Telluride 2008 Festival
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
Find movies you'll love

FullMetal_Atheist Blog

  • The Devil & Roky Erickson

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Seminal Texas Psyche-Rock band The 13th Floor elevators were an influence on artists as diverse as Janis Joplin, Patti Smith and ZZ Top.  If you’ve never heard of them, don’t feel too bad. After heroic doses of various psychotropic substances lead elevator Roky Erickson suffered a nervous breakdown and the band imploded, remaining little more than a cult footnote in the history of psychedelic pop.  The Who jamming with The Doors might be a, somewhat unsatisfying, description of the Elevators sound although we don’t really hear enough of their music in You’re Gonna Miss Me – the story of Erickson’s burnout, wilderness years and gradual rehabilitation.

    Diagnosed with schizophrenia at the height of the bands success Erikson fled to San Francisco and began a devastating heroin binge. Busted for possession on his return to Texas he was declared insane and sent to the infamous Rusk mental hospital.

    However, this wasn’t exactly the end of Erikson’s musical career. While in the hospital, which at the time seems to have been more Victorian bedlam than place of rehabilitation, he formed a band with a motley crew of murderers and rapists. Released in 1972, Erikson attempted to articulate his experiences by writing and recording some extraordinary sounding music that went largely unnoticed.

    The documentary is predominantly made up of recent footage of Roky, now living in relative obscurity with his elderly mother, at home in Austin, Texas. With seemingly little interest in his previous life it remains unclear how much of Erickson’s muddled state is the result of drug abuse, shock therapy received at Rusk or other factors. We see him sitting around listening to white noise on the radio or watching bad Saturday morning anime.  A British music journo, working on a biography, comes visiting but Erickson answers his questions in a staccato manner and declines a copy of the early draft.  His mother, a devout Christian, discourages her son from psychiatric help or taking medication insisting he must seek aid from the divine.

    Erikson’s two brothers have an extremely frayed relationship with mom (who, frankly, comes off as mad as box of frogs) culminating in a ‘custody battle’ of sorts for guardianship of their sibling. You’re Gonna Miss Me really wants to be as much about the breakdown of this family unit as the breakdown of its protagonist, but it only partly succeeds.  One problem is that this sort of thing has been done before and far more dramatically too.  Brian Wilson, the patron saint of music genius burnout, had his story told in Don Was’ fascinating I Just Wasn’t Made For These Times and the breakdown of the family has, most recently, been handled in documentaries as diverse as Capturing The Friedmans and Crumb.  It’s strongly reminiscent of the latter, in particular, although the creepy voyeurism that made Crumb so compelling is absent here.  As harsh as it might sound, the other problem is that this story just isn’t that interesting. There really doesn’t appear to be much to differentiate Erikson’s story from any one of a thousand others that could have been picked randomly from the big book of Rock’n’Roll history. The film has an unfussy, almost downbeat, style which be commendable if the material were stronger. As it is, You’re Gonna Miss Me doesn’t really have the crossover appeal of The Devil & Daniel Johnston – another recent documentary about a semi-obscure Austin songwriter with mental health issues.  Whereas Johnston has a sort of quirky charisma it’s actually rather depressing to spend 90 minutes in the company of Erikson and his squabbling family.  File under: Die-hard  Elevators fans only.


  • War without end

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    No End in Sight  (2007)

    First time writer/director Charles H. Ferguson‘s documentary concerns the post-2003 US occupation of Iraq.  It covers the toppling of the Saddam-led Ba’ath government, the rise of a Muslim fundamentalist civil war in the country, and the violent insurgencies against coalition forces.  Most specifically No End In Sight tells the story of an ill-prepared American-led occupation that was fueled by incompetence, misinformation and lies.

    Ferguson’s approach is to utilize talking head interviews with military personal, local journalists, and (in most cases refreshingly frank) occupation coordinators interspersed with newsreel footage of the increasingly chaotic breakdown of Iraqi society, post-Saddam. While this could have made for a dry, uninvolving piece, it is a cleverly structured story with sharp editing that is truly exceptional.  By letting the facts speak for themselves, Ferguson and his collaborators have made a compelling indictment of the Bush administration's treatment of Iraq; a nation it claims has been delivered from tyranny and bloodshed.

    The evidence of US blunders presented within is enough to bring even the staunchest pro-war, Bush lovin’ Republican’s blood to boil (governmental dismissal of expert evidence that Iraq would collapse into anarchy without sufficient policing, a total disregard for civilian welfare, fresh-out-of-Harvard graduates in charge of Baghdad traffic control).  Most disturbing of all is the suggestion that coalition forces squandered the good will of the Iraqi people leading to the rise of extreme fundamentalism in the region. For anyone who wondered what happened to those smiling children waving US flags and screaming ‘Thank you America’ at passing Humvees on CNN after the initial takeover – the heartbreaking answer will be found here.

    The documentary’s impartiality extends to its treatment, or lack thereof, of ‘Gulf War II’ itself. This is a picture which firmly concerns itself with events after the overthrow of Saddam, with the exception of a brief Post-9/11 history lesson for anyone who may have been shipwrecked on a desert island for the last six years.  There is no talk of the ethics, morality or hidden agendas of the war itself and no overt politicizing.  It could be suggested that the arguments are a little one-sided but inter-titles make clear that the most well known and culpable figures (Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, etc.) declined to be interviewed.

    That said, anyone who has remained informed on events in Iraq may not find any new or enlightening information in the film. Ferguson's real achievement, however, is to bring all the facts together into a cohesive history – and to do so in a way that is both riveting and devastating.

    This is, of course, a story without conclusion. The real, unanswerable question that the film poses is “What happens now?” but in the meantime this essential, vital piece of reportage will stand as a definitive document, and along with Eugene Jarecki’s Why We Fight, one of the very finest non-fiction films of recent years.


  • A West Bank Story.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Campfire  (2004)

    Israel, 1981. Recently widowed mother-of-two Rachael (Michaela Eshet)
    applies for a position on the founding committee of a new settlement
    on the West Bank. Meanwhile, her eldest daughter has embarked on an
    ill-fated relationship with an army conscript while the younger is
    beginning to come to terms with her own sexuality.
    Given the setting and the above synopsis, one could be forgiven for
    thinking that American-born Joseph Cedar's Campfire would be a rather
    po-faced, worthy affair. However, any fears in that department are
    quickly put to rest with the opening narration from the younger
    daughter,  Tami (Hani Furstenberg), who assures us that this year she
    means to 'Be happy, no matter what.'  It's ironic then that the sweet
    and appealing Tami gets the roughest deal of the three as the film
    progresses towards the titular campfire.
    Cedar's cast of characters is uniformly likeable, with strong
    performances all around and a fine sense of time and place, hideous
    eighties fashions included.  Having said that, the framing device of
    Tami's narration suggests a coming-of-age tale that never really
    materialises.  Cedar himself seems to like his characters too much to
    allow anything really dramatic to happen to them and, although there
    are some standout scenes (especially between Rachael and would-be
    suitor Yossi - a fine, bittersweet performance by Moshe Ivgy) they
    don't really build to an emotionally satisfying climax.
    The setting, too, has a vague air of novelty about it. The politics of
    Rachael's decision to move her family to a new settlement are never
    explored, apart from her remark that she 'believes in the cause',
    although it's never made clear if even this remark is truthful or an
    attempt to sway to male-ccentric settlement committee to allow her to
    join. Campfire could really be set anywhere, at anytime, in the last
    thirty years and perhaps that's the point. Certainly Rachael is a
    strong-minded woman in a society where such things are frowned upon
    but even this is not examined with much depth. Possibly Cedar, mindful
    of the slew of films on the Middle-East conflict, chose to steer clear
    of the era's politics but a little more context would have benefited
    the film greatly.
    All of which is not to say that Campfire isn't worth your time. The
    excellent performances alone are enough to recommend the film, just
    don't expect anything particularly original or enlightening.

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<August 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678


Categories
 


Advertisement