Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

GradysGhost Blog

  • Bobby is powerful, moving, complicated...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Bobby  (2006)

    The year is 1968. A controversial war rages overseas. Planet of the Apes dazzles American audiences. Robert "Bobby" Kennedy is nearing the first victory on the road to winning the US presidential election where he promises to end racial prejudice, pointless and hateful violence, as well as the terrible crisis in Vietnam.

    And then, the night his presidential candidacy is to be decided, he is shot and killed in the Ambassador Hotel in L.A.

    Bobby is not Emilio Estevez's directorial debut, but it may well be the first honest-to-God good movie he's directed. The film has an ensemble cast of characters that each seem to feel a different connection to then-Senator Kennedy, whether it's simply greeting him and welcoming him into the hotel in the case of John Casey (played by Anthony Hopkins) or working by his side as a campaign volunteer like it is for Wade (Joshua Jackson).

    While Wade feels connected to the democratic process, constantly disparaging a reporter from socialist Czechoslovakia, his black sidekick Dwayne (Nick Cannon) believes with all his heart that, after the murder of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Bobby Kennedy is the last hope for putting an end to racial prejudice.

    Over the course of the movie, we also follow the stories of the hotel's manager (William H. Macy) and his wife, who finds out from the hotel's food and beverage manager (Christian Slater) that Macy is cheating on her with a phone operator (Heather Graham). Macy's wife happens to be the hotel's stylist. She cuts the hair of the stars who stay at the Ambassador Hotel, including Virginia Fallon (Demi Moore) who is slated to sing tonight prior to her introduction of Kennedy himself.

    William and Diane (acted out by Elijah Wood and Lindsay Lohan) are getting married in the church so that William won't be drafted to go to Vietnam. He's getting cold feet because he doesn't think Diane really loves him. Diane is slowly finding out that she really, really does.

    Cooper and Jimmy (the up-and-coming Shia LeBeouf and Brian Geraghty) are also volunteers for Kennedy's campaign, but they decide to take the day off. They get some LSD from a stoner named Fisher (Ashton Kutcher) and spend the day tripping.

    All of these stories and more (there are tons of them involving even more well-known actors not mentioned yet, like Martin Sheen, Helen Hunt, Emilio Estevez himself, Laurence Fishburne, Harry Belafonte, and Sharon Stone) take place concurrently without much interaction between them until the final, destructive moment of the film: the Kennedy assassination.

    This works both to the movie's benefit and detriment. While it's never difficult to keep the stories straight, there also isn't much story actually happening. It turns out what actually keeps you watching is the fact that the individual scenes are so short that you get the effect of plot. Instead, what you have is lots of character development with no real story development.

    On the other hand, Bobby isn't about the myriad characters coursing their way through the hallways and tennis courts and swimming pools of the Ambassador Hotel. It's about the death of Robert Francis Kennedy. Moreover, it's about the death of everything he represented to the characters - freedom from racial division, from the unending pointless violence, from the Vietnam War and the draft and the countless Americans travelling home by way of body bag.

    The point is... what's the point? Is this movie just a relic? Just a memory of Senator Kennedy as he would have been? Is it a call coming forward through time to look at our own situation? Is it saying we need a savior, and if so, is it saying our country's savior already died and that we already lamented this loss? Is Bobby just a love song for a fallen hero?

    This is where the movie has its real flaws. Ashton Kutcher's mediocre performance can be overlooked because it is so miniscule. There are a couple of cheesy lines, like when Laurence Fishburne delivers a monologue to one of his prep chefs saying that the prep chef is a "future king," but the biggest problem the movie has is that the themes are blurred together so you can't figure out what Estevez was trying to get at, like so much ink running down soaked paper.

    The condition of war, racial downtroddenness, high society and alcohol abuse, the emotional impact of human aging, death, life, youth, drug consumption -- I could keep on for quite some time. These things all have a prescence in Bobby. The trouble is simply figuring out why and for what purpose.

    But don't let that fool you. The film is still gripping. A stark reality surrounds everything. A sense of innocence falls over everybody. Irony runs through Bobby, and builds tension. We, the audience, know that Kennedy will be dead by the time we leave the theater (or sofa), but the characters do not.

    Bobby is unsure of itself, but still manages to be a powerful, moving picture that captures in its two hours a full snapshot of the 60's and the present-day ramifications of the tragic event on June 4, 1968.


  • Truly engaging...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Intacto  (2001)

    Sometimes I find a little difficult to get into a foreign-language film.  I'll watch just about any movie you throw my way, foreign or not, but because I end up reading all the dialogue (even through sometimes bad translations), I have to have something else to really engage me in a film.

    Intacto does just this.  You quickly get introduced to some of the "players" - The Jew and Frederico.  The Jew takes away Frederico's "gift."  What is this gift?  You have to watch more of the movie to find out that it is the gift of being able to steal luck from other people that the Jew refers to.  Within the confines of Intacto, luck is a tradeable commodity which people with this gift of "luck theft" gamble with each other over.

    Enter the main character: Tomas.  Tomas is a wanted man, a bank robber, and the sole survivor of a plane crash.  His chances of survival are estimated at 1 in 273 million.  Frederico catches wind of this and enters Tomas into several tournaments of luck ranging from the bizzarre (covering people's heads with molasses and sending a molasses-loving praying mantis into the room) to the truly sadistic (an inverted game of Russian Roulette).  At the same time, they attempt to escape the cops at every twist and turn, since a federal agent is trying to pin Tomas with his bank robbery.

    It's exciting at every minute, often suspensful to a degree that most movies don't reach, but it does have a couple of downfalls.  First, and probably least, it's a little predictable.  Especially in the last fifteen to twenty minutes.  Also, it gets a little overcomplicated at points, making you study the "rules" of the movie and either question them in order to get it, or simply ignore them and accept the events for what they are.

    Definitely worth watching, though.  The movie is partially in English (most of the Max von Sidow scenes), so don't feel too discouraged by the foreign-ness of it.


  • At wit's end...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Okay.  So the movie was entertaining.  It's tough, but I have to admit to that.  That said, the movie was still extremely flawed, and I can't say as I like it as much as Curse of the Black Pearl.

    First, the plot was so confounding that I felt like I was playing a board game.  Seriously.  You know how when you're playing Monopoly with the family, there's always that stickler to rules who says, "You can't sell your Get Out Of Jail Free Card for fifty bucks!  It says so right here on the box cover!"  That's what it felt like watching At World's End.  "You can't elect Elizabeth Swan!  That's against the rules!"

    Secondly, there's the fact that this third installment doesn't exist without the second installment.  If I had it my way, I would have taken all the plot-driven elements of Dead Man's Chest (about 20 minutes of screen time) and thrown them at the beginning of At World's End.  It would have made both movies better.

    Still, the special effects were terrific.  The acting was decent (though it seems like Depp may be getting tired of the Jack Sparrow routine).  The maelstrom scene at the end was pretty cool.  I wish they hadn't brought the god Calypso into it.  That's Greek and we're discussing the Caribbean islands.

    If you're a fan of the series and you easily buy into the convoluted storylines, you'll probably like this one more than I did.


  • Shrek the Third...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Mary Reilly  (1996)

    Shrek the Third  (2007)

    I should probably not even be writing about this movie.  While I'm sure it's great for children (I've heard several parents say that their kids couldn't keep their eyes off the screen, and that's certainly true from my noisy theater experience), Shrek the Third has got to be the most difficult to watch movie for parents since Baby Geniuses 2.

    If you cut open a rubber tree and let it bleed all over this movie, Shrek 3 STILL couldn't get any sappier.  If you filled it with clips of Mary Reilly, it STILL wouldn't be any more boring.  And if it were a fifteen-minute-long short film, it would still feel like a waste of time.

    Here's how Shrek 3 works: First, show some cute characters that talk funny.  Introduce the plot, which is essentially the same as in Shrek and Shrek 2.  Somebody says something.  Somebody else hears it.  Somebody's worried about what the other thinks.  Then things blow up.  Someone gets kidnapped.  And Shrek must save the day.  We're used to it, Dreamworks.  Come up with something special next time!  Jeez.  Even Grimm's fairy tales were gruesome.  I want some of that.

    Here's the point.  If you've seen Shrek and you've seen Shrek 2, then there's really nothing to see here.  Don't waste your time.  Maybe rent it in a few months.  Here's the worst part about it.  Even though the original cast came back for the sequel, almost none of the characters actually sound like the characters.  They're bored!  Eddie Murphy's got Dreamgirls.  Antonio Banderas has got... well, anything else!  Cameron Diaz just did The Holiday (and that's probably more entertaining, watching Jack Black trying to be a serious actor).  John Cleese is waiting on that paycheck.  Julie Andrews wishes she could still sing.  This movie is made more boring by the fact that all the voice actors are.  Why bother?

    Just skip this one.  Avoid it unless your kids want to see it.


  • Pieces of April...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Pieces of April  (2003)

    Do you like those movies you get around the holidays made by those Frank Capra wannabes?  The movies that are so damn sweet they make your stomach hurt?  The ones that are so sappy you'd rather laugh than cry?

    Clearly, I don't.

    And that's precicely why Pieces of April made me smile.  Katie Holmes may not be the first name you think of when you think of a quirky, goth-esque girl living in a small apartment in the slums of New York City, but I don't think any other actress could have pulled it off.  She's living with a boy named Bobby, and they don't just love each other - they are in love with each other.  Now it's Thanksgiving morning.  April's prepping to cook a giant Thanksgiving dinner for the rest of her family.

    That's problem number one.  The rest of her family consists of her cancer-ridden mother who is constantly sick from the chemotherapy; her mild, passive father (played by Oliver Platt); her prim and proper, always right bitch of a younger sister; her brother (who seems to be the only voice of reason amongst them all); and her grandmother with Alzheimer's.  It's a six-hour road trip for the crew, and they're all pretty bitter about the fact that they don't get along with April and she can't cook.  Oh, and they're all stinking, filthy rich and don't know Bobby is black, which leads to both great comedy and a feeling of tragedy later in the movie.

    But the movie has a happy ending - I'll tell you that much - and in no way is it sappy or mushy.  Even my brother, who only gets into movies when things explode into the stratosphere, liked this movie.  It's a good film for everybody, and with a PG-13 rating, it would be a guaranteed family film if it were only as popular as it deserves to be.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<June 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement