    Apocalypse Now (Francis Ford Coppola, 1979)

    Talk about setting a tone.


    With Apocalypse Now, Coppola came out blazing.

    A whooshing noise, heard but offscreen, is placed when a helicopter drifts into view, almost dreamlike in it's approach, heading towards a lush green jungle. The first chimes of 'The Doors' haunting and atmospheric 'The End' starts to chime, primary coloured smoke starts to fill the screen and that beautiful jungle explodes, a raging inferno engulfing the landscape.

    Welcome to hell on earth. The madness and the poetic, the perverse and the divine, such an arresting display of visual and audio effects has hardly been bettered than this opening gambit. The face of Martin Sheen, Captain Willard, starts to fade into view, the sound of the helicopters rotor blades transform in to the sound of a ceiling fan and we find ourselves in a hotel room in Saigon.

    The stories behind the film, the demise of Coppola and the craziness that engulfed the cast and crew can wait for another day, for now let's just soak up this brilliant scene. Enjoy.


    'Shit, I'm still only in Saigon'

    Originally posted on:Film for the Soul

  • The Orphanage - Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Orphanage  (2007)

    Juan Antonio Bayona, 2007

    After a career directing award winning pop videos and shorts, Bayona's first foray into the world of feature length film couldn't really have a higher accolade than being associated with Guillermo Del Toro, who is credited here as producer. However such an association is not without it's pitfalls, expectations are invariably raised and what if you fall flat on your face and fail to deliver? Fortunately, for all involved, Bayona passes the test, with the odd wobble here and there, with resounding flourish and style. A success both at home; where it won 7 Goyas (the Spanish equivalent to the Oscars) and overseas, Bayona has created an old fashioned style chiller, teeming with gothic pretensions, finger nail chewing mise-en-scene and ghostly children, set in a old orphanage in modern day Spain.

    The Orphanage delights for several reasons, for example it has a tendency to hold back on the cheap thrills and scares that litter tedious Hollywood fare, instead it focuses on the slow build-up with relative craft. Secondly, the naivety of children is put to good use by making the audience generally fear their presence and their, in our adult minds, total lack of regard for things that could hurt them make them all the more fearful. Children have always made for scary propositions in chiller/horror films, most recently I'm led to Alejandro Amenabar's chiller The Others, which The Orphanage draws strong comparisons to, which saw children as conduits to other dimensions. The Orphanage plays on similar territory here, children are otherworldly and, though not dangerous, certainly menacing - add a sack cloth, as a mask, to the equation and you've got a genuinely frightening spectre.

    Honestly. If he was at your door, would you let him in?

    Happily married, joined by their adopted son Simon (Roger Princep), Laura (Belen Rueda) and Carlos (Fernanado Cayo), buy an old orphanage, where Laura grew up some 30 years ago, in the hope of refurbishing and making it a home for foster children. Laura's past plays a big part in her motivations, it becomes evident that she has persuaded Carlos to buy the orphanage and perhaps it's her experience as an orphan that has led her to in wanting to help other children. Slowly, and to the film's defining credit, things start to unravel, not is all as it seems in the old ramshackled house, there seems to be more to Simon's new imaginary friend, Tomas, than just childish whimsy and who's the old lady, mooching around the grounds of the old orphanage, claiming to be a social worker?

    It's the craft behind The Orphanage that gives the film the edge over contemporary fare, there's a real heralding to classic horrors such as The Haunting and The Innocents, with a real 'less is more' approach to scaring the audience. This classic approach is even evoked in a the lovingly assembled opening credits that pay homage to those wonderful Saul Bass/Alfred Hitchcock sequences, here tiny hands scramble for pieces of wallpaper, greedily tearing back great lumps of wall space to reveal more credits underneath. It's with methodical ease and crafted suspense that The Orphanage is able to deliver real chills and nerve jangling suspense.

    Belen Rueda, as the doting mother Laura

    The reasons behind the ghostly apparitions, the creaking noises, the sombre looking trinkets found in unusual places, start to unravel as soon as Simon disappears. The disappearance of the young child throws the audience in to a quandary, what are we actually witnessing here? Is this a haunted house complete with the ghosts of the children of the old orphanage or are they the imagination of Laura, driven mad by the disappearance of her son? In classical style we are driven into arguments of the rational vs superstition, the corporeal vs the supernatural and of reality vs fantasy, classic staples of these ghost and haunted house tales.

    A medium is called in, Aurora, played by Geraldine Chaplin, at the insistence of Laura, much to the chagrin of Carlos, his very job as a doctor, a man of science, balancing the argument with his cold reason and rational thinking. Laura is convinced that Simon has been taken by the ghosts of the orphanage and sets about finding the truth, no matter what the cost. Laura's love for her son drives the plot and again helps to separate The Orphanage from it's contemporaries; where characters usually seem to be a plot devise to deliver more unsavoury blood letting. This unconditional love gives the film it's emotionally charged edge, adding poignancy to a tear inducing finale; one where you're truly wishing everything turns out for the best.

    Don't go down there!

    The Orphanage creates an atmosphere where hiding behind a cushion is compulsory, as lingering shots, creepy composition and startling sound effects coax even the most ardent and desensitised horror viewer into missing a heart beat now and then. Thankfully short of gore, albeit for one moment of true body horror that's all the more shocking for it's brief cameo, The Orphanage keeps a tight rein on the splatter and just lets the suspense build and slowly terrify the audience. The use of the gothic orphanage and a battered old lighthouse are put to good use, building up an Edgar Allen Poe quality to the scenery, as places you really don't want to be in on your own, or at night.

    So, despite all this, why is it that I felt a little short changed when I left the theatre? Can a film suffer from too much strategy and composure? There's a feeling that Bayona's film is too well measured and mannered, as if he's frightened to let go and lose a little control, he seems to be tightly regulated to the conservative conventions of the genre. These may well be small quibbles, considering what an astute picture The Orphanage actually is; it's beautifully shot, technically faultless and well paced yet you can't help feeling a little underwhelmed by the time it's finished. So this is not a dismissal, far from it, I enjoyed my time watching The Orphanage, it does exactly what it says on the tin - which, I suppose, is my problem with the film.


    God, this trailer is awful

    Originally posted on:Film for the Soul

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<September 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
31123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829301234
567891011


Categories
 


Advertisement