Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

ChrisThilk Blog

  • Movie Journal: Nobody’s Fool, The Stranger, Hoffa

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hoffa  (1992)

    The Stranger  (1946)

    Nobody's Fool  (1994)


    I went on a movie-watching spree on Hulu recently and wanted to catalog some of the flicks I caught on the site.

    Nobody’s Fool: I saw this movie when it first came out and remembered quite liking it so I thought it was cool that it showed up on Hulu and I had a chance to revisit it. Paul Newman, unsurprisingly, gives a great low-key performance as a small town curmudgeon who tries to come to terms with the life he’s lead as he meets his grandchildren, tries to hold down a job and other everyday tasks. There’s no big emotional arc he goes on - he winds up in much the same place at the end of the movie that he started out in - but Newman is always worth watching and he never makes the one long, sustained note he’s asked to hold out boring.

    The Stranger: Orsen Welles plays an on-the-run Nazi who has managed to integrate himself into a small town in the U.S. but who is eventually tracked down by Nazi-hunter Edward G. Robinson. Not the best film from either one but definitely worth watching if you can track it down.

    Hoffa: I know it’s popular to trash the 1992 Danny DeVito-directed biopic of the union legend, but I like it. It’s another movie I saw around the time of its first release and, upon re-watching, I stand by my assertion that DeVito makes some interesting choices and that Jack Nicholson does a pretty good job in the title role. It’s obviously not going to be a complete story of the man’s life but it hits many of the high points and does so in an entertaining way.

    OK, now I’m all caught up.


    Originally posted on:Chris Thilk

  • Movie Journal: Watchmen

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Watchmen  (2009)


    I did see Watchmen opening weekend but haven’t had the strength/time to write up anything approaching a review of the film and, quite frankly, still don’t. But I did want to share my overall impression of the film.

    Unlike my brother-in-law, who saw it with me, I didn’t completely hate it and want to start attacking those involved in the film with pointed sticks. In fact I quite liked it and felt that while it’s still largely impossible to completely adapt the sourch graphic novel into even a 2:45 film, the filmmakers did a pretty good job of accomplishing what they could.

    High points include:

    • Jackie Earl Haley’s portrayal of the detective Rorschach: Filmspotting’s Adam or Matty (I can’t remember which said it) were right when he said it was a performance that approaches what Heath Ledger did as The Joker in The Dark Knight.
    • Jeffrey Dean Morgan as The Comedian: Yeah, he exists only to provide motivations of one form or another to the rest of the characters - he is the Macguffin - but he sells it.
    • The moments when Zack Snyder departs from the source material but remains true to the story: No squid? No problem. The idea that Ozywhatever would try to accomplish his goal by turning the world against Dr. Manhattan completely works within the movie’s logic and gets around the problem created by 1) the fact that a giant alien squid would have looked ridiculous and 2) the fact that its creation would have been impossible to tell without including The Black Frieghter and about 35 more minutes of footage involving an artist’s colony.

    Low points include:

    • Malin Ackerman as Silk Spectre II: Oh just kill me now. I’m convinced she wasn’t actually on the set but that Snyder just filmed her at the first table read and dropped the footage into his digitally-created sets.
    • “That scene” on the Owlship: Yeah, you know the one I’m talking about. If Snyder were looking for minutes to cut from the film I can show him about six that could be lifted easily.

    Despite those few problems with it I did like it and am looking forward to seeing it again, when I can be free of all the expectations and hype that surrounded its release, something that without a doubt colors everyone’s perceptions of the finished product.


    Originally posted on:Chris Thilk

  • DVD Review: Ashes of Time (Redux)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:


    51cqlkg4kll_sl500_aa240_It’s more or less impossible for me to adequately explain the plot for Ashes of Time, a film from director Wong Kar-Wai, so let me just paste the official synopsis here:

    The film is set in five parts, five seasons that are part of the Chinese almanac. The story takes place in the jianghu, the world of the martial arts. Ouyang Feng (Leslie Cheung) has lived in the western desert for some years. He left his home in White Camel Mountain when the woman he loved chose to marry his elder brother rather than him. Instead of seeking glory, he ends up as an agent. When people come to him with a wish to eliminate someone who has wronged them, he puts them in touch with a swordsman who can do the job.

    Now let’s be clear that this brief description of the film doesn’t come close to doing justice to the film itself.

    Broken into five parts, the loose center of the film is the man, mentioned above, who finds people for clients who need problems solved.

    But what it’s really about is the visual palette that Wong Kar-Wai works with throughout the film. In addition to the highly dramatic - also melodramatic - performances from all the lead actors and actresses the colors and tones the director works with are a character in and of themselves. It’s absolutely gorgeous to look at and behold. I mean absolutely fantastic.

    Aside from the visuals, though, Wong Kar-Wai gets some fantasticly deep performances from the actors he uses. The subtleties of those performances - despite the over-the-top emotions they’re asked to portray - are simply outstanding and a joy to watch.

    This “Redux” version is meant to be the ultimate version of the film, originally released in 1993 but since disseminated - both officially and unofficially - in various versions. This Redux release, then, is meant to set the record straight and be “definitive” in the eyes of the director. Not being familiar with the original or any of the subsequent iterations I can’t rightly speak to what’s different but I can tell you that if the original was half this moving it has to be fantastic.

    The DVD release contains just a couple special features, a Q&A with Wong Kar-Wai and a featurette on the making of the film.

    Ashes of Time is full of fantastic visuals and emotive performances and well worth checking out if you’ve heard of the movie or not as it’s a richly rewarding experience.


    Originally posted on:Chris Thilk

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<March 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
22232425262728
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234


Categories
 


Advertisement