Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

CinemaRian Blog

The Jungle Book (1967, USA, Wolfgang Reitherman) **

1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Under discussion:

The Jungle Book  (1967)

he Jungle Book will always hold a special place in my cinematic heart, as it's the first movie I ever saw in a theatre. Not on its original run, of course, but during a 1990 re-release, when I was six years old. I hadn't seen the movie since then and its remarkable how much of that early experience came back. I guess I have thing for remembering movies I see.

What I remember most about the movie was how I got creeped out by the python, Kaa (voice of Sterling Halloway). The snake has the ability to hypnotize anyone who looks into its eyes, and I was more frightened that the young protagonist, Mowgli (Bruce Reitherman) would forever fall asleep under his influence than be mauled to death by the movie's real antagonist, the tiger Shere Kahn (George Sanders). Not that I wasn't a little disturbed by Shere Kahn as well, but I remember congratulating myself for not getting too scared and running out of the theatre.

Had you asked me immediately after I saw the movie in 1990, I surely would have given The Jungle Book four stars (if I knew what a star rating was back then, of course). But it is a good movie if you're not six years old?

Well, maybe it's good at seven, eight, or nine, but beyond that the picture has limited value. For those who don't know, it's based on a series of short stories by super racist Rudyard Kipling about the feral child Mowgli, who is raised by wolves in the jungles of India. The wise panther Bagheera (Sebastian Cabot), recognizes that Mowgli must leave the jungle and return to his fellow humans if he is to escape the wrath of Shere Kahn, and he sets out with the boy on the journey to the man village.

The setup to the movie is quite well done. There is a real sense of really being the jungle at the character and animation is also strong. It seems the Ralph Bakshi was paying close attention here. But after awile the movie becomes essentially a road film, with one episode after another. The "star" of the film is supposed to be Baloo the bear (Phil Harris), but the character is just annoying. Once the movie abandoned its somewhat serious, naturalistic tone (reminiscent of Bambi) it has a lot of kid stuff in it, which gets grating, long with Baloo, pretty fast.

Okay, okay, it's a kids movie, but all of the great Disney films, from Pinocchio to Aladdin are great because they can be enjoyed by people of all ages. The Jungle Book is definitely not in the above films league. Although the animation is excellent, the characters are poorly written, the structure lazy, the songs forgettable. Unless you were me at six, and you just can't get that snake out of your head.

The Jungle Book (1967)

posted on Sunday, July 13, 2008 1:15 AM by CinemaRian


Was this review helpful?
Yeah Yeah Nope Nope



Comment    Email me new comments.


aidanbrack
Posted Friday, July 18, 2008 3:44 PM

I was another person whose first ever film in the cinema was The Jungle Book (I didn't know the year but 1990 would be about the right time) - my feelings are pretty similar. It's a series of short incidents rather than a central narrative. I recently watched it with my family and I was struck by how it felt very "stop-start". The episodic nature means that it doesn't succeed in pulling me along emotionally. That said, it seemed to cater to the attention span of the four year old in our group who was glued to the screen the whole way through. I suspect that in 20 years time she will have a similar feeling of nostalgia about it.

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<July 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789


Categories
 


Advertisement