Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

CinemaRian Blog

  • My Blueberry Nights (2007, Hong Kong/China/France, Wong Kar-Wai) **

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    At times, My Blueberry Nights doesn't even seem like a movie.  It reminded my of a first novel by an English major, in love with the tone of their own writing.  Believing that film is a visual medium, I often don't comment much on the script, but I have to say that there's really no way this could have been a good movie.  The screenplay is so stupid and self-consciously arty (is that word?) that no director, not Wong Kar-Wai, not Ingmar Bergman, not Francis Ford Coppola, could have made it work.

    That's not to say the only flaw is the script, but we'll get to that later.  The movie is three different stories concerning the wandering Elizabeth (singer Norah Jones in her first movie) who is recovering from a break-up.  She stars in New York, and forges a friendship with Jeremy (Jude Law) a British guy who owns a café.  He falls in love with her, and she gets close to him, but she's not ready to commit.  Although she already has a job, Elizabeth can't sleep at night, so she gets another job as a bartender.  Is she aware that if she really can't sleep, she'd be a hallucinating and dead in about a week?  Anyway, while at the bar, she observes the very end of a breakup between Arnie (David Strathairn, who gives the best performance in the movie) and Lynne (Rachel Weisz).  Heading to Nevada, she makes friends with gambler Leslie (Natalie Portman) who lies a lot.

    The movie has an incredible number of obvious stupid metaphors- the blueberry pie of the title, a bar tab, a car.  It also has numerous ridiculous scenes that would never ever happen in real life.  At one point, a character pulls a gun in a bar and threatens to kill someone, and nearly pulls the trigger.  The next day, he's back in the bar as if nothing happened.  Right.  I'd certainly want to come back to that bar with that guy as a patron!

    Not only that, but Norah Jones is frankly not a good actress. She doesn't even come off as a professional one, often seeming fake.

    This movie is like spending ninety minuets with an overly snobby and pretentious high school student who writes poetry at Starbucks. I was surprised there wasn't an Alanis Morissette song over the credits.

    My Blueberry Nights (2007)


  • The Fighting 69th (1940, USA, William Keighley) **

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Imagine this scenario:  You are a soldier in WWI.  There is a jerk in your unit named Plunkett who is both a coward and incompetent.  He does things like open fire without permission, causing a rain of enemy shells that also killed three of your fellow soldiers.  Plunkett also gets scared during missions and screams, alerting the Germans to his presence.  Needless to say, he is not that popular in your unit and is about to get transferred out.  But then your units chaplain, beloved to the troops, convinces your commanding officer that he'll turn around if you give him one more chance and he's okay with this.  If you are that soldier, wouldn't it be time to check to see whether you are either dreaming or doing some kind of hallucinogenic drugs, or perhaps entered another dimension while crossing the Atlantic? 

    So yes, this is one of those stupid movies Hollywood started to make around the end of the thirties, when American pictures started to go downhill.  This is kind of the old-fashioned film that people refer to when they refer to old movies in a negative way.  The ostensible purpose is, I suppose, is to commemorate the real life priest, Father Duffy (Pat O'Brien), who was a hero in both the Spanish-American War and WWI, but is showing the guy having horrid judgment the way to do it?  Plunkett (James Cagney) is a fictional character that the movie doesn't need, and it's absolutely unbelievable that anyone could tolerate his behavior that kills at least seven fellow officers. Would the US army or any other for that matter tolerate this?  If Plunkett were in the IRA, he would either not be an Ireland or not be above ground! 

    Why are we even supposed to care about this anyway?  There are lots of interesting stories, both real and fictional, to tell about WWI, but this is not one of them.  In fact, I would venture to argue that in many ways this is a proto-typical WWII film, and would be one had the US not joined that conflict at the time the picture was made.  From a historical standpoint, it's interesting that so many films of the 30's tried to show how terrible WWI was, this one seems to avoid most of the discussions of the suffering of the soldiers (aside from the ones who die because Plunkett's gaffs, of course) or the political ramifications of the conflict.

    The Fighting 69th is a weird and confused film, and I can't think of any reason to see it.  Unless you are writing a master's thesis on WWI or the films of James Cagney, of course.

    The Fighting 69th (1940)


  • Pilgrimage (1933, USA, John Ford) ***1/2

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Pilgrimage  (1933)

    Joseph McBride, the Ford scholar who does the commentary track on the DVD says that although its not as famous as The Searchers or some of Ford's other films, Pilgrimage  is among the director's best works, and I agree with him.  It is his most emotionally raw film and among his most moving.

    The move opens in 1918 in the small town of Three Cedars, Arkansas. Jim Jessop (Norman Foster) is a young man who is having serious problems with his mother, Hannah (Henrietta Crosland).  He wants to get married to Mary (Marian Nixon), move out and get a job, maybe join the Army, but his domineering mother will have none of it.  She wants him to live at home and stay single, presumably forever or at least until she dies.  In short, she refuses to see him as an adult.  After he breaks away and agrees to marry his now pregnant girlfriend anyway, Hannah is incensed and argues that if she cannot have him, no other woman can, so she enlists him in the Army without his knowledge, and he is promptly sent to France, where he's almost immediately killed.  In hatred of her son, the egocentric mother refuses to even acknowledge her grandson and daughter in law.  In 1928, she is petitioned by the government to go on a free trip to France with other mothers of war dead to see her sons, grave, and almost refuses to go, filled with both anger and repressed guilt.

    Pilgrimage is a work of great compassion.  It is hard not to hate Hannah Jessop in the earlier parts of the picture, as she ruins her son's life because he dared violate her own ego, but as the film goes on she becomes a sad character, and you feel a mix of anger and sorrow for her position.  Movies did not often features psychologically realistic characters in these days, but Hannah is totally believable person and creation from both Ford and Crosland.  As McBride notes, it's surprising that Crosland didn't win an Oscar. 

    This picture is one of the most moving all of Ford's films.  The director could often fall into clichéd, one dimensional heroes and villains, but this is a film about real people and doesn't fall into the director's macho trap.  It's a deeply felt film, just a few notches below The Grapes of Wrath as the director's best.

    Pilgrimage (1933)


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<June 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345


Categories
 


Advertisement