Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

CinemaRian Blog

  • Religulous (2008, USA, Larry Charles, Co-Autuer Bill Maher) **1\2

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Religulous  (2008)

    I’ve seen this movie before, when it less obnoxious, done better and potentially more offensive.  It was called The God Who Wasn’t There and it was directed by Brian Flemming. Both that film and Religulous are documentaries about atheists (although Bill Maher calls himself an agnostic) who interview people about faith, generally with the purpose of showing what they feel to be ludicrousness of religious belief. 

    The problem of reviewing a movie like this is that your opinion of its going to be inevitably influenced by your own personal beliefs.  Since I am neither an atheist nor agnostic, I don’t agree with the arguments of Maher or Flemming.  But Flemming was such a good filmmaker that his movie was fascinating to watch and the jokes were genuinely funny, even when they were made at my own faith’s expense.

    Maher, on the other hand, is at times rude and even mean to his guests.  He’s not as funny either.  Something has always bothered me about Maher.  I used to watch his TV show, Politically Incorrect and his main problem seemed to be arrogance mixed with dose of chauvinism.  I got tired quickly of constant discussions of the “feminization of America” and it’s not surprising that he got his ass cancelled after he said one stupid thing to many.  Less than a week after the attacks, he entreated the grieving nation to this pearl of wisdom: “We have been the cowards, lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That's cowardly. Staying in the airplane when it hits the building, say what you want about it, it's not cowardly.” Smooth move, Bill!

    Anyway, Religulous consists of mainly of director Larry Charles (who made the way better Borat) following Maher around as he “interviews” various religious figures.  He treats all of them, even the ones who attempt to be logical and rational with contempt and disdain.  He doesn’t try to come up with logical arguments as to why they are wrong, but instead just rails against how ridiculous they are.  He even walks out on one person with letting them finish what they have to say. Throughout all this, he keeps mentioning that he has no idea what’s going to ha

    Obviously, Maher is miffed at religion, for what reason I don’t know.  In his film, Flemming mentioned being emotionally abused at his religious elementary school, so at least that’s understandable.  Maher is an angry man who inspires anger in other people.

    The other valid comparison between this film and Flemming’s is that the fact many of the arguments and cinematic techniques are the same, such as using  clips from cheesy Christian movies and intentionally offensive intercuts.  But Flemming is a superior filmmaker and a more likable screen precense.

    You may have determined from this review that I do not like Maher very much and you’d be right.  I might venture to guess that even those who agree with his views might find his approach distasteful or at least annoying.  If you want to see this exact same movie, but better, rent The God Who Wasn’t There.

    Religulous (2008)

     


  • Man on Wire (2008, USA, James Marsh) ***1\2

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Man on Wire  (2008)

    Man on Wire is about a man who would risk his life and incarceration to do what most people literarily would not do for a million dollars.  Phillipe Petit is a high-wire tightrope walker, who breaks into famous landmarks so he can walk between famous monuments without a net.  If he fails, he dies.  If he succeeds, he is usually arrested. 

    Obviously, Petit is not an ordinary man, and perhaps the biggest failure of Man on Wire is that it does not get much into his psychology.  Director James Marsh is content to portray him as somewhat childlike like figure who has a great time during tightrope walks.  To a degree, the audience must appreciate what he does, as his walks are works of great beauty.

    Marsh’s film intercuts the story of his greatest achievement, a 1976 balancing act over the World Train Center, while intercutting his early career, including death defying stunts in France and Australia. 

    By the time we get to walk over the Two Towers, we are amazed at Petit’s talent, but somewhat disturbed by his apparent megalomania.  He puts his girlfriend through a lot every times he does this and asks his entire crew to risk arrest so he can do his act.  Also, the movie never describes where he gets the money to do all this stuff.

    But when the film climaxes with his beautiful walk over the Twin Towers, we are quite impressed.  (The film is marred only by the fact that no film footage was taken of the event, so we have to rely on still photographs.) 

    The film is entertaining, but somewhat forgettable (one wishes somebody like Werner Herzog directed it, as its right up his alley).  But is it better than the most of the junk this year?  ****, yeah!

     

    Man on Wire (2008)

     


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<December 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
30123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910


Categories
 


Advertisement