Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

azguki Blog

  • Should Be Released Under a New Title...

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    The Happening  (2008)

     

     

      The Crappening.


  • Please Make It Stop!!!

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

     

        This is the worst movie I have seen since the turn of the century.  That is not an exaggeration.  I mean this is Pearl Harbor bad.  At least Pearl Harbor had Cuba Gooding Jr. and cool special effects.  It was really, really, really, really, really, really bad, but it had Cuba Gooding Jr. and cool special effects.  There are no redeeming qualities at all about this one.  It is just really, really, really, really, really, really bad.  I am dumber now for having witnessed it. 


  • Bukowski's Screenplay

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Barfly  (1987)

     

        I just finished writing my thoughts about Ask the Dust, John Fante's master novel adapted by Robert Towne, and it really was impossible for me to stop without sharing a few thoughts about Charles Bukowski.  The performances in this one are fantastic.  However, Mickey Rourke's take on the Bukowski alter-ego, Henry Chinaski, is more of an exaggerated charicature.  For a more subtle, and far more accurate, portrayal of the notorious poet look to Matt Dillion in Factotum.  I would expect the biggest complaint about this picture to be the screenplay itself.  For example, Michael Costello's observation at the bottom of this page reads: "What little story there is...."   I'm not sure if Costello was aware of Bukowski's correspondence with John Fante, but when Bukowski was asked to write the introduction to a new printing of Fante's Ask the Dust, he solicited the man himself for advice.  Fante was himself a successful Hollywood screen writer.  In his reply to Bukowski, he tells him the necessary details about the writing of the book and in closing offers a few words answering Bukowski's questions about screenplay writing.  I don't have the exact words in front of me, but it was something to this effect:  "That Frenchman who stands over your shoulder while you type sounds like a kook to me.  You are the writer.  They asked you to do the writing.  Write the most unorthodox script you can, the script that is most appealing to you." 

     Sage advice. 


  • What Has Towne Done To John Fante !!??!!!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ask the Dust  (2006)

     

         I know that Robert Towne is admired for his success in Hollywood, but he completely messed this one up.  My opinion is unapologetically biased.  I am a lover of John Fante.  In the past 5 years I have read anything, and everything, I could find of his.  His name, if it is not already, will be mentioned with the other American greats (Hemingway, Sherwood Anderson, Faulkner, Fitzgerald, etc.).  This has to be one of the finest novels ever written (in my humble opinion).  Towne fails to grasp the energy or the attitude.  If he does grasp it, he certainly doesn't convey it on the screen.  I admit it is a difficult task, but then.....if he loves the work and is uncertain it will translate to the screen, why do it?  There is also the problem of the performers in the film.  I thought Donald Sutherland and Idina Menzel absolutely nailed their performances.  It is a real shame they played such minor roles.  Colin Farell and Salma Hayek both look amazing in this film.  In fact, they look too good.  These characters are not supposed to look this good.  Farrell and Hayek are great at what they do, but here, neither of them succeed in completing a full portrait.   And Towne, ROBERT TOWNE, he changed the ending........one of the most romantic, harrowing, mystical, beautiful endings I've ever read (and I majored in literature).  I CANNOT BELIEVE HE CHANGED FANTE'S ENDING.  It didn't make the movie any better, solve any time issues, or make any more sense.  All it did was completely ruin the experience for me.  Perhaps I am too attached to the book.  I concede that making any film adapted from a novel will lose certain elements.  However, those elements could have been thought out a little more here.  Like I said before, Farrell and Hayek look absolutely spectacular together here.  It makes the film easy to watch.  I did love it because it was Fante brought to the big screen, but considering the material with which Towne had at his disposal ( commonly referred to as a masterpiece in literary circles ), this should have been a hell of a lot better.


  • Grindhouse

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Grindhouse  (2007)

     

      What a fun show!!!  I had my doubts going into this one, but ended up having a great movie experience.  The stunts in Death Proof were out of %&$*@#!  control!!!    I found myself sincerely concerned for the poor woman on the hood of that car (the amazing ZOE BELL who couldn't care less) .  There are a ton of pure adrenline and tongue-in-cheek guilty pleasures here.  Enough to fill the Astrodome.  These guys are on top of their games and enjoying/ capitalizing on all of the freedom the weinsteins pour on them.  I love the way it said at the end of the Machete clip, "Brought to you by your friends at the weinstein company!"   Hysterical.  These guys can get away with anything.  I love it.    


  • AAAHAHAHAHAAAAAHA!!!!!!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

       

      I searched for Junebug, and this was on the list that came up.  AHAHAHAAA!!!!!!   I totally remember this movie from my youth.  I think it was on HBO every afternoon after I came home from grade school.  AHAHAHAAAA!!!  This is one of the funniest movies of my entire childhood.  I haven't seen it in probably 13 years, but I still remember every joke.  Must have seen this 50 times.  Laughed my @%*@# off every time.  There is a teenage Chris Rock cameo in this movie that I still quote today, "Pour some in my hands for a dime!"   AAAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!  CLASSIC.  CLASSIC.  CLASSIC.  I need to go call my brother and reminiesce about this one right now..........


  • This one could've been better

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sunshine  (2007)

     

         With the overabundance of talent working on this film, the end product should have been something far superior to what exists here.  The premise is fantastic (although way too soon of a time frame for the sun to be dying,try 6 billion years after it has swelled to a size that will engulf earth).  But astronomy mistakes aside, i am willing to suspend disbelief for a quality story, there was too much going on in this movie.  And the characters start dying before the audience gets a chance to get to know them, or even try to care about what happens to them.  And the end.....................SPOILER ALERT!...................is the guy from the other ship really there......is it his ghost........is it god.........too many questions for me.   By the end of the movie, I had no idea what had happened, or why.  Ambiguity is interesting, but sheer incoherence is annoying.


  • WHAT A PLEASANT SURPRISE

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Junebug  (2005)

     

       This film was just released in Korea last week.  What a pleasant surprise this movie was.  I found it to be an absolutely refreshing piece of work.  The characters are so well drawn (not to mention thrown right out of the screen and into your lap).  Warm, funny, touching, bothersome........how on earth did one filmmaker put all of that into a single work.  And that kid from the OC is actually a fun actor to watch.  I have never seen the show, but I imagine that they do not use him to his potential.  High quality entertainment here.  This reaches beyond what all those other art-house/indie movies try to do, but never quite touch. 


  • The Always Impressive Gilliam

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Tideland  (2006)

     

        I have loved Terry Gilliam ever since I saw Time Bandits when i was like 14.  My automatic response whenever anyone asks that "Who is your favorite director?" question is always the same, Terry Gilliam.  It is quite safe to say that he is one of the most original directors of the last 20 years.  If Tideland is any indication of the direction he is currently going though, I'm afraid we may have lost him. 

    I love weird.  I love weird.  Tideland is something beyond weird. 

    Maybe I'll come back to that thought. 

    I think the one thing that is most impressive about Gilliam's style is his constant ability to get completely unique performances out of his actors.  He does it every time.  If you think about Brad Pitt in 12 Monkeys,  Heath Ledger in The Brothers Grimm, Johnny Depp and Benecio Del Toro in Fear and Loathing, and EVERYONE in The Fisher King, they are all completely unlike anything else you've ever seen from them. 

    The performances in Tideland are top-notch.  It is pure entertainment.  However, it will not be accepted well by many in the theatre-going community. 


  • Oh Stop It!!!!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Transformers  (2007)

     

          Okay.  First of all, anyone who takes this film seriously, and feels compelled to critique,  is way too tightly wound.  I was a fan of the cartoon, I had the toys at Christmas, and  I consider myself a fairly capable film buff.  That said, this movie absolutely rocked!!!!!!! 

          It's not class. Not even close.  Michael Bay is a hack.  That's undisputable. However, he is a flashy, explosions, beautiful girls, suped-up effects, all-in-your-face, certified genius of a hack. 

           I saw it in a theatre full of Koreans, and everyone cheered, applauded (not at the Japanese references hahahahahahhaaaaa), and laughed.  Even in translation this movie works.  You could take out all the dialogue together (although it is a very funny movie), and it would still be a summertime masterpiece.  I mean after Spiderman 3 and Pirates 3 (both unbelievably disappointing), this movie saved my summer.  I highly recommend it, if for nothing more than two hours of mind-numbing fun and deliciously fatty popcorn.

     


  • OH MY GOD!!!!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Baise-Moi  (2001)

     

       I almost feel guilty for watching this one.....almost.  In the all time top charts for most offensive and difficult-to-watch films these eyes have ever seen, this one is right near the top (with one ot two others I dare not even mention).  Unlike most films that are daring and trying to test social morality through controversy, this one is completely void of any redeeming features (most have at least one).  I understand what the filmmaker was trying to do, but for contemporary films pushing the envelope (especially by means of unsimulated sex in cinema) 9 Songs or Shortbus are vastly superior. 


  • Upon a second viewing

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

     

       The first time I watched this was on a Sunday afternoon about 3 months ago and I think I was interrupted a few times.  I remember being happy for Forest Whitaker winning the Oscar (I will never forget his absolutely brilliant cameo in The Color of Money), but I was also a little disappointed that Ryan Gosling didn't get it (Half Nelson was probably the best movie I saw out of all the Oscar hopefuls). 

        But upon a second, uninterrupted,  viewing of this film last night, I can firmly say that I have a much better appreciation for it.  Not only are all of the performances perfect, it details what must have been one of the most intense times and places of the last fifty years.  I love a good fish-out-water story (being a white man in Asia myself) and watching McAvoy's astonishment at all things African,before realizing it isn't the grand adventure theme park he anticpated, seems 100% realistic and believable to me.  I wonder how much of his character's story is based on fact. 

         Before I close this down, I have to rave about Kerry Washington!!!  Not only is she beyond beautiful, but she has to be one of the most talented young actresses out there now.  Look at her in The Dead Girl.  Yeah!  That's the same girl.


  • Parker Posey

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Fay Grim  (2007)

     

          Maybe it's just me, but I could probably watch Parker Posey do anyting for 2 hours and not get bored (Party Girl excluded).  Hal Hartley is quite an intriguingly unique filmmaker as well.  That makes for a pretty solid combination.  However, this one was a little bland.    The style and the mood of the whole piece is cool and completely refreshing in its estrangement from modern filmmaking conventionality, but it is necessary to see HENRY FOOL (a truly exceptional film) before watching this one.  

    AND THERE IS A SPOILER COMING FOR THOSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO AVOID IT!!!!! 

          My biggest problem with FAY GRIM (and there are not many problems with it), is that the entire movie is leading up to a promise that Fay will, at the end, be reunited with Henry, or at least have a face-to-face encounter with him.  That is what the entire plot built towards for myself.  That was going to be the big prize at the end of the game.  And it never came......................  I like Hal Hartley.  I like his style.   The Amateur is his best work (and a genuine masterpiece).  Unfortunately Fay Grim doesn't come close to its potential. 


  • Ouch!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Condemned  (2007)

     

      Vinnie Jones was the only thing that made this watchable.  Actually, the only reason I bought it was because the guy was selling 6 DVDs for $10 on the sidewalk in Phnom Penh and I had run out of options.  I JUST LOVED the critic's quote on the front of the pirated copy "It seems as though thinking hurts Steve Austin's head.  Watching him certainly hurts mine."   Aren't those blurbs supposed to entice one to watch the film?  hahahahahaaaaa


  • Noah Baumbach

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

     

       This is just a quality movie.  Noah Baumbach is probably too talented a writer to be making films though.  His mid-90's Kicking and Screaming was a borderline masterpiece and also about over-literate types in the same Whit Stillman-ish manner.  While that style makes for entertaining banter, however, it loses focus on film.  And, please, just completely disregard Baumbach's Mr. Jealousy (there was obviously something miscalculated about that production).   The Squid and the Whale is something new from Baumbach though.  It is a much more honest and harrowing side.  He allows the pace of the movie to carry it (no doubt a tip he picked up while collaborating with Wes Anderson on The Life Aquaitc).    This is as fine a film as I expect to see this summer. Jeff Daniels and Laura Linney just get better and better all the time.   I expect Noah Baumbach to do greater things in the near future.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<December 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789


Categories
 


Advertisement