Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

circuitsnake Blog

  • A Great Trip Down the Road

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    While watching Wild Strawberries the other night I began to come to a realization. I was watching a road trip movie. But like most Bergman movies, there is so much more to it. I'll admit it, I'm not the biggest fan of Persona, I think it has some excellent moments (hottest sex scene in a film has no sex at all), but as an overall film I found it lacking. Wild Strawberries is fantastic.

    The film starts off slow, at first I found the opening narration filled with exposition, I understood the man was lonely, I get it. Let's move on. You do not really get how misunderstood this man is until we start his journey. How he is haunted by dreams and memories of the past, which I never really understood until he visited his 94-year-old mother. I truly enjoyed watching this character's immense amount of history. 

    That being said, it is a road-trip movie and I've always had something against road-trip movies. Perhaps it is because the concept is simple "a character or a number of characters get from one place to another and change." Now, one could argue that all films are like that, but that's another argument entirely. What I am saying is the true genius of this film that only a handful of road-trip movies get right (see Y Tu Mama Tambien) and millions get wrong (see Little Miss Sunshine) is how deep the character is. This film cannot be talked about without mention of the ingenious dream sequences, something that Bergman mastered. This film isn't just about a character changing, but about the audience coming to realize how they can change. Which is why this film is so important.


  • Eraserhead and Other FIlms: Films As Experiences.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Eraserhead  (1977)

    Children of Men  (2006)

    Ratatouille  (2007)

    Eraserhead is more than just a film. It's an experience. It's one of those films that it all depends on how and where you see it that decides your reaction to the film. Which is why I find Eraserhead to be one of the scariest films ever made. If you get a chance, see this film in a theatre late at night, or on a good T.V. with a good sound system. This film is way more than just sitting down and watching a film. It's a film that has to be seen in a good environment. 

    So, what other films are affected by where you see them? For one you have to see how the film is shot. The recent film Children of Men is pretty much universally adored by film fans is a film that doe not have the same affect when being watched on a T.V. The film is shot for theaters and the full affect of the climatic 10 minute uncut action sequence isn't half as effective when seen on a T.V. 

    So, for a simple blog entry tonight I say this. If you know you're going to go see a film the audience matters just as much as the film itself. I recently saw Ratatuoille with a french friend and I am sure  the experience would have been very different with another person. Films are just as important as theatre. The advantage theatre has over film is that the performers exist in-front of the audience.


  • Brad Bird is a Genius

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ratatouille  (2007)

    There, I said it. It's done. Brad Bird is one of my favorite directors working today.

    This film is an amazing achievement on so many different levels. First is the complete ingenious use of visual storytelling. This film is not dialogue heavy and is a throwback to so many slapstick comedy's. Which works in even more advantage because of the relationship between Remy and Linguini.

    There are so many classic parts to this film, I don't even know where to start. I feel bad coming back from the preview screening and not really having a well structured review. Throughout the film we are given surprises with some of the most ingenious characters to ever grace the scene. The character of "Ego", (voiced by Peter O'Toole) almost steals the film. And I won't say it here, but Bird pulls off a moment which will go down in film history as one of the funniest and most emotional part in a film. There are so many throwbacks to old films in paris as well as just great storytelling throughout the film. All I can say is that I hope I am this good when I get to my third film. 

    See this film. It's the best film of the summer. 


  • Miller's Crossing

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    After seeing the DVD for ten bucks, I remembered how much I liked Miller's Crossing and decided to pick it up and re-watch it. The movie is great, the beauty of the scenes at Miller's Crossing, the characters are just as entertaining to watch as to listen to and the famous execution sequence hold's up beautifully.

     So, why do I have problems with this film?  Don't get me wrong, I think the film is brilliant, I just have some issues with it. For one, I don't feel the score fits the mood of the film, I see what it's meant to do, but I found it awkward when introduced the scene. My second problem is Marcia Gay Harden, who is miscast. She never quite convinces me of the role she is playing and her character disappears around half-way through the film and the manipulation of the femme fatale character that is introduced in the beginning of the film is lost. 

    This being said, Gabriel Byrne holds the film together perfectly with his portrayal of Tommy. 


  • So Different, but Equally Beautiful

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    White  (1994)

    This week I've been watching the Three Colors Trilogy (tomorrow I'm watching Red) and I found myself pleasently surprised to how different 'white' is from 'Blue', while 'Blue' was about the world finding you when you are lost, white seems about the world discovering you when you are lost.

    White is underrated. It's different from Blue and from what I've heard, Red as well. The difference between Blue and White is the observation of the charactersr. Blue goes inside the characters head, while White is more of an observational piece. Rather than get inside the mind of the character, Kieslowki spends a lot of time just simply studying the main character of Karol and his perdicament. The performance is superb and it really shows how a simple concept of revenge can still hold more emotions than the distastful complicated plots of today's cinema.


  • The Biggest Problem With This Film is that You Probably Haven't Seen It

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This film is truely a film that deserves praise (and perhaps a criterion?!) it's a warm hearted comdey about three people who really shouldn't get along. The film really takes the time to observe and look at each character. The begining of the film, reminds me of Eraserhead, the cold, dark city engulfing the character, and initially you feel cold. But as the film goes on you begin to really love the characters and just have fun taking the ride and enjoying being with them.

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<June 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement