Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

civex Blog

  • Male and Female

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Male and Female  (1919)

    Sunset Boulevard  (1950)

     

    This is one of several silent movies that are still interesting to watch. "Male and Female" is an early effort by Cecil B. DeMille, and it stars Gloria Swanson, who was about 20 when it was made. Her co-star is Thomas Meighan, who was 20 years her senior and the bigger star in 1919 when "Male and Female" was made. But adorable Lila Lee steals the show as the scullery maid, Tweeny.

    Silent movies were very different from talkies. The beginning of the movie introduces the viewers to the cast of characters and tells who plays each role. The introduction is unnecessary by today's standards, and it's very leisurely, reminding us that audiences in 1919 were very unsophisticated (and not just in movies). The title role is Crichton, the family butler to the family of Lord Loam. DeMille has Meighan introduce his character very elegantly, making Crichton admirable from our first view of him (the movie is based on a play called "The Admirable Crichton"). All characterization is done in mime, of course, so the camera lingers on Meighan's face as Crichton's emotions ficker across. Meighan was quite a good actor, effortless and devoid of the mugging we often associate with silent films (most of our experience is with clips from the Keystone Kops, it seems to me). Lila Lee is equally good here, playing a maid who is in love with Crichton, but who can see his secret crush on Lady Mary Lasenby (played by Swanson), a love which must never speak its name because it crashes against the boundary of class.

    The family sails to the South Pacific with Crichton and Tweeny in tow, and they apparently run aground on Santa Catalina (the island of romance, romance, romance, romance) which substitutes for a tropical paradise. It is here that roles reverse completely, as Crichton somehow knows all the skills not only to survive, but to live in royal comfort: after two years on the island, they have a forge (and appear to have made their pots and pans so well they can be used as mirrors), a potter's wheel, a lovely home, more food than they can eat, and Crichton is treated as the king, with Tweeny and Lady Mary having a cat fight to see who gets to serve his dinner to him.

    The lack of sophistication in early movies is either charming or damning depending on your point of view. They use bows which are barely able to launch the arrows out of the frame of the film; parts of the island are clearly a set with palm trees and brush, but outside views really do look like they were shot on Santa Catalina, a mountainous island without trees; there's no indication of how these people were able to get iron, but we have a large smelting operation with bellows and kiln made of apparently fireproof bricks. We let those objections pass.

    Since this is a C.B. DeMille movie, we have a fantasy scene from Babylon which is more interesting than the movie, foreshadowing DeMille's rise as the master of spectacle with a cast of thousands and sets to match. In the fantasy, Crichton plays a Babylonian king, Tweeny his would-be queen, and Lady Mary the Christian slave captured but refusing to kneel. Crichton tells her to accept his advances willingly or go to the lions; Lady Mary of course chooses death before debauchery. These scenes show DeMille already advanced in setting up tableaus and scenery which are beautifully composed and shot.*

    Our hero and his charges are rescued and returned to England where the roles are unreversed, and Crichton returns to being a servant, unable to marry Lady Mary, who has learned to love him. Instead, Crichton accepts Tweeny as his wife, they emigrate to America, and live happily ever after as farmers. At the end, we see Lady Mary accepting the offer of marriage from a suitor who acknowledges that her love will always be with the absent Crichton, and the last shot of her fades with Swanson showing an empty sadness. We then dissolve into Crichton and Tweeny on their farm, and the movie ends with their embrace, both obviously in love. I'm sorry to have missed what I think would have been some excellent character development in seeing how Tweeny made Crichton's love bloom, apparently making him forget Lady Mary. To Lee's credit, I think she could have pulled it off. And I miss Lady Mary's remorse in choosing not to marry Crichton for love, choosing instead to maintain her peerage and her money. 

    This is an interesting movie in spite of its shortcomings. We see Gloria Swanson at the start of her career; many of us remember her better for her role in "Sunset Boulevard" (released in 1950**) where she played the aging actress with the constant refrain, "I'm ready for my close up, Mr. DeMille." Thomas Meighan was at his peak, a manly man with a soft streak for beautiful women. And Lila Lee had not yet suffered her several failures of luck, work, and health. We also see that DeMille was not at his best with naturalistic scripts and that his segue into epic movies was a good career move.

    *Silent movies can be truly beautiful, as the directors, lighting directors, and cinematographers worked together to create shots as compelling as any professional still photographers then or since can make. The silent camera can linger on an empty shot, then have a character enter and pose, beautifully lighted in luscious black and white while we admire the tableau. For some reason, none of this works in color. Black and white film made better photographers of its directors. DeMille showed his genius for sets and spectacle in the Babylon fantasy, while letting the main story fall to mere competence.

    **"Sunset Boulevard," of course, is a remarkable movie in its own right. The cast included not only Gloria Swanson but Cecil B. DeMille himself, Eric von Stroheim, Buster Keaton, Hedda Hopper, and other well-known actors.

     


  • Titus (Shakespeare's "Titus Andronicus"

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Titus  (1999)

     

    The best film of 1999, directed by Julie Taymore and starring Anthony Hopkins, Jessica Lange, Harry Lennix, and Alan Cumming.

    Taymore brings Titus into the modern day in some of her staging of the film, but the dialogue is all Shakespeare, and the cast is excellent. It's a pleasure to see Hopkins playing a real character with many facets instead of Hannibal Lecter.

    In classic tragedy, the hero fails, brought down by a flaw which would have been a good trait if the hero had not had so much of it. In Oedipus Rex, for example, Oedipus would have been fine but for his overweening curiousity. Here in Titus Andronicus (Shakespeare's title), our hero is honest. Too honest for his own good. He has returned from war, with Tamora (Jessica Lange) a Goth queen as his slave, and the emperor has died, leaving two good-for-nothing sons as his heirs apparent. When offered the crown, Titus rejects it out of hand: Of course not, the crown goes to the eldest son. Titus should have accepted the wreath. All his woes befall him for not knowing he would do better for Rome.

    Before you see the movie, I recommend getting a copy of the play in one of the several editions that explain the language as you read the script. Read it before you see it so that you have some understanding of the beautiful Elizabethan language. The Folger Shakespeare Library or Arden Shakespeare edition should be at your local library. When people ask why Shakespeare's plays are written as they are, I've heard it answered that it's because that's how people talked back then. I assure you, no one ever talked that way. Read an annotated script so that you understand the Elizabethan English these consummate actors spread before you.

    Hopkins, Lange, Lennix, and Cumming all get to chew the scenery, the screen, the frame, and even some of the seats. My shirtsleeves were in tatters when I left the building. It's a great piece of Shakespearean theater, and Taymore lets it all out. That said, this is a true tragedy, and there is no happy ending for Titus Andronicus and his entire family. Where in "Fracture" Hopkins plays the guy who pulls the rabbit out of the hat, here in "Titus" Hopkins's character has to gnaw his paw off in a vain attempt to get out of the snare set by Tamora. Never has integrity been so ill repaid. Taymore does a remarkable job of bringing the play to the screen. And it got nominated for Best Costume Design. Feh.

     


  • Constantine

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Film Name  Production Year

    Constantine  (2005)

     

    "Constantine" has the best Satan I've ever seen (in a movie). Peter Stormare (also in "Fargo") brings true savoir faire to the role of Lucifer. Keanu Reeves plays the hero, John Constantine, and my initial reaction was that he couldn't carry it off. I pictured Constantine as a hard-bitten dick like Sam Spade, and Reeves just doesn't have it. However, his attempt to be hard-bitten grew on me -- maybe Constantine is really a gentle, caring guy trying to play tough. I think it works.

    The plot is taken from a comic book that I've never read. I think it's called "John Constantine: Hellblazer," or maybe just "Hellblazer." I don't care. Most movies based on comic books suck pretty bad, and I had low expectations on this film. But "Constantine" very much exceeded my expectations solely because of Stormare and Tilda Swinton - more on her later.

    Okay, the plot. Angela Dodson (Rachel Weiss) is a Catholic woman whose sister appears to have committed suicide, a big no-no in the Catholic Church. This means the sister (Isabel, also played by Weiss) is refused a Catholic funeral and will burn in hell for all eternity. (The name Angela is obvious, of course, but it turns out that Isabel means "God's promise.") John Constantine has a reputation as a sort of supernatural private eye, so naturally Angela seeks him out and puts him on the case - did Isabel fall or was she pushed? So Constantine and Angela pursue the case in this world and the next, learning there's a plot to let Satan and his minions overrun earth. Can they foil it? Of course.

    Director Francis Lawrence keeps the film moving, lots of action and special effects (although I thought his depiction of hell was mundane), unburdened by boy-girl sparks between our hero and his client (it is a comic book, after all). Two pieces of casting makes the movie rise above its comic book status: Stormare and Swinton.

    Swinton plays Archangel Gabriel. I have no idea if the role was written with a man in mind, but if so, no concession was made for Swinton to play it. At one point she's seen in a mannish suit, and I don't recall references to Gabriel's gender (and I may well have forgotten -- what gender are angels, anyway?). She plays the role to the hilt. At one point, Constantine says with all sincerity, "Gabriel, you are insane." Best line in the movie, in part because it's totally true. Gabriel has definitely gone off the deep end, and Swinton plays Gabriel not as a thrashing lunatic but as utterly sincere.

    Stormare plays Lucifer with all the panache of a mafioso who's got a job condemning to hell everyone that he can, he's good at it, and he likes the job. Total confidence, total competence. There are a couple of special effects hinting at his satanic powers, but it's pretty much just Peter Stormare giving Satan character. I really liked his work.

     


  • Memento

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Memento  (2001)

     

    We are confused completely by what's going on. Eventually we figure out that we're seeing the movie scenes played in reverse order. If we're really paying attention, we figure out that the black and white scenes are playing out in chronological order and the color scenes are in reverse order and that they're going to collide at the climax.

    It's an interesting trick, and we even get to like Leonard (Guy Pearce) as we watch him struggle to find and kill the man who murdered his wife. The fun of the movie is figuring out what the heck is going on.

     

    SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS 

     

    Unfortunately, the movie is only a trick. Directed by Christopher Nolan, who wrote the screenplay, the film is based on a short story by his brother Jonathan Nolan. Although we may root for Leonard, we find out in the end that he's been used and manipulated not only by Teddy (Joe Pantoliano), but by Natalie (Carrie-Ann Moss). And actually, Natalie is the main character here; she's the one we could have had feelings for as she plotted and planned her revenge with stunning originality and great care. But we never get a feel for her loss, for her. If you read the IMDB's bulletin board on this movie, almost all the posts are about figuring out what happened, matching timelines, and figuring out what all the clues were. Few people seem to care about Leonard and Catherine (his dead wife), nor about Natalie. In context, the fact that the characters aren't as important as the plot device is not much of a loss, but it keeps Memento from being what I'd call a good film. It's good entertainment, but it doesn't give you anything to take with you for the rest of your life. Contrast this film with "Betrayal," where the reversal of the unity of Time works beautifully in a script by David Mamet, and you get a brief hour and a half of tragedy that you'll feel for days.

    (NOTE: The movie is Memento, not Momento. Memento is a reminder of past events -- Leonard's tattoos are the memento of the movie. If you remember that memento is akin to memory, the word is quite a good title. Jonathon Nolan's short story is Memento Mori, and it's online at 

    http://www.impulsenine.com/homepage/pages/shortstories/memento_mori.htm

    Memento Mori is translated from Latin as "reminder of death" or "remember your death." Either way, also a good title.)

     


  • American Beauty

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    American Beauty  (1999)

    Lester (Kevin Spacey) is bored with his life, his job, his wife, Carolyn (played by Annette Bening), and his home. In the midst of what appears to be a mid-life crisis, he is laid off his job and falls hard for a high school girl, his daughter's best friend. His imaginary affair with her renews and reinvigorates him, and Lester decides to make his life, if not exciting again, at least not stagnant. Lester's family and life are contrasted with two other families: the next door neighbors, a family headed by a retired military man (Chris Cooper) who is a closet psychopath and whose son is a drug dealer; and two gay men, who live the only normal family life we see, bringing welcome gifts to new arrivals in the neighborhood. Lester becomes the order taker at a fast food restaurant, and lives a second childhood with much comic relief. The movie is well-written and well-acted, with a lot of tension at the end as we wonder how Carolyn is going to resolve her own conflict concerning ending her marriage with Lester.

    This is a movie about plastic. The title is a reference to American Beauty Roses, which are the roses presented to the winner of the Miss America Pageant. Lester's fantasy girlfriend, Angela, represents the youthful dream of plastic, and his wife, Carolyn, represents the dream turned real plastic. Lester's life has become plastic, the real future from as far back as "The Graduate." Lester's daughter, Jane (played by Thora Birch), thinks herself unattractive (Angela is blonde, a model, and claims sexual experience) and wants plastic breast implants to improve others' view of her.

    While this is a very enjoyable movie, it's not great. Sam Mendes, the director, really pounds us over the head with the rose petal metaphor. The petals fall from the ceiling and Carolyn doesn't notice, Lester spits petals out of his mouth and they just sort of disappear -- these are huge clues that the petals are a metaphor, so then we have to figure out what for. 

    I'll say that the roses appear during scenes which are Lester's fantasy or in which he is shown having a fantasy. Angela in the bath, covered in floating petals is a scene which is Lester's fantasy. Lester in bed smiling rapturously with petals floating down from nowhere is a scene in which he is shown having a fantasy. So what are we to make of this? My suggestion is that Lester is having a midlife crisis and he's trying to have a second -- well, not childhood but there's no word for teenagehood, so let's make it up: a second teenagehood. The petals in the bath represent that first love and the first exploration of sexuality while Lester was in the bloom of youth -- as Angela is at the time of the movie. I would even go so far as to suggest that the petals represent Angela's labia and that when Lester finds a petal in his mouth, it represents his fantasy of the taste of Angela, as well as the taste of youthful love.

    The petals are a metaphor which we use to compare Lester's fantasy of his and Carolyn's lost youth and lost youthful love with how things are at the time of the film. Objects have become more important than fun -- Lester is not supposed to drink beer in his living room because it might stain the fabric. Appearances are more important than feelings -- watch their dinner scenes; listen to Jane talking about herself; listen to Angela and Jane talk. Thus, I see the petals as a metaphor for loss.

     

    SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS 

    DO NOT READ PAST THIS POINT IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN THE MOVIE

     

     

    Ultimately -- as he should, of course -- Lester realizes that actually realizing his fantasy of sex with Angela would be wrong. (I think of Woody Allen's line in "Annie Hall": Annie says, "Sex without love is an empty experience." Alvy replies, "Yes, but as empty experiences go, it is one of the best.") And then we come to the scene where his blood on the wall replaces the petals of the rose as a metaphor for loss.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<November 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2627282930311
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30123456


Categories
 


Advertisement