Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

civex Blog

  • Catch-22

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Catch-22  (1970)

    Directed by Mike Nichols, the screenplay by Buck Henry is totally brilliant. The novel by Joseph Heller is itself brilliantly written, with nuances and subtleties many readers miss. Henry caught the gist of the novel and got it on screen, using the device of returning again and again to an airplane with a scene we don't fully see, showing us a little more each time, then fading to white as we get the voice over of the next scene. We get the circularity of the novel and the scattered sanity of Yossarian as he struggles to keep his shredded reality less tattered if not totally intact.

    The cast is incredible. Nichols gives us an all-star cast without the drivel of such disasters as "A Bridge Too Far" and "The Longest Day." The cast includes Alan Arkin, Martin Balsam, Richard Benjamin, Buck Henry, Bob Newhart, Anthony Perkins, Paula Prentiss, Martin Sheen, John Voight, and Orson Welles, among many, many others.

    Henry had to make a movie out of the novel, so he made some hard choices, excising characters and situations that some find disappointing. My suggestion is to see the movie as the movie without comparing it to the book; on the other hand, I'm astounded at how well Henry captured the essence of Heller and his work. Jon Voight is chilling as Minderbinder, who is in my very humble opinion the lynchpin of the movie. When Minderbinder tells Yossarian, "Then they'll understand," the full impact of World War II (and who's the real enemy) shatters Yossarian's weakening sanity.

    For me the end of the novel and the end of the movie are unsatisfying, but the ride is still worth it.

    Trivial notes concerning the people involved in the movie. Mike Nichols also directed "The Graduate," with Anne Bancroft and Dustin Hoffman. Charles Grodin (Arfy Aardvark) was supposed to play Benjamin, but couldn't agree on a salary with Nichols, so Bancroft suggest Dustin Hoffman to Nichols - she'd heard about Hoffman from her husband, Mel Brooks, who had just signed Hoffman for his movie "The Producers." Hoffman bailed on Brooks and did "The Graduate" instead. Norman Fell (Sgt. Towser) played Benjamin's landlord in a short scene (also involving Richard Dreyfus) in "The Graduate." Bob Balaban (Capt. Orr) was in "Midnight Cowboy" with Jon Voight (and Dustin Hoffman, of course). Buck Henry wrote a TV series for Richard Benjamin (Major Danby), who is married to Paula Prentiss (Nurse Duckett). Orson Welles (General Dreedle) did the voice-over narration for Mel Brooks's "History of the World." Mel Brooks and Buck Henry developed "Get Smart." Bob Newhart (Major Major Major) and Peter Bonerz (Capt. McWatt) were in The Bob Newhart Show together. And Susanne Benton (Dreedle's WAC) had a completely unrelated role in the totally unrelated "A Boy and his Dog."


  • Pandora's Box (also Die Buchse der Pandora)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Pandora's Box  (1929)

    The Germans had a thing for men degrading and debasing themselves without limits for women. For Louise Brooks, maybe it was worth it. This is a silent film worth seeing.

    The myth of Pandora* is heartbreaking, and this movie actually follows it rather closely. Louise Brooks plays Lulu, a rather naive prostitute beloved of Professor Schon. Dr. Schon is engaged to a proper lady, but he cannot escape the lure of Lulu. He marries Lulu, but he cannot control her, and she continues her erotic behavior with others. In a rage he attacks her, she struggles, she kills him. She is convicted for the crime, but escapes before she goes to prison. She has seduced Dr. Schon's son Alwa, who takes her away.

    For her escape, they go to other countries, and Alwa's money is soon exhausted. Thus begins the spiral into sordid tragedy. Lulu eventually supports Alwa and her pimp by prostituting herself again. Eventually, Alwa sinks so low he comes to himself and leaves her as she takes a john to their room. (At least Alwa ends up better off than Professor Rath in "The Blue Angel.") Ironically, the lover is Jack the Ripper, who murders Lulu - a circumstance of which Alwa remains oblivious as he walks away down the street. He has given up everything he had for the love of her. She has lost her life, another prostitute victim of a serial killer. Perhaps there is hope for Alwa. Or maybe not. Who knows what's left in Pandora's Box as the curtain is drawn on his wretched life?

    The direction is fabulous. G.W. Pabst was at the height of his talent in 1930, and this movie shows it. All the actors were topnotch: Fritz Kortner as Professor Schon, Francis Lederer as Alwa, and Carl Goetz as the scummy Schigolch (the pimp who pretends to be her father). Louise Brooks is one of the most beautiful women of the 20th Century, and her acting here is flawless, natural. Her power over Schon and his son flows from her face and her body. This film may be the first to show a lesbian relationship between two women (Lulu and Countess Anna), and the version I saw was missing the scenes that show the end of their relationship, leaving a puzzling gap in the story line.

    It's interesting to contrast this movie with "The Blue Angel," with Marlena Dietrich as Lola. Dietrich steals the show, of course, with her iconic characterization of the woman of easy virtue, but Lola is never a person we sympathize with. Lulu, on the other hand, has our feelings from the beginning. Lulu is much more complex than Lola, and Brooks inhabits her completely. (Dietrich inhabits Lola, too, of course -- but Lola has no heart.)

    *Prometheus brought mortal men fire, making them more nearly like gods. To punish Prometheus, the gods created Pandora,the first woman. Each god gave her a virtue which she was made to carry to Prometheus in a box. (I understand that Pandora means "all gifts.") Prometheus (which means foresight), wary of women bearing gifts from the gods, sent her away, and he changed all those virtues into evils. Prometheus's brother Epimetheus (hindsight) fell in love with her; Prometheus forbade Pandora and him ever to open the box, but curiosity overcame her. And when she opened the box, all evils were loosed upon the world, leaving her (and mankind) with only hope in the box. (There are other similar stories about a woman loosing evil upon the world because she failed to follow her instructions.) 


  • Divine Intervention (also Yadon ilaheyya)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This 2002 film is almost a documentary. Elia Suleiman directed and plays a major role in what many call a comedy about life in Nazareth at the time the film was made. It may be of greater interest now than when released because of current events.

    I watched the director's commentary after watching the movie on DVD. It seems that the first half of the movie is about life in occupied Nazareth from the view of the Arabs who live there. Nazareth is a large city in northern Israel which Wikipedia says is the Arab capital; Arab residents are by far the largest segment of the population.

    This half of the movie shows the boiling anger against the occupation being taken out on each other - friendly waves as you pass, muttered curses under your breath. The movie gets off to a slow start, but I soon began to chuckle, then laugh aloud at the goings on. I'm sure if you live there, you know much more about what's going on in the movie than I do as an American living in another world.

    At some point in the movie, the unnamed character played by Suleiman begins meeting a woman in a parking lot near an Israeli checkpoint. The scenes are remarkable for both their romanticism and their stoic heartbreak as they caress each other's hands and watch the Israeli soldiers abuse the Arabs passing through the check point.

    Viewers should be aware that there are several scenes which are fantasy: Suleiman's character throws a persimmon pit out the window onto an Israeli army tank and blows the tank to smithereens; a woman walks by the Israeli checkpoint, and the elevated guard tower collapses. The woman becomes a ninja fighter and kills trained plainclothes soldiers or police (I don't know which) by throwing rocks, darts, and other objects at them as they shoot at her repeatedly, reload, and shoot again. At one point, she elevates and looks down on them from the air in the position of a crucified person with a crown of bullets circling her head. The symbolism is pretty heavy at times.

    "Divine Intervention" is both funny and poignant. It is entirely from the viewpoint of the Arabs, but it skewers both sides without being propagandistic and heavy handed.


  • The Conversation

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Conversation  (1974)

    This may be the best Seventies paranoia film, chock full of astounding actors: Gene Hackman, John Cazale, Frederic Forest, Cindy Williams, Teri Gar, Harrison Ford, Robert Duvall, and others. This was written and directed in 1974 by Francis Ford Coppola, and Coppola and his actors were at the height of their talents.

    Hackman plays Harry Caul, a surveillance expert who has caused the death of at least one innocent person and may be on the threshold of the deaths of other innocents. Or maybe not. He's so paranoid, who can tell? Forest and Williams play a young couple who walk around Union Square in San Francisco and have puzzling conversations that only Caul can arrange to surveil. Are they going to be murdered? Or are they just lovers on a lunch break?

    Hackman gives Caul a soul-wrenching angst that lifts "The Conversation" out of the run of the mill genre like "Three Days of the Condor" and "Night Moves," another Gene Hackman movie. John Cazale, Teri Garr, and Harrison Ford make major contributions to the film, as well. 

    The technology, of course, is horribly dated, but this is a character- and paranoia-driven movie, so I'm happy to overlook the equipment.

     

     

     

     

    SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER 

     

     

     

     

     

    The key to the film is what the couple means when they make a particular statement, which Caul has recorded. Caul listens to it over and over trying to parse it out, but the problem with the film is that Coppola had the statement re-recorded by the actors with different emphases to create the confusion Coppola needs for Caul to feel, instead of having an ambiguous reading of the line to begin with. The meaning changes drastically from our first hearing of the statement to the last because the way the line is said changes drastically. It totally turns the movie around.


  • Lost in Translation

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sofia Coppola wrote and directed this quietly excellent movie starring Bill Murray, Scarlett Johansson, and some other people who don't matter. The gist of the movie is that Bob Harris (Murray) and Charlotte (Johannsson) are alone in Tokyo with some time on their hands. They begin a caring, affectionate, sex-free relationship that can't go anywhere, and then it ends.

    Coppola contrasts the weird, alien world of Japan with relatively ordinary Americans stuck there for various reasons. Charlotte's husband is there on a job; she tagged along because they're recently married but she can't be with him while he works. Bob is a has-been American actor who's still popular in Japan, so he's paying the bills doing commercials for a whisky. Coppola does an entertaining job using Bob to show the discrepancies between the mores and life of Japanese and those of Americans. Bob meets Charlotte, and each has the opportunity to share their mutual alienation with someone alike. Coppola's script is very good, and Bob and Charlotte's relationship grows naturally, although we know it's doomed because of their age difference. (Actually, it was nice for a change not to have a gorgeous twenty-something falling in love with a fifty-something guy, which seems to be the fantasy of all the men in Hollywood.) 

    Johansson and Murray are wonderful in the film. The characters' relationship becomes relaxed as the two get to know each other and grow more comfortable with their affection, and the two actors wear the roles well. We follow them around as they explore Tokyo, have fun, sing, eat, and such - just a couple of tourists. The scenes of Tokyo, whether on the street or through their hotel windows add meaningfully to their lostness.

    Nothing much happens during the movie. We see the characters meet, grow together, then part as their worlds take them in other directions. It's a life we've all lived and know. A very good adult film that lets us look in on the lives of other competent adults who handle things appropriately for their ages -- things including loss.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<January 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement