Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

CinemaRian Blog

  • Sunshine Cleaning (2009, USA, Christine Jeffs) **

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Film Name  Production Year

    Sunshine Cleaning has all the signs of a movie that went into production too soon, with script that was either still being written or with one in serious need of revision.  The movie has the cast it needs and a setting that works, but lacks the crucial element of focus. 

    As you’ve seen from the trailer, the movie is a light comedy about a two sisters who open up their own business cleaning up after bloody suicides or murders.  This is certainly an interesting idea for a movie, but the picture never bothers to consider most of the implications of this.  Instead it spends much of its time on a great many subplots, some of which are set up and never pay off.

    The two sisters are Rose (Amy Adams) and Norah (Emily Blundt).  Rose works as a maid and has a young son named Oscar (Jason Spevack) and spends a great deal of time looking forward to her weekly rendezvous with a married police officer (Steve Zahn).  Norah lives with her father Joe (Alan Arkin), an unsuccessful businessesman who is trying to market a new kind of candy.  Oscar gets kicked out of school due to some troubling behavior (that the movie never resolves, nor mentions again) so Rose feels the needs to make more money to get him into a private school.  The cop advises that she can big bucks cleaning up after dead people, and she convinces Norah join her.

    Among the nine million other subplots in the movie are Rose’s attempt to impress her former high school classmates at a baby shower, Norah’s quasi-voyeuristic interest in the daughter of one of the suicides (Mary Lynn Raskub) , Rose’s relationship with the cop, Rose’s potential relationship with the owner of a cleaning supplies shop (Eric Christian Olsen), the sister’s coming to terms with the death of their own mother, and Joe’s potential inability to deliver on a promise to Oscar.

    Lost in all of this is any kind of analysis as to the implications of the cleaning company, the ostensible selling point of the movie.  At no point does director Christine Jeffs or screenwriter Megan Holley deal with any of the obvious questions.  Aside from the fact that the job would be disgusting, how would this effect a person psychologically?  Would this change someone’s opinion about death, or life or religion or whatever?  Is there much of a distance between cleaning up blood and tomato sauce if you clean up one enough after a while?

    The screenplay is the central problem here, although the direction by Jeffs in uninspired.  Some plot points, such as Oscar’s trouble at school are introduced and never referred to again, while others, such as the death of the sister’s mother, are brought up too late and pay off too quickly.  The entire chronology of the movie seems off, with events that should be days apart apparently (and implausible) taking months to occur, while others seem to come along too fast.

    Where the film works is in the acting, which is very impressive.  I really got the impression that Adams and Blundt were members of the same family, something that rarely happens in movies.  They share a sisterly bond that is utterly believable and silently real, more real that anything else in the picture.

    I can’t flaw Sunshine Cleaning for a lack of ideas, or even a lack of good ones, but I can find fault in its inability to focus itself.  The whole is far less than the sum of its parts, though I have to say that the movie was not boring.  I think I might want to see a movie about a single mother with a troubled child, or a thirty something dealing with the emptiness of her life, or two sisters who start a weird business together, or two sisters dealing with death of their mother.  But not all at once.

    Sunshine Cleaning(2009)

     


  • Underworld: Rise of the Lycans (Patrick Tatopoulos) ***

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Film Name  Production Year

    I have a confession to make.  I was not a fan of the first two Underworld movies.  Or, more accurately, of what I saw of them.  I rented both and turned both off because I found them quite dull, despite the fact that I did not find their star, Kate Beckinsale, to be dull at all. 

    So why did I even bother with the third film?  There wasn’t much else playing and I wanted to see a movie, and I have a very strong weakness for vampire films, good, bad and ugly.  Despite the star rating, I’m not sure that I can classify Underworld: Rise of the Lycans as a “good” movie, but I can say that I enjoyed far more the other two (of what I saw anyway).   I can’t complain about the money, I spent on it, either, as it delivers exactly what you would expect from a movie with its title.

    The first two pictures are not required viewing as it’s a prequel, so I didn’t feel that I walked in on the third installment of something.  This is not to say that everything makes sense, because nothing makes sense in these movies.  Set in the Middle Ages, the story revolves the revolt of werewolves (the Lycans) who enslaved by vampires.  What the movie never explains is why the vampires would need to enslave anyone.  What kind of resources do they need?  They don’t need to eat, and since they are all strong, they should be able to do all the work they need themselves.  Are they just lazy?  If so, what do they do all night?

    Anyway, one Lycan named Lucian (Michael Sheen) gets special treatment and falls in love with the vampire Sonja (Rhoma Mitra, in a strange coincidence bares a striking resemblance to Kate Backinsale).  This creates  problems as later starts to feel bad for the other werewolves, and he eventually escapes and ends up leading the other werewolves to revolt (hence the title).  Among all this action, there is the love story between Sonja and Lucian, which is not boring but not moving at all.  I don’t know how moved I could be by a werewolf\vampire romance, but I did wonder what there children would be like.

    The movie is a success in the sense that the characters look cool (despite the fact the film has a strange digial grade), is not boring, and does not waste its story time.  It doesn’t go on and on like the first films, nor does it have any gun fights.  I mean, if vampires and werewolves were to have a war, would they fight it with GUNS?

    I didn’t care about the characters or the plot, and found no deep message or human observation, but I can say that I was entertained, which is something that a whole lot of more ambitious movies fail to do.  I can’t even say if fans of the first two pictures will like it, but I can say that it passed the test as a dumb, fun movie to see on Saturday night.  Believe it or not, that is a virtue in of itself.

    Underworld: Rise of the Lycans(2009)

     


  • I've Loved You So Long (2008, France, Phillippe Claudel) ****

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Film Name  Production Year

    The first thing we notice is the face of Kristen Scott Thomas.  She is a beautiful woman, and still is, but there is something in that face of extreme pain.  It is as if all of the life and happiness has been sucked out of it.  It is a face that not only lacks joy but seems to negate the possibility of it.

    Her character is named Juliette, and she sits at an airport terminal waiting for someone to come. That someone is her sister, Lea, played by Elsa Zylberstien.  Lea hasn’t seen her sister for fifteen years, when she was a child, but there is only the most basic level of recognition at the reunion. For Juliette, there is no reason for anything anymore.

    The movie works simultaneously as a drama and mystery, as we slowly find out what the characters know about what happened and what led to this reunion.  Most everyone walking into the picture will know that Juliette has spent the last fifteen years in prison, but the crime itself and that motive behind are revealed slowly. 

    Because we do not know this information, we judge Juliette slowly.  It is not so much that she has no social skills as it is that she chooses not to use them.  There is no reason for her to do so, no society for her to believe in. She is intelligent, educated and articulate, but has nothing to say to anyone.

    Lea, on the other hand seems to have everything- with kids and a loving husband, Luc (Serge Hazanavicius).  What makes the picture so interesting (and moving) is that Lea loves her sister unconditionally.  She believes that no matter what she did, she has not done anything beyond understanding or forgiveness.  This is the central conflict of the film.  One sister wants to recall the other to life, and the other has forgotten that there is any purpose in living.

    The acting in this film is superb, but Scott Thomas is outstanding.  Setting aside the fact that nearly all of her dialogue is in a second language she manages to show us the utter darkness that her character lives in without ever becoming manipulative.  Zylberstien must also be complimented for playing a part that could have easily become maudlin without a trace of Robin Williams- like manipulation. 

    Although an excellent movie, there are a few flaws.  There’s a rather ridiculous pastoral montage in the middle of the film that belong in another movie, and occasionally the screenplay (by director Phillipe Claudel) seems a bit contrived and lays on its points a bit obviously, especially in the subplot involving Juliette’s parole officer (Frederic Pierrot).  But overall, this is a moving picture about one person who knows, just knows, her sister is a person worthy of love and respect, and another who cannot conceive that anyone could feel that way.

    I've Loved You So Long...(2008)

     


  • Stranded: I've Come From a Plane that Crashed in the Mountains (2008. France\Brazil, Spain, Gonzolo Arijon) ****

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Film Name  Production Year

    Note: It’s impossible to discuss the movie without giving away spoilers.  Pretty much everyone going into this probably knows what happened, but if you don’t you’ve been warned.

    I walked into Stranded: I’ve Come From a Plane that Crashed in the Mountains wondering if I could make it through the picture without becoming disgusted, and I found that the what everyone remembers about the story- cannibalism-is not the main focus.  It’s more about in an insane situation, and it’s own way is kind of life affirming.

    The story has been previously told in Frank Marshall’s 1993 fiction film Alive (which I have not seen), and well known in the annals of airline disasters.  In 1972, a plane flying from Uruguay to Chile crashed in the mountains of Argentina.  The passengers consisted almost entirely of members of a Uruguayan college rugby team, their friends, girlfriends and family.  Seventeen of the forty-five people on board died within twenty four hours of the crash.  The remaining twenty-eight would have to find some way to survive in the cold with very little food for seventy two days.  The governments of Uruguay, Chile and Argentina tried a rescue but the bad weather meant that the plane could only be visible for one hour a day, and it was white against white snow, and no one knew where the plane was when it went down, and eventually the passengers realized that they would have to in some way be in the instruments of their own rescue.

    Director Gonzolo Arijon avoids what could have very easily become an Oprah – type inspiration story.  Instead, he focuses on the sociological aspects of what happened- how a new world with new rules was formed immediately after the crash.  Death was always close at hand, the survivors deal with it as best they can.  Some lose their fear of death or the desire to live, or both, others fight until they end so they can return.  Nearly all of them become very spiritual, and this how the film becomes a positive statement.

    It is not so much their will to live or their endurance that is moving (though it is to a degree) then it is there the attitude towards the event afterwards.  Many of the survivors return to the crash site and there are tears but one man says “I’m glad I came here.” This event has haunted these men for thirty years, but it has not broken them.  They bring their children with them, and they celebrate and thank the dead.  One says that he feels the dead “Gave their muscles so we might live” and that’s how the men seem to feel.  Many equate what they did to a kind of Holy Communion, where the dead gave their body for the life of others.

    The movie ends with footage of the men as they play soccer game.  They all still live in the same small town.  They did what they needed to do to live, and in watching this film, I learned that living is to a degree in end unto itself.  

    Stranded: I've Come From a Plane That Crashed on the Mountains(2008)


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<April 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293012
3456789


Categories
 


Advertisement