Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

dj4our Blog

  • A Petition to Stop Lucas!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    written by: Henry Gilroy, Steven Melching, Scott Murphy (screenplay) & George Lucas (story)
    produced by: George Lucas & Catherine Winder
    directed by: Dave Filoni
     
    rated PG (for sci-fi action violence throughout, brief language and momentary smoking)
    1 hr. 38 min.
     
     
     
    I took my 8 year-old nephew to see this movie opening weekend and one of us had fun. As we sat in the large, barely-filled theater, I looked upon him in my sleepy haze of boredom and noticed how entranced he was at the intergalactic fantasia before us. I was saddened though. I wished more than anything that it was the summer of 1977 again and my dear nephew could witness the sheer wonder of the introduction to a world that shaped my childhood in a most amazing way. Alas, that is impossible. There is no way to physically and as in the case with this film, cinematically recapture that initial experience. Creator George Lucas couldn't do it with his prequel trilogy and he's proved once again that he cannot deliver the magic of the original trilogy in this animated form.....nor can he let go.
     
    I'll try to describe this formulaic story here with it's plot contrivances, lazy expositions and inane characters but I gotta tell you....I fell asleep a couple times. That's right. And I never fall asleep in a movie theater! Ever! Sure, it was boring but bottom line (except for a handful of scenes) it just didn't hold my interest. I just had to put that out there in case I miss a few things as I tell the story. The film opens with a lazy intro, gone is the dramatic opening crawl of the yellow letters we are used to seeing in the other theatrical releases. Instead we get a "the story so far" voice narration panning several scenes in an effort to throw us into the raging Clone Wars spread across the galaxy.
     
     
    Padawan learner Ahoska and Jedi mentor Anakin Skywalker in Warner Bros. Pictures' Star Wars: The Clone Wars
     
     
    Word is out across the universe that the kidnapping of Jabba the Hutt's infant son Rotta presents a new problem for the Galactic Republic. The Jedi Council take Anakin Skywalker (voiced by Matt Lanter) and Obi-Wan Kenobi (James Arnold Taylor) out of battle and assign them the mission to return the baby Hutt to Jabba in order to ensure good standing with the gangster, so critical space routes can be available. The Jedi are accompanied by a padawan (that's a Jedi intern) young Ahsoka Tano (Ashley Eckstein), who is given to Anakin despite his disapproval. As in the prequels, we see Yoda divvy out responsibilities in an effort to tell the audience who's gonna go where and why. Obi-Wan is sent off to thwart Count Dooku's (Christopher Lee earning a paycheck) evil schemes on Tatooine while Anakin (still petulant and whiny) and Ashoka (green and eager) are left in charge of the smelly little Hutt-let, eager to return the child to Tatooine safely before Jabba sides with the Separatists and the war plunges further into chaos.
     
    Of course, there are some other familiar supporting Star Wars characters present here but none are ever really given much to do. Mace Windu (Samuel L. Jackson) hangs with Yoda and nods his head, Artoo shows off  his usual "save the day" action while assisting Anakin, and Senator Amidala (Catherine Taber) encounters Jabba's uncle, the effeminate Ziro the Hutt on the wrong side of Coruscant in an effort to assist the Jedi. Ziro sounds like Truman Capote and is clearly a gay stereotype that makes what Jar Jar Binks represented to the island of Jamaica look subtle by comparison. He's right up there with the lamest Star Wars characters ever created. Thank you very little, Mr. Lucas!
     
     
    Captain Rex and Obi-Wan Kenobi in Warner Bros. Pictures' Star Wars: The Clone Wars
     
     
    This all takes place between the last two live-action prequels, Episode II and III and the problem with that is....who cares? There's already two excellent volumes of Clone Wars stories with superior quality animation by Genndy Tartakowsky, so why in the world would we need more filler? Anyone who's seen the prequel trilogy knows the date of these characters from The Clone Wars, so why bother? There's just no real drama here cuz we know the future. Does it really matter that Anakin Skywalker has a lightsaber duel with Count Dooku when we already know what happens in Episode III? No. It's just an excuse to give the kiddies something to "Ooooo" and "Ahhhhh" over.
     
    Now, the film does have a few impressive actions scenes, the most notable of which is a vertical assault on a cliff-side fortress. This allows for the Jedi characters to do something besides repetitively slice ineffective battledroids. The visuals are unique here as the large AT-TE walkers climb up the cliff. Another impressive scene features Anakin piloting a clunker of a ship around a Republic Cruiser while being pursued by enemy ships.  Still, if these scenes are the highlight of a Star Wars film, that's just sad.
     
    No matter what way you flip it, Anakin Skywalker was a selfish brat who gave into fear and anger while The Jedi Council were just too dumb, gullible or limited to know how to deal with him. So, I'm tired of seeing him as a hero cuz he just doesn't cut it for me. You can show yourself a hero in action but if your heart ain't in it and you're not doing it for the sake of others, then forget about it. Yes, he redeemed himself in Episode VI, but all through the prequels he remained unfaithful to the Jedi Order and while that's another topic entirely it does support why I cannot sit here and root for a guy who will go on to destroy anything good and of value.
     
    It's quite obvious to me who this movie was for. All I had to do was turn to the right of me and see my lil nephew's gaping mouth. It's too bad Lucas has to polarize the now thirty-something fans of the Star Wars universe who remember themselves sitting in the theater just like my nephew. Time does that I suppose, you can never go back and all that but I was hoping to live vicariously through another youth.  I don't like what's being done with the universe I grew up not to mention the writing and style of animation is luke (pun intended) warm at best. That's not to say that "The Clone Wars" cannot be enjoyed, just not by me. Of course, in the twilight of the summer movie season,  there are worse alternatives out there at the local multiplex but I would suggest skipping the theater altogether (gasp!) and spoiling the child on a heavy helping of  ice cream.

  • Shaken Bond causes a Stir

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    written by: Neal Purvis, Robert Wade, Paul Haggis & Joshua Zetumer (uncredited)
    produced by: Michael G. Wilson & Barbara Broccoli
    directed by: Marc Forster
     
     
    When I heard that the Bond producers had signed on director Marc Forster I immediately smiled with anticipation. I had hopes that what had exellently begun in 2006's "Casino Royale" could now be continued by a stylish, genre-skipping director with indie chops. I smiled again when it was revealed that this was the first Bond film that is a direct sequel, taking place right after the events of the last film. It only made sense to continue a story that has created a new Bond universe, free from forty years of continuity yet left the viewer with some unanswered questions. While I did have my hopes up, I also knew that this was a different director and there would be no way to duplicate the feel of the previous film's new direction.
     
    James Bond (Daniel Craig) is back, in fact he's only been gone a half hour or so. We're immediately thrust into the action, trying to catch up with a fast and furious 007 speeding through traffic in Italy. Bond wastes no time dispensing his gun-toting pursuers from Lake Garda to Siena, with the captured/injured Mr. White (Jesper Christianson) in the trunk of his car. He ends his brutal swath of destruction by dropping off his battered captive at the heel's of his frustrated boss, M, in order to begin his interrogation.
     
    Bond's goal in this film is to learn more about Quantum, the evil organization behind the death of his love, Vesper Lynd and uncover what their nefarious global plans are. It would appear they are everywhere and they are one step ahead of MI6. So much in fact, that the interrogation is interrupted by the betrayal of M's bodyguard Mitchell (Glenn Foster) who attacks her, allowing Mr. White to escape. An adrenalized chase ensues as Bond pursues Mitchell through the tunnels and across the rooftops of Siena, amid the crowd assembled for the Palio di Siena. He winds up killing him (much to M's disaproval) leaving forensics to find intel typing him to a contact in Haiti.
     
     
    More Photos


    Like every Bond film, we are now off to another country yet unlike any pre-Craig entry there is no time for sight-seeing here. This Bond is on a mission. He's like a bull in a china shop with cat-like agility as he takes out Slate (Neil Jackson), his intended target in a bloody tactile mess. Since his encounter with Slate didn't provide any useful information, Bond poses as his victim which leads him to a briefcase and an unexpected ride from a beautiful Russian-Bolivian woman named Camille Montes. They both discover that she has been targeted for termination by her supposed lover, Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric) the chairman of ecological organization Greene Planet and a member of Quantum. She kicks him outta the car thinking he's the hitman, but Bond pursues her by motorcycle to a dock warehouse and spies on her as she meets with Greene.
     
    Greene is a smarmy, effete eco-terrorist villian, in love with himself while showing little regard for anyone or thing but his own agenda. He awaits the arrival of  Bolivian General Medrano (Joaquín Cosío), a man Camille has worked her whole life to meet and kill since he murdered her entire family when she was a girl. Greene is helping the exiled general get back into power, in return for support of his organization. In doing so, he hands Camille over to Medrano to do with what he will. What does Greene get out of all this? A seemingly barren piece of desert land. 

    Bond rescues her in an exihilarating motorcycle/boat chase but finds out Camille's not too grateful for his intervention. After making sure an unconscious Camille is in good hands, Bond follows Greene to a private jet, which flies to Austria. His flight is accompanied by CIA agents Gregg Beam (David Harbour) and Felix Leiter. Beam offers U.S. support of the overthrow in return for Bolivian oil, which he believes Greene to have discovered. In return, Greene requests that the CIA eliminate Bond's interference. Beam agrees, despite Leiter's unspoken disapproval.

    Meanwhile, on the Austrian shore of Lake Constance near Bregenz, members of Quantum (including Greene and White) gather at a floating performance of Puccini's opera Tosca. They're holding a covert conference via concealed earpiecest to finalize plans for their Tierra Project. Among the talking heads is Guy Haines (Paul Ritter), an advisor of the British Prime Minister. In a clevr and humorous scene, Bond obtains an earpiece and disrupts the meeting, and then takes photos of various Quantum members as they flee the theater. As Greene abruptly departs from the opera with his entourage, he is intercepted by Bond in a standoff. A gunfight ensues with Quantum goons in a restaurant that carries over onto a rooftop where Bond confronts Haines' bodyguard, who is subsequently killed by Greene's goon.
     
     
     More Photos
     
    M is furious with Bond's activities at the opera and revokes his passports and credit cards. She demands that he return to London, on learning of the bodyguard's death, frustrated that there is no one to interrogate. Undeterred, Bond instead travels to Italy by boat, where he reunites with his old ally René Mathis (Giancarlo Giannini). Mathis is reluctant to help due to what transpired with the Le Chiffre incident, but Bond persuades the retired agent (once stationed in Bolivia) to accompany him to La Paz. They are greeted at the airport by Strawberry Fields (Gemma Arterton), an MI6 field operative from the British Consulate. Fields demands that Bond return to the UK on the next available flight, but he disobeys and they both wind up in his hotel suite bed. Mathis pulls some strings and gets them into a Quantum fundraiser that night held by Greene, where Bond runs into Camille again. When Bond and Camille leave together, but are pulled over by the Bolivian police. They order Bond to open the trunk of his vehicle to reveal a bloodied Mathis. As Bond helps Mathis out, the policemen open fire, killing Mathis. Bond disarms and kills the policemen and comforts the dying Mathis, who asks Bond to forgive Vesper Lynd.
     
    Bond and Camille make it to the location of Greene's suspected land acquisition, surveying the area in a Douglas DC-3 propeller plane. Suddenly they are intercepted and shot down by an Aermacchi SF-260 fighter and a Bell UH-1 helicopter. They barely escape from the crippled plane by parachuting into a sinkhole below. As they escape the cave, Bond and Camille learn that Greene's Tierra Project involves water, not oil. Quantum is blockading Bolivia's supply of fresh water, normally flowing in underground rivers, by damming it into hidden reservoirs beneath the desert. During this short down time, Bond also learns that Camille's family was raped and murdered by Medrano and that is why she seeks revenge.
     
    After these discoveries, they return to La Paz, where Bond meets M and discovers  Quantum murdered Fields by drowning her in oil. M orders Bond to disarm and end his activities in Bolivia, but he escapes by overpowering the MI6 operatives in a hotel elevator. As he makes his escape, he tells M he's not finished with his operation.
     
    Quantum of Solace


    Once again, Bond turns to a trusted ally in Felix Leiter (Jeffrey Wright) at a local bar, who advises that the CIA is now after him. Leiter discloses the location where Greene and Medrano will meet and gives Bond enough time to flee from American forces when they arrive. Bond and Camille make their way go to a hydrogen-powered eco-hotel in the Bolivian desert, where Greene and Medrano are finalizing their plans. As the various parties depart, Bond attacks and kills the departing Colonel of Police (Fernando Guillén Cuervo) for betraying Mathis, setting off a chain of explosions when a hydrogen fuel tank is hit by an out of control vehicle. Camille makes her way to Medrano and manages to kill him while Bond captures Greene after a vicious fight amid the deteriorating hotel.
     
    After interrogating him, he leaves Greene stranded in the middle of the desert with only a can of motor oil. Bond drives Camille to a train station, where they kiss before she departs. They both know it's not a romantic exchange, moreso one of gratitude as Camille is aware Bond's heart belongs to someone else. With this in mind, Bond knows he still has one last lead to follow.
     
    Bond arrives in Kazan, Russia, where he confronts Vesper Lynd's former lover, Yusef Kabira. Turns out Yusef (Simon Kassianides) is a member of Quantum with the job of seducing high-ranking women who have valuable connections. He gets them to give up government assets as ransom for himself by staging fake kidnappings where he is supposedly held hostage. Bond catches him at Yusef's apartment, attempting to do the same with Canadian agent Corinne Venneau (Stana Katic), even giving her the same kind of necklace he gave Vesper. Bond tells Corinne about Vesper and advises her to hit the road and alert the Canadian Security Intelligence Service. Bond leaves Yusef's apartment and is met by M who is surprised that Bond did not kill Yusef, but rather left him alive for questioning.
     
    M (Judi Dench) reveals that Leiter has been promoted at the CIA to replace Beam. News that Bond is cotnent with. He also tells him that Greene was found in the desert, shot in the head twice with motor oil found in his stomach. Bond doesn't volunteer any information on Greene, but tells M that she was right about Vesper. M then tells Bond that MI6 needs him and fully reinstates him as an agent, to which he replied, "I never left," and then walks off into the cold night. As he leaves, Bond drops Vesper's necklace in the snow.
     
    I'll be so bold to say that for the first time Ian Fleming's James Bond is accurately portrayed on screen by the piercing Daniel Craig. If you've read the novels, you'll know that the charming spy was never described as gorgeous or cracking one-liners. Sure, he's charming but he's first and foremost a man about his duty, a cold killer and a stubbornly resilient one at that. Craig has this down. He's so good at exuding a cragginess on the outside while internally simmering that you can't even imagine him playing with puns like Roger Moore did. Craig won me over in the previous film and simply confirms he ownss Bond in this film.
     
    Composer David Arnold returns to score the franchise for the fifth time and he does an excellent job. Combining the classic Bond them with music indigenous to locales such as Haiti as he also includes some of Alicia Key's piano heard in her song with Jack White Another Way to Die that played during the traditional opening credits.  
     
    There are some flaws with this film but for me not as many as the critics would have you believe.  As I mentioned, it helps to see this as a direct sequel and not a stand alone story like we're used to. It also helps to understand this is who Bond is. He's not Jason Bourne as everyone is whining on about. I understand the comparison but Craig is utililizing the same physicality here that he brought to the role in "Casino Royale". This film suffered from being the shortest Bond entry yet. It would have been good to flesh out more of the Quantum organization or maybe even the character of Camille (although I'll admit Kurlyenko is kind of a bore) but that may have been for the better. It gives them more material to work with later. After all, Craig has signed for three more films.
     
    It would be impossible to live up to "Casino Royale" which is actually the highest grossing Bond film ever. Forster knews what he had to live up to and all the expectation of a sequel. Still, he makes his own film instead of copying anything done in the last film. I can respect that. While he's not known for being an "action director" he does a good job at combining the action scenes with a parallel plot point, holding your attention even more. Forster does a great job bringing closure to this whole Bond/Vesper story. Bond can still pursue Quantum in the next film but and maybe even start to grow into that gadget-weilding, womanizing spy everyone is used to. Maybe in time viewers will come to understand that it took these two films to make a return to the Bond they know possible.

  • Compelling Immigrant Song

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This documentary chronicles the courageous journey of three young Southern Sudanese men, John Dau, Daniel Pach and Panther Bior, to the United States where they strive for a brighter future.
     
    Along with 27,000 other young boys in the early 1980s known as "The Lost Boys of Sudan", they had walked a thousand miles barefoot through harsh terrain to escape the twenty-two year civil war that pitted the Sudanese government against the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army. They made it to a camp in Ethiopia where they lived for three years in hopes of returning to Sudan but then additional violence forced them to make yet another arduous trek to escape Ethiopia. During the five years they walked in search of safety, thousands died from starvation, dehydration, bomb raids and genocidal murder.
     
    Finally, with their number dwindled down to 12,000, they found relative safety in Kenya’s Kakuma refugee camp. While the refugee camp was their physical home away from Sudan, their real home become what they had nurtured in their hearts. Already forced into a makeshift family, these boys formed what they called Parliament, a gathering group where they can tell stories, encourage one another and share their hearts. They were inevitably brought together after years of children burying children, feeding sick brothers that could no longer move and watching their peers drop dead. These memories are brought to life as the three boys, now men, remember the harrowing events which brought them to the States.
     
    John, Daniel and Panther along with 3,600 boys were invited by the United States to live in America in 2001. Through sponsorship from Catholic Charities International, the three boys had their lives once again changed dramatically as they left their brotherhood to the unknown. We see their first encounter with electricity and the modern conveniences we are so used to as they step onto the airplane that will take them to Europe then to New York City. When John hears the captain speaking from the overhead intercom he wonders where "that voice is coming from?", this is just one of many humorous fish-out-water moments.
     
    The three young men were assigned specific American cities in which they will reside, John settles in Syracuse, N.Y. while Panther and Daniel arrive in Pittsburgh. They are given a tour of their apartments (a world which they were unfamiliar with) so they know how to operate: a light switch, a trash can, a shower, a refrigerator and an alarm clock. Their guide stresses the later device because, "In America, time is money." Work is one of the many things they have to get use to as they come to find it consumes the majority of their days. Yet, they have no problem working since their family and friends are always on their hearts. They put money aside to send back to their camp in Kenya as well as any family they've been able to find. At one point, John postpones his plans for school to work a third job when he finds that his family is alive and not-so well in Uganda.  
     
    The film continues to show how these "Lost Boys" have to adapt to the shock of being thrust into an economically intense culture. I didn't mind at all seeing how they have to learn new customs, adapt to new and strange foods, cope with the ordeal of getting, and keeping a job, or multiple jobs, while never forgetting who they are and where they're from. I just felt like at times the director took to much time on this, rather than the more interesting response of the white folks who would often stare at them in curious fear. It's during these times that an American viewer cannot help but examine his/her own lifestyle and culture.
     
    I was continuously impressed at the commendable resilience these men displayed. Sure, they would deal with loneliness and guilt but never once did I hear them express anger with the inequality they observed both in Africa and in the States. “It’s not in their nature," the narrator calmly explains."which is uniquely ‘Dinka’. They are not judgmental.” That in and of itself, is quite a unique trait and makes the lives of these men all the more impressive.
     
    The film was produced, written and directed by Christopher Quinn and co-directed by Tommy Walker. It wasn't until the help of actors Catherine Keener and Dermot Mulroney executive produced by Brad Pitt and narrated by Nicole Kidman. The title of the documentary is a quote from the tall, charismatic John Dau discussing the despair he and other Sudanese felt during their civil war plight.

  • An Artful Codger

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Gran Torino  (2008)

    written by: Nick Schenk (screenplay/story) & Dave Johannson
    produced & directed by: Clint Eastwood
     
    rated R (for language throughout and some violence)
    1 hr. 56 min.
     
     
     
    If it wasn't for iconic characters like The Man With No Name and Dirty Harry, there would be no way to take Clint Eastwood's latest acting role seriously. One of the more resonating characteristics of these gun-toting, take-no-crap personas is the way in which they resolve their problems with a blast of gunfire and a resoluting wisecrack, while walking away without a second thought. Many of us wish at times that we could get away with that behavior, so does racist Korean War vet, Walt Kowalski. Retired after 50 years from the local Detroit Ford plant and recently widowed, Walt grumbles and growls his days away as he nurses his perfectly-manicured postage stamp of a lawn in his well-maintained, picket-white fenced home.
     
    Walt is that old goat who looks around at his world and wonders how things have gotten the way they are. His selfish and chubby Midwest sons, busy with their careers, have alienated themselves (most likely due to his cold gruffness) as they plot out how to get Walt into a senior home. He groans at his grandkids with their piercings and blackberrys but also at the persistant Father Janovich (Christopher Carley) from his wife's church. Walt doesn't care for the baby-faced padre who promised his wife that he'd get him to confession. It would seem Walt cares only for a handful of things at this stage in his life: his Lab retriever Daisy, his M1 rifle from the war, and his mint condition 1972 Gran Torino, a symbol of days long gone. Walt finds himself as lost and without a place as the company he used to work for.
     
    What gets under Walt's skin the most though is the noticeable influx of Asian Hmong immigrants he finds himself surrounded by in what used to be a blue-collared neighborhood.  No country for this old man, indeed!  Eastwood plays up Walt's disdain to the hilt but we can't despise him because we realize he's cut from a different time period. While there's no excuse for his abrasive racism, you can't help but respect who he is and that's a tribute to the actor who's playin' this worn-down character.  With all this build up, it's obvious that Walt is destined to get a serious thawing.
     
     

    Clint Eastwood, Gran Torino

     

     

     

    That comes in the form of the neighbor teen, Tao (Bee Vang) who tries to steal Walt's beloved vehicle in a gang initiation stunt. He thwarts the freshman thief but this encounter just catapults the inevitable. The botched theft  is what brings a livid Walt rifle-first into the Hmong neighbors as he winds up breaking up a gang fight on his front lawn.  Inadvertantly scaring off the gangbangers, Walt unintentionally winds up saving Tao and his family from further violence. All he wanted was them to stay off his well-kept lawn. What follows is an outpouring of gratitiude from the Hmong family and as punishment for his actions, Tao is made to work for Walt (though it's unclear who this is punishment for) in order to restore honor to the family.

    Tao's older, plucky sister, Sue (Ahney Her) starts to wear down Walt's calcified heart as she becomes his introduction to her family which finds him coming to terms with the Hmong culture. Through his encounters with the various generations, he starts to see that he is a haunted man, empty and without peace. A man who hides behind any racial epithet possible without any possibility of anyone really getting to know who he is. Walt is soon won over by Hmong traditions, befriending Thao with hopes to teach him some self-respect before the gang activity worsens. But he sees there isn't much hope or future for Tao and his family and is compelled to intervene, driving away local gang members and earning the respect of the Hmong community.  

     

       

    For Walt, defending the defenseless is a form of atonement and an act of contrition. The killings in Korea still effect him, as he tells Tao, "I used to stash guys like you five fet high in Korea. Used 'em for sandbags," which only confirms that some resolve is needed. He now has a reason to do away with his bitterness and protect these kids against anyone who would do them harm. Yet unlike the typical Eastwood vengeance flick we're used to, this is as much in line with Will Munny (from "Unforgiven") in that there is a price one must pay when violence is used. Esatwood knows it would be plain stupid at his age to have Walt decimate the gangs in the hood. Instead, we're given an emotional resonance that becomes enthematic for the entire film. There's a final validation here for Walt which gives the viewer a rewarding cinematic experience.
     
    Eastwood successfully culminates all the tough-guy characters he's known for into Walt Kowalski, an incorrigible soul who has to deal with issues of life, death, racism and salvation. While it may not be his best performance it certainly is one of his more ballsy ones. Is it a perfect script? No, not really. Are there flaws? Some. It's not a scholastic take on race relations, but newcomer Schnek understands the venomous mentality of men like Walt, who live and breathe outdated American values, only to find their faith rewarded by the degeneration of respect in the youth and the rise of foreign perspectives in their own backyard. I appreciated the fact that Eastwood used primarily first-time Hmong and Asian actors. It lended an added authenticity and naturalness to the characters that at time is jarringly noticeable but a welcome surprise nonetheless.  
     
    Like many of his smaller films (Million Dollar Baby) there's an exacted simplicity that is to be commended here. A easy-going yet purposeful filmmaking style that is long gone. At 78 years, Clint has no peer. No one else can do what he does, making him the best there is at what he does. If this is to be Eastwood's swan song as an actor (gasp!) then this is quite appropriate.  For anyone who enjoys Clint's acting, his humor, his honesty and craftsmanship as a director....this is a must see.
     
     

  • Stallone should be proud!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Son of Rambow  (2008)

    rated PG-13 for  violence and reckless behavior.
    1 hr. 35 min.
     
    written & directed by: Garth Jennings
    produced by: Nick Goldsmith
     
     
     
    Watching writer/director Garth Jennings new film, I couldn't help but recall the wonder and excitement I felt the first time I devoured the movies that shaped my childhood. Leaving the movie theater as a wee lad, I remember feeling as if there was no end to the movie I had just seen. It continued on in my mind, living inside me as the characters embodied my actions. I believed wholeheartedly that I could pilot a "piece of junk" through outer space with a wookie as my copilot or that I could crack a whip in search of the lost Ark. If that sounds familiar to you then this lovable film will bring you back to that time with a smile on your face and maybe even a tear in your eye.
     
    The film takes place just outside of England in 1982, right around the time Stallone's socially-challenged Vietnam vet was introduced to cinemas. It is indeed the movie "First Blood" that brings two young boys together in an unlikely friendship. Unlikely because they are worlds apart despite living in the same town. Will Proudfoot (Bill Milner) is an introverted loner who takes refuge in drawing up an entire book of colorful stories. He lives with his mother, younger sister and grandmother who are all part of the Plymouth Brethren, a religious sect that shuns worldliness, secular music, TV and movies. Then there's freckled Lee Carter (Will Poulter), the thieving, charismatic troublemaker at Will's school. His teachers call him "the devil child" and yes he is a hellion but right away we see that he is just as endearing as Will. He lives with his much-older brother, Lawrence (Ed Westwick), unchecked and on their own while his mother lives in Spain with their stepdad. A situation ripe with mischief.
     
     
    Will Poulter and Bill Milner in Paramount Vantage's Son of Rambow
     
     
    Lee runs a video piracy business at home for his brother and has secretly decided to make a home movie himself. His goal: to make it the best ever and enter it into the local young filmmaker's contest. Lee finds an awe-struck ally in the imaginative Will, who is soon recruited by Lee to be his stunt double for an action movie he is making. Once Will sees his first ever movie over at Lee's place, a pirated copy of "First Blood" well, it's all over! He becomes obsessed with all things Rambo! He imagines himself as the "Son of Rambow" (stay till the end of the credits for a funny audio clip about the title) and enthusiastically immerses himself in the character...literally. We see Will jump from heights, fall from a tree and swing into a lake all for the sake of the art. Both boys develop an indelible bond as they become amateur cinematic collaborators.
     
    But this wouldn't be the hilarious, touching and joyous film that it is if all went well for our boys. When a busload of French exchange students are dropped off at their school, pretty boy, Didier (Jules Sitruk) enters the scene. He captivates the uniformed girls and boys with his black leather, red boots and his new wave music but provides a driving wedge between the boys when he practically takes over production. Another challenge is fellow Brethren brother Joshua (Neil Dudgeon) outing his Will's forbidden celluloid adventures while horning his way into his  family, putting Will and his family in danger of expulsion. But the most heart-wrenching of challenges is of the hurt caused by the growing egos and stubborn pride of both boys. You really want them to be the best of friends and it breaks your heart when anything opposing that occurs.
     
     
    Jules Sitruk in Paramount Vantage's Son of Rambow
     
     
    Director Jennings ("The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy") and his producing partner Nick Goldsmith really hit the jackpot finding these two non-actors as their leads. They really are perfectly cast and just flawless. I would imagine that Jennings has reels of edited film of these boys that didn't make the released cut. The supporting cast is excellent as well, particularly Jessica Hynes as Will's devoted mother who patiently tries to relate to his burgeoning backsliding. Little does she know that as much as her son wants to be a good son, he also wants to be the "Son of Rambow". Not only do the laugh-out-loud scenes make the film but the quieter, character moments add a sweet sincerity.
     
    When I found out that the film is partly based on Jennings' own childhood experiences of filmmaking, it made me love the film all the more. No wonder the film has so much heart. It can be seen in the writing and visual storytelling which seem straight out of a fond reminiscing dream. His use of scribbly graphic animation is used wisely, not overdone but rather caters to Will's vivid imagination. The film is a wonderfully unpretentious reminder of the unlimited possibilities of make believe. The only possible way to not like this film is if you hated being a child and you hate children. It's been a long time since I sat in the theater and felt the same exuberance as the main characters but this film did just that for me. 

  • Unbearable!

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Untraceable  (2008)

    written by: Mark Brinker, Allison Burnett & Robert Fyvolent
    produced by: Andy Cohen, Hawk Koch, Gary Lucchesi, Steven Pearl & Tom Rosenberg
    directed by: Gregory Hoblit
     
    Rated R for grisly violence and torture, and some language.
    100 min.
     
     
    Untraceable? I don't think so. You shouldn't be able to predict every turn while watching a movie with such a title. I can't imagine anyone who couldn't follow such a tepid plot in this day and age of CSI, Bones and Cold Case. That's basically what this is combines with the cinechock of the "Saw" movies. was there anyone watching this who didn't see where the story was going? To be sure, there are worse movies out there but this was crud. Too bad cuz the cast isn't to blame, they're not that bad really. It's what they're given to work with. If anything, they are to blame for reading and saying yes to such a sucky script.
     
    The story is set in dour and rainy Portland, Oregan (too bad, I thought that place was supposed to be nice) where FBI cybercrime profiler, Jennifer Marsh (Diane Lane) spends her nights trapping pathetic internet scumbags with her partner, Griffin (Colin Hanks). A new site is discovered called www.killwithme.com that features a live streaming video where victims are killed based on the number of hits received, the faster the hits the quicker the death. Of course, like a traffic accident on the side of the road, millions of people log on, hastening the victims' violent deaths. It woulda been more interesting if the writers focused on the phenomena of gawkers and how these viewers actually became murderers themselves by visiting this site. A unique perspective would be how to legally hold these viewers accountable but instead we're given shots of Diane Lane in the shower.
     

    Colin Hanks and Diane Lane in Screen Gems' Untraceable 

     
    So, cybercop Marsh, pieces together this so-called mystery at great risk to herself and her family. Isn't that always the case. Why do these protagonists always have to have family? I'd like it if the protagonist was someone that everyone hates, even her family. Ah well. Marsh knows her job and she's a loyal single mom and all but she's just not that interesting. Lane winds up looking tired throughout the film, as her character tries to isolate the location of the killer who racks up a curious roster of victims. With each gruesome execution committed online, the audience grows more impatient for the next thrill, leaving the FBI little time to solve the case.
     
    The film tries to teeter on "torture porn" thrills but thankfully it only shows the kinda tortue you might see on any similar TV show.  I got a kick outta the film's need for boring exposition that spells out terms like "LOL" or "ROTFL" possibly catering to those who aren't familiar with online lingo and "clever" internet shorthand.
     

    Diane Lane in Screen Gems' Untraceable

    The killer turns out to be some pretty-faced kid (Joseph Cross, looking like an X-Men reject) wanting to get even and perhaps teach the world a lesson. What's his deal? He's upset, disturbed and unhinged about live-footage of his father's suicide being saturated online. What's bizarre is this killer is revealed not even half way into the film. Where's the suspense in that? I was never sold that this klid was some brilliant criminal sicko, once he's revealed I just wanted to slap him and sent to bed without dinner. It's yet another interested thread that is left frayed and unexplored.   Director Gregory Hoblit  ("Primal Fear," "Fracture") helps Lane sell the suspense of the script but not by much. He has her spend most of the movie wet (either in the rain or the aforementuiioned shower) and furrowed with a serious look plastered on her face. Too bad Hoblit is so lazy with the camera in that he has to hold on certain characters or locations which blatantly gives away to who and where something will happen. It's obvious that the writes were going reaching for an opportunity to showcase the freedom of internet media and expression that today's technology provides but it's just too obvious making it downright insulting. Every shot was completely leading and predicatble. And the screenplay? Just lame. A better title would be Unwatchable. Now THAT'S a movie I'd watch just to see if the title was true, kinda like those online viewer/killers.

     

     


  • Marvel's Metal Man is Fun!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Iron Man  (2008)

     

    PG-13 for some intense sequences of sci-fi action and violence, and brief suggestive content.
    2 hrs. 6 min.
     
    written by: Mark Fergus, Matt Holloway & Hawk Ostby
    produced by: Avi Arad & Kevin Feigue
    directed by: Jon Favreau 
     
     
    Terrence Howard , Jon Favreau and Robert Downey Jr. in Paramount Pictures' Iron Man 
     
     
     
    When it was first announced that Robert Downey Jr. was cast as billionaire/inventor/playboy Tony Stark for the big screen adaptation of Marvel Comics Iron Man all I could think of was....genius. I was already excited to see what actor/director Jon Favreau would do with the comic book icon. After all, he has over forty years of material at his disposal. Then once the rest of the cast had been locked, my confidence in this film was reassured. With Favreau being a fan and four award-winning actors locked in, the possibility of this movie getting it right on all levels was strong. And that's exactly what happened! Believe the hype cuz there is now a comic book movie that delivers and exceeds all expectations. Before I get into why the movie is worthy of repeated viewings, let's get familiar with the world of Tony Stark....
     
    Stark Industries is a global manufacturing corporation that sees most of it's revenue come from their creation of various weapons. Tony's father, Howard Stark, built the empire with partner and friend Obadiah Stane (Jeff Bridges) and once Howard died, Tony took over at age 21 with Stane as his mentor. Graduating at the top of his MIT class at age 15, Tony doesn't claim his inheritance ignorantly although his cavalier lifestyle might show otherwise. He'd rather zip around in one of his sports cars or hit the casino with some hotties than bother with accepting an award from his best friend and military liaison Jim "Rhodey" Rhodes (Terence Howard). But then again being a friend of Tony's means you expect such behavior. It would take something life-changing for Tony to see not only who he is but what he's responsible for.
     
    That something takes place in Afghanistan where Tony makes a business appearance demonstrating his new cluster bomb, the Jericho. The trip turns out to be quite literally a bust when Tony's military Humvee entourage is attacked by an insurgent terrorist group known as The Ten Rings. They throw their injured captive in a cave with another captive, Dr. Yinsen (Shaun Toub) a scientist who winds up saving Tony's life by installing an electromagnetic device in his chest, keeping deadly shrapnel away from his heart. It is here in the cave that we see who Tony Stark is. Stripped away from all the conveniences that he's used to having at his disposal, he is faced with something he often does not think of....mortality.
     
     
    Robert Downey Jr. and Shaun Toub in Paramount Pictures' Iron Man 
     
     
    The terrorist leader, Raza (Faran Tahir) demands that Tony build a Jericho bomb for them "or else" but the tables are turned. Out of the scrap they give him for materials (much of which are from Stark Industries) Tony and Yinsen builds a small arc reactor, basically a longer-lasting replacement to the device on his chest as well as crude but formidable full body armor. Soon an armored Tony escapes, barreling his way through the terrorist camp, flinging soldiers, destroying their weapons and spraying flame every which way before he is able to launch himself in the air and out of harm's way. When he's picked up by Rhodes and military crew, we know that things have changed for Tony Stark, although he still wants an American cheeseburger upon arriving on U.S. soil.
     
    A press conference is held where Tony surprises everyone by announcing that effective immediately the weapons division of Stark Industries will close down. Not only does this shows a different side of Tony to the public but also infuriates Stane who was just fine when Tony took no actual role of his company's business dealings. He's not the only one effected by Tony's new social awareness though. His taken-for-granted Girl Friday Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow) is shocked by his new seclusion from Tony's usual party self.  Potts is the one who has endured the most from Tony, handling pretty much everything (like memorizing his social security number) and everyone (like escorting that blonde cutie the Morning After) for him. She has to deal with the mysterious Agent Coulson (Clark Gregg) who follows her around with several questions regarding the events that took place upon Tony's escape. During his seclusion, we see Tony tinkering away in his workshop/lab with his A.I. servant, Jarvis (voiced by the uncredited Paul Bettany) on a new, souped up and sleeker suit of armor. Well, you just know these scenes are coming and they are some of the best scenes.
     
    While Tony builds a more powerful and reliable arc that can power both his heart and his suit he also learns that what misdeeds his company has made. Turns out Stane was supplying arms not just with the U.S. but also with terrorists, specifically the ones who kidnapped Stark. Hmmmm. After several test runs, an incensed Tony suits up and blows through the atmosphere in a super-sonic red and gold blur! As much as I thoroughly enjoyed all the character-building moments of the film (something rare in a comic book adaptation) these are truly the "geek out" moments that every fanboy and girl have been anticipating! It's an exhilarating payoff!
     
     
    Paramount Pictures' Iron Man 
     
     
    That's right, seeing Iron Man soar to Afghanistan to save Dr. Yinsen's village from The Ten Rings is the awesome cinematic action that this comic book geek desired! He gets shot outta the air by a tank and then deals with it accordingly. The coolest thing is that Tony is still getting used to the armor but he's willing to risk his life in order to protect those who cannot protect themselves. Here's a guy who just wants to atone for his mistakes and he has the power to do so. He's not thinking of any U.N. rules nor is he thinking how Rhodey will have to cover for him somehow when his body appears as an unidentified blip on the USAF screens. It's just another thing that Tony doesn't have time for but such behavior requires he include Potts and Rhodes, the only two people he trusts.
     
    Since Tony hasn't functioned without Pepper Potts and has come to heavily rely on her, he has to involve her. She knows about the suit, about the flying and really doesn't know quite what to think of all of it. She does know though that he's putting himself in harm's way and makes it clear she wants no part of it. Tony sees this and knows she deserves an explanation. His witty wise-cracks she continuously suffers won't suffice. She's capable and knows she can help him, it just might take persuading her to believe in herself. Tony also knows there's no way he can't include Rhodes seeing as how he's monitoring the skies with the military. Once this two are with him, Tony is free to suit up once again and tackle the man he at one time called mentor.
     
    Yes, it becomes clear throughout the film that Stane is up to no good and he is the requisite villain which requires a climactic standoff. At times it might become a bit too obvious that Stane is the villain and really that's my only qualm of the film. I'm guessing it's just the way the character is written rather than Bridges handle of Stane. It took me a second to believe that Stane would don his own armor but then again I suppose all weapons dealers have a propensity to play with their toys. What I liked most about the final battle that starts at Stark Industries and then spills into public streets is that it was kinda clumsy which is kinda expected. After all, we have two guys who are still new at wearing these armored suits. At one point, Iron Man gets run over by a family in an SUV after he saves them. It's funny but at the same time you think "yeah, that would happen".
     
     
    Gwyneth Paltrow in Paramount Pictures' Iron Man 
     
     
    Throughout the film, we know what's going to happen, it's a pretty straightforward origin story with very obvious bad guys. Admittedly, I've kinda grown tired of origin stories (except "Batman Begins") but here I see the need for it. This isn't mindless exposition, there is an actual reinvention of character here with Tony Stark. It's a definitive role for Downey Jr., who not only fits perfectly nails the casual apathy of a billionaire playboy weapons dealer but also nails the naive way the guy doesn't fully understand that it's not just the good guys that play with his toys. He brings a needed depth to an unlikable character that you can't help but be won over by. So, while there may not be a surprising twists and turns for a change there is actual character development in a comic book movie.
     
    I was surprised by what I enjoyed and appreciated most about this film. The whiz-bang action was fun of course (that's a given) yet it's the characters that really stand out here. It was actually refreshing to see actors play their age and provide characters that have some life in them. In her mid-thirties, Paltrow is the youngest and while she may be an actor I usually don't care for, she shines here giving a lively performance that keeps in step with Downey's snappy charisma to form a Dave & Maddy chemistry. Not much more can be said about Downey, this is his film. I now have no choice but to hear his voice the next time I read an Iron Man comic. It will be said that the always enjoyable Terrence Howard isn't given much here and while I liked what I saw from him here, I know there's much more for him in the sequels. That's right, the core cast has signed on for at least three more films!
     
    Favreau has made a funny film without being dumbed-down or heavy-handed with dazzling action sequences that actually enhance the story rather than distract us from the lack thereof. He gives the fans what they want while delivering an intelligent and fun summer blockbuster to everyone else. There are plenty of in-jokes and hints for the fanboys, especially after the credits. So, sit in your seat! Setting the tone for the rest of the summer, this is the film to beat right now...at least till Memorial Day weekend when a certain man with a hat and whip will be back!
     

  • Knocking on the door has never been so frightening!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Orphanage  (2007)


     
    written by: Sergio G. Sánchez
    produced by: Mar Targarona, Joaquín Padro, Álvaro Agustín & Guillermo del Toro
    directed by: Juan Antonio Bayona
     
    rated R (for some disturbing content)
    105 min.
     
     
     
    I'm a big fan of "less is more" which can be applied to almost anything really and it also correlates well with the phrase "show don't tell". I prefer when art stands on it's own without any additional interpretation. I don't want anything accompanying the art that states the obvious, tells me what to feel or think, or bats me over the head with a message. I especially feel this way toward film. There really is so much more that can be told to the audience when the filmmakers just show through images and let the film hold the audiences attention. That is certainly how I felt as I watched this amazingly beautiful film that had me reeling through an emotional gamut.
     
    It's no surprise to me that this suspenseful ghost story is a foreign film. I just don't see American filmmakers making any original and intelligent suspense films. If they aren't boring torture porn sequels then they're American remakes of successful Japanese horror films. There's an audience for all those films but to me there's just nothing special there. Unlike, Juan Antonio Bayona's debut film "El Orfanato" or "The Orphanage" which happens to be something very special. At the start of this film , there's a feeling of the traditional haunted house/ghost story but by the end of the film you are left with such a heavy and full heart that you're simply frozen.
     
    It begins with a scene outside a large seaside orphanage with a group of young kids playing a game similar to "Red Light, Green Light". A young girl named Laura is called from the game by one of the teachers there and is soon taken away by her new adoptive parents. Decades later, Laura, now a woman is back at the orphanage. She and her physician husband Carlos (Fernando Cayo) have bought the orphanage with plans to turn it into a home for disabled children, and they've moved in with their 7-year-old son Simón (Roger Príncep). The boy immediately starts acting odd, talking about an imaginary friend named Tómas. At a party for the opening of the home, Simón mysteriously disappears amid prospective children, and Laura (Belén Rueda) immediately suspects a strange old woman who has been lurking around the house. Months later, with her boy still gone, Laura is still convinced he is still alive or that his spirit is haunting the creepy old house. I'll stop right here....
     
    To say much more about the general plot might give far too much away. It really is a beautiful film where the less you know the better off you are and since I am fond of the aforementioned motto, I will leave the plot details alone. Is it enough to persuade you to see it? I hope so, even if you aren't a huge fan of the horror or suspense genre, this really will hit you in many surprising ways. There's a lot of depth at play and many layers throughout to the story as well as the characters, which slowly unfold as we learn more about what happened with the orphanage after Laura was taken away as a child.
     
    There is great care to meticulously construct a story that reveals itself in such an inventive, seductive fashion, it seems disrespectful to talk about it too much. You really need to see this at home with someone and experience it the same way I did, knowing very little. There are some real chills to be found in this film although not too many gross out moments and at first you may feel you know where it's going. You may think there are some genre cliches thrown in and even if there are, they aren't used in a typical manner. The shocks that come are really a result of your imagination that has been built up while watching the film. The creators know that if they can spark yours, you'll completely buy into the world they are showing (not telling), and the more engrossed you become, the more you enjoy it.
     
    As Laura, Belén Rueda gives a absolutely, stunning performance in a role that requires more than just acting scared or screaming and it has to. The grief involved over her missing boy, the fear that she'll never get him back, combined with the strength she calls upon to search for him could be considerably overwhelming for most actors but Rueda ("The Sea Inside") is simply amazing. This is the first movie I've seen her in and I plan on going back and finding others while I keep tabs on any of her upcoming projects. It's refreshing to 43 year-old woman get a great role and run with it. With this being his first feature-film, director Bayona is also one to watch, as he clearly has a sharp eye for visuals, creating a mood, and intricately telling a story. I'm interested to see if he stays in the horror genre or explores other genres for his next film, cuz from this film, I feel he can succeed in any direction.
     
    A good ghost story can inspire our imaginations, which is sadly the first thing that so many of us lose when we grow up. So, it makes a certain kind of sense that a story like this would reference the spirit of Peter Pan in its twisty narrative. Of course, there are also more dangerous lessons to be gleaned from Pan, particularly the danger of being stuck in one place, be it the eternal boy who can't move on or the avenging Hook who won't quit until he gets his revenge. Such themes are also applicable toward this Spanish (yeah, there's subtitles....deal with it!) tale of a haunted home for children.

    Writer Sergio G. Sanchez conveys a similar feel to other fright fests that have come from Spain and Latin America in recent years, most notably Alejandro Amenabar's "The Others" and Guillermo del Toro's "The Devil's Backbone". del Toro serves as producer (chiefly one of the reasons this film received an audience), and it's obvious that Bayona and Sanchez share the same love of storytelling that has made del Toro's best films such a joy to watch. While there doesn't seem to be any end in sight of Hollywood's endless recycling and remakes, here is a film carefully peeling a genuine story. There is an art to spinning a scary tale and there are times when that art makes it to the screen, this is one of those films.




  • Penn gives soul to a soul-searching, sad tale

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Into the Wild  (2007)

    INTO THE WILD (2007) ****
     
     
    R (for language and some nudity)
    2 hrs. 20 min.
     
    written by: Sean Penn (from the novel by Jon Krakauer)
    produced by: Art Linson, Sean Penn & William Pohlad
    directed by: Sean Penn
     
     
     
    I made my way out to the movie theater on a numbingly cold December night. The wind was whipping through me on this last Saturday of 2007. I wondered what it would be like to wander off on your own with your only focus being just you and the surrounding natural elements. Familiar people and places left behind, the open road ahead with all it's possibilities of sights and sounds. I  was alone (something I rarely do), on my way to see "Into the Wild" a movie based on the true story of a young man who did something similar with the last two years of life on earth.   
     
    Back in 1996, the cover to writer Jon Krakauer's book Into the Wild caught my attention in a bookstore. It had a cover image of an abandoned snow-swept bus on the top half and on the bottom half it read....
     
    In April 1992 a young man from a well-to-do family hitchhiked to Alaska and walked alone into the wilderness north of Mt. McKinley. His name was Christopher Johnson McCandless. He had given $25, 000 in savings to charity and abandoned his car and most of his possessions, burned all the cash in his wallet, and invented a new life for himself. Four months later, his decomposed body was found by a moose hunter
     
    ....After I read that, I knew I would someday have to read this book.  
     
    What happened to McCandless in-between his departure and his death is just as extraordinary and shocking as his decision to discard his family and friends. This is the rugged territory covered by screenwriter/director Sean Penn in his film which adapts and takes its title from Krakauer's book. The film depicts McCandless (Emile Hirsch) as a restless searcher roaming from one fresh experience to another, be it working the land for a rascally farmer named Wayne (Vince Vaughn) in South Dakota, hitching a ride with a hippie couple Jan (Catherine Keener) and Rainey (Brian Dierker) in Oregon, or befriending a lonely old man named Ronald Franz (played superbly by Hal Holbrook) in the Southern California desert.

    Along the way, McCandless (who renames himself Alexander Supertramp on his journey) made reckless and foolhardy decisions on his westward journey. He almost got himself arrested, injured and killed with no experience and it seems he's become for today's disaffected youth either a folk hero or a cautionary tale, depending on your point of view. Penn's take on McCandless sojourn is one of a tragic figure, and his film mixes the beautiful with the devastating. Nature witnessed in the film is powerful, communing with it can be rejuvenating; yet, to view it alone is indeed a terrible thing. When reading all this about McCandless, one obvious question continues to surface....Why? What compelled him to come to such a decision? How did all this come about?
     
     
     
    Emile Hirsch in Paramount Vantage's Into the Wild 
     
     
     
    Well, the film gives us a look as to what elements may have contributed to his decision to drop off the grid. We meet 22 year-old McCandless near Atlanta, Georgia, as he graduates from Emory University in 1990. His parents Walt (William Hurt) and Billie (Marcia Gay Harden) are wealthy east coast socialites who want to purchase him a new car as a present and an incentive to go to grad school. The real reason could be that they're embarrassed by the Datsun clunker he drives. McCandless is insulted and refuses their gift, he could care less about a new car. Throughout the film there are scenes that portray his parents as superficial as they cluelessly raise McCandless and his sister Carine (Jenna Malone). In flashbacks, they're seen constantly bickering and abusive to one another yet always prepared with a facade in public. Whether or not his family was depicted accurately is unknown but it does show how this upbringing had a tremendous impact on McCandless' life. He wanted to be nothing like his parents and wanted nothing to do with them.
     
    Having rejected his parents and their lifestyles, McCandless focused his love and attention on the words of Thoreau, Jack London, and other naturalists. This too possibly tainted McCandless. After all, these writers wrote romantic works of natural adventures and reflections but that doesn't mean they necessarily lived them out. Still Chris believed a life living off the earth without material possessions and personal ties could be possible and should be pursued. He wanted to leave society entirely....not just the material trappings of it, but all of it....and commune with the rivers and the forests.

    Penn's film cuts between two time-lines which is a smart approach since we see where he is and also how he arrived there. One follows him on his westward journey, kayaking down the Colorado River, meeting hippies and foreigners, working for a time flippin' burgers at a McDonald's as well as a wheat harvester in for Wayne, all with the goal of his "Great Alaskan Adventure". The other time-line is two years later and shows McCandless living in an old bus he's found in the Alaskan woods. He has a rifle to hunt his food, some rice, his beloved books and of course the big surrounding country he cherishes. He's reached his destination and faces the peaceful beauty along with the unpredictable wild.
     
    But McCandless learns the hard way that there's more to inner peace than that. Crushingly and heartbreakingly at times we see him scrounge for food and shelter, often meeting disappointment but sometimes making friends. Hirsch's surrender to the role is impressive, both physically and emotionally. We see the anger McCandless feels toward his parents in his performance, which has led to a disillusionment with society in general....and yet he remains a optimistic, good and decent person himself, more disappointed than cynical. His charisma enthusiasm and drive are witnessed by all who meet him but I wondered if this was the side McCandless wanted them to see. He has a solid moral code about him and it could be his parents' failure to live up to it that has turned him off. With all of these characteristics in mind, you can't help but to like him but you also wonder and worry about him.

    Penn's treatment of all this is passionate, ambitious and respectable. It's probably my favorite film he's directed thus far. He takes a lyrical, poetic approach that serves the film well from a visual standpoint. Throughout parts of the film we actually see words and phrases written across the screen, running along with Eddie Vedder's songs and Michael Brook's soundtrack. His weighty baritone provides earthy, folky tracks that temper the romance of absolute freedom with an eerie foreboding. At times, we also hear Carine's voice-over narration, presumably from her diary but Penn also injects some well-needed silence to the film. After all, when you're off on your own in the wild all that can be heard is what's around you. 

    Cinematographer Eric Gautier films outstanding shots of nature here but it's the performances though that really make this film fantastic. Starting with Hirsch's mature portrayal of the immature McCandless. Vaughn has a decent part as the shifty grain harvester who gives Chris a job. The always reliable Keener is great, playing a woman who is estranged from her own son about Chris' age. He runs into her and Rainey, these freewheelin' hippies, a couple times on his trek. They become replacement parents to him, in a way, and Jan has a conversation with Christopher late in the film that reminds him of the pain his real parents must be feeling after all these months of not knowing where he is. She almost gets him to confront his feelings, to maybe put himself in their shoes but he keeps his guard up and pretty soon he hits the road.
     
     
     
    Hal Holbrook and Emile Hirsch in Paramount Vantage's Into the Wild 
     



    The most impacting character that McCandless encounters is an 84 year-old gentleman named Ron Franz, an old man Christopher meets in the California desert. Holbrook gives a buzz-worthy performance that supplies the film's needed emotional weight as it comes together as it heads into its final act. Ron was living on his own just fine until he came across McCandless with his backpack. Something in him must have immediately connected to this young man and when he tells Chris a lil of his history we see why. He gives plenty of sage advice, but he's more than just a typical Wise Old Man. Ron can see that someone this idealistic, naive, and unprepared as McCandless isn't going to make it in the harsh world without help, and he's visibly saddened by this knowledge, practically pleading with Christopher to forgive his parents and return to real life. Holbrook's work is a true definition of a great subtle supporting performance.
     
    Sure I can appreciate what we're asked to believe were McCandless' motivations and hurts but his actions were ultimately selfish and irresponsible. The sad part of the film is really the lives that he touched. While he was a charming character and often a delight to be around he could also be a stubborn fool. He resisted the attempts of all those around him on his journey to love him, having determined that such concerns were irrelevant to him. He wasn't rude about it but right about the time that an opportunity would present itself for someone to really get to know him, he'd dodge them.  It's not until it's too late that he realizes what they were subtly teaching him all along: that communing with nature can bring tranquility and joy, but it's ultimately nothing if you don't have someone to share it with.




  • Marshall pays bloody homage

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Doomsday  (2008)

    Doomsday (2008) ***



    R for strong bloody violence, language and some sexual content/nudity.
    1 hr. 45 min.
     
    written by: Neil Marshall
    produced by: Benedict Carver & Steven Paul
    directed by: Neil Marshall
     
     

    I was really surprised to find out that this new film by writer/director Neil Marshall had not been screened before it's release. No press screenings for a film usually mean certain "doom" for a movie's chance of surviving the tumultuous box office waters. Generally, that's true. The studio may have been sitting on a film or they know the movie is a dud yet they also know they gotta release and see if at least makes them some kinda profit. Since none of the critics have seen a film that hasn't been screened there's usually some kinda automatic negative vibe when it's eventually released (I just think the critics are being' babies cuz they haven't been given a look at the film in advance). If I'm already stoked to see a film, bad reviews don't stop me.
     
    Sometimes, if you enjoy a certain genre, especially a certain filmmaker, you just go see a film despite what the word is and make up your mind for yourself. Now I like pretty much any kind of post-apocalyptic sci-fi story be it action or horror. So when I heard that Marshall was essentially working on a homage to such films, I was in. Why? Primarily cuz his previous two films proved to me that there's someone out there willing to take a new twist on the action-horror genre. 2002's "Dog Soldiers" was an original look at the werewolf genre and 2005's spelunking, all-estrogen nightmare "The Descent" had me goin' to bed with the willies. While these films had originality going for them, they also had some decent character development in them to keep one's interest.

     
     
     
    Rhona Mitra and Bob Hoskins in Rogue Pictures' Doomsday
     

     
    In April 2008, the UK faces annihilation at the hands of something called a Reaper virus that is violently killing off Scotts. It's like "28 Days Later" only they die instead of going berserk. So, the British government decides to quarantine Scotland by erecting a 30 ft. wall, leaving those who couldn't escape to fend for themselves until they get sick and die. We're not only shown all these scenes but maps are drawn and narration is given as well by actor Malcolm McDowell. No one really knows what happened inside the wall since the quarantine but one can only imagine the horror.
     
    Three decades later, that same virus is loose in London and the only hope (and perhaps civilization's) appears to be a blip found on satellite coverage of Glasgow.  Since they thought that all life on the other side of the wall would've been annihilated by the virus, they're sure this means a cure. So, England's Prime Minister Hatcher (Alexander Siddig of "24") is coerced by his corruptible Number Two (David O' Hara) to send an "elite team" over the wall to get the cure in 48 hrs. They turn to a government handler, Nelson (Bob Hoskins) cuz he knows just the right someone to lead an elite group into Scotland. That would be his best operative, Eden Sinclair (Rhona Mitra), the chain-smoking, deadpan action heroine who is basically the female answer to Snake Plissken. It's never really clear what Sinclair's title is just that she kicks butt really good and in a movie that doesn't really get too deep, that's enough for me.
     
    We pretty much know already that Sinclair takes the mission or else it wouldn't be the adrenaline-crazed, post-apocalyptic movie that it is. He tells her that the team needs to find a doctor named Kane (McDowell) and get a cure outta him. No problem. Heh. Sinclair takes it not just cuz the fate of all civilization rests on her know-how but cuz she's haunted by the fact that her mother was left behind in the quarantined zone. The prospect of her mother being alive is slim but the curiosity of going back to her place of birth probably factors as well. Yes, Sinclair has the requisite tortured past and her fake Rt. eye to chow for it. She's introduced to head soldier, Norton (Adrian Lester), and is put in charge of a team of soldiers, doctors and other unknown specialists before the giant walls advance them to their, um "doom".
     
     
     
    Craig Conway and Rhona Mitra in Rogue Pictures' Doomsday 
     
     
    Once the armored team gets to the hospital in Glasgow where they think Kane might be all hell breaks loose. They immediately find out that the source of that satellite blip is actually a rogue community of punked-out cannibals led by Sol (Craig Conway). He's a skinny, psycho sporting a mohawked with raccoon-eyed make-up and intends to use Sinclair as his way back to civilization (I think he'd need a lil more than her). Of course that plan doesn't quite work out, soon enough Sinclair and what's left of her team are trekking across lovely Scottish landscapes to find Kane. Turns out he's holed up like Col. Kurtz in some castle in Edinburgh with a society of his own made up of  medieval rejects and heavily-armored knights. Bloody Middle-Age violence ensues with whizzing arrows, bludgeoning battle axes all while finding an unlikely cure.
     
    The rest of the film is more crazy-action turned up way past eleven. Logic throughout the film is loosey goosey at best but it definitely gets tossed out the window of Sinclair's 2008 Bentley she commandeers, especially when she finds a brand new cell phone that is able to patch her through to Nelson. Hullo? How would that happen? But when I saw it, I just laughed cuz this isn't the type of movie you question. If you like the genre, you just go with it. This film really is insane, it's a side of Marshall we haven't seen before except for perhaps in the final battle in Dog Soldiers but even this is 100% more in-your-face. Marshall adds his humorous subtleties and in-jokes that amid his chaotic homage that make you laugh-out-loud (like the running gag with a dead girlfriend) almost with queasy child-like glee. 
     
    If you can't stomach violence, lemme forewarn you, Marshall is all over the place with his violence here. There are severed heads and arms which are seemingly a running theme.  Blood sprays, splats, drips, hits the camera lens and pops in an crimson celebration of wet, vibrant viscera. What else? There's an eyeball cameras. Skanky chicks adorned with tattoos and piercings. Eviscerated rabbits  A herd of cows. There's a man barbecued alive and then his flesh consumed by punk-rock psychos. Yeah, it's just crazy but in some crazy way I had fun with it. It brought me back to all those action-heavy, futuristic movies I watched in the 80's. Marshall gets those movies and adds his own special brand of unbridled fury and tosses it all on the screen. 
     
     
     
    A scene from Rogue Pictures' Doomsday 
     
     
     
    Throughout the story's hyper-kinetic pace, there really isn't much time for character although there are some characters, let me tell you. This isn't an actor's movie anyway but Mitra really does deliver a great cold-hearted action hero. She's the estrogen-laden Snake Plissken wanna-be that you can't take you're eyes off, despite her characters defiance of logic. Hoskins and McDowell's roles are far too small but it's good to see them there. I was resolved from the start to not get too involved with these characters and just go along with the thrill ride.
     

    Marshall has said in interviews that the film is an homage to a variety of previous cult classics such as: "Escape from New York", "The Road Warrior", "The Warriors", "Maelstorm", "Zulu", "Excalibur" and "The Fisher King".  There's also a touch of  "28 Days Later" inspiration only the plague that effects Scotland here fills people instead of turning them into raging, murderous savages. While viewers and critics are crying rip-off and calling this the "worst movie ever" (to quote Kip from "Napoleon Dynamite", "How can anyone even know that?"), I think they are forgetting the definition of homage and not giving Marshall enough credit. He knows there are many elements in this film that have been seen elsewhere....how could he not? He's just celebrating those films.

     

     


  • Oil: A Bloody Timely Feud

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    THERE WILL BE BLOOD (2007) ****
     
     
    rated R (for some violence)
    2 hrs. 38 min
     
     
    written by: Paul Thomas Anderson (based on the novel Oil! by Upton Sinclair)
    produced by: Paul Thomas Anderson & Scott Rudin
    directed by: Paul Thomas Anderson

     
     
    Here's another film that has remained with me a week after viewing and that's why it made it on my Top Ten Films of 2007 list. I saw it because I have never seen a movie starring Daniel Day-Lewis where I wasn't absolutely mesmerized by his performance. This film only supported that statement, the man is an amazing actor and this movie is a quite an experience. It definitely supports the fact that oil and religion don't mix, not today and certainly not in the desolate Northern California landscape of the late 1800's. That's right, the film is about oil and greed and religion and deception. It's a dirty movie where you will feel the grime and dust cake your skin in your seat, you feel the heat just as much as the characters on screen do.
     
    This is a film that demands your undivided attention and does so easily from the beginning. Writer & Director Paul Thomas Anderson starts off with unprecedented form by not giving any dialogue for about the first 15-30 minutes. That's right, no one utters a word but the film still manages to speak volumes on many levels. We're shown a barren desert landscape somewhere in California with the swelling sounds of orchestral strings accompanying the sharp bite of a tool striking the earth. The man is Daniel Plainview (Daniel Day-Lewis) and he is indeed meticulously chipping away at a wall deep down a man-made well, searching for his fortune. He mines for silver alone, an independent man with no need of assistance let alone words. He has no one to turn to when calamity strikes, and yet he has the will to overcome that calamity in order to stake his claim.
     
     
     
    Dillon Freasier and Daniel Day-Lewis in Paramount Vantages' There Will Be Blood 
     
     
    In an unprecedented move, Anderson only uses music amid the sounds of a birthing industry for this opening scene and that's what hooks you in. I sat there finding myself riveted as I'm sure others were in the quiet theatre. I was forced to pay attention, almost as if right from the start viewers are asked to make the decision to become thoroughly invested. Very soon, we see that  Plainview is not your average turn-of-the-century entrepreneur who pulled himself up by his bootstraps. No, this is a man consumed by himself, who surrounds himself by those who would believe in him. Yet we see right through the charismatic salesman. Plainview doesn't care about anyone, he even flat out says later on that he often finds himself despising other people.
     
    Years later, Plainview has his hands in multiple wells which has made him a rich man. He travels around speaking to townspeople living in prospective lands with a prop, an adopted a son named H.W. (first-timer Dillion Freasier), who was orphaned as a baby when a collapsing rig killed his father.  That may seem like a compassionate act by Plainview but like anything else, we find he has his ulterior motives. H.W. is unaware that Plainview isn't his real pappy, and Plainview exploits his mini-me so he can call his enterprise a family business. This behavior is dealt with eventually as is many other of Plainviews unrepentant ways. We see that a man cannot repent until he actually sees the need to.
     
    The film does play like a work of classic literature in ways I can't really describe, it just has an epic scope. Like any such work, there is an antagonist and what's interesting is that a reader (or viewer) is usually already rooting for a respectable protagonist but not in this film. One night, a mysterious young man named Paul (Paul Dano) appears and tells Plainview he knows where there are untapped oil reserves. He tells Plainview that for $500, he will disclose the location of his family's ranch. Of course, Plainview is soon on the scene and trying to cheat the old farmer (David Willis) out of his property under the guise of wanting a quiet place to hunt quail. The farmer's other son, Eli Sunday (also played by Dano) suspects the real motivation for the purchase, and so their clash of wills gets underway. Hence, we have our classic protagonist in Sunday, a Pentecostal preacher in the small local church.  He wants to make sure his congregation--and their spiritual leader--are taken care of but he too is a charlatan with ulterior motives.
     
    So you have two charismatic people at odds with each other who are more alike than they'd ever admit. It's ironic that this is essentially a war between oil and religion....sound familiar? As much as these two characters are continuously at odds one commonality is that money and salvation can change who a person is. There are continuous clashes throughout this film of the material and the spiritual. I'm not gonna get into the specific cause and effects of either of these characters actions but both definitely cause serious repercussions to those around them. All of it is gripping and powerful, as Anderson shows us two men consumed with their own agenda and the misery that comes from it.
     
    The story comes from Upton Sinclair's eighty year-old novel Oil! about an oil baron who engages in a mental battle with a revival type preacher who holds the key to a plot of land with oceans of crude bubbling underneath the surface. Both want control of the gusher, because both are looking to line their coffers. Anderson uses that set up and runs with it, creating an ominous title change that does indeed provide that human life source but also blood from the earth. Oil is the fuel for everything. It powers cars, it invigorates communities, and it compels men to trade their souls for its reward.
     
    I'm probably not the best person to call this film a masterpiece but nonetheless, that's how I see it. The only other film by Anderson that I've seen is his last one, 2002's "Punch Drunk Love". I know some may find that shocking but I knew that "Boogie Nights" was more or less a cover of Scorcese's "Good Fellas" and that "Magnolia" was a take on Altman's "Short Cuts".There's nothing wrong with that but I figured if I'd seen those movies....why watch those? I know, heresy.
     
     
     
    Paul Dano and Daniel Day-Lewis in  Paramount Vantages' There Will Be Blood
     
     
     
    A protagonist like Plainview can make or break a film. He's a great literary character that you can't take your eyes off of but you don't like him. What is most riveting as I watched the film is trying to find out why he thinks so highly of himself. Maybe he doesn't, maybe he has his demons, but he sure comes across like a guy who really believes what he's doing is right. An strong actor is needed for this role and I can't see anyone else but Day-Lewis as Plainview. I can't help thinking that this movie would not be nearly as excellent as it is had a different actor been cast in the lead. The entire cast is fantastic, including Ciaran Hines as Plainview's right-hand man and Kevin J. O'Connor as a shady grifter. Dano falters a little in trying to play a convincing older version of himself, but as the awkward and often sinister preacher, he's able to sell the man as both a righteous lunatic and a scheming con artist.
     
    This is by far Daniel Day-Lewis' film. That's who you see this for. He commands every scene with his John Huston-inspired characterization. He's an actor who famously gets lost in the roles he takes and this is no exception. I've enjoyed every performance I've seen him in since I first saw him in his Oscar-winning role as Christy Brown in "My Left Foot". He plays Plainview in multiple stages of life, from a determined young man to the over-confidence of middle age and on into old age, broken and alone with his ego. Though Plainview has the gift of gab when it comes time to pitch his sale, he is most often a man of few, carefully chosen, often biting words. Some viewers and critics see his performance as grand standing and entirely over-the-top. I can see that but Day-Lewis is so captivating that I forgive it and become absorbed by him.  
     
    There's also much talk about how the movie ends. While I would never spoil it for those who haven't seen it yet, I can't seeing it ending any other way. This topic isn't unusual though, I hear many discussing the conclusion of "No Country for Old Men" as well. I understand the complaints but I respect both endings for the fact that they remain true to the characters and however a story ends, that's what should matter. Like the Coen brothers film, here's a film that will haunt you for some time. I saw it three weeks ago and I'm still seeing images and discussing it with others. Not many films can do that today.




  • Doesn't live up to "Legend" status

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I Am Legend  (2007)

    I AM LEGEND: The IMAX Experience (2007) ***
     
     
    PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi action and violence.
    1 hr. 40 min.
     
    written by: Akiva Goldsman & Mark Protosevich with source material from John William & Joyce Hopper Corrington("The Omega Man") and Richard B. Matheson (novel: I Am Legend)
    produced by: David Heyman, Neal H.Moritz, Akiva Goldsman & James Lassiter
    directed by: Francis Lawrence
     
     
    I had just finished a Christmas show performance on December 23rd at church (you can check out the pics here) which required a set of tedious rehearsals and I knew I needed some kinda outlet. For me, this outlet usually involves gettin' out and seein' a movie. I wanted some kinda escape, so I planned one which consisted of some of the usual suspects. The plan was to take in a 9pm showing of "I Am Legend" at the IMAX at Navy Pier. It would turn out to be one of the coldest, windiest nights yet. On the way there I started doubting my sanity which is exactly what I would see Will Smith do on a gigantic screen. But first....
     
    I chose to see this film in IMAX for two reasons: 1.) it would be cool on the big-big screen 2.) it had a prologue for "The Dark Knight" playing before it. All the non-IMAX showings of this film just had the new trailer for "The Dark Knight" but this was the actual beginning of the movie....and it was awesome! Filmed in IMAX, the intense prologue showed The Joker (Heath Ledger) and his masked goons robbing the Gotham National Bank. The way this is implemented is pretty twisted and ingenious (just like the comic book Joker) and in one particular scene where the goons are swinging to the roof of the bank from an adjacent skyscraper (clearly Chicago, yes!)....quite dizzying (yay for IMAX)! It was great to see the bank manager (the great William Fichtner) go up against the goons and Joker with a shotgun in the bank. It was also great to see how Joker deals with him and flees the bank (onto what looks like Jackson Blvd!) Something tells me this sequel will surpass the previous one in greatness. Heck, just the sheer joy of noticing all the Chicago locations will be worth it. Plus, it would be nice to spot myself as well but that may be wishful thinking.
     
    After seeing that, I was all excited and looking forward to seeing Dr. Robert Neville (Will Smith) go at it alone in a desolate Manhattan of the near future. By now, you're likely aware of the story....he's the Last Man on Earth! Whoa. How'd that happen? Well, it's 2012 and it turns out back in 2009 there was this virile outbreak that wiped out 90% of civilization by years end.The film starts out with some news recordings that reveal a genetically engineered measles virus that had been created by a Dr. Alice Krippin (an uncredited cameo by Emma Thompson-how'd they get her?) as a cure for cancer. Little did she know it would mutate into a lethal strain which would rapidly infect humans and animals. So, of the 10% left of civilization 9% were infected, but did not die. These survivors spiraled into a primal state of aggression and began to react painfully to UV rays, forcing them to hide in buildings and other dark places during the day. Less than 1% remained completely immune to the virus, but were hunted and killed by the infected.
     
     
     
    Will Smith in Warner Bros. Pictures' I Am Legend 
     
     
     
    That's how US Army virologist Lieutenant Colonel Robert Neville is left as the supposed last healthy human in NYC and quite possibly the entire world. We're shown in some well-done flashbacks that when the breakout went live, Neville being the army doc he is was able to get his wife Zoe (Chicago's own Salli Richardson) and daughter Marley (Smith's own Willow Smith) on a helicopter off Manhattan to hopeful safety. That was more than three years ago and now Neville's daily routine is trying to find a cure for cure for cancer. He feels it's his responsibility to see if their is a way to reverse the infected. Of course he and his daughter's German Shephard Sam (short for Samantha, played by Kona) need to stay away from the infected at night and do so in the safety of his fortified home.
     
    Slowly drained of his sanity and growing weary of battling the vampire-like infected that attack during the night, Neville is losing hope that his nightmare will end. By far, the finest moments of the picture are easily the sequences of the him and Sam driving around the city streets, interacting with a frozen world. Hunting deer or shooting golf balls into buildings off an aircraft carrier, Neville has the world to himself in the daytime, employing careful street geography sharpened over three years of seclusion. In this game of boredom and survival there appears to be no winner, just survival. The balance between the two is where "Legend" finds the strongest dramatic flavor, carefully studying Neville's fragile sanity while upping the tension with the menacing "Dark Seekers" and their escalating aggression toward the viral survivors.
     
    Neville's daily routine includes experimentation on the infected he manages to capture in order to find a cure for the virus as well as trips through a Manhattan devoid of humanity to hunt for food and supplies. He even goes through the local video store starting from A to Z, he's got the time (something I would do). He also makes friends with mannequins he's positioned in the store, he knows their names and back stories. Waiting each day for a response to his continuous transmission broadcasts, which instruct any survivors to meet him at midday at the South Street Seaport. When other survivors finally do start to surface, the revelation stuns Neville, who finds his struggle to remain optimistic is in constant battle with his knowledge that humanity has likely been snuffed out for good. Smith handles their appearance in a very real way. It's still hard to comprehend that he's not alone, that there are others out there beside these metropolitan night creatures.
     
    Francis Lawrence (who also directed "Constantine") is a skilled enough director to pull off the visual apocalypse of a deteriorated New York City and he also successfully sets up an environment for Smith to allow you to feel what it would be like to live in this world. The reason some of the scenes I mentioned work is due to the total silence Lawrence uses during the opening acts. He does this not just to amp suspense, but to have you feel the unnerving stillness in the air. One of the best, nail-biting scenes has Sam wander off in daylight into a building. A big no-no cuz we and Neville know that those insatiable creatures are lurking in there. It really draws out the horror, fear and dependence he has with his only companion.
     
    So, Lawrence succeeds in making the first three fourths of this film an excellent look at isolation, loneliness and aloneness. But (there had to be one) the final half hour just seem rushed. Once Anna (Alice Braga) and her son Ethan (Charlie Tahan), the two survivors who find him come into the story everything speeds up into an adrenalized action picture. The slow, tense build-up Lawrence gave us is replaced with a video game feel with the CGI-heavy creatures swarming all three of them. It had to come, I knew the action would kick up a notch as I watched it but I though it woulda been a notch, not full throttle. Ah well.
     
     
     
    Will Smith in Warner Bros. Pictures' I Am Legend 
     
     
    Some viewers have commented on how lame the infected creatures were in the film. They're saying they felt too similar to something you'd find in a video game, not life-like enough. At first, I didn't mind them (maybe cuz I saw less of them) but I have to admit something about them after awhile felt....goofy. This could be some of the worst CGI creatures put to film, making them look more like crude animation tests. What ever happened to the magic of makeup?Maybe it's cuz we don't know any of them to begin with, I mean supposedly all of those infected were once averages people, right? Yet, they all are skinny, half-naked and veiny, resembling Johnsonville brats. They all look the same! Why aren't they all different sizes? Average people are short and tall and fat and skinny so how'd they get this way? I know that Lawrence started out using real actors for these creatures but later opted for CGI. That's too bad.
     
    Obviously not just any actor can handle a role where the majority of the film you're hanging either by yourself or with a German Shephard. Tom Hanks could only do it for so long and then he needed (or rather the movie needed) a volleyball. But Smith has the charisma and talent to take on the character, putting in his best sci-fi acting work to date. He effectively portrays a man pushed to the brink of madness dealing with great loss and feeling burdened with trying to cure those infected. Smith offers up fantastic work here, from singing Bob Marley to Sam to his thickening depression. It's a dark and desperate performance that feels real but "Legend" is a dark and desperate film. Anyone stereotyping Smith's talent and expecting something similar to his previous work, will be surprised.
     

    Honestly, I woulda preferred watching an entire film of Neville confronting his despondent life, but Lawrence doesn't have the patience to see his mounting despair all the way through to the end. Instead, the third act is rushed and the ending a tad too tidy for me. I know the films overall look does benefit from 2007 technology but it is also ruined by it. As for the benefit of seeing it in IMAX, maybe I'm getting old but the IMAX films I see the more I seem to miss especially in action films. I tend to lose a lotta detail when a screen five stories tall is giving me dizzying visuals. So, unless it's filmed in IMAX, it's kinda hard to make everything out. In the end, the film slumps to the finish line, failing to find a pathway to a stimulating, satisfying finale. While there are some great things going on for the majority of the film, it's just too bad it runs out of gas as it speeds it's way to mediocrity.


  • An Unforgettable Directing Debut

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Away From Her  (2007)

    AWAY FROM HER (2007)
    ****
     
     
    PG-13 (for some strong language)
    1 hr. 50 min.
     
    written by: Sarah Polley (screenplay) & Alice Munro (from short story, The Bear Came Over the Mountain)
    produced by: Daniel Iron, Jennifer Weiss & Simone Urdl
    directed by: Sarah Polley
     
     
    I can't imagine a time where after fifty years of marriage my wife would look at me and not know who I am. That would be devastating. I would obviously want to provide her with the best care possible if her dementia increases but what about me? How would I manage? This may sound selfish but just think about how this would hit you if someone you love dearly was affected by this disease. The majority of my life would have been spent with this person who knows me better than anyone else but now all that is vanishing. That's exactly what position Grant Anderson (Gordon Pinsent) finds himself in as he comes to terms with his wife, Fiona (Julie Christie) being diagnosed with Alzheimers disease. As they both come to terms with this unexpected stage in their life, their challenging history is also brought to light and we see that their marriage wasn't always as cozy as they seem.
     
     
     
    Julie Christie and Gordon Pinsent in Lionsgate Films' Away From Her
     
     
     
    Until now, this was a couple who were comfortable with who and where they are in life. Yet as Fiona's memories fade, new ones seem to enter. We get the idea that in their past, Grant may have fooled around with a student during his tenure as a professor. It seems like an event that rocked their relationship but may have been uncomfortably glossed over. Well, it surfaces now as well as other doubts and frustrations. Since Grant still has his faculties, it is he who must now feel the same isolation that Fiona must have at one time felt. He wants to support Fiona in her decision to check herself into a nursing home not far from where they live but he still feels alone and somewhat guilty (both for the affair years ago and for not being able to help her). This decision becomes more real for both of them after Fiona is found after being lost in the snowy outdoors, it's then that they realize that she's going to need care. 
     
    For the first time, the couple are forced to undergo a long-term separation that brings pain, confusion and frustration. It's even more painful for Grant when he's told by the facility's administrator Madeline (Wendy Crewson) that new patients must have no outside contact for 30 days, so that they can become acclimated to their new stage of life. At least he's able to confide in Kristy (Kristen Thomson) a nurse who helps Grant deal with this new stage of life with stark honesty. When Grant is finally able to visit Fiona after the orientation period, he shows up with flowers and is devastated to find out that not only has she seemingly forgotten him, but she has transferred her affections to another man. It's up in the air whether or not this man, Aubrey (Michael Murphy) is all there since he's only shown as a wheelchair bound mute patient at the nursing home. Although he seems quite reliant on Fiona as she helps him move around and reads to him, I wondered if it was a ruse.
     
    As the distance between husband and wife grows, Grant must draw upon his love for Fiona to perform an act of self-sacrifice in order to ensure her happiness. Grant continues to visit but is relegated to the rec room sofa on the sidelines as he watches Fiona help Aubrey play board games with the other residents. Side note: if I have to admit myself to a nursing home, I guess I'm heading north to Canada cuz this was the nicest looking facility I've ever seen. Pinsent quietly commands these scenes. His eyes show a man frozen in love with a woman who no longer knows him. He doesn't know what to do but still cannot bare to be away from her. It's almost as if he is afraid that he too will forget her and will be left the strange voyeur in her life.
     
     
    Gordon Pinsent and Kristen Thomson in Lionsgate Films' Away From Her
     
     
    In an effort to provide for Fiona any way he can, Grant introduces himself to Aubrey's wife when she takes him out of the home due to financial reasons. With Aubrey gone from the home, Fiona is depressed which noticeably deteriorates her condition and Grant knows he is not the man who can provide what his wife needs. He gradually builds a connection with Marian (Olympia Dukakis), the blunt-talking, pragmatic wife of Fiona's catatonic friend. She seems as stuck and lonely as she is, the only difference is he's new to all this. This leads to a brief and awkward relationship for the two ostracized spouses. They need each other, perhaps Marian moreso than Grant since she's dealt with her husband's illness longer than he has but he clearly still loves Fiona.
     
    Clearly and deservedly, Christie is promoted as the mesmerizing star of the film and first-time director/actress Sarah Polley, focuses as much on her beauty as Christie does on her character. It doesn't take much for one to be absorbed by Christie's startling, mature beauty yet Polley keeps the camera tight and close on her magnificent face and those piercing blue eyes as Fiona takes leave of her life and her husband. I get the feeling that Polley is as much in awe of Christie as anyone else who sees her work. But Pinsent is formidable here and the story is just as much about his character if not moreso. It's a role that is just as challenging as Christie's and the two of them work wonderfully together. Until this film, I had never seen or heard of this Canadian actor. I'll definitely be looking to see what he does next.
     
    I gleaned that Canadian writer, Alice Munro is telling a story about hanging on and letting go, and about the mysteries of what binds men and women together. How Polley's screenplay differs from the source is unknown but the filmmaker does take the time to glance back at Grant and Fiona's past as much as their unknown future unfolds. Polley delivers a thoughtful and compelling meditation on the familiar lives older people with this disease are leaving and the frightening lives they find themselves entering. Deceptively simple but wrenching in execution, writer/director Sarah Polley has become a talent to look out for behind the scenes as well as in front of the camera. There have been several films released within the last six years that have dealt with Alzheimer's disease in some manner. I've only see Nick Cassavete's 2004 film "The Notebook" which I really enjoyed but I kinda felt like at times I wanted to see just the older couple currently dealing with the disease instead of flashbacks of their youth. That's one of the many things I like about this film, it has no problem focusing on characters over age 60 and it does so in a real manner. It's a beautiful film.
     
     
     
     
     

  • Stallone bloodies another iconic role....

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Rambo  (2008)

    RAMBO (2008) ***
     
     
     
    rated R (for strong graphic bloody violence, sexual assaults, grisly images and language)
    1 hr. 33 min.
     
    written by: Art Monterastelli & Sylvester Stallone (from source material by David Morrell)
    produced by: Avi Lerner & Kevin King
    directed by: Sylvester Stallone
     
     
     
    Let's get this outta the way right from the start. I like the Rambo films. It's not a guilty pleasure either or cuz I particularly like violent films. I like them solely because it's one man taking on injustice and the violent atrocities of man. I'll admit, the character of Rambo become more and more out-of-control as the sequels were released. He became more and more buff, put in impossibly outnumbered combat situations and escaped certain death countless times. The icon of Rambo became crazy with all the political mumbo-jumbo of the Reagan surrounding the second sequel, "First Blood: Rambo Part II", not to mention all the merchandise like action figures and cartoons. Ugh! Everything about the character got out-of-hand. No wonder everyone made fun of Stallone for his muscle-bound, seemingly muscle-headed role.
     
    Still, "First Blood", the first Rambo move was awesome! I was a lil over 10 years-old when I finally saw that 1982 film (unbeknownst to my mother) and it certainly left an impression on me. It was the action but soon after I realized Rambo's sensitive backstory. Yes, I included sensitive and Rambo in the same sentence. Here was a decorated Vietnam veteran, whose war buddies were all dead and found no place or function in society. He was trained by his country to be the ultimate weapon, the perfect warrior, but came to realize he had no place in his country anymore. It was one of the first movies where you saw a veteran at war with his own country. That still is a cool concept for me.
     
    Unfortunately, what began as a franchise of high adventure and sympathy for the underdog and the veteran protagonist became a feral cartoon. Now, 20 years later, "Rambo" comes full circle finding its rightful home in utter bloody chaos. We find John J. Rambo (Sylvester Stallone) in Thailand where he was at the start "Rambo III" working as a boatman and snake wrangler. He's away from America, away from any politics and trying to lead a life of solitude while evading his demons. A group of Christian missionaries find the battle-scarred loner and ask him to drive them up the river to the heart of the Burmese civil war in order for them to deliver some hope to the villagers there. Rambo know better, he knows without weapons the war zone up north will not change despite anyone's good intentions and actions.
     
     
     
    Sylvester Stallone in Lionsgate Films' Rambo 
     
     
     
    Rambo knows this and director Stallone shows us in the beginning previous scenes the atrocities of the Burmese military committed onto their own people. Villagers are mutilated and beheaded while a truckload of villagers are forced to walk in a swampy mindfield while the Burmese soldiers place bets on who might survive. When the movie title appears in blood red, we know that these oppressed people will have their rescuer and the dead will be avenged. But right now Rambo's not budging. He turned down the request of missionary leader Michael (Paul Schulze) which gives his spirited girlfriend (the only gal in the group) a chance to persuade the hulking loner. Either something she says stirs him or he just hasn't seen a cute blonde like Sarah (Julie Benz) in quite a while cuz we next a reluctant Rambo steering the group up the river.
     
    On their way, the group witness how dangerous both the river is and their quite guide, as they see how Rambo deals with pirates. This doesn't sit well with Michael and once they arrive he lets Rambo know he won't be needed on the way back as they plan on returning by land. Returning home alone, a conflicted Rambo thinks about what Sarah told him about making a difference in people's lives while wrestling with what he is, a warrior. When he's visited by a Colorado church pastor (Ken Howard) he knows the missionaries are in trouble. He asks Rambo to lead a group of mercenaries he's hired (wuh?) to the village to rescue them cuz communication has been cut off and we know why.  We were shown the vicious Burmese military obliterate the village where the missionaries are, cutting an unbelievable path of genocide. Woman are beaten and raped, limbs are cut off, children are stabbed or shot at point blank and thrown into a fire if their not old enough to join the military. Bodies explode near the missionaries as the try to evade death or capture. Amid the carnage, Sarah and Michael and another missionary are captured and taken away.  
     
    This leaves Rambo in a position to turn his back or assume his psychologically tattered solider mentality and launch into battle once again. Of course, it's obvious what he does. He does what he does best and he doesn't allow a band of mouth mercs get in his way. These mercenaries don't know what to make of Rambo until they actually see him in action and then they follow his lead. 
    Yes, once Rambo turns on his military mojo the film goes crazy!  It explodes with a hurricane of aggression aimed directly at those clueless Burmese soldiers. Wave after wave of bloody fury assault us as Rambo turns predator in a very dynamic manner that explodes across the screen with all the horror and fist-pumping that is expecting in franchise. Stallone serves up an insane amount of gore in the film's finale (amplified with rickety CGI), and I gotta say I commend him for the the fearlessness of the realism of it all. Sure, it's uneasy to look at, it's assaulting after all. But Stallone has built up the enemies despicable actions enough where you just hold on in your seat and go along with him.
     
     
     
    Sylvester Stallone as John Rambo in Lionsgate Films' Rambo 
     
     
     
    This is probably the first Rambo movie where you really feel what it would be like in the heat of battle. There's no shirtless, slo-mo shots (thank you!) with Rambo jumping over a gorge with a blasting M60. Stallone is going for the heart of darkness here, exhibiting this decades long civil war that most don't know about on very realistic terms, stunning viewers with real depictions of death and carnage. He's said in interviews that if he were to do another Rambo film, it would have to be socially relevant to some existing injustice. This film doesn't recoil from any of it, displaying a gruesome rain of death and unspeakable acts of violation. It's a bleak perspective and Stallone perhaps distances himself from the mindless body count craziness of the two earlier films by coming closer to authenticity. It still may seem overboard to some, but putting the viewer in the middle of pure hell really drives home a vivid theme about the futility of peace and war. Fighting slaughter with slaughter is exhilarating, but Stallone shows us there's an unavoidable price to pay.
     

    Unlike Stallone's return to his other iconic character in 2006's "Rocky Balboa", this film isn't about healing any old wounds nor is it necessarily a return to the melodrama underneath the first Rambo film. It's not the superficial action romp that most have come to associate with the character either.  It seems Stallone is hungry to prove a point this time around, and he unleashes a torrent of violence in a manner that's just plain berserk. It cannot be stressed enough: "Rambo" is a monumentally vicious film. Is it odd to see a hulking Stallone in his 60's run through the jungle like a runaway rhino? Nope. I like the idea of him not being the lean machine he once was and I find that time away from the character can bring an added dimension to the role.
     
    There's a lotta talk about how absurd it is for actors at this age returning to such physical roles but this is nothing new in cinema. John Wayne did it, so did Lee Marvin and James Coburn, why not Sly? After all, coming back to what became such a cartoon character at this age brings about a needed maturity. It seems that during this considerable downtime, Stallone has reassessed his work as John Rambo and his iconic screen history, and is comfortable raging again in this ruthless exclamation point on a surreal series of films. The film concludes Rambo's mournful journey well enough for me although it was way too short. Still, I'd be fine with it finally ending here. Then again, studio head Harvey Weinstein is quoted as liking the opening weekend numbers, so he might be pushing Stallone for another one. That'd be a mistake but a part of me would be curious. Stallone is far from my favorite actor but I do like the guy. He's funny, intelligent, self-deprecating and humble. I know....you're stunned.
     
     
     


  • Coens & McCarthy make compelling Country!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN (2007) ****
    rated R (for strong graphic violence and some language)
    2 hrs. 2 min.
    written by: Joel & Ethan Coen, from the novel by Cormac McCarthy
    produced by: Joel & Ethan Coen, Scott Rudin
    directed by: Joel & Ethan Coen
    This movie still haunts me. I saw it back on November 23rd at 11:05am and I'm still thinking about it. I knew it would be great going in but as I left the theatre that early afternoon, I had no idea how to approach a review. Sometimes a movie is so good that you just want to tell people "Just go see it and see for yourself" because you feel that any words you have to promote the film wouldn't do it justice. I feel that way with this film and I also feel I don't want to give too much away. By now, many have seen this film and it has deservedly made it's way to several year-end top ten lists. It's complete with all the qualities a classic Coen brothers has: a great script with intelligent and witty dialogue, amazing cinematography, a perfect cast and layered themes. It's a movie I want to see again, maybe in the theatre but certainly on DVD where I can treat it like some great archaeological find and discover uncovered nuances.
    The movie feels and at times looks like a western, but it is not. It has the qualities and characters of one but it is set in the late 1970's, possibly early 80's, primarily in West Texas. The vast open desert prairie of the Lone Star state is a character all on it's own here. As the film opens, we're introduced to the voice (who I feel is) the main character, Sheriff Ed Tom Bell (the great Tommy Lee Jones, in his second amazing performance of 2007) with his tired, reflective voice serving as narrator. He's telling us a story about an arrest he made a while back, an arrest to this day he doesn't fully understand. There's an emptiness in his voice as we're shown the desolate Texas landscape with it's farmland and windmills. There's also confusion which sets the tone for what violent actions we will see and the results of those violent acts Bell will comes across.
    The tone of the film then takes an ominous turn as we're introduced to a character everyone is declaring the most evil and violent presence cinema has ever seen. While I dunno if I can agree with that, I have to say that Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem) is certainly one of the most unnerving and original characters I have ever seen. Right away, he's revealed to be a killer, a calm unstoppable force that is motivated and sustained by his own deranged code. He often decides the fate of those he encounters by the flip of a coin, which make for some of the most memorably unsettling scenes ever filmed. There's such uneasiness surrounding the atmosphere that Chigurh occupies wherever he goes that so captivating you can't take your eyes off him but you wish you could.
    Javier Bardem in Miramax Films' No Country For Old Men
    The plot of the film slowly and carefully revolves around an attache case of money. While out in the Texas desert hunting deer, Llewellyn Moss (Josh Brolin, another guy having a great year) happens upon the remnants of a drug deal gone bad. He finds $2 million in cash that was intended to be the buy money and makes a rash decision to take it home, leaving the lone survivor of the bloodbath to die on his own. Feeling guilty, he returns to the scene in the middle of the night, only to be spotted by bad guys who want their money back. Barely escaping alive, Llewellyn sends his wife Carla Jean (Kelly MacDonald) off to her mother's and goes on the run with the money. Moss is a stubborn Vietnam vet who sees this as an opportunity to totally change their lives and figures he can evade his pursuers until they grow tired and quit.
    What he doesn't know is that his pursuer is a one-stop death machine who doesn't know the words tired or quit. Chigurh is hired to track Moss and get the money, what he does to anyone he encounters along the way is totally up to him. Thus his killing spree begins before he even gets to the mess in the desert, so Llewellyn is just going to be another notch in his belt. The simple act of filling up his stolen car with gas is like an existential exercise in flexing his muscles. There is nothing Chigurh (pronounced Shu-gur) does that doesn't end with blood, whether it's his own or someone else.
    Josh Brolin in Miramax Films' No Country For Old Men
    Soon enough, the film turns into a entangled chase picture. Chigurh is on the trail of Moss, the money men and drug dealers team up to chase them both, and Jones is scratching his head trying to keep up with all three. There's even a bounty hunter Carson Wells (Woody Harrelson), familiar with Chigurh, who tries to persuade Moss to give it up. Along their journey both Moss and Chigurh encounter some of the standard, quirky characters that have becomes a Coen brothers staple. When these all characters do catch up with one another at different times in the picture, the results are unexpected and harrowing. Each twist of the plot strides in on a very comfortable (and uncomfortable) gait. The best thing the Coens is not rush it when it doesn't need to be rushed, and they never inject a scene with an inflated sense of peril. The danger is always evident, there is nothing forced cuz there is time enough to get where they are all going.
    The irony in all this thing about the pacing of this story is that ultimately, despite the lack of panic, time is running out. It's both a eulogy for a particular way of life and a lament for dying values. Chigurh represents the senseless, unstoppable and increasing violence that is in the world today, he's a force of nature remiss of any moral code. He comes seemingly out of nowhere with no backstory (none is really needed) and it his pace it would appear he represents the future. He twice lets his victims gamble on their life with his flippant coin toss that determines their fate by. The other two characters may also be two sides of the same coin. Sheriff Bell is heads, a thinker who follows a code and predetermined ideas, whereas Moss is tails, running on instinct, making choices that his counterpart would never make.
    With all the dead bodies that are left in the wake of these men, the most devastating part of this film has really nothing to do with blood, guns, or carnage. Hell, most of the more surprising bends in that road (and there are several near the end) eschew those elements altogether. What lingers most is the passage of time, in our awareness of it, and in the inevitability of the countdown. That's what's so riveting. You know it's only a matter of time and it's time you're trying to hold onto but you know it's running out. You can't stop it by pure stubborn action, not even by the inclination of chance. Maybe it's better to be like Moss and try to remain ignorant of what lies ahead, because when it comes down to it, there is no comfort in acceptance. It's an excellent achievement for all of this to be conveyed in a motion picture and the Coen brothers deliver it excellently.
    Tommy Lee  Jones in Miramax Films' No Country For Old Men
    Back to the heart of the film though, some may feel Jones is once again channeling the same role he's known for, but it's been a long time since he's been this good. Now, I feel his performance in Paul Haggis' "In the Valley of Elah" was just as good, maybe better, but he does something great here. He takes this somewhat minor role of Sheriff Bell, one that could have been just another display of his good humored cynicism and corn-fed homilies and makes it the heart of the film. It's as if he rightly sensed that Bell would be the true emotional center of McCarthy's story, the spiritual symbol of its deeper themes.
    I've heard from friends who have liked this film immensely for some of the same reasons I do and also from some who have left appreciating it but ultimately somewhat disappointed. I think those who are disappointed miss out on the themes here, which are essentially in the title and deal with Jone's character. He cannot understand the violence all around him much less how to enforce law in such a world. He feels like an old man in a foreign world, hence the title. The fact that he doesn't come out on top as the typical successful hero makes his character all the more attractive.
    As a result, Jones sheds the skin of easy comfort that he's worn through most of his recent films and let's his soul back out. Just as the Coen brothers appear to be going back to the feel of their earlier work (Blood Simple, Fargo) while blazing new trails for themselves, dropping their old tricks for serious storytelling, so Jones seems to have wearied of his image and has decided to put that weariness on film. This weary tone can also be felt through two Coen veterans: cinematographer Roger Deakins and composer Carter Burwell, both provide a rich yet calculated minimalism to the film. If this movie would've come out last March I still think it would be weighing heavy on my mind. It still would've been included on many best of 2007 lists and for a film to have such an impact is a rare treasure.
    No Country for Old Men (2007) poster 1
    No Country for Old Men (2007) poster 2
    No Country for Old Men (2007) poster 3

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<November 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345


Categories
 


Advertisement