Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

forrest_gump Blog

  • is it tough to go through the clouds when you love?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    a walk in the clouds 

     

    its tough to go through the clouds when you love..its tough to fight them..face them..but at the end when it results into seeing the peeping sun...everything seems so natural and obvious..a walk in the clouds is a excellent love story where the protogonist experienced the clouds of  love

      The film begins as Paul returns home from World War II to find that he has nothing in common with his young cutie-pie wife Betty (Debra Messing), whom he impulsively married before shipping overseas. Haunted by wartime nightmares laced with personal angst, Paul just wants to pursue the American dream — home and hearth, children and a dog, etc.

      When he hits the road to find himself he instead finds Victoria Aragon (Aitana Sanchez-Gijon), a college student on her way home to "The Clouds," a nickname for the family winery. She looks forward to seeing her supportive mother and grandparents, but is worried about facing her bombastic, intolerant father (Giancarlo Giannini), as she is pregnant and unmarried.

     So, Paul offers to be her husband for a day or two, a ploy that is, of course, doomed to failure. And there's no doubt from their first meeting that Paul and Victoria will gradually fall in love.

    Arau fills the screen with vivid colors and heavenly images, using the harvesting of grapes as a metaphor. (A grape-stomping sequence is particularly sensuous.) And there are a number of individual moments that are quite entrancing (enhanced by Maurice Jarre's lush music), despite the feeling that it's all a bit empty.

    In the family scenes, it is Anthony Quinn as the grandfather who steals the show with a hilarious and touching performance as the sage old voice of dubious wisdom.As Don Pedro Aragon, he is full of the kind of good advice that urges the enjoyment of sexual favors and large amounts of strong alcohol. When Don Pedro gets Paul drunk, you can see Quinn pushing Reeves to loosen up, which Reeves actually starts to do. From this scene one can detect signs of acting potential beneath Reeves' usual mono-emotionality. Everyone else in the cast is equally lively, however, with Sanchez-Gijon managing to combine an unlikely sense of both innocence and sensuousness, while Giannini is charmingly hammy.

    Reeves is a little too quiet and polite as an actor to give much of a sense of the struggle between his growing passion and the chivalry that will not allow him to act on it.

    Arau tries to mix good old American practicality (this is his first English language movie) and the magical realism that tempered a tendency toward gravity in "Like Water for Chocolate." In an otherwise American movie, the magic seems awfully hokey.

    at the end its a wonderful film...for lovers and for people who loves their family.. 

     


  • No barriers to love

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    City of Angels  (1998)

    city of angels

    Loosely based on Wim Winders' enchanting tale Wings of Desire, Brad Silberling's City of Angels is a superlatively crafted romantic drama that solidly stands on its own merits. Like the German film, new pic offers a haunting yet lyrical meditation on such universal issues as spirit versus matter, human courage, and the true meaning of love and desire. The endlessly resourceful Nicolas Cage, as a celestial angel, and a terrifically engaging Meg Ryan, as a pragmatic, surgeon enjoy such a blissful chemistry that they elevate the drama to a poetic level seldom reached in a mainstream movie. Major stars--and an exceedingly handsome production--should help position the film as a major spring release, but Warners still faces a challenge in marketing a stylish movie with undeniable philosophical overtones that deviates substantially from Hollywood's more conventional romantic fare.

    A rarity, City of Angels is a big-budget, star-studded studio movie that approximates European art films not only in its thematic concerns but also in tone, style and design.

    Seth the angel (Nicholas Cage) and Maggie the surgeon (Meg Ryan) are discussing tears. Seth, who has never cried or wiped away a tear, wants to know why people cry. Maggie tries to explain it in medical terms: the tear ducts overact for some reason, nobody knows why. Seth knows the real reason and says so — there’s too much emotion, and the body just can’t handle it and weeps.

     In a Hollywood that celebrates action and explosion and glamor, this is a movie that’s not afraid to embrace the important issues of love, faith, loss and devotion that we face everyday. It is, superficially, about the romance between the angel and the surgeon, but it reaches out past the barriers of the love story to awaken the hearts and spirits of the audience.

    But ultimately, what gives the movie its special grace is the exquisite, nuanced acting of Cage, as the rebel, Pinnochio-like angel who wants to be a real boy. Drawing on expressive movements and slightly stylized gestures, he gives one of his most low-key and lyrical performances. Casting aside her customary "cute" look, Ryan also excels as a down-to-earth surgeon, whose entire set of beliefs is shaken by her encounter with Seth. Impressive supporting work also comes from TV's two tough cops, Messinger (NYPD Blues), as a free spirit who fully embraces life's pleasures, and Braugher (Homicide), as the more serenely content angel.

     And if Cage is wonderful, Cage and Ryan together are electric. Their early scenes are almost heartstopping — actually heartstopping at first, as their eyes meet over an operating room table after a heart surgery gone awry. The scenes where Seth is invisibly comforting Maggie are silently eloquent, and when they finally talk, Cage speaks with such understated passion and sincerity

    Whether intended or not, City of Angels plays like a valentine to L.A., romanticizing the city in a manner not seen since Steve Martin's 1991 starrer, L.A. Story.

    for true lovers its a must see one!!


  • love does defeats time...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Lake House  (2006)


    how much can love do? can it defeat time?can it bring back your dearest one? the lake house depicts this fact..it is first a love story than a science fiction(lol) 

    When Chicago doctor Kate Forster (Bullock) vacates the spectacular lake house she's been renting for a few months, she leaves the next tenant a welcome note. When architect Alex Wyler (Reeves) arrives at the lake house, he finds the note left by Kate. The odd thing, however, is the date on the letter: it's 2006. For Alex, 2004 has just begun and the house has been abandoned for years. He thinks it's a practical joke, and he leaves the "trespasser" a note. When Kate, needing a brief break from the stress in Chicago, returns to the lake house, she finds the note, and she writes back.

    Soon, they realize that they exist in two different times, exactly two years apart. Their only connection with each other is the magical mailbox and the letters they leave for each other. Through their letters, they start to get to know each other. Curious, Alex crosses path with Kate in 2004, who obviously doesn't know him and is living with her boyfriend Morgan (Dylan Walsh). The love between Alex in 2004 and Kate in 2006 grows as they continue to confide in each other. Soon, Kate decides that she must meet Alex in 2006 and settle this once and for all.

    Speed made Bullock (Crash) a star and Reeves (Constantine) a bona fide action hero. It's interesting to see them get together again in a romance-fantasy. Bullock still does her lonely, girl-next-door part justice. She's radiant, lovely(seems bit aged!!), yet vulnerable and guarded. Reeves is, as usual, cool and dashing, yet surprisingly expressive in some key scenes. Twelve years later, Bullock and Reeves still share tremendous chemistry with each other, and that's quite phenomenal when you consider they only have two scenes together. In a romance, chemistry counts for everything.

    The script by David Auburn (Proof) is based on the Korean film Siworae (2000) written by Eun-Jeong Kim. The story makes an interesting decision to not explain the magic of the mailbox and how the time rip comes to be. The audience must simply accept the premise; thus, the movie sets up an expectation: Alex asks Kate, "Is this really happening?" and Kate answers, "Why not?" Likewise, we must also believe in the magic of love, that anything could happen. The timeline is a little confusing and we must pay attention or else we would get lost. As with any stories dealing with time-space continuum, there is a number of inconsistencies, logical flaws and plot holes. For example, the bits about the tree and the book are too sentimental and silly, they defy logic. And we must ask, have they ever heard of e-mail and Google? However, none of these flaws are fatal, and it doesn't really affect our enjoyment of the story in any negative way.

    While the plot is somewhat predictable, it doesn't feel cliched or overtly sentimental and sweet, which is a bonus, considering how many romance stories fail because of that. The incident near the beginning is an obvious foreshadow, but it sets up the rest of the film nicely, making us want to find out how the story unfolds and concludes. The ending also makes perfect sense to me, and I must say it's one of the best time-defying love stories I have seen, and I'm not easily impressed by love stories. For the hopeless romantics, The Lake House is fine and satisfying. 


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<February 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728123
45678910


Categories
 


Advertisement