list WraithTDK's Recent Activity - Spout http://www.spout.com/ WraithTDK's Recent Activity - Spout Copyright 2005-9 Spout, LLC Spout RSS http://www.spout.com/images/SpoutLogoRSS.jpg WraithTDK's Recent Activity - Spout http://www.spout.com/ 136 30 Spout Group:Spout Customer Care - Get answers to your questions here! http://www.spout.com/groups/Spout_Customer_Care/420/default.aspx Group Name: Spout Customer Care - Get answers to your questions here!
Group Description:

Have a general question? Need help with some thing on the site? Have a bug you would like to report? Well then, you have come to the right place. No matter what you are having trouble with, we would like to help you find a solution. And maybe, through your own experience with the site, you will want to help other users too. That's what communities are all about. 


Created: 8/1/2007
Number of Members: 79
Number of discussion posts: 513
]]>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:47:00 GMTSpout Customer CareWed, 01 Aug 2007 09:06:04 GMT790513Group Spout Group:HORROR MOVIES 101 - FOR ALL WHO LOVE HORROR MOVIES http://www.spout.com/groups/HORROR_MOVIES_101/222/default.aspx Group Name: HORROR MOVIES 101 - FOR ALL WHO LOVE HORROR MOVIES
Group Description:    " I bid you welcome...  Enter freely and of your own will..."
Created: 12/17/2006
Number of Members: 414
Number of Lists: 6
Number of discussion posts: 2333
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 00:53:17 GMTHORROR MOVIES 101Sun, 17 Dec 2006 01:20:09 GMT41462333Group Spout Group:foureyedmonsters - Talk to Susan & Arin about the movie and those addictive podcasts. http://www.spout.com/groups/foureyedmonsters/338/endorsed.aspx Group Name: foureyedmonsters - Talk to Susan & Arin about the movie and those addictive podcasts.
Created: 6/4/2007
Number of Members: 322
Number of discussion posts: 56
]]>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:42:31 GMTfoureyedmonstersMon, 04 Jun 2007 15:28:43 GMT322056Group Spout Group:Weekly Theme - "Fighting off boredom with the Iron Fist of Variety" http://www.spout.com/groups/Weekly_Theme/625/default.aspx Group Name: Weekly Theme - "Fighting off boredom with the Iron Fist of Variety"
Created: 6/30/2008
Number of Members: 52
Number of Lists: 12
Number of discussion posts: 701
]]>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:20:23 GMTWeekly ThemeMon, 30 Jun 2008 15:13:45 GMT5212701Group Spout Group:Spout Mavens - Spout's best movie reviewers. Membership is limited. http://www.spout.com/groups/Spout_Mavens/366/default.aspx Group Name: Spout Mavens - Spout's best movie reviewers. Membership is limited.
Group Description:

A group of Spout's best reviewers.
Read the requirements.


Created: 6/20/2007
Number of Members: 36
Number of Lists: 9
Number of discussion posts: 451
]]>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:10:52 GMTSpout MavensWed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:29 GMT369451Group Spout Group:missing a film - we'll help you find a film http://www.spout.com/groups/missing_a_film/263/default.aspx Group Name: missing a film - we'll help you find a film
Created: 3/5/2007
Number of Members: 131
Number of Lists: 1
Number of discussion posts: 234
]]>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:30:05 GMTmissing a filmMon, 05 Mar 2007 16:37:43 GMT1311234Group Spout Group:Friends of Foreign Flicks - Discussions of all films not American. http://www.spout.com/groups/Friends_of_Foreign_Flicks/591/default.aspx Group Name: Friends of Foreign Flicks - Discussions of all films not American.
Group Description:

At some point you just want more than what's right in front of you.


Created: 4/24/2008
Number of Members: 30
Number of Lists: 1
Number of discussion posts: 92
]]>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:05:26 GMTFriends of Foreign FlicksThu, 24 Apr 2008 11:44:11 GMT30192Group Spout Group:The Documentary - A place to talk about the much overlooked genre of the Documentary. http://www.spout.com/groups/The_Documentary/79/default.aspx Group Name: The Documentary - A place to talk about the much overlooked genre of the Documentary.
Created: 4/2/2006
Number of Members: 49
Number of Lists: 4
Number of discussion posts: 53
]]>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:05:39 GMTThe DocumentarySun, 02 Apr 2006 00:58:55 GMT49453Group Spout Group:Sound on Sight - Podcasts, movie reviews, interviews, news and more. http://www.spout.com/groups/Sound_on_Sight/529/default.aspx Group Name: Sound on Sight - Podcasts, movie reviews, interviews, news and more.
Group Description:

Sound on Sight proudly brings you two podcasts each week. Voted best podcast in 2008, these hard working hosts cover everything from mainstream Hollywood films to noir, horror, science fiction, cult cinema, documentary film making and more. Look out for a new show added every Tuesday and Thursday morning.

http://www.soundonsight.org/

 

 


Created: 1/6/2008
Number of Members: 104
Number of discussion posts: 150
]]>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:03:03 GMTSound on SightSun, 06 Jan 2008 21:24:34 GMT1040150Group Spout Group:Worst Movie Ever - The Group is dedicated to uncovering the bombs, so you don't have too. http://www.spout.com/groups/Worst_Movie_Ever/104/default.aspx Group Name: Worst Movie Ever - The Group is dedicated to uncovering the bombs, so you don't have too.
Created: 5/5/2006
Number of Members: 200
Number of Lists: 10
Number of discussion posts: 412
]]>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:43:26 GMTWorst Movie EverFri, 05 May 2006 20:20:45 GMT20010412Group Spout Group:Movie Polls - Vote in weekly polls and discuss http://www.spout.com/groups/Movie_Polls/657/default.aspx Group Name: Movie Polls - Vote in weekly polls and discuss
Group Description:

Each week I will post a new poll.  Please vote in the poll and reply to the discussion thread to discuss the question.  Please do not vote more than once.


Created: 11/25/2008
Number of Members: 66
Number of discussion posts: 414
]]>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:42:29 GMTMovie PollsTue, 25 Nov 2008 16:54:38 GMT660414Group Spout Group:Zombie Obsession - Zombie Lovers, Unite! http://www.spout.com/groups/Zombie_Obsession/329/default.aspx Group Name: Zombie Obsession - Zombie Lovers, Unite!
Group Description:

Join us to discuss your favorite or most horrifying Zombie Movies or just your most memorable Zombie Moments.  From Funny to Scary to Gory to Bizarre...

 


Created: 5/28/2007
Number of Members: 104
Number of Lists: 1
Number of discussion posts: 594
]]>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:29:56 GMTZombie ObsessionMon, 28 May 2007 02:04:45 GMT1041594Group Spout Group:A World of MSTies - Thank You, Won't We? http://www.spout.com/groups/A_World_of_MSTies/590/default.aspx Group Name: A World of MSTies - Thank You, Won't We?
Group Description:

Glorify the best show ever (MST3K) with wit, wisdom and downright wackiness!


Created: 4/23/2008
Number of Members: 10
Number of Lists: 2
Number of discussion posts: 23
]]>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:25:25 GMTA World of MSTiesWed, 23 Apr 2008 20:21:48 GMT10223Group Spout Group:It's a Wonderful Night for Oscar! - Devoted to everything nominated or snubbed by the Academy of Golden Guys http://www.spout.com/groups/It_s_a_Wonderful_Night_for_Oscar/46/default.aspx Group Name: It's a Wonderful Night for Oscar! - Devoted to everything nominated or snubbed by the Academy of Golden Guys
Group Description: Year after year, movie lovers and non movie lovers alike discuss ad nauseum the fate of films nominated for the utmost honor, the Academy Award. Some people watch it for the fashion. Some people watch for the haute couture. Some people watch for their fill of celebrity sightings. If you are a member of this group, you love everything about the Super Bowl of movies, especially the movies themselves! You love to make predictions, guess at the politics, discuss and dissect who should have been nominated and who should have won...or, you're just an avid movie lover that likes to pay attention. Come join the group!
Created: 3/4/2006
Number of Members: 41
Number of Lists: 58
Number of discussion posts: 226
]]>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:11:33 GMTIt's a Wonderful Night for Oscar!Sat, 04 Mar 2006 15:24:32 GMT4158226Group Spout Group:Movie Marathons http://www.spout.com/groups/Movie_Marathons/693/default.aspx Group Name: Movie Marathons
Group Description:

This is a group for members to start and organize movie marathons. Its primary purpose is to get more people exposed to more film. And to watch these films and discuss them as a group.

Anyone can start a marathon and marathons can be organized in many different ways to showcase the films of a director, actor, genre, theme etc...

Check the Guidlines and Suggestions discussion for ideas.


Created: 7/22/2009
Number of Members: 15
Number of discussion posts: 22
]]>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:33:02 GMTMovie MarathonsWed, 22 Jul 2009 01:35:58 GMT15022Group Spout Group:Movies we do not want to see - Try to convince us to see these movies! http://www.spout.com/groups/Movies_we_do_not_want_to_see/70/default.aspx Group Name: Movies we do not want to see - Try to convince us to see these movies!
Group Description: Want to be a member? Send me a message with a list of at least 5 movies that you do not want to see. There are many movies that I do not want to see. I'm not sure if its right of me to decide never to see a movie without seeing it. You know...like when a kid says they hate mushrooms even though they admit never trying them. So maybe this is a good spot for people to display movies they don't think they want to see, and see if anyone can convince us to try them out.
Created: 3/22/2006
Number of Members: 20
Number of Lists: 3
Number of discussion posts: 190
]]>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:31:56 GMTMovies we do not want to seeWed, 22 Mar 2006 14:27:50 GMT203190Group Spout Post: The best of either series so far! http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/7/3/32090.aspx Post By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 7/3/2008 6:04:09 PM
Body: A perfect franchise match-up, as the ultimate "sport-hunter" takes aim at the the ultimate natural predator. The film does an excellent job of merging the two legendary franchises, and even though it takes place in the present (long before any of the Alien movies), they do a great job of tieing it in to the series' continuity by having the main characters funded by Mr. Weyland, founder of Wayland Industries, better known as "The Company", the sinister organization that sent the Nostromo to capture the original Alien. This at last answers the question of how the company first found out about the killing machines.If you are a fan of either series, I can't recommend this movie highly enough, and consider it the best of either franchise (though I have not yet seen AVP 2).
]]>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:04:09 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog7/3/2008 6:04:09 PMA perfect franchise match-up, as the ultimate "sport-hunter" takes aim at the the ultimate natural predator. The film does an excellent job of merging the two legendary franchises, and even though it takes place in the present (long before any of the Alien movies), they do a great job of tieing it in to the series' continuity by having the main characters funded by Mr. Weyland, founder of Wayland Industries, better known as "The Company", the sinister organization that sent the Nostromo to capture the original Alien. This at last answers the question of how the company first found out about the killing machines.If you are a fan of either series, I can't recommend this movie highly enough, and consider it the best of either franchise (though I have not yet seen AVP 2). Spout Post: A good "popcorn movie" http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/7/3/32088.aspx Post By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 7/3/2008 5:29:26 PM
Body: Not all that original, but still a good flick.
]]>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:29:26 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog7/3/2008 5:29:26 PMNot all that original, but still a good flick. Spout Post: The best on-screen adaptation yet. http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/6/14/31236.aspx Post By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 6/14/2008 7:36:48 PM
Body: If the 2003 Hulk movie featuring David Banna left you somewhat less than overwhelmed, this movie will show you exactly what that film should have been. It is a bit annoying that they completely started from scratch remaking a film that came out only five years ago, when the start of this film had the main character in almost the same circumstances that he was left in at the end of the 2003 movie, but regardless, a good movie if you're willing to disregard the last one.
]]>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:36:48 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog6/14/2008 7:36:48 PMIf the 2003 Hulk movie featuring David Banna left you somewhat less than overwhelmed, this movie will show you exactly what that film should have been. It is a bit annoying that they completely started from scratch remaking a film that came out only five years ago, when the start of this film had the main character in almost the same circumstances that he was left in at the end of the 2003 movie, but regardless, a good movie if you're willing to disregard the last one. Spout Post: Good if you don't care about details... http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/4/4/26971.aspx Post By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 4/4/2008 5:13:35 PM
Body: This movie really got on my nerves, because it ignored the finale chapters in the evolution of both of the title characters. It starts with Freddy resurrecting Jason, because he needs people to fear him in order to gain power, so that he could return. The thing is, he did it by just “convincing” Jason to come back, at which point Jason rose from his grave. Wait. Back up a minute. Grave? Jason Vorhees was definitively killed by a family member. Not to mention his body was blown to pieces. So how was Jason once again whole, and in a grave? And if he could come back at any time, why didn’t he? Seems like a pretty cheap cop-out way to bring him back. Then there’s Freddy. Freddy got his power from people fearing him. That much is true. However, in Freddy’s Dead: The Final Friday, they finally revealed how it is that he keeps coming back, no matter what they do to him: he wasn’t just a restless spirit, he had made a pact with three dream demons. The pact allowed Freddy to “be forever” in people’s dreams. The thing is, Freddy’s daughter brought him into the real world, where he could be killed. He was blown up, and when that happened, the dream demons left him, and THAT is why he couldn’t come back. He no longer had his demonic “backers.” So how is he now still empowered? Moving forward, apparently, all the adults in the town of Springwood know of and acknowledge Freddy’s existence (though, apparently, an entire town of adults remember him wasn’t enough to empower him) as a supernatural evil, but, instead of moving away from what they know to be a cursed town, they decide to cover it up by quarantining any kid who learns about Freddy, and giving them drugs that prevent them from dreaming (which, FYI, would in reality cause a person to go insane). They hid all records of any Freddy-related deaths, and none of them speak of it. Riiight. Then there’s the comment that “Freddy died by fire, Jason by water.” Did the writers even WATCH the final movies of those two series? Really, that should be a requirement before re-launching a series. Then there’s the scene where Freddy makes Jason revert to his childhood state by pouring water on him. This happened in first in Friday The 13th Part VIII, Jason Takes Manhattan. It was also one of the many reason I put that movie on my list of the worst sequels of all time (see the list here: http://www.flixster.com/movie-list/worst-sequels-of-all-time-2). It really didn’t make any sense, and was never explained why that actually happened. And the idea of Jason being afraid of Water seems a little strange to me, considering he practically lived in Camp Crystal Lake. As a few people have said, the one redeeming quality of this movie was watching Freddy fight someone who, for once, he just could not kill. Someone who may not have had the versatile offensive abilities of Freddy, but who could withstand them and just keep coming. And really, the look on Freddy’s face when he’s pulled into the real world realizes that he’s now face to Face with Jason, and for the first time since he was human, he’s outclassed; that was priceless. All in all, the movie was an o.k. horror flick if you don’t care about continuity, or haven’t watched the last chapters of Friday The 13th or A Nightmare on Elm Street series. However, if you’ve watched them all, and you’re kind of a stickler for details, be ready for some irritating moments. Three stars. Not bad, could be better.
]]>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:13:35 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog4/4/2008 5:13:35 PMThis movie really got on my nerves, because it ignored the finale chapters in the evolution of both of the title characters. It starts with Freddy resurrecting Jason, because he needs people to fear him in order to gain power, so that he could return. The thing is, he did it by just “convincing” Jason to come back, at which point Jason rose from his grave. Wait. Back up a minute. Grave? Jason Vorhees was definitively killed by a family member. Not to mention his body was blown to pieces. So how was Jason once again whole, and in a grave? And if he could come back at any time, why didn’t he? Seems like a pretty cheap cop-out way to bring him back. Then there’s Freddy. Freddy got his power from people fearing him. That much is true. However, in Freddy’s Dead: The Final Friday, they finally revealed how it is that he keeps coming back, no matter what they do to him: he wasn’t just a restless spirit, he had made a pact with three dream demons. The pact allowed Freddy to “be forever” in people’s dreams. The thing is, Freddy’s daughter brought him into the real world, where he could be killed. He was blown up, and when that happened, the dream demons left him, and THAT is why he couldn’t come back. He no longer had his demonic “backers.” So how is he now still empowered? Moving forward, apparently, all the adults in the town of Springwood know of and acknowledge Freddy’s existence (though, apparently, an entire town of adults remember him wasn’t enough to empower him) as a supernatural evil, but, instead of moving away from what they know to be a cursed town, they decide to cover it up by quarantining any kid who learns about Freddy, and giving them drugs that prevent them from dreaming (which, FYI, would in reality cause a person to go insane). They hid all records of any Freddy-related deaths, and none of them speak of it. Riiight. Then there’s the comment that “Freddy died by fire, Jason by water.” Did the writers even WATCH the final movies of those two series? Really, that should be a requirement before re-launching a series. Then there’s the scene where Freddy makes Jason revert to his childhood state by pouring water on him. This happened in first in Friday The 13th Part VIII, Jason Takes Manhattan. It was also one of the many reason I put that movie on my list of the worst sequels of all time (see the list here: http://www.flixster.com/movie-list/worst-sequels-of-all-time-2). It really didn’t make any sense, and was never explained why that actually happened. And the idea of Jason being afraid of Water seems a little strange to me, considering he practically lived in Camp Crystal Lake. As a few people have said, the one redeeming quality of this movie was watching Freddy fight someone who, for once, he just could not kill. Someone who may not have had the versatile offensive abilities of Freddy, but who could withstand them and just keep coming. And really, the look on Freddy’s face when he’s pulled into the real world realizes that he’s now face to Face with Jason, and for the first time since he was human, he’s outclassed; that was priceless. All in all, the movie was an o.k. horror flick if you don’t care about continuity, or haven’t watched the last chapters of Friday The 13th or A Nightmare on Elm Street series. However, if you’ve watched them all, and you’re kind of a stickler for details, be ready for some irritating moments. Three stars. Not bad, could be better. Spout Post: The series gets a mercy-killing. http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/4/3/26919.aspx Post By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 4/3/2008 3:34:13 PM
Body: My word, it’s no wonder Wes Craven felt the need to redefine Freddy in “A New Nightmare.” By this point, he’s like a cartoon villain. The killings (while I’ve never been that guy who watches these things for them) were like watching a sicker version of Bugs Bunny. There was even cartoon sound effects! Freddy looks a little better than he did in the last movie, but not by much. He now looks more like he’s got a weird skin condition than horrible, disfiguring burns.And the plot didn’t make a whole lot of sense, either. We start with an on-screen message that says the movie takes place ten years from now (well, ten years from 1991, when it was made. Although nothing looks different), and apparently, Freddy has killed every kid in Springwood (the town Elm Street is located in). The killings are all rules “mysterious deaths and suicides” and apparently all the adults are suffering from “mass hysteria.” Alright, so we haven’t even seen an actor yet, and ALREADY things aren’t making sense. First of all, if every kid in town was systematically murdered, and the streak went on for ten years, why the hell did people continue to live there? Call me crazy, but it seems to me like that would be the type of things that makes someone want to get out of Dodge. Secondly, after the largest string of “mysterious deaths and suicides” in American history, and this place isn’t quarantined, or under constant surveillance, or at LEAST a notorious American mystery? Once again, we get the “Freddy’s back, but we’re not gonna make any attempt to explain HOW, since he was supposedly destroyed in the last movie” issue. At least this time we get some explanation for how Freddy became what he is (we already got the story of his twisted birth in the last two movies). Apparently, when he was killed, he was confronted by dream demons, who promised that he would live forever in dreams, as long as he did their bidding. The ultimate solution, the one that was supposed to finally kill Freddy for good (and actually DID until over a decade later in Freddy Vs. Jason) was that they had to pull him OUT of their dreams (like Nancy did in the first movie), and kill him there. Why he looked normal he was taken out in this one, when he was sill burnt up and crazy when they did it the first time is beyond me. The real question is why he didn’t just return to the dream world like he did back then? When Nancy did it, all Freddy had to do was grab someone, and collapse into the dream world, taking Marge (Nancy’s mom) with him. Fortunately, instead of just turning her back on Freddy and stealing his power (which, IMO, was a much better, much more creative way of killing him), Maggie (Freddy’s long-lost daughter) actually beat him senseless and then blew him up with a pipe bomb.And so, my trip down Elm Street with the original series proper comes to a close. It had its up points, but for the most part, I can’t believe they made six of these things. I have to agree with Wes Craven, and many of the series fans; if Craven didn’t make it, it wasn’t good. That’s not a pretentious “loyalty to the writer” statement, it’s my God-honest review. The first one was good. The third was good. Wes Craven made both. The rest of them, including this one, just plain sucked on ice. Two stars.
]]>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:34:13 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog4/3/2008 3:34:13 PMMy word, it’s no wonder Wes Craven felt the need to redefine Freddy in “A New Nightmare.” By this point, he’s like a cartoon villain. The killings (while I’ve never been that guy who watches these things for them) were like watching a sicker version of Bugs Bunny. There was even cartoon sound effects! Freddy looks a little better than he did in the last movie, but not by much. He now looks more like he’s got a weird skin condition than horrible, disfiguring burns.And the plot didn’t make a whole lot of sense, either. We start with an on-screen message that says the movie takes place ten years from now (well, ten years from 1991, when it was made. Although nothing looks different), and apparently, Freddy has killed every kid in Springwood (the town Elm Street is located in). The killings are all rules “mysterious deaths and suicides” and apparently all the adults are suffering from “mass hysteria.” Alright, so we haven’t even seen an actor yet, and ALREADY things aren’t making sense. First of all, if every kid in town was systematically murdered, and the streak went on for ten years, why the hell did people continue to live there? Call me crazy, but it seems to me like that would be the type of things that makes someone want to get out of Dodge. Secondly, after the largest string of “mysterious deaths and suicides” in American history, and this place isn’t quarantined, or under constant surveillance, or at LEAST a notorious American mystery? Once again, we get the “Freddy’s back, but we’re not gonna make any attempt to explain HOW, since he was supposedly destroyed in the last movie” issue. At least this time we get some explanation for how Freddy became what he is (we already got the story of his twisted birth in the last two movies). Apparently, when he was killed, he was confronted by dream demons, who promised that he would live forever in dreams, as long as he did their bidding. The ultimate solution, the one that was supposed to finally kill Freddy for good (and actually DID until over a decade later in Freddy Vs. Jason) was that they had to pull him OUT of their dreams (like Nancy did in the first movie), and kill him there. Why he looked normal he was taken out in this one, when he was sill burnt up and crazy when they did it the first time is beyond me. The real question is why he didn’t just return to the dream world like he did back then? When Nancy did it, all Freddy had to do was grab someone, and collapse into the dream world, taking Marge (Nancy’s mom) with him. Fortunately, instead of just turning her back on Freddy and stealing his power (which, IMO, was a much better, much more creative way of killing him), Maggie (Freddy’s long-lost daughter) actually beat him senseless and then blew him up with a pipe bomb.And so, my trip down Elm Street with the original series proper comes to a close. It had its up points, but for the most part, I can’t believe they made six of these things. I have to agree with Wes Craven, and many of the series fans; if Craven didn’t make it, it wasn’t good. That’s not a pretentious “loyalty to the writer” statement, it’s my God-honest review. The first one was good. The third was good. Wes Craven made both. The rest of them, including this one, just plain sucked on ice. Two stars. Spout Post: A Major Disapointment... http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/3/27/26678.aspx Post By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 3/27/2008 6:09:53 PM
Body: Take Mortal Kombat, add more characters than you have time to do anything with, and remove everything that wasn't a fight scene, and you've got Annihilation.
]]>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:09:53 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog3/27/2008 6:09:53 PMTake Mortal Kombat, add more characters than you have time to do anything with, and remove everything that wasn't a fight scene, and you've got Annihilation. Spout Post: The worst of the series. http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/3/27/26676.aspx Post By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 3/27/2008 6:08:13 PM
Body: Shatner: good in front of the Camera. Poison behind it. 'nough said.
]]>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:08:13 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog3/27/2008 6:08:13 PMShatner: good in front of the Camera. Poison behind it. 'nough said. Spout Post: The movie that spawned "The Highlander Rule" http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/3/27/26675.aspx Post By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 3/27/2008 6:06:31 PM
Body: Widely accepted as one of the worst sequels of all time, Highlander II takes the story of an ostensibly mystical race of immortals, fighting for the prize of ultimate power, and redefines it as a sci-fi tale, where the immortals are in fact alien beings exiled to earth, with the prize being the ability to return home, or grow old and die on earth. When Connor McLoud, now an old man, kills another alien who has just been sent to earth, he is made immortal once again; and must use his abilities, along with help from Ramirez (who, apparently, Connor can bring back from the dead just by calling his name, which kind of makes you wonder why he took this long to do so), must battle an oppressive future government to save the world. This movie was so bad that it spawned what I refer to as ?The Highlander Rule?, which says that when a movie sequel reaches a certain level of awful, I simply refuse to acknowledge its existence when speaking of the franchise.
]]>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:06:31 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog3/27/2008 6:06:31 PMWidely accepted as one of the worst sequels of all time, Highlander II takes the story of an ostensibly mystical race of immortals, fighting for the prize of ultimate power, and redefines it as a sci-fi tale, where the immortals are in fact alien beings exiled to earth, with the prize being the ability to return home, or grow old and die on earth. When Connor McLoud, now an old man, kills another alien who has just been sent to earth, he is made immortal once again; and must use his abilities, along with help from Ramirez (who, apparently, Connor can bring back from the dead just by calling his name, which kind of makes you wonder why he took this long to do so), must battle an oppressive future government to save the world. This movie was so bad that it spawned what I refer to as ?The Highlander Rule?, which says that when a movie sequel reaches a certain level of awful, I simply refuse to acknowledge its existence when speaking of the franchise. Spout Post: The Worst of the series http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/3/27/26674.aspx Post By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 3/27/2008 6:04:41 PM
Body: Easily the worst chapter in the series*. Be it the lack of interesting characters, the completely, utterly incomprehensible ending, or just the fact that in a movie named "Jason Takes Manhatten", Jason only spends about five minutes IN Manhattan, this movie was just plain crap.*It should be mentioned that since V goes off on such a tangent that it doesn't even include Jason, I do not consider to even be part of the series.
]]>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:04:41 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog3/27/2008 6:04:41 PMEasily the worst chapter in the series*. Be it the lack of interesting characters, the completely, utterly incomprehensible ending, or just the fact that in a movie named "Jason Takes Manhatten", Jason only spends about five minutes IN Manhattan, this movie was just plain crap.*It should be mentioned that since V goes off on such a tangent that it doesn't even include Jason, I do not consider to even be part of the series. Spout Post: Quite possibly the worst sequel of all time. http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/3/27/26671.aspxPost By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 3/27/2008 5:59:36 PM
Body: So I turn on Sci-FI today at 9pm to watch The long-rumored Highlander movie about Duncan's search for the origins of the immortals?!The one that was never released in theaters? The one that I've not seen ANY ads for? It's just on? WTF?O.k., so I watched it.Well, now I remember why I call the Highlander rule "The Highlander rule." OMG it was awful. It was just. Freaking. Awful. It takes place in, I dunno, the future? I mean, the world had descended into complete chaos and it was all post-apocalyptic, but Joe was still alive, and he was mortal, so it couldn't be too far away. About 90% of it was done in front of terrible looking blue screen. The acting was meh. The writing was awful. Lots of random encounters with bands of post-apocalyptic crazy people. The visuals were awful. And the ending? oh. God. The ending.Apparently, "there can be only one" does not mean that they had to kill all the others; it just meant that there was only one with a pure enough heart to pass the test of the source, and thus allow him to make a child (which immortals were otherwise not able to do). WHAT THE HELL?! HALF STAR!
]]>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:59:36 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog3/27/2008 5:59:36 PMSo I turn on Sci-FI today at 9pm to watch The long-rumored Highlander movie about Duncan's search for the origins of the immortals?!The one that was never released in theaters? The one that I've not seen ANY ads for? It's just on? WTF?O.k., so I watched it.Well, now I remember why I call the Highlander rule "The Highlander rule." OMG it was awful. It was just. Freaking. Awful. It takes place in, I dunno, the future? I mean, the world had descended into complete chaos and it was all post-apocalyptic, but Joe was still alive, and he was mortal, so it couldn't be too far away. About 90% of it was done in front of terrible looking blue screen. The acting was meh. The writing was awful. Lots of random encounters with bands of post-apocalyptic crazy people. The visuals were awful. And the ending? oh. God. The ending.Apparently, "there can be only one" does not mean that they had to kill all the others; it just meant that there was only one with a pure enough heart to pass the test of the source, and thus allow him to make a child (which immortals were otherwise not able to do). WHAT THE HELL?! HALF STAR! Spout Post: Never give up on your ideals. http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/3/27/26666.aspx Post By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 3/27/2008 5:04:46 PM
Body: A classic tale of uncompromising idealism winning over all.
]]>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:04:46 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog3/27/2008 5:04:46 PMA classic tale of uncompromising idealism winning over all. Spout Post: A True Classic. http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/3/27/26661.aspx Post By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 3/27/2008 4:36:49 PM
Body: A true classic, this one has everything. Great acting, great script, great plot, and one of the few depictions of a Catholic Priest actually ACTS like 80% of the Priests out there, instead of the clichéd, over-used stereotype of the hypocritical , Bible-bashing villain in sheep’s clothing. Five Stars.
]]>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:36:49 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog3/27/2008 4:36:49 PMA true classic, this one has everything. Great acting, great script, great plot, and one of the few depictions of a Catholic Priest actually ACTS like 80% of the Priests out there, instead of the clichéd, over-used stereotype of the hypocritical , Bible-bashing villain in sheep’s clothing. Five Stars. Spout Post: The Worst of The Series So Far... http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/3/27/26659.aspx Post By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 3/27/2008 4:06:49 PM
Body: A couple weeks ago, I started watching the Elm Street movies. The second one was awful, and was immediately placed on my Flixter list “the worst sequels of all time.” I didn’t think they could MAKE a worse Elm Street flick. Then I saw part 5. Ugh. It starts with the acting. Horrible. Every cheesey line was PAINFULLY delivered. The Plot wasn’t bad, but it was hideously executed. How the hell did they come to the conclusion that Amanda Kreuger hung herself if they never found the body? And why was her dead body still standing? If she did hang herself, shouldn’t her corpse still be hanging there? Did she somehow die standing up? And how did her body get sealed up in that room? Then There’s Freddy Himself. Not only has he been turned from a classic being of pure evil into a flat-out comic book super-villain (a transformation that, I think, started in the second movie and got slowly worse), but the instead of using makeup to give him his trade-marked burned-up look, they just slapped a cheap looking rubber mask on Englund. Instead of looking horrifying, he just looks ridiculous. I could spend twenty bucks in a costume shop and come out looking more convincing. And that’s not the only place where the effects were cheap. The blood looked like strawberry syrup, the blue-screen effects were ridiculously obvious, how is it that fiveyears after the first movie, the effects got that much WORSE? Then there was the ending. If you don’t can’t the crappy “twists” that they slapped at the end of the other movies (which were clearly after-thoughts), this was by far the worst of them.honestly, I can’t think of a single redeeming quality in this movie. Half star.
]]>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:06:49 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog3/27/2008 4:06:49 PM A couple weeks ago, I started watching the Elm Street movies. The second one was awful, and was immediately placed on my Flixter list “the worst sequels of all time.” I didn’t think they could MAKE a worse Elm Street flick. Then I saw part 5. Ugh. It starts with the acting. Horrible. Every cheesey line was PAINFULLY delivered. The Plot wasn’t bad, but it was hideously executed. How the hell did they come to the conclusion that Amanda Kreuger hung herself if they never found the body? And why was her dead body still standing? If she did hang herself, shouldn’t her corpse still be hanging there? Did she somehow die standing up? And how did her body get sealed up in that room? Then There’s Freddy Himself. Not only has he been turned from a classic being of pure evil into a flat-out comic book super-villain (a transformation that, I think, started in the second movie and got slowly worse), but the instead of using makeup to give him his trade-marked burned-up look, they just slapped a cheap looking rubber mask on Englund. Instead of looking horrifying, he just looks ridiculous. I could spend twenty bucks in a costume shop and come out looking more convincing. And that’s not the only place where the effects were cheap. The blood looked like strawberry syrup, the blue-screen effects were ridiculously obvious, how is it that fiveyears after the first movie, the effects got that much WORSE? Then there was the ending. If you don’t can’t the crappy “twists” that they slapped at the end of the other movies (which were clearly after-thoughts), this was by far the worst of them.honestly, I can’t think of a single redeeming quality in this movie. Half star. Spout Post: Better than part 2, but still unnecessary. http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/3/23/26524.aspx Post By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 3/23/2008 5:06:09 PM
Body: Still better than part 2, but all in all, just another unnecessary victim of the dreaded "sequel rule."
]]>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:06:09 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog3/23/2008 5:06:09 PMStill better than part 2, but all in all, just another unnecessary victim of the dreaded "sequel rule." Spout Post: The best of the series so far... http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/3/19/26412.aspx Post By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 3/19/2008 8:42:38 PM
Body: I remember when I first started hearing about Freddy Kreuger in the 1980’s. I was too young to know the term “lucid dreaming”, but I understood the concept (and years later how to actually do it), and I always thought that if I was in the situation the Elm Street Kids found themselves in, I would have used it to battle Freddy. Clearly, I wasn’t the only one to think of this, as that’s exactly what happens in Nightmare on Elm Street 3. Heather Langenkamp returns as Nancy Thompson, the only surviving Elm Street child from the first movie, who is now a psychiatrist specializing in dream therapy. Nancy arrives at a psychiatric hospital specializing in sleep disorders, and finds that the last of the Elm Street Kids are being terrorized by Freddy. This time, however, things are not quite as one-sided as they were during her first encounter. One of the children, Kristen, has a special gift that allows her to pull others into her own dream. They devise a plan to use this gift, along with lucid dreaming, to fight Freddy and beat him at his own game. Meanwhile, Freddy’s horrible origins are further revealed, and an attempt is made to destroy him by laying his earthly remains to rest. So far (I’m watching the movies in order), this is my favorite of the series. The imagination that was so lacking from the second movie is present here; and if I was going to write one of these, this is the how I would do it (conceptually speaking, anyway). The Elm Street kids aren’t terribly creative, given that they could make themselves into anything in their dreams, and the best they came up with was a fruity looking wizard, and there is some 1980’s cheese (not to mention some 1980’s cheesecake), all in all, I thought this one was pretty good. Four stars.
]]>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:42:38 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog3/19/2008 8:42:38 PMI remember when I first started hearing about Freddy Kreuger in the 1980’s. I was too young to know the term “lucid dreaming”, but I understood the concept (and years later how to actually do it), and I always thought that if I was in the situation the Elm Street Kids found themselves in, I would have used it to battle Freddy. Clearly, I wasn’t the only one to think of this, as that’s exactly what happens in Nightmare on Elm Street 3. Heather Langenkamp returns as Nancy Thompson, the only surviving Elm Street child from the first movie, who is now a psychiatrist specializing in dream therapy. Nancy arrives at a psychiatric hospital specializing in sleep disorders, and finds that the last of the Elm Street Kids are being terrorized by Freddy. This time, however, things are not quite as one-sided as they were during her first encounter. One of the children, Kristen, has a special gift that allows her to pull others into her own dream. They devise a plan to use this gift, along with lucid dreaming, to fight Freddy and beat him at his own game. Meanwhile, Freddy’s horrible origins are further revealed, and an attempt is made to destroy him by laying his earthly remains to rest. So far (I’m watching the movies in order), this is my favorite of the series. The imagination that was so lacking from the second movie is present here; and if I was going to write one of these, this is the how I would do it (conceptually speaking, anyway). The Elm Street kids aren’t terribly creative, given that they could make themselves into anything in their dreams, and the best they came up with was a fruity looking wizard, and there is some 1980’s cheese (not to mention some 1980’s cheesecake), all in all, I thought this one was pretty good. Four stars. Spout Post: A timeless story of passion and parental pressure. http://www.spout.com/blogs/wraithtdk/archive/2008/3/15/26245.aspx Post By: WraithTDK
Post To: WraithTDK Blog
Post Date: 3/15/2008 6:09:13 AM
Body: Possibly the best silent movie I've seen, The Jazz Singer a story about a timeless subject: the difficulties and pressures of growing up in a family steeped deeply in tradition. Al Jolson's character is born into a Jewish family that has produced Cantors for five generations. While Jakie Rabinowitz (who changes his name to Jack Robin) is expected to carry on the tradition, his heart isn't in it. He instead wants to be a jazz singer. This breaks his father's heart, causing him to disown Jack. Throughout the movie, Jack is torn between wanting to stay true to his family and his faith, and hiss passion for jazz. This is truly a timeless story, little different than the actor who was "supposed to be" a doctor, or the rock musician that was "supposed to be" a laywer, like their father was. As a black man, seeing Al put on black face made me uncomfortable, but ultimately, I found it acceptable within the context of the movie, that is, he wasn't actually portraying a black man, he was portraying a singer in a vaudeville act, which, historically did include black face, and even then, all he really did was sing. All in all, I'd say this movie is worth of its "classic" label. Four stars.
]]>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:09:13 GMTWraithTDKWraithTDK Blog3/15/2008 6:09:13 AMPossibly the best silent movie I've seen, The Jazz Singer a story about a timeless subject: the difficulties and pressures of growing up in a family steeped deeply in tradition. Al Jolson's character is born into a Jewish family that has produced Cantors for five generations. While Jakie Rabinowitz (who changes his name to Jack Robin) is expected to carry on the tradition, his heart isn't in it. He instead wants to be a jazz singer. This breaks his father's heart, causing him to disown Jack. Throughout the movie, Jack is torn between wanting to stay true to his family and his faith, and hiss passion for jazz. This is truly a timeless story, little different than the actor who was "supposed to be" a doctor, or the rock musician that was "supposed to be" a laywer, like their father was. As a black man, seeing Al put on black face made me uncomfortable, but ultimately, I found it acceptable within the context of the movie, that is, he wasn't actually portraying a black man, he was portraying a singer in a vaudeville act, which, historically did include black face, and even then, all he really did was sing. All in all, I'd say this movie is worth of its "classic" label. Four stars. Spout Member:The_MOW - Mickey Micklon http://www.spout.com/members/148616/default.aspx Identity: The_MOW
Name: Mickey Micklon
Interests: movies, sci-fi, professional wrestling
Occupation: Unemployed
Location: Salem, NH
Films listed: 369
Number of lists: 4
Number of groups: 2
Blog posts: 372
Blog post views: 11337
Number of times tagged: 25
Member since: 4/4/2009
Last login: 10/13/2009
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMTThe_MOWMickey Micklon369Uberlister (>100)Sat, 04 Apr 2009 11:50:30 GMTMember Spout Member:horror http://www.spout.com/members/144661/default.aspx Identity: horror
Films listed: 1
Number of lists: 4
Member since: 1/17/2009
Last login: 1/17/2009
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMThorror1Beginner (<10)Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:27:41 GMTMember Spout Member:butterknife http://www.spout.com/members/127080/default.aspx Identity: butterknife
Films listed: 1
Number of lists: 4
Blog posts: 1
Member since: 4/2/2008
Last login: 4/2/2008
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMTbutterknife1Beginner (<10)Wed, 02 Apr 2008 03:18:37 GMTMember Spout Member:rnt2630 http://www.spout.com/members/95208/default.aspx Identity: rnt2630
Number of lists: 4
Member since: 9/13/2007
Last login: 9/13/2007
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMTrnt26300Beginner (<10)Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:16:00 GMTMember Spout Member:dsalaski http://www.spout.com/members/94482/default.aspx Identity: dsalaski
Number of lists: 4
Member since: 9/10/2007
Last login: 9/10/2007
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMTdsalaski0Beginner (<10)Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:47:53 GMTMember Spout Member:jennkp http://www.spout.com/members/94443/default.aspx Identity: jennkp
Number of lists: 4
Member since: 9/10/2007
Last login: 9/10/2007
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMTjennkp0Beginner (<10)Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:45:31 GMTMember Spout Member:Don0262 http://www.spout.com/members/94195/default.aspx Identity: Don0262
Films listed: 2
Number of lists: 4
Member since: 9/9/2007
Last login: 9/9/2007
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMTDon02622Beginner (<10)Sun, 09 Sep 2007 15:33:14 GMTMember Spout Member:martinluthar http://www.spout.com/members/93901/default.aspx Identity: martinluthar
Number of lists: 4
Member since: 9/8/2007
Last login: 9/8/2007
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMTmartinluthar0Beginner (<10)Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:58:58 GMTMember Spout Member:clwoolfe http://www.spout.com/members/93885/default.aspx Identity: clwoolfe
Number of lists: 4
Member since: 9/8/2007
Last login: 9/8/2007
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMTclwoolfe0Beginner (<10)Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:09:50 GMTMember Spout Member:XtreamDenny http://www.spout.com/members/93661/default.aspx Identity: XtreamDenny
Number of lists: 4
Member since: 9/7/2007
Last login: 9/7/2007
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMTXtreamDenny0Beginner (<10)Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:49:41 GMTMember Spout Member:bofo http://www.spout.com/members/93627/default.aspx Identity: bofo
Number of lists: 4
Member since: 9/7/2007
Last login: 9/7/2007
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMTbofo0Beginner (<10)Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:57:17 GMTMember Spout Member:seanjoneswrexham http://www.spout.com/members/93570/default.aspx Identity: seanjoneswrexham
Number of lists: 4
Member since: 9/7/2007
Last login: 9/7/2007
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMTseanjoneswrexham0Beginner (<10)Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:31:57 GMTMember Spout Member:nny921 http://www.spout.com/members/92277/default.aspx Identity: nny921
Number of lists: 4
Number of groups: 2
Member since: 9/3/2007
Last login: 11/20/2008
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMTnny9210Beginner (<10)Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:27:22 GMTMember Spout Member:mr_lol http://www.spout.com/members/92275/default.aspx Identity: mr_lol
Number of lists: 4
Member since: 9/3/2007
Last login: 9/3/2007
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMTmr_lol0Beginner (<10)Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:25:57 GMTMember Spout Member:fire1311 http://www.spout.com/members/91742/default.aspx Identity: fire1311
Number of lists: 4
Member since: 9/1/2007
Last login: 9/1/2007
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMTfire13110Beginner (<10)Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:48:24 GMTMember Spout Member:Argueta http://www.spout.com/members/91469/default.aspx Identity: Argueta
Number of lists: 4
Member since: 8/31/2007
Last login: 8/31/2007
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMTArgueta0Beginner (<10)Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:52:15 GMTMember Film:Funny Games http://www.spout.com/films/Funny_Games/288707/default.aspx Title: Funny Games
Year: 2007
Director: Michael Haneke
Times Tagged: 27
Number of Lists: 24
Number of blog posts: 14
Number of discussion threads: 8
SpoutRating: 3
]]>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:47:00 GMTFunny Games2007Michael Haneke27Tag Target (>10)241483http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/s288707.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/Funny_Games/288707/default.aspxFilm Film:The Dark Knight http://www.spout.com/films/The_Dark_Knight/288704/default.aspx Title: The Dark Knight
Year: 2008
Director: Christopher Nolan
Times Tagged: 149
Number of Lists: 98
Number of blog posts: 156
Number of discussion threads: 55
SpoutRating: 4
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:13:34 GMTThe Dark Knight2008Christopher Nolan149Tag Target (>10)98156554http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/s288704.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/The_Dark_Knight/288704/default.aspxFilm Film:H2 http://www.spout.com/films/H2/397884/default.aspx Title: H2
Year: 2009
Director: Rob Zombie
Number of Lists: 1
Number of blog posts: 1
SpoutRating: 1
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:45:58 GMTH22009Rob Zombie111http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/s397884.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/H2/397884/default.aspxFilm Film:Eleanor: First Lady of the World http://www.spout.com/films/Eleanor_First_Lady_of_the_World/10331/default.aspx Title: Eleanor: First Lady of the World
Year: 1982
Director: John Erman
Number of blog posts: 1
]]>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 02:47:51 GMTEleanor: First Lady of the World1982John Erman1http://www.spout.com/images/no_image.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/Eleanor_First_Lady_of_the_World/10331/default.aspxFilm Film:Black Test Car http://www.spout.com/films/Black_Test_Car/328181/default.aspx Title: Black Test Car
Year: 1962
Number of Lists: 2
SpoutRating: 4
]]>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:01:54 GMTBlack Test Car196224http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u37747stl5z.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/Black_Test_Car/328181/default.aspxFilm Film:Dumpster Baby http://www.spout.com/films/Dumpster_Baby/273527/default.aspx Title: Dumpster Baby
Director: James Bickert
Number of Lists: 1
]]>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:53:10 GMTDumpster BabyJames Bickert1http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t76920jjhow.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/Dumpster_Baby/273527/default.aspxFilm Film:Rick http://www.spout.com/films/Rick/235722/default.aspx Title: Rick
Year: 2002
Director: Curtiss Clayton
Times Tagged: 1
Number of Lists: 1
SpoutRating: 2
]]>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:32:48 GMTRick2002Curtiss Clayton1Slightly Tagged (1-5)12http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t51978e8qnf.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/Rick/235722/default.aspxFilm Film:Speed Racer http://www.spout.com/films/Speed_Racer/297765/default.aspx Title: Speed Racer
Year: 2008
Director: Andy Wachowski, Larry Wachowski
Times Tagged: 90
Number of Lists: 16
Number of blog posts: 41
Number of discussion threads: 16
SpoutRating: 3
]]>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:21:45 GMTSpeed Racer2008Andy Wachowski, Larry Wachowski90Tag Target (>10)1641163http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/s297765.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/Speed_Racer/297765/default.aspxFilm Film:Speed Racer [Anime Series] http://www.spout.com/films/Speed_Racer_Anime_Series/32330/default.aspx Title: Speed Racer [Anime Series]
Year: 1967
Number of Lists: 1
Number of blog posts: 1
Number of discussion threads: 1
SpoutRating: 3
]]>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:20:43 GMTSpeed Racer [Anime Series]19671113http://www.spout.com/images/no_image.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/Speed_Racer_Anime_Series/32330/default.aspxFilm Film:The Raven http://www.spout.com/films/The_Raven/317289/default.aspx Title: The Raven
Year: 2007
Director: Ulli Lommel
Number of blog posts: 2
SpoutRating: 1
]]>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 04:13:53 GMTThe Raven2007Ulli Lommel21http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u08974fjkcg.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/The_Raven/317289/default.aspxFilm Film:The Ballad of the Sad Cafe http://www.spout.com/films/The_Ballad_of_the_Sad_Cafe/2239/default.aspx Title: The Ballad of the Sad Cafe
Year: 1991
Director: Simon Callow
Number of blog posts: 2
SpoutRating: 2
]]>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:25:24 GMTThe Ballad of the Sad Cafe1991Simon Callow22http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t54643em1b1.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/The_Ballad_of_the_Sad_Cafe/2239/default.aspxFilm Film:New York, New York http://www.spout.com/films/New_York_New_York/24524/default.aspx Title: New York, New York
Year: 1977
Director: Martin Scorsese
Times Tagged: 23
Number of Lists: 12
Number of blog posts: 57
Number of discussion threads: 2
SpoutRating: 2
]]>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:22:40 GMTNew York, New York1977Martin Scorsese23Tag Target (>10)125722http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u47828gvtpe.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/New_York_New_York/24524/default.aspxFilm Film:St. Nick http://www.spout.com/films/St_Nick/402616/default.aspx Title: St. Nick
Year: 2009
Director: David Lowery
Times Tagged: 3
Number of Lists: 2
Number of blog posts: 5
SpoutRating: 5
]]>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:01:06 GMTSt. Nick2009David Lowery3Slightly Tagged (1-5)255http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/s402616.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/St_Nick/402616/default.aspxFilm Film:We Are the Strange http://www.spout.com/films/We_Are_the_Strange/314016/default.aspx Title: We Are the Strange
Year: 2007
Director: M dot Strange
Number of Lists: 3
Number of blog posts: 3
SpoutRating: 4
]]>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:25:52 GMTWe Are the Strange2007M dot Strange334http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/s314016.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/We_Are_the_Strange/314016/default.aspxFilm Film:The Sadist http://www.spout.com/films/The_Sadist/29811/default.aspx Title: The Sadist
Year: 1963
Director: James Landis
Number of Lists: 4
SpoutRating: 3
]]>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:08:29 GMTThe Sadist1963James Landis43http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t27402rl1sl.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/The_Sadist/29811/default.aspxFilm Film:The Alligator People http://www.spout.com/films/The_Alligator_People/50507/default.aspx Title: The Alligator People
Year: 1959
Director: Roy Del Ruth
Number of Lists: 2
Number of blog posts: 1
SpoutRating: 2
]]>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:04:19 GMTThe Alligator People1959Roy Del Ruth212http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t46806zj8ua.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/The_Alligator_People/50507/default.aspxFilm