Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

CinemaRian Blog

  • Johnny Greyeyes (2001, Canada, Jorge Manzano) **

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Johnny Greyeyes  (2002)

     

    The opening moments of Johnny Greyeyes remind us of why low-budget independent cinema can be so appealing.  We see life as it happens to normal people that we rarely see in the movies, in a location that is not New York, L.A., or a California suburb.  But as the picture goes on it begins to loose us in an over ambitious structure and underdeveloped characters.  By the end the end, we see that the movie is really pointless.  There’s just no reason to see it.

    The director and co-writer Jorge Manzano, has made the decision to tell the story out of chronological sequence.  This can sometimes be a worthwhile approach in pictures like Kill Bill or Memento, but here it just confuses the plotlines and makes the film at times incoherent.  It takes an obscenely long time to figure out who everyone is and where we are in the timeline, and what the relevance of most of these scenes are.

    As the title suggests, the central figure in the film is Johnny Greyeyes (Gail Maurice), a Native American woman who is getting out of prison after seven years.  Although she has a lot of screen time in the picture the movie takes detours to show us the lives of her mother (Gloria May Eshkibok) and brother (Jonathan Fisher), which are sometimes interesting but don’t add up to much.  There is also a lot of time showing Johnny in prison, where she begins a lesbian affair with Lana (Columpa Bobb), a lifer.  Both are abused by male and female guards, much of which seems rather over the top.

    The movie is very low budget, and the prison looks suspiciously like a high school (where I have a feeling it was really shot).  Oddly enough, the budget doesn’t actually hurt the film that much, perhaps because we are willing to get into the low-fi spirit of the endeavor. 

    I think that in conceiving this picture, Manzano was overly influenced by Tarintino and thought that the fact his movie would have a weird structure would make it far more interesting than it is.  The raw materials of this story could make a good indie- a kind of Canadian Sling Blade, but nothing is developed enough to bring us into the world of the characters.

    Finally, I should state that the specific crime that brought Johnny to prison is not shown or discussed until the end of the film as surprise but is revealed on the back of the DVD cover.  That is not a good strategy.

     

    Johnny Greyeyes (2001)


  • Heroes for Sale (1933, USA, William A. Wellman) ***

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Heroes for Sale  (1933)

     

    The advertising for Heroes for Sale listed as a social problem film dealing with the plight of World War One veterans during the Great Depression, but in realty the movie only briefly discuss that problem.  The movie has a strange rambling plotline that takes up a number of other social concerns while rarely commenting on any of them.  It’s a strange movie, but a good one.

    The film stars Richard Barthelmess, who used to a big star but is now almost forgotten as Tom Holmes, who is indeed a WWI veteran.  Opening during the war, the movie depicts how Holmes is wounded during a super dangerous mission and his cowardly richboy comrade, Roger Winston (Gordon Wescott) takes the credit, believing him dead.  Tom has really just been captured, and is well cared for by the Germans, who are nonetheless unable to give him the surgery he needs to remove the shrapnel from his spinal cord, meaning he is constant pain.  A German doctor gives him some morphine capsules to deal with the pain and Tom is soon a genuine fiend, and gets fired from his job as a teller at Roger’s father’s (Benton Churchill) bank.  He’s incarcerated and forced to undergo a drug treatment program and the strain is so great it kills his mother (Margret Seddon).  Near penniless, he heads to Chicago, where he takes a room at boarding house because a hot babe (Loretta Young).  He then gets a job as a laundry truck driver.

    I am going stop the plot summary at this point because we are barely into a third of this movie.  Spoilers! Tom still must be involved in a labor riot, sent to jail for a crime he didn’t’ commit, become a millionaire, be run out of town under false suspicion that he’s a Communist, and so on.

    Heroes for Sale is a very unfocused film, and although it concerns itself with a number of contemporary social problems, it rarely takes much of a stand on any of them.  The exception is a satire on Communism with a poor Russian worker (Robert H. Barrat) who immediately becomes a hardcore conservative when he his it big.  Aside from that, the picture seems content to point out controversial issues, but afraid to actually say something, making it less brave than it seems.  However, I am told that for a film, even in the pre-code era, to even mention drug addition was a big deal.

    As I said earlier, Barthelmess is almost completely forgotten today, possibly because he did not appear in any grade-A classic film, but that it is not a statement on him as an actor.  He is quite good in this performance, and his somewhat folksy, down to earth style allows him to carry the picture with ease.

    Heroes for Sale is perhaps most interesting to contemporary audiences as an example of many of the social concerns that were important to people in 1933, shortly after FDR came to power.  Some (such as drugs) are still around, but luckily even the worse economic climate today is nowhere near as bad as the Great Depression, which is something to be thankful for.

    Heroes for Sale (1933)


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<May 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
27282930123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement