Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

BigJeffLebowski Blog

  • Pretty Persuasion

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I absolutely love it when both a film and its characters have such distinct voices.  Within the first five minutes, distinct and recognizable rhythms emerge in the look and pace of the film, and especially in the character of Kimberly, whom Evan Rachel Wood plays to near perfection.  Ron Livingston and James Woods give equally strong performances as Kimberly's teacher and father, respectively.  My only complaint is the drastic tonal shift in the film's final scene; though it makes sense thematically, it's hard to believe there wasn't a more subtle way to make the same point -- and to do so less jarringly.

  • A Discomforting Masterpiece

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hard Candy  (2006)

    The pairing of a playwright and a music video director -- each making their first proper foray into feature filmmaking -- seems at once sensible and ill-advised.  It's not inconceivable that the stylistic clash between the two sensibilities would be jarring, resulting in a finished product that is at best inconsistent and at worst incoherent.  It also stands to reason, however, that in such a claustrophobic setting, a strong playwright would be uniquely capable of executing plot, character, and subtext through dialogue alone, and a director coming from advertising would be able to make it visually arresting with the location's limited pallette.  Hard Candy is a sterling example of the latter, exhibiting a strong visual style which never overpowers the narrative.

    Particularly of note, though, is the performance of Ellen Page as Hayley.  Having been one of the two good parts of the otherwise deplorable X-Men: The Last Stand (the other being Kelsey Grammer's turn as Dr. Hank McCoy), it's not surprising that Page is talented, only that she is this talented.  The film rests firmly upon the shoulders -- or specifically the faces -- of stars Page and Patrick Wilson, and though they both perform admirably, Page steals the film with equal parts guile, deception, sympathy, charm, and vulnerability.  So much of the subtext of the film is told in subtle shifts of gaze, in the barely noticeable narrowing and widening of her eyes, in carefully chosen beats and hesitations that reveal the slowly growing cracks in Hayley's facade, both intentional and unintentional.  We are at first shocked to see her innocent precocity give way to fervent antagonism, and are later concerned to see glimpses of uncertainty and apprehension rise to the surface.

    Hard Candy is a discomforting film not for the issues it tackles, but for how it addresses them.  Jeff explains away his unseemly preoccupations, but neither Hayley nor the filmmakers endorse his simplistic -- and, as Hayley notes, overly polished -- justification.  Instead, the audience is left with the onus of gauging the ethics of the actions of two morally ambiguous characters who have both, at one point or another, warranted both our sympathies and our resentment.


  • A disappointing remake

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Wicker Man  (2006)

    As a fan of both the original Wicker Man and of Neil LaBute, I'd been looking forward to this film.  The trailers were promising, and the script had received favorable reviews.  The movie was disappointing on several counts, but one aspect in particular struck me; there's no fundamental understanding of basic filmic vocabulary, of the visual narrative, in this film.

    I became a LaBute fan early on with his debut In the Company of Men (I didn't have the pleasure of knowing his stage work beforehand) and The Shape of Things is one of my favorite films, but The Wicker Man
    exposed, to me, a huge flaw in his filmmaking; it was not something I'd noticed in his other films -- though I'm tempted to go back and rewatch them with this in mind -- but is glaring enough to have completely killed the last act ofThe Wicker Man for me.  LaBute is terribly inept at knowing the appropriate uses for wide, medium, and close shots as they relate to the dramatic action of a scene.  The parade scene toward the end, in particular, is robbed of any of its possible suspense by poorly chosen shots.  As a playwright and stage director, it makes sense that LaBute would have a better understanding of the screenplay and of the actors than he would of the more technical/visual aspects of filmmaking, but stage directors such as Sam Mendes and Julie Taymor have exhibited no such shortcomings.  And again, I also hadn't noticed these tendencies in his earlier films (although, the content and presentation of a suspense thriller is of course far removed from those earlier efforts).

    All in all, I suppose I'm just confused as to why LaBute would have even made this film.  It's clearly a labour of love on his behalf -- he both wrote and directed the film, and is by no means his most mainstream project -- but it plays against his abilities as a filmmaker and adds little, if anything, to the superior original.

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<September 2006>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement