discernment Bloghttp://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/default.aspxen-USSpout RSSRussian Roulettehttp://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/archive/2007/10/25/21163.aspxThu, 25 Oct 2007 05:07:48 GMTcdd0f780-13db-4d93-b0f4-ada579d02ae7:21163discernment0http://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/comments/21163.aspxhttp://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/commentrss.aspx?PostID=21163I just finished watching this film for the first time, a truly heart wrenching story that tares apart a loveable group of characters. I have never felt so horrible after watching a movie as this one. I will admit that I hardly cried, but I still felt like shit. The characters that Michael Cimino created are so completely flesh and blood that it&#39;s hard to get past the fact that this movie was in the hands of a screen writer the entire time.<br /><br />That said, through the scenes of Russian roulette I had to remind myself that it was just a movie, and the entire fate of all the characters was in the hands of a screenwriter. The fact that the characters were in the hands of a screenwriter didn&#39;t really matter on one of the final scenes. I could only think that this screenwriter has his motives, and the characters are going to meet an inevitable fate.<br /><br />All of the performances were solid, and whenever I asked myself if a scene was working... the answer was always a pure yes. I think that I loved almost every aspect of this film.<br /><br />The only thing I would critique and say I would change would be the real life footage. It was kind of interesting that Cimino re-created these scenes from real footage, but the idea of dubbing in the real footage over the re-shot footage kind of dis orients the main focus or direction of the film, and I personally feel as though the audience may get into the wrong perspective with the true footage.<br /><br />Other than that small fact, I believed this movie to be almost flawless. Periods of slowness, and a non-directional material from the beginning are very minor on the scale of this great movie. I really love it.<br />Fighting Personalitieshttp://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/archive/2007/10/22/21037.aspxMon, 22 Oct 2007 06:01:06 GMTcdd0f780-13db-4d93-b0f4-ada579d02ae7:21037discernment1http://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/comments/21037.aspxhttp://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/commentrss.aspx?PostID=21037<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">I guess I should put the blame of the let down on other movies like Secret Window and Hide and Seek.<br /><br />I am a huge David Fincher fan. I love Seven, Zodiac, Panic Room, and aside from the bad CGI even Alien 3. I had neglected Fight Club for a very long time, and decided that I needed to watch it. Everything in this film came to me with a blissful David Fincher punch in the face. After the first hour I was in love with the characters, and was ready to watch another two hours of plot unfold. <br /><br />Unfortunately I was extremely disappointed by the plot turn at the end. (for those who have not seen this movie&hellip; discontinue reading&hellip; the following is a spoiler)<img style="width: 338px; height: 254px" src="http://sideways8.files.wordpress.com/2006/05/fight_club.jpg" alt="" width="338" height="254" align="right" /><br /><br />Multi-personality character attributes seem to be over used so much. I guess I really should be getting angry at other movies that used this element, but the twist didn&rsquo;t really get to me. The only part of Edward Norton being a multi personality that bothered me was the fact that Brad Pitt would no longer be his own individual character. The depth of Tyler was so intriguing that it was a let down to know he was just a divide of another character.<br /><br />All personally thoughts of the plot aside&hellip; this film was incredibly well done, the plot really was solid, and the actors were incredible. I felt almost completely satisfied at when the credits started rolling, and I regained any faith I had lost in David Fincher. <br /><br /></font></p><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">(I guess that all I have to say is&hellip; Alfred Hitchcock pulled multi-personalities off the best in the 60&rsquo;s)&hellip; you&rsquo;re right&hellip; I suck at critiquing.</font></p>My new favorite movie... (for now)http://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/archive/2007/10/22/21035.aspxMon, 22 Oct 2007 05:26:02 GMTcdd0f780-13db-4d93-b0f4-ada579d02ae7:21035discernment0http://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/comments/21035.aspxhttp://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/commentrss.aspx?PostID=21035<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Last year at film camp the director brought this film up, and I was very disinterested in the entire idea of it. Things have definitely changed since then, and tonight I got to share the company of myself and Gael Garcia Bernal. I was completely pleased by every aspect of this film. The conflicts these characters are going through are very profound, and had my mind pondering every aspect. I felt all the acting to be solid and every character to have his/her purpose in each scene. I would just like to point out what I thought was probably my personal favorite part of this movie&hellip; <img style="width: 300px; height: 236px" src="http://www.vam.ac.uk/vastatic/microsites/photography/images/photograph/medium/im00133.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="236" align="left" />The still shot documentary style photographs. They were very powerful, and I felt them to be one of the most important pieces.</font></p>gaghttp://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/archive/2007/10/21/21032.aspxSun, 21 Oct 2007 23:17:49 GMTcdd0f780-13db-4d93-b0f4-ada579d02ae7:21032discernment0http://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/comments/21032.aspxhttp://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/commentrss.aspx?PostID=21032<p>definately one of the worst sequels of all time. any rules that were established in the previous movie were neglected in the writing and shooting of this horrible production. don&#39;t waste your life on this or any of the further installments to bob shayes nightmare on elm street series.&nbsp; </p>Beautifulhttp://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/archive/2007/10/21/21021.aspxSun, 21 Oct 2007 04:45:56 GMTcdd0f780-13db-4d93-b0f4-ada579d02ae7:21021discernment0http://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/comments/21021.aspxhttp://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/commentrss.aspx?PostID=21021This is one of the most beautiful films I have ever seen. No matter the deep meaning or not, it is just apparent that beauty in the shots hold a special significance. The emotions between Ryder and Depp are incredible, and the emotion reminds me of every time I felt distraught about the world that I live in.Green Horn perspectivehttp://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/archive/2007/10/21/21019.aspxSun, 21 Oct 2007 04:39:17 GMTcdd0f780-13db-4d93-b0f4-ada579d02ae7:21019discernment0http://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/comments/21019.aspxhttp://www.spout.com/blogs/discernment/commentrss.aspx?PostID=21019As a fan of Kubrick&#39;s work, I was sucked into this film. Shots that have the deep and beautiful significance a famous work of art that one would hang on a wall, and pure framing genius that makes one grin at the sight. The beauty in this film is a truth that shines through about every person on this planet. Although someone may have sadistic, violent, or disgustingly lustful thoughts, there is a way to be sane on the inside. The narrator in this film poises as a normal person, and although being a violent driven sex addict isn&#39;t socially acceptable, this character is free in his own mind to live among a world that would sooner damn him than to see his point of view. The simplicity of sanity is complicated by the discernment of a prospector, and hardly ever by the owner of the thoughts.