Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

ChrisThilk Blog

  • Movie Journal: August

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]


    My review of August, a fictional cautionary tale of the Dot Com Bust’s irrational exuberance, is up at Spout.


    Originally posted on:Chris Thilk

  • Movie Journal: Ira & Abby

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ira & Abby  (2007)


    Is Ira & Abby believable? Not in the slightest. Is it fun and funny? Absolutely.

    The movie tells the story of a neurotic Jewish guy who, in the middle of a very upsetting day, finds a woman working at a health club who immediately takes a liking to him and convinces him to marry her just a few days after their initial encounter.

    The success of the movie at pulling off such a conceit is dependent on the charm of the two leads, as well as the supporting cast. Luckily everyone here, including Fred Williard as the father of the bride and Robert Kline as the father of the groom, is up to the task, pulling off the many convenient plot twists and turns with precision and gusto. There’s nothing lazy in the filmmaking and that gives the movie a tight, peppy beat that, if you allow yourself to go with it, is very easy to get caught up in and be entertained by.

    Oh, and if you’re looking closely, you’ll recognize Jon Hamm - Don Draper from “Mad Men” - in the role of the scruffy ex-husband of Abby.


    Originally posted on:Chris Thilk

  • Movie Journal: Persepolis

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Persepolis  (2007)


    The story of a young girl - later a young woman - who bounces back and forth to and from her home country of Iran, Persepolis is not necessarily an easy movie to watch but it rewards the viewer who does.

    This is the kind of movie that could only really be told in animated form. The settings are too vivid and the violence too stark to be told as a live-action film. Animation allows for more interpretive visuals but also for more stark realism. If this were live-action it would actually come off as less-realistic than it does in animated form.

    There are many moving parts in Persepolis that all come together, but there’s no fat on the film at all. The story-telling is lean and pointed, with meaning and sub-text behind every graphic element that’s on screen and every line of dialogue that’s uttered. It’s highly recommended if you enjoy movies that bridge the gap between exposing you to a serious subject and being truly entertaining.


    Originally posted on:Chris Thilk

  • Movie Journal: Semi-Pro

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Semi-Pro  (2008)


    Semi-Pro isn’t nearly as funny as it should have been, but it’s much funnier than some people have made it out to be.

    The story of an egotistical and out-of-touch ABA team owner in 1976, Semi-Pro is basically an excuse for Will Ferrell and a few of his friends to goof around and wear some insanely big wigs.

    Comedies like this are completely subjective depending on the whims and attitudes of the viewer. But what struck me, and which I’ve pointed out to others, is that “retard” is thrown around at least a few times in the movie as a clearly derogatory term. This film didn’t stoke the bubbling outrage, though, that Tropic Thunder has recently. Perhaps it’s because there isn’t something as clearly meant to stir offense as the Simple Jack component of Tropic, but if the protests were really about the word’s usage, it’s odd to me that Semi-Pro didn’t begin some sort of outraged discussion about the word’s usage. And it’s not like we’re talking about a great deal of time having elapsed - this was just four or five months ago.


    Originally posted on:Chris Thilk

  • Movie Journal: Star Wars - The Prequel Trilogy

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]


    With the arrival of Star Wars: The Clone Wars in theaters (which I’ve still yet to see) I thought it a good opportunity to revisit the first part of Lucas’ space epic.

    As I worked through The Phantom Menace, Attack of the Clones and then Revenge of the Sith (with the first animated Clone Wars series in between the last two) I found the biggest change is a gradual diminishing of unnecessary moments in each consecutive film. Where Menace is filled with shots that serve no discernible purpose, Sith is pretty tight from a story-telling point of view. We aren’t subjected to many useless shots of a character looking from one side of the frame to the next, and the camera doesn’t linger upon the glory of Lucas’ CGI creations as it so often does in the first movie.

    It’s impossible, even if you’re like me and are willing to forgive a lot as I am, to not be occasionally taken out of the moment by the hammy bits of dialogue and instances of wooden acting that litter the films. But even with those roadblocks in place the trilogy probably isn’t as bad as most people would have you think. It’s simply impossible to feel about a movie at age 30 the same way you did when you were seven. And that reality has done a lot of damage to a set of movies that, really, aren’t as bad as they’ve been made out to be.


    Originally posted on:Chris Thilk

  • Movie Journal: Christopher Guest Mockumentary Trilogy

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Best in Show  (2000)

    A Mighty Wind  (2003)


    I always enjoy Waiting for Guffman, Best in Show and A Mighty Wind on a variety of levels. First, there’s the watching of a batch of actors who truly know where their towels are to an extent that they can largely make a movie up as they’re going along. Then there’s the level on which I admire the editing of the footage that was shot into a coherent story. Finally there’s the mental image that follows every scene of the cast breaking each other up and requiring another take to try and play it straight.

    Of the three Best in Show probably works the best in terms of being an actual movie. The characters are the best developed and it’s played straight for the most part, only rarely diving into overt gags. The other two are filled with more “funny” moments as opposed to letting the humor bubble up from the outrageous situations the characters find themselves in.

    Still, though, all three are a treat to watch. Plus, watch Christopher Guest through the films and you’ll see how scary good an actor he really is.


    Originally posted on:Chris Thilk

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<August 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31123456


Categories
 


Advertisement