Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Aaron_Peck Blog

  • Review: Poison Ivy 4 - Secret Society

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Well, we’ve come a long way from the cult Sundance hit Poison Ivy starring Drew Barrymore. What, you didn’t know that Poison Ivy actually premiered at Sundance in 1992 and was nominated for the dramatic Grand Jury Prize along side movies like Reservoir Dogs? Well, you learn something new every day, don’t you?

    The first Poison Ivy movie spurred a cult following, and with most movies that garner “cult” status, film studios think that is their license to churn out hack sequel after hack sequel until the audience is bled dry both of money and any feeling of good will they had toward the original film.

    So on down the sequel road we’ve gone, from Drew Barrymore, to Alyssa Milano in Poison Ivy II: Lily, Jamie Pressly in Poison Ivy: The New Seduction, and finally to today’s featured presentation Poison Ivy 4: The Secret Society starring Miriam McDonald (Degrassi: The Next Generation) and various other girls who like to take their shirts off.

    The cover of Poison Ivy 4 features a sultry brunette sexily buttoning up her shirt and the same vixen soaking wet in a pool with her clothes on. Flames lap at the title giving the  would-be watcher an ominous feeling of thrills and sex. At least this is what I thought while inspecting the case. So you can imagine my surprise when what I got was a comedy.

    Poison Ivy 4
    had me laughing my head off five minutes into the film as poor country girl Daisy is planning on leaving her hick boyfriend and his newly purchased piece of land for a chance at an education from a big prestigious school. To say the dialogue is clunky is to insult clunks everywhere. It’s best described as the vocal equivalent of fingernails on a chalkboard — one step away from reading off of cue cards.

    But it’s not fair of us to hold Poison Ivy 4 to such a high standard, right? We knew what we were getting into when we picked this title up. We wanted some nakedness and some sex. That’s it! Expecting a coherent, engaging story from the fourth installment in this series is like expecting Oscar-winning acting in a late-night Cinemax movie.

    So let’s talk about those sex scenes since that’s the only reason anybody would be remotely interested in this film. Again, referring to late-night Cinemax shows, that’s the kind of sex you can expect, complete with campy saxophone “porn groove” music playing in the background. There’s no hint of eroticism involved here, just plain old rip-off-those-clothes-and-do-it-already sex.

    The film is painful to watch, yes, if you were expecting some sort of sexy, erotic adventure involving college girls. But, on the other hand if you were expecting a cheesy romp with boobies to show to your frat buddies while drunk, then this is the movie for you.


  • Review: Peter and Vandy

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Peter and Vandy  (2009)

    I don’t know how it happened, but Sundance picked up the same movie twice, just under a different name. Just like 500 Days of Summer, Peter and Vandy tells the story of a relationship. The movie jumps back and forth in time showing us the good, the bad, and the awful. The characters look back on their relationship with each other and try to decide if they were ever in love.

    I couldn’t believe how extremely similar these two movies were, but just in case you thought I was going to give Peter and Vandy a bad review think again.

    Peter and Vandy has a much smaller budget than 500 Days of Summer and some lesser known faces, but it is a solid little film.

    Peter gets the courage to walk up to Vandy while she’s sitting in a town square eating her lunch. He’s a naturally nervous person who profusely apologizes for himself even though he’s not doing anything wrong. Vandy is a beautiful strong woman who falls for Peter after he gives her a thoughtful gift.

    The conversations Peter and Vandy have together reminded me of conversations you could hear anyone have. I wonder if everything was completely scripted or if the actors did a lot of adlibbing. Peter and Vandy gives you the feeling that you are peering in on a real relationship, watching the problems of real couples.

    Some people who watch may realize that they do the same things with their significant other. Fighting over little things, and letting those problems fester without resolving them can eat a relationship up from the inside out.

    Peter and Vandy isn’t just a well constructed little flick, it is a wake up call for all those who have someone they truly love but take for granted.


  • Review: The Winning Season

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Winning Season is a way to tell a conventional story in a fairly unconventional way. A local high school girls basketball team needs a coach. They are terrible team who never win. See what I mean about conventional? A team that needs a new coach because they are terrible? What do you think happens with the new coach? That’s right, they end up winning. But, that’s not the point of the film. The reason why this film is different from the other feel-good sports films that involve a new coach taking over a team is because here it's more about the personal lives of the players and the coach involved, rather than the winning, and the "big game."

    The new coach, Bill (Sam Rockwell), is a drunk who is currently busy busing tables at the local restaurant. He’s divorced and barely gets to see his teenage girl once a week. He takes the coaching job mostly because he doesn’t have anything else going on in his life.

    The new team only has five healthy players and one with a broken foot. However, over the next few montages, Bill shapes them into some sort of a team that can compete with the other local high schools. But The Winning Season really isn’t about winning or basketball.

    I recently saw Big Fan up here at Sundance and explained how Paul was the most sad and pathetic character ever created. Well, Bill is right up there with Paul in the pathetic department, but the difference is Bill has some redeemable value. His character undergoes change, not only with helping the basketball team, but helping to better his life in the process.He becomes a better human being. He treats his family and people around him better, and maybe even more importantly he treats himself better.

    The acting by the young girls is another bright spot in the film. Emma Roberts is brilliant as Abby, the leader of the team. She holds her own with her one-on-one scenes with Rockwell. Their banter with each other is humorous and real.

    I liked that Winning Season found a new way to tell a very old story. It works. It’s delightful to watch.


  • Review: The Informers

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Informers  (2009)

    Star-studded casts are lures at Sundance. They draw the people into the theaters, but sometimes the audience ends up leaving empty-handed. In the case of The Informers, the audience leaves empty-headed.

    The film is a 98-minute journey into narcissistic nothingness. Set in the '80s in the middle of L.A., The Informers follows around a plethora of characters all of whom, surprise, have problems. Big ones. Kidnapping, sexually transmitted diseases, cheating partners, underage infatuations, and confusion over sexuality just to name a few.

    There are so many characters and so many story lines, packed into such a short movie that none of them approach anything considered coherence or resolution. The characters are thinly connected to one another, but there’s nothing that truly brings them all together. There’s even a completely superfluous plot line that involves a young kid and his father in Hawaii.

    This movie wants so bad to be a quirky character romp in the vein of Pulp Fiction, but it fails on so many levels. There is not one likable character in this film, they are all irredeemable messes who have no point in existing in the first place other than to be vapid wastes of space.

    This film was one of the most frustrating messes I have seen in a long time. The best thing about the movie was hearing the groans from the press corps out in the hall after the screening.


  • Review: Five Minutes of Heaven

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    It’s pretty hard to start watching movies at 8:30 in the morning. It’s a good thing that Five Minutes of Heaven was 90 minutes of genius filmmaking. It did get screwed with its timeslot in the press screenings though -- early in the morning and on Inauguration Day. Needless to say the theater was nearly empty.

    Five Minutes of Heaven tells the story of two men caught up in the conflict in Ireland in the 1960s. As a youth, Alistair (Liam Neeson) killed a man. That man was the brother of Joe (James Nesbitt), who witnessed the shooting as a young boy. Years later Alistair and Joe are grown men. Alistair served twelve years in prison for shooting Joe’s brother. They are about for the first time on an Irish television show that wants to film the meeting between the two.

    For the past 33 years Joe has had to live with the guilt thrust upon him by his mother. She blamed Joe for his brother being killed. Even though Joe wasn’t older than 10, she still continued to blame him. The effects of this mental abuse can be seen in Joe as an adult. He’s constantly nervous and fidgety. He plays things over and over in his head. His undeserved guilt still deeply affects him.

    The second act of the film — when Joe and Alistair are about to meet — is filmmaking at its best. Suspense builds and builds with an obviously agitated Joe and a shaken Alistair.

    The acting here is superb. Nesbitt plays a man on the edge better than anyone I’ve ever seen. You can tell that deep down he really is a good guy, but he wants revenge. He wants revenge for his brother and for what happened to him in the aftermath.

    Neeson, likewise, is great as Alistair. Unlike Joe, who wears his emotions on his sleeve, Alistair tries to conceal them, but you can tell he has deep remorse for what he’s done.

    This is a revenge movie without all of the fighting and killing. Nesbitt and Neeson rarely have any screen time together, but the tension is still unbearable. What’s going to happen when they meet? That’s the big question, and the conclusion is perfect.


  • Review: The Cove

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Cove  (2009)

    This is the first documentary that I’ve seen at Sundance thus far, and it was worth it. If you have any heart or feeling in your soul you will connect with this film…that is unless you live in Taiji, Japan.

    The Cove focuses on one tiny secluded piece of water in the town of Taiji, Japan where every year fisherman with large boats channel thousands of dolphins into a secluded bay. Here in the bay dolphins are sold to trainers from dolphin shows around the world. The dolphins who aren’t picked are then led to the cove in question where they are slaughtered, 23,000 every year.

    The man behind the film is Ric O’Barry. He feels personally responsible for the plight of these dolphins and captive dolphins everywhere, because he’s the guy who made dolphins famous. He’s the brain behind TV show Flipper. After one of the five dolphins who played Flipper died, or as O’Barry says it “committed suicide” he has vowed that his life work will be to free the dolphins and stop the slaughter in Taiji.

    Every year in Taiji thousands of dolphins are funneled into a small bay. The fisherman of the village make a very decent living doing this. They are also very particular that no one sees what actually goes on in the cove where the dolphins are slaughtered. And so the quest of O’Barry and his crew begins. Trying to find some way to film the atrocities taking place within the cove.

    O’Barry is well-known by the government and police in Japan for trying to stop these activities, which hinders the group’s ability to sometimes get their work done.

    The documentary works when it focuses on the town of Taiji and the cove. At points throughout though it loses its focus and goes off on a few tangents that could be covered in their own films, like the mercury toxicity in dolphin meat and how the Japanese government doesn’t mind selling it under the guise of it being whale meat.

    The dastardly deeds of the slaughtering cove are finally exposed in gruesome detail. It’s one of those films that makes you want to do something, but you’re not sure what. I’ll tell you one thing though, I’ll never go to Sea World again.


  • Review: Big Fan

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Big Fan  (2009)

    The first film I saw today was a screening of Big Fan starring Patton Oswalt and written/directed by Robert D. Siegel of The Wrestler fame.

    You know that saying “There’s always someone worse off than you?” Well, Paul Aufiero (Oswalt) is that guy. Paul works in a parking garage booth, lives with his nagging mother, and his only happiness in life depends solely on the success of the New York Giants football team.

    Paul is the saddest and most pathetic character ever created for the big screen. He spends his nights writing personal scripts to use when he calls into the local sports talk show. Like two immature geeks on an online video game message board, Paul and a man named “Philadelphia Phil” exchange heated football discussions back and forth. His Sundays are spent, not actually in the stadium, but with his buddy in the parking lot of the Giants’ stadium watching the game on a tiny TV hooked up to the car battery.

    Paul tells everyone he’s happy, but he presents himself like a person who just saw a group of innocent puppies get slaughtered. Oswalt is normally a very funny man, but here he is pathetic. That’s not a slight against the film, because he is supposed to be pathetic, the warning is don’t expect a comedy.

    The film drags on at the pace at which Paul approaches his life. Virtually nothing happens in the first half of the film, except we learn Paul’s brother is a sleaze bag attorney, his brother’s wife has enormous fake boobs, and his family doesn’t respect him.

    The conflict comes when Paul and his buddy follow the star quarter back of the Giants team to a club, where Paul gets the living crap beat out of him after he discloses they’d been following the player. Now what does Paul do? Does he turn his favorite player in and risk the Giants losing? Does he sue the thug for all he’s worth? Do we really care?

    It’s so hard to care for a character that doesn’t care for himself. There’s no redeeming value in Paul. When he finally confronts his nemesis “Philadelphia Phil” the scene is confusing, and doesn’t accomplish much other than showing us how immature these people really are.

    I understand there are people out there that actually take something as trivial as sports this seriously, but a movie about it isn’t interesting. If I wanted to see this type of obsessive immaturity I’d go down to the local sports bar where it’s free.


  • Review: Good Hair

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Good Hair  (2009)

    Now here is the most interesting documentary I’ve seen since King of Kong. Just like King of Kong, Good Hair takes a topic I formally knew nothing about and sheds some light on it in the most fascinating way.

    Good Hair is narrated by comedian Chris Rock. One day one of Chris’ daughters walked into him and said “Daddy, why don’t I have good hair?” This started a quest where Chris delves into the culture of the hair of black women.

    Straight flowing hair is apparently the envy of the black female community. It’s a highly sought after commodity. The straighter the better. Some women achieve this look by using a highly concentrated substance called relaxer. This relaxer, Chris finds out, contains sodium hydroxide as the main ingredient. Sodium hydroxide is highly toxic and can cause scalp burns.

    The other way to get straight “beautiful” hair is with the weave. Weaves can cost women anywhere from $1,000 to $3,000. The weave hair, we find out, comes from India where women cut it off in religious rituals, and then in turn it is sold.

    Chris Rock is great at narrating, but at some points eats up too much of screen time with his face. He makes the famous black women he interviews, except the immortal Maya Angelou, look pretty vain and egotistical as they explain how much they spend to get long flowing hair.

    Good Hair does falter as it loses focus from the main issue of the movie to talk about a large competition that takes place in Atlanta, Georgia every year where contestants compete in outlandish performances to be crowned the stylist of the year by Bronner Brothers hair products.

    Even though Good Hair is predominantly funny as Chris Rock cracks joke after joke, it does show something that seems to be an identity crisis among black women. Most of them are ashamed of their natural hair.


  • Review: 500 Days of Summer

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Zooey Deschanel star in this quirky story about boy meets girl, boy becomes infatuated, but girl wants to be “just friends.” Being friends with the girl of your dreams is possibly the most dreaded thing that could happen to a single man.

    Gordon-Levitt plays Tom, a sappy young guy who believes in fate and “the one.” He writes and designs greeting cards for a living, but secretly wants to be an architect.

    Deschanel plays Summer. She’s perfect for this role; she seems cute and quirky enough to be one of those girls that could make a guy fall madly in love with her without really realizing it.

    The movie jumps around in the chronology with a little counter that pops up every so often to tell us what day within the 500 days it is. At first we see them sitting on a park bench and she’s got a ring on, they’re holding hands, and everything looks like it worked out perfectly. Cut to another scene where Tom is in the kitchen breaking plates distraught that him and Summer have broken up.

    So the movie plays out like this. Skipping back and forth in time showing us the good, the bad, and the terrible in Tom and Summer’s relationship. It’s an interesting way to tell a story. Little intricacies are revealed about scenes we’ve already seen part of, but they are given a different context.

    There’s even a part where director Marc Webb shows us a split screen of Tom’s expectations and his harsh reality. After not seeing Summer for a while they accidentally meet on a train and Summer invites Tom to a party she’s having. As Tom is walking up to the door the screen splits. On the expectations side we see Tom and Summer having a great conversation. They’re laughing and touching, and then they start kissing. On the reality side, something much different is happening. Summer is ignoring Tom and is flirting with other guys.

    500 Days of Summer is as real as a movie can get to the actual truth of dating. The ups, the downs, and the games that people play without making their true feelings known. It’s a cute, sweet film and it should do well in theatrical release.


  • Review: Taking Chance

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Taking Chance  (2008)

    First up is already the front-runner for my festival favorite. It’s called Taking Chance and stars Kevin Bacon as Lieutenant Colonel Michael Strobl. Based on the real journals of Lieutenant Colonel Michael Strobl, this film follows the transport of a fallen soldier, named Chance Phelps, back to his home to be buried. Strobl volunteers for the duty of transportation escort.

    It turns out that this is an extremely serious duty and honor within the military. Strict guidelines are to be followed. The escort must witness each time the body is taken on and off any type of transport. The escort must also transfer the fallen soldier’s personal items, with the utmost respect, to give them to the family.

    At the beginning we’re not sure why such a high ranking officer like Strobl has volunteered for a duty that is mostly given to lower ranking personnel. As Strobl traverses the country from the east coast to the Midwest he meets all different kinds of people along the way — a pilot, a young driver, a funeral home director, a flight attendant, a perky teenager. All of them, once they find out what Strobl is doing, have such a profound sense of gratitude that it’s hard not to cry.

    Everywhere Strobl goes, everyday Americans pay their respects to Chance by solemn gestures. Simple things, such as when the luggage handler removes his hat as the body is loaded onto the plane, are profound statements.

    Kevin Bacon is perfect in this role. He’s stoic and stalwart. He doesn’t show his emotions outwardly, but you can tell he feels very deeply about the gratitude the people have for Chance and the military in general.

    Here is a film about the military, set in 2004, which constantly mentions Iraq, but has no political statements to make at all. No anti-administration or pro-administration rhetoric, no political agenda of any kind. This is a film about the true goodness in people, and the respect that they have for the men and women who serve this country with distinction.

    Taking Chance is a powerful and profound film. It will touch you. It touched me. There are no overly dramatic scenes in this film. Nothing felt forced or cliché. Everything came straight from the heart.


  • Review: Moon

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Moon  (2009)

    The future is an energy efficient place. Rocks on the moon are being harvested for “Helium 3” a clean burning fuel that is trapped inside of the rocks when the sun hits them. There is one station on the moon that we know of, with the population of one. Sam Rockwell plays Sam Bell. He’s the lone engineer manning the station. Most everything is automated, and he’s helped with his tasks by a personal computer named GERTY (voiced by Kevin Spacey).

    Sam spends most of his time working on a wooden model of a small town. He carves buildings out of wood. He has a contract to work on the moon for three years, and then he can go home. When we join him, he’s got two weeks left on his contract, but the isolation and loneliness has taken its toll.

    Soon Sam starts to hallucinate. He sees a women sitting in his chair. Then while driving out to fix one of the rock harvesters he sees something in the distance coming toward him. He can’t make it out. Straining to see the object, he ends up wrecking his rover.

    The next scene Sam wakes up in the infirmary. How did he get there? Who brought him there? GERTY the friendly computer is there, but no one else.

    After that anything I say may give away the overall secret of the film. But, here is where the film excels. It reveals this secret at the beginning of the second act. For the most part of the film you know the secret, and so does Sam. So, now we’re left wondering how the story is going to go forward, but it does, beautifully. Because the real secret hasn’t been revealed yet. It isn’t until the end that we know the full gravity of the situation Sam is in. He has to make choices. Choices that will affect his life, and the life of others that he may or may not love.

    Sam Rockwell is the only on screen actor in this film. It’s an interesting gimmick, which could only work with the energetic Rockwell.

    This is a film that will most likely be seen in theaters after the festival. Keep an eye out, you won’t be disappointed.


  • Review: Taken

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Taken  (2009)

    Ah! It’s good to get back to the basics, with Liam Neeson’s (“Batman Begins”) new thriller “Taken.” Sure we’ve heard the story before. Ex-military father’s daughter is kidnapped and sold into some kind of human trafficking ring, which then triggers those hidden “talents” the father acquired in his military days.

     “Taken” is a perfect example of taking a simple story, sticking to the basics of what makes a good action movie, and going with that. First and foremost, they keep the camera still! Gee, what a novel concept.

    Bryan Mills (Liam Neeson) is an overprotective father. He’s ex-military who still does side security jobs with some of his military buddies. Right out of the gate we see that Bryan really knows how to handle himself when there’s an altercation at the concert he’s working security for.

    Bryan is trying to connect with his precocious teenage daughter named Kim (Maggie Grace “Lost”). Kim lives with her mother (Famke Janssen “X-men”) and her obscenely rich step-father (Xander Berkeley “24”). Bryan is extremely protective of his daughter, which is why when Kim brings up her plans of traveling to Paris with her friend, he is apprehensive.

    As you can tell from the trailer Kim is kidnapped by faceless thugs who may or may not be running a human trafficking business. When learning that his daughter has been taken Bryan kicks into gear and flies to Paris to find his daughter. What follows is a fast-paced action thriller that doesn’t disappoint.

    Liam Neeson shows that even at his age he can still churn out some pretty amazing fight scenes. He stacks up the body count as fast as Jack Bauer or John McClane. He swiftly navigates his way through the underworld of Paris gathering information on his daughter’s whereabouts and dealing with bad guys who have plenty of weaponry, but apparently have never heard of ‘target practice.’

    The action scenes are tense and well filmed. The camera stays still and doesn’t resort to one second close-up cut scenes like “Quantum of Solace” or “Transporter 3” did. The camera backs up and gives us a full view of the action. It’s nice to see the actual choreography of a well-thought out fight scene rather than a rapid succession of close-up thrusting fist and flailing leg shots.

    While Neeson’s Bryan character deserves to be in the same group as the Jack Bauer’s of the action world, Grace’s Kim is the biggest downer of this film. Thankfully she’s not actually in it for very long. As a 26 year-old playing a 17 year-old Maggie Grace lays the whiny, annoying teenager act on pretty thick. She doesn’t have a brain in her head, but I guess none of us did at that age. The difference is she doesn’t think she does, and as we all know even though we didn’t have brains at 17 we all thought we knew everything.

    “Taken” is a very well put together action film. It has all the popcorn elements that an action film needs: fight scenes, car chases, explosions, and machine guns that hit everything but their target. But, it’s nicely packed together into a taut little thriller. Even though we’ve heard the story before there’s no need to try and reinvent the wheel when you have a decent story.

    Grade: A-

     


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<December 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789

Dig through the archives

Categories
 


Advertisement