Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Demndiary Blog

  • Film on Film to Life

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Mitsuo Yanagimachi’s Who’s Camus Anyway? begins in chaos. It is 5 days to filming and the male lead has dropped out. Naoki Matsukawa (Shuji Kashiwabara), the director is being stalked by Yukari (Hinano Yoshikawa) a student who transferred schools just to be with him. The assistant director Hisada (Ai Maeda) is seeing her boyfriend off to a mountaineering trip. Oyama (Tomorowo Taguchi) is still getting permits and working on the budget. It doesn’t look good. All the while, Professor Nakajo (Hirotaro Honda) is getting ready to mark the second anniversary of his wife’s death and has a crush on a coed (Meisa Kuroki).  Both Director Yanagimachi and Cinematographer Junichi

    Fujisawa must be applauded for a film with so many terrific camera views. The first scene of the film is a one shot take involving many actors and even involves a conversation about some of cinema’s best one shot takes. The film is filled with great wide angle shots and building shots inside.  

    Yanagimachi also has made realistic and believable characters. Ikeda (Hideo Nakaizumi) has conflicting thoughts on relationships. Hisada is being chased by many suitors and is still trying to resolve why the main character in The Bored Murderer is killing. Yukari is both a scary stalker and a sympathetic woman who is willing to sacrifice anything for the guy she loves.  The film is overstuffed with film references. Everyone in the film relates different parts to memorable and not so memorable films. It is done in a cleaner way than Dario Argento’s Do You Like Hitchcock? It is also not used as filler material like Tarantino’s Death Proof. Since all the characters are in film school it is believable. The film chapters are also named after the different parts of film. This is not obvious. It is discovered when the SCENE ACCESS is used.  

    The one area where the film slows is the actual filming of The Bored Murderer. After all the drama leading to the film it is anti-climatic to see the filming. It adds little to the story, and takes away from the story until then. 

    In conclusion, Who’s Camus Anyway? is a great, realistic film about film and life. Anyone who studies film will find it a fun experience. It does lag in the finale, but it does not bring down all that came before it.


  • Dysfunctional Function

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Marion Bridge  (2003)

    Wiebke Von Carolsfeld's Marion Bridge is a family drama filled with strong characters. The film itself is quiet in scope, and photography but rests upon a solid screenplay.

    Molly Parker's Agnes is the rebel who earned a reputation with her sisters. She was the heavy drinker, and partier. The Agnes who comes home is different and almost trapped by the perceptions of her sisters. Theresa (Rebecca Jenkins) is the eldest and is used to holding her world, and everyone else's together whether they need it or not. Stacey Smith's Louise is the middle sister who has many dreams but has always remained as the stable one between her sisters.

    As with all character dramas it is the conflict of the characters that is the story. It is best seen with Molly Parker and Rebecca Jenkins. They emote their bond as well as their anger in a sparsity of words. It is also strongly seen in the scenes of Molly Parker's Agnes and Ellen Page's Joanie. Both actresses let their characters speakk volumes without saying a word.

    The film as a whole never overwhelmed nor faded. There were wonderful tidbits in the screenplay dialogue that came through beautifully in the film. Sadly many parts, including the beginning dragged. The film seemed determined to bring arguements with the characters so any change would seem miraculous. A subtler touch would have sufficed. It is not another On Golden Pond for acting. It is also not an Evening for melodrama. It is a simple drama with actors who have developed into more since its filming.


  • Right on Taget

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Stalag 17  (1953)

    Blood Diamond  (2006)

    Richard Shepard's The Hunting Party is that wonderfully strange creature known as a political comedy, or more appropriately, a war comedy. It is incredibly funny, but also delves into the horrors of war. It does this without being preachy. It is a rare gift these days.

    Richard Gere's Simon is wild, spontaneous, and just a little not there. It is not Gere's best part, ,but one of his best. Terrance Howard's Ducky owns the movie. It is his narrative that puts everything in perspective while showing just how absurd it really is. It should be an Oscar part for Howard. Jessie Eisenburg's Benjamin, the green cameraman, is over the top stereotypical until one scene that makes the ending of the film.

    War films are tough. It is a fine line between Letters from Iwo Jima, and MASH. They can be too preachy like Saving Private Ryan and Blood Diamond. The Hunting Party finds it line in a space that The Last King of Scotland, and Stalag 17 drew out. It is the right mix of comedy, absurdy and characters that keep the audience balanced against bloodshed and horror. It is a fun film and worthy of seeing again and again.


  • A Beautiful Little Nightmare

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Wicker Man  (1974)

    May  (2003)

    Madeinusa  (2006)

    Claudia Llosa's Madeinusa is a dark and disturbing film. At first it seems like a coming of age film, but quickly reveals itself to be a dark horror film similar to The Wicker Man.

    The film opens around Madeinusa (Magaly Solier) and her younger sister Chale (Yiliana Chong). Their relationship is not a sibling rivalry. Chale truly hates Madeinusa, and barely hides it in her actions which become progressively worse throughout the film. Add to this equation is the incestuous father Cayo (Ubaldo Huaman), and the viewer is asked to wonder how this family and town have survived this long. It is only the addition of Salvador (Carlos De La Torre) that makes the violitile situation explosive.

    Next, the elements of isolation and a weird festival make Madeinusa feel otherworldly. The town is nestled in the Andes, and 3 days walk from anyplace. The location is beautiful with mountain peaks and lakes. The camera swallows these scenes without overwhelming. It can draw comparisons to House of Sand. The festival is disturbing by itself. Adultery, theft, and other debaucheries are common as a clock is paged through by one man. The festival begins once the crucified Jesus is removed from the cross and blindfolded. It is unsettling to say the least.

    Third, the performances and the direction are alive. Magaly Solier's Madeinusa is both naive of the world, and vaguely aware that everything is wrong at the same time. Her lack of social skills are reminiscent of Angela Bettis' May. Madeinusa's world is narrow and defined. Llosa's screenplay uses language to hide things. Many times it seems like the translation can't be right, only to be discovered in the next scene. Llosa brings the viewer to the nightmare and makes everyone guess if there is a resolution.

    Madeinusa is a beautiful little nightmare. It also hints that Llosa has parts of Stephen King and Clive Barker in her writing and future.

     


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<September 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2627282930311
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30123456


Categories
 


Advertisement