Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement

dibot Blog

Tideland Superfly

Under discussion:

Superfly  (1972)

Tideland  (2005)
This will probably be a rant.

The DVD of Tideland starts with an introduction by director Terry Gilliam ("The Brothers Grimm") where he tells us that many of us will not like the film and many of us will not understand it. And then he says that some will love it. Also, it seems that Gilliam has a small girl inside him. I don't know that that's really a surprise. But, by starting out with the negative, I got the feeling that he was saying that this was a mess of a film and his intro was just a ploy to stem criticism by implying that the audience who did not enjoy the film just wasn't smart enough to understand his vision. Well, f you, Mr. Gilliam. I don't want my films to come with an explanation or an apology. And I don't like my intelligence to be insulted before I even get a chance to delve into the movie.

So the whole 122 minutes, I had the taint of this intro in my mind and I got angrier and angrier as this mess of a movie played out. The story, and I use the term loosely, follows a young girl with horrible parents who die and then she has to fend for herself. So she creates an imaginary world. This fantasy Gilliam develops for her is in no way original. It's a blatant rip-off of Alice in Wonderland with hints of every other famous kid's story, The Secret Garden,  Beatrix Potter,  The Wizard of Oz, to name a few. All the adults are horrible, over-acting and extremely messed up. The young girl, Jodelle Ferland ("Good Luck Chuck"), is forced to do a Southern accent as well as several other voices which she is just not capable of pulling off.

On a side not, I'm sick of Southern characters being trashy and unbalanced.

Then the little girl, and I'm not sure how old she's supposed to be, 10 at the oldest, starts seducing a retarded man. It's f-ed up and for no reason. There's no point. Nothing happens for what seems like hours at a time. And when an action does occur, it is ridiculously implausible.

I hated this movie so much that Gilliam, who I usually have some affection for, is now on the bus. And it will take a whole lot of convincing from people I trust to even get me to approach one of his films in the future.

I do give this film one point for some excellent visuals. But they are not worth putting yourself through the torture of the story line.

Superfly is my second blaxploitation film. I liked it better than Sweet Sweetback, but it's still not my cup of tea. The main character is a cocaine dealer planning one big sale before he gets out of the business. The story is okay. The acting average. But the soundtrack is magnificent. Curtis Mayfield is amazing.

posted on Wednesday, October 03, 2007 1:07 PM by dibot


Was this review helpful?
Yeah Yeah Nope Nope



Comment    Email me new comments.


scswngr
Posted Monday, November 26, 2007 1:57 AM

Thank you.... I felt the exact same way. I felt like Gilliam was only confusing us with his little rant at the beginning of the movie, a much better example of this idea was pulled off in Pan's Labyrinth and Gilliam has become utterly dissappoing after failing to make Man from La Mancha.
Proteus
Posted Friday, October 12, 2007 8:50 PM

Among the most visceral movie-watching experiences of my life, I was transfixed and shocked by this astonishing movie. It's a pretty simple trick to create anxiety in the audience by placing a child at great risk but not permit the child to see, understand, or react to the threat. This film uses this device to an extreme I'd never seen before. All of the performances are astonishingly great, this visual effects and setting were neither realistic nor dreamlike, nor obviously fake. This is an uncomfortable film. I was curled in the fetal position through much of it. It was as brilliant and affecting as anything I've ever seen, and it treats its protagonist with respect - rather than taking the audience along on a ride a la Wizard of Oz and Alice in Wonderland, this film firmly plants the audience in the real world, while fully exploring the active imagination of its heroine. I would love for this film to be recognized as a landmark. It is not likely to find support from more than a minority of its audience, not due to its intelligence or sophistication, but due solely to its completely different purpose than almost all other films. It is not at all escapism, and not at all informative. It is solely an emotional voyage through uncomfortable circumstances, and the thoughts it provokes are not redeeming, but are gripping and unusual. This is the best film of 2006. It does more with its characters, plot, setting and audience than anything else released that year. But it is grim, and it is almost completely unsparing, and Gilliam is right that it will not find a large appreciative audience. Unlike most of the shock stories I've seen (The Shape of Things, Requiem for a Dream, etc) this film left me feeling as though Gilliam respected the audience he had left at the end, and respected his characters and story. It is impressive. It is uncomfortable. And Tideland is, most of all, astonishing.

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<October 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
30123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910


Categories
 


Advertisement