Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

CinemaRian Blog

  • Journey to the Center of the Earth 3D (2008, USA, Eric Brevig) ***

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Journey to the Center of the Earth 3D is the first movie that I can say gave me a headache, but is still good enough for a recommendation.  Unlike some of the other movies that made me break out the Ibruprofen (Baz Luhrmann's Romeo + Juliet, Time Bandits), with Journey the problem is with the format.  In other words, it's the 3-D.

    To be sure, there are a couple of 3-D shots in the picture that are cool- a guy at beginning extends a tape measurer suddenly, a translucent fish jumps out the water during an action sequence.  But a lot of the other times the 3-D just doesn't work.  Objects at the edge of the screen sometimes only register in one eye, and other times the editing causes momentary confusion.  The process doesn't really add anything to the experience of the film (which is also being released in some theatres in regular 2-D), as you just get used to once the novelty wears off.

    But the movie itself is good.  It's pretty much what you would expect from the trailer, although the kid (Josh Hutcherson) is not annoying and the screenwriters are smart enough not to slow the movie down with a love story between Brenden Fraser and Anita Briem any more than is absolutely required by the conventions of the genre.

    I like adventure movies like this.  Someday I hope I will discover a lost civilization and find some great treasure that will unlock the secrets of universe.  I kind of doubt that will happen, but it will always stay at the back of my mind as I watch movies like this.  And the picture comes close to doing the impossible- it almost makes geology interesting.  Emphasis on the "almost".

    Journey to the Center of the Earth (2008)


  • Sergeant York (1941, USA, Howard Hawks) *1/2

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sergeant York  (1941)

    Every once in a while as a filmgoer you run into a classic film that is so bad you are dumbfounded by its status in the pantheon of great movies.  For me, Sergeant York is definitely one of those films.  It is so boring and clichéd that it was a major chore to keep from shutting it off, and I only refrained from doing so because I had to complete it for my WWI book. 

    The movie is a classic of example of what happened to WWI in popular thought during WWII.  Instead of being a great international calamity, it became a vehicle for patriotism and propaganda, albeit propaganda which people were willing to pay money to see, as Sergeant York was the highest grossing film of 1941.  It was critically acclaimed, too- Gary Cooper won a Best Actor Oscar in the title role, beating out Orson Welles for Citizen Kane and Humphrey Bogart for The Maltese Falcon, something I doubt too many movies fans today would agree was the correct choice.

    The movie is a biopic about Alvin York, an alcoholic from Tennessee who found religion and turned his life around.  He was drafted into WWI and tried to gain consciousness objector status, but (according to the movie anyway) a stirring a speech from his commanding officer made him realize that Jesus wasn't really a total pacifist after all.  He then became a war hero, and received the Metal of Honor from General Pershing.

    The broad outlines of York's story seemingly they would automatically lend themselves to conservative propaganda, and that's exactly what happens.  The movie's treatment of religion is simplistic in the most ridiculous sense.  There are no real ideas behind the picture, and if it were made today, it could be found in the Christian bookstore next to the Left Behind movies.  There is also a lot of down-on-the-farm country boy stereotyping in the movie.  I know that Hawks probably intended this to be cute Americana in a John Ford kind of way, but he ain't no John Ford.

    Essentially, Sergeant York has all the typical flaws of a movie of its era.  It does not portray America is it, but as it wants to see itself, but is not smart enough to realize it.  As I said earlier, in addition being clichéd, the movie is just plain boring.  It goes on and on and on, with precious little of interest happening on the screen except speeches and the occasional fake action sequence once the war starts.

    The only way that Sergeant York is helpful to audiences today is as a cultural curio.  It helps to show us in some ways how we have evolved as a culture.  There are lots of different kind of portrayals of war in movies, but today very few are as naïve and stupid as Sergeant York.

    Sergeant York (1941)


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<July 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789


Categories
 


Advertisement