﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:spout="http://www.spout.com/schemas/rss/core/2006" xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005">
  <channel>
    <cf:treatAs>list</cf:treatAs>
    <cf:listinfo>
      <cf:group element="type" label="Type" ns="http://www.spout.com/schemas/rss/core/2006" data-type="text" />
    </cf:listinfo>
    <title>Casino Royale's Recent Activity - Spout</title>
    <link>http://www.spout.com/</link>
    <description>Recent community activity around Casino Royale on Spout</description>
    <copyright>Copyright 2005-9 Spout, LLC</copyright>
    <generator>Spout RSS</generator>
    
    <item>
      <title>Film:Casino Royale</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/films/Casino_Royale/5368/default.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<table width='100%' style='font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><tr><td><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u45259vekps.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' /></td>
<td>
<strong>Title:</strong> Casino Royale<br/>
<strong>Year:</strong> 1967<br/>
<strong>Director:</strong> John Huston, Robert Parrish, Val Guest, Ken Hughes, Joseph McGrath<br/>
<strong>Plot:</strong> Retired after years of international espionage, Agent 007 is lured back into action to battle the evil spy organization SMERSH in this notoriously incoherent parody of the <a href=/films/17694/default.aspx style='text-decoration:underline'>James Bond</a> films. <a href="/players/P____52791/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>David Niven</a> portrays the aging Bond, who atypically rejects the advances of a variety of women, and agrees to battle SMERSH's hold on the lavish Casino Royale only after organization head M is murdered. Also mixed up in the affair are several other secret agents, all named James Bond, played by everyone from <a href="/players/P____64447/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Peter Sellers</a> and <a href="/players/P____79388/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Woody Allen</a> to a chimpanzee. Despite a star-studded cast, a large production budget, and a hit score by <a href="/players/P____80337/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Burt Bacharach</a>, the film was universally panned as a muddled, overlong failure, with the occasional amusing sequence lost in the unintelligible surroundings. The participation of several screenwriters and five different directors, including <a href="/players/P____95260/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>John Huston</a>, only adds to the confusion. ~ Judd Blaise, All Movie Guide<br/>
<strong>Times Tagged:</strong> 8<br/>
<strong>Number of Lists:</strong> 6<br/>
<strong>Number of blog posts:</strong> 5<br/>
<strong>SpoutRating:</strong> 2<br/>
</td></tr></table>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 22:00:53 GMT</pubDate><spout:Title>Casino Royale</spout:Title><spout:Year>1967</spout:Year><spout:Director>John Huston, Robert Parrish, Val Guest, Ken Hughes, Joseph McGrath</spout:Director><spout:Plot>Retired after years of international espionage, Agent 007 is lured back into action to battle the evil spy organization SMERSH in this notoriously incoherent parody of the &lt;a href=/films/17694/default.aspx style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;James Bond&lt;/a&gt; films. &lt;a href="/players/P____52791/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;David Niven&lt;/a&gt; portrays the aging Bond, who atypically rejects the advances of a variety of women, and agrees to battle SMERSH's hold on the lavish Casino Royale only after organization head M is murdered. Also mixed up in the affair are several other secret agents, all named James Bond, played by everyone from &lt;a href="/players/P____64447/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Peter Sellers&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="/players/P____79388/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Woody Allen&lt;/a&gt; to a chimpanzee. Despite a star-studded cast, a large production budget, and a hit score by &lt;a href="/players/P____80337/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Burt Bacharach&lt;/a&gt;, the film was universally panned as a muddled, overlong failure, with the occasional amusing sequence lost in the unintelligible surroundings. The participation of several screenwriters and five different directors, including &lt;a href="/players/P____95260/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;John Huston&lt;/a&gt;, only adds to the confusion. ~ Judd Blaise, All Movie Guide</spout:Plot><spout:TimesTagged>8</spout:TimesTagged><spout:taglevel>Taggedy Taggged (6-10)</spout:taglevel><spout:Numberoflists>6</spout:Numberoflists><spout:NumberOfBlogPosts>5</spout:NumberOfBlogPosts><spout:SpoutRating>2</spout:SpoutRating><spout:FilmCoverURL>http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u45259vekps.jpg</spout:FilmCoverURL><spout:SpoutFilmDetailURL>http://www.spout.com/films/Casino_Royale/5368/default.aspx</spout:SpoutFilmDetailURL><spout:type>Film</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: 007 Bond Parodies: A Stirred, But Not Shaken History</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2008/11/3/36913.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u45259vekps.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/9325/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog on spout.com</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 11/3/2008 5:00:53 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> A man was arrested in London last week for imitating James Bond. He wasn’t going around and ordering vodka martinis though, he had numerous fake IDs, replica guns, and even a personalized wallet styled after From Russia With Love. That’s dedication right there. We’ve had James Bond imitators in the movies for more than 40 years, but sadly none of them have ever been arrested. Although thankfully, a few of them have been entertaining. Check out the James Bond knockoffs in the list below, as we ramp up towards Quantum of Solace.


Our Man Flint
The United States didn’t have a dashing and cool super-spy hero like Britain’s James Bond, so in 1964 James Coburn stepped into the role of Derek Flint. Flint was an ex-spy for Z.O.W.I.E. (Zonal Organization World Intelligence Espionage… I kid you not) who was lured out of retirement and forced to battle three mad scientists who wanted to control the world’s weather. At one point, he meets up with an agent 0008, who looks and dresses like Sean Connery. The movie spawned a sequel, In Like Flint, and later helped inspire Austin Powers.

 The Matt Helm Movies
Between 1966 and 1969 Dean Martin starred as Matt Helm in The Silencers, Murderers’ Row, The Ambushers, and The Wrecking Crew. He was a wisecracking super-spy who often found himself in comedic situations. Although the books these movies were based on were fairly serious, the producers decided not to try and compete with James Bond and made these a lot lighter. These movies were also cited as direct inspirations for Austin Powers, and later for the 1970s James Bond films, which often copied the set pieces from the Helm films. Dreamworks currently holds the rights to the Matt Helm series, and is apparently working on a new adaptation.

Casino Royale
Long before Daniel Craig stepped into the tuxedo as James Bond, there was an original James Bond spoof of Casino Royale in 1967. Produced as a comedy by Columbia Pictures, this movie features six different James Bonds in an effort to throw off his enemies, and is most famous because Peter Sellers (as Jimmy Bond) walked off the set and didn’t return to finish his role. Although most of this was blamed on uneasy feelings between Orson Welles and Sellers, the movie The Life and Death of Peter Sellers portrays it as Sellers trying to play the role seriously, and walking off when people wanted him to play it slapstick.

OK Connery
This actually happened. Italian producers hoping to cash in on the spy craze of the 1960s wrote this James Bond parody where James Bond isn’t available, so they use his kid brother. What’s even more bizarre is that they used Sean Connery’s actual brother Neil in this film, and his character is named Connery, although his lines were all dubbed by an American actor. Lois Maxwell and Bernard Lee reprise their roles as Moneypenny and M in this movie, it was released in the U.S. as Operation Kid Brother, and was later razzed on Mystery Science Theater 3000 as Operation Double 007. Truly bizarre.

Spy Hard
This Leslie Nielsen movie tried to ride in on the Naked Gun coattails, but just showed us a fairly tired and overused character. Nielsen played Agent Dick Steele (ouch), and would go on to play the same bumbling character with different names in other movies, but this one is especially bad. You know it’s a bad sign when Mr. T, Hulk Hogan and Pat Morita are your “guest stars.” The best thing about this movie is the James Bond-esque opening title sequence from Weird Al Yankovic. Which also belabors the point about guest stars.

 Johnny English
Most people know Rowan Atkinson as Mr. Bean, and they either love him or loathe him. I fall in the former camp, which is probably why I enjoyed this parody of the Bond films so much. The character was actually based on another Atkinson role, Richard Latham from the Barclaycard ads in the UK. He works for MI6 and is actually a bumbling spy wannabe who constantly makes mistakes. Many of the gags from the commercials made it into the movie, and last year Atkinson said on British TV that a sequel is in the works.

Austin Powers
Easily the most famous parodies of James Bond, the Austin Powers franchise is three films long, and during junkets for The Love Guru earlier this year Mike Myers said that he has an idea for a new Powers movie, so chances are you’ll see the crushed velvet suit and bad teeth once again. Myers has said that his inspirations included Our Man Flint, the Matt Helm movies, Vincent Price’s movie Dr. Goldfoot and the Bikini Machine, Michael Caine in The Ipcress FIle, and plenty of others. While it’s obviosuly an amalgam of many roles, the James Bond influence is the strongest throughout all of these films, as evidenced by the subsequent titles The Spy Who Shagged Me, and Goldmember. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 22:00:53 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>SpoutBlog</spout:postby><spout:postto>SpoutBlog on spout.com</spout:postto><spout:postdate>11/3/2008 5:00:53 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>A man was arrested in London last week for imitating James Bond. He wasn’t going around and ordering vodka martinis though, he had numerous fake IDs, replica guns, and even a personalized wallet styled after From Russia With Love. That’s dedication right there. We’ve had James Bond imitators in the movies for more than 40 years, but sadly none of them have ever been arrested. Although thankfully, a few of them have been entertaining. Check out the James Bond knockoffs in the list below, as we ramp up towards Quantum of Solace.


Our Man Flint
The United States didn’t have a dashing and cool super-spy hero like Britain’s James Bond, so in 1964 James Coburn stepped into the role of Derek Flint. Flint was an ex-spy for Z.O.W.I.E. (Zonal Organization World Intelligence Espionage… I kid you not) who was lured out of retirement and forced to battle three mad scientists who wanted to control the world’s weather. At one point, he meets up with an agent 0008, who looks and dresses like Sean Connery. The movie spawned a sequel, In Like Flint, and later helped inspire Austin Powers.

 The Matt Helm Movies
Between 1966 and 1969 Dean Martin starred as Matt Helm in The Silencers, Murderers’ Row, The Ambushers, and The Wrecking Crew. He was a wisecracking super-spy who often found himself in comedic situations. Although the books these movies were based on were fairly serious, the producers decided not to try and compete with James Bond and made these a lot lighter. These movies were also cited as direct inspirations for Austin Powers, and later for the 1970s James Bond films, which often copied the set pieces from the Helm films. Dreamworks currently holds the rights to the Matt Helm series, and is apparently working on a new adaptation.

Casino Royale
Long before Daniel Craig stepped into the tuxedo as James Bond, there was an original James Bond spoof of Casino Royale in 1967. Produced as a comedy by Columbia Pictures, this movie features six different James Bonds in an effort to throw off his enemies, and is most famous because Peter Sellers (as Jimmy Bond) walked off the set and didn’t return to finish his role. Although most of this was blamed on uneasy feelings between Orson Welles and Sellers, the movie The Life and Death of Peter Sellers portrays it as Sellers trying to play the role seriously, and walking off when people wanted him to play it slapstick.

OK Connery
This actually happened. Italian producers hoping to cash in on the spy craze of the 1960s wrote this James Bond parody where James Bond isn’t available, so they use his kid brother. What’s even more bizarre is that they used Sean Connery’s actual brother Neil in this film, and his character is named Connery, although his lines were all dubbed by an American actor. Lois Maxwell and Bernard Lee reprise their roles as Moneypenny and M in this movie, it was released in the U.S. as Operation Kid Brother, and was later razzed on Mystery Science Theater 3000 as Operation Double 007. Truly bizarre.

Spy Hard
This Leslie Nielsen movie tried to ride in on the Naked Gun coattails, but just showed us a fairly tired and overused character. Nielsen played Agent Dick Steele (ouch), and would go on to play the same bumbling character with different names in other movies, but this one is especially bad. You know it’s a bad sign when Mr. T, Hulk Hogan and Pat Morita are your “guest stars.” The best thing about this movie is the James Bond-esque opening title sequence from Weird Al Yankovic. Which also belabors the point about guest stars.

 Johnny English
Most people know Rowan Atkinson as Mr. Bean, and they either love him or loathe him. I fall in the former camp, which is probably why I enjoyed this parody of the Bond films so much. The character was actually based on another Atkinson role, Richard Latham from the Barclaycard ads in the UK. He works for MI6 and is actually a bumbling spy wannabe who constantly makes mistakes. Many of the gags from the commercials made it into the movie, and last year Atkinson said on British TV that a sequel is in the works.

Austin Powers
Easily the most famous parodies of James Bond, the Austin Powers franchise is three films long, and during junkets for The Love Guru earlier this year Mike Myers said that he has an idea for a new Powers movie, so chances are you’ll see the crushed velvet suit and bad teeth once again. Myers has said that his inspirations included Our Man Flint, the Matt Helm movies, Vincent Price’s movie Dr. Goldfoot and the Bikini Machine, Michael Caine in The Ipcress FIle, and plenty of others. While it’s obviosuly an amalgam of many roles, the James Bond influence is the strongest throughout all of these films, as evidenced by the subsequent titles The Spy Who Shagged Me, and Goldmember. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: 10 Movies That Made ‘Get Smart’ Obsolete</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2008/6/16/31288.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u45259vekps.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/9325/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog on spout.com</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 6/16/2008 5:01:14 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> The best time for a Get Smart movie would have been the late ’60s, when the original television series was still on the air. In fact, there was a theatrical Get Smart film in the works during the run of the show, but it was canceled when the theatrical release of Munster, Go Home! bombed at the box office. Many years later, in 1980, a Get Smart feature titled The Nude Bomb was released to theaters, but it also performed poorly.
Now we’re getting a remake version starring Steve Carell in the role that was so iconically defined by the late Don Adams. Will it do the show justice? Reportedly the budget was $80 million, a significant amount of which was probably put towards pointless effects. But the best thing Warner Bros. could have done with that money is to give a large amount to series creators Mel Brooks and Buck Henry, who probably even today could churn out a better script than Failure to Launch scribes Tom J. Astle and Matt Ember.
Despite its lack of original Get Smart talent, though, it could still be marginally funny. Yet the real problem is that it may be too outdated and obsolete for audiences to care. In the four decades since the show went off the air, there has been plenty of similar-themed movies, from spy spoofs to films with bumbling heroes. The following ten titles are the best evidence of why this new Get Smart movie is completely unnecessary:

Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery - It’s interesting that Get Smart is going up against a Mike Myers movie this weekend, because in a way it’s also going up against Myers’ Austin Powers movies, as well. Sure, spy parodies have been around in spades since around the time of the first James Bond movie, but nothing has been as popular as this series, which of course includes the much bigger-grossing sequels, Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me and Austin Powers in Goldmember.

Inspector Gadget - The original animated series was based on Get Smart and even featured the voice of Don Adams. Also like Get Smart, it was remade into a feature film with a different cast. However, it did find room to employ both Adams (as the voice of the dog, Brain) and Andy Dick (who had played Maxwell Smart’s son in a 1990s Get Smart series). Regardless, it was still a failure, both in terms of its box office gross and the way it ruined our childhood memory of the beloved cartoon. Perhaps if the Get Smart movie is good enough, then it could make up for Inspector Gadget (and its sequel), but it would have to be really, really good.
The Pink Panther - You might say that Get Smart came about as a response to both the Bond films and the original Pink Panther movies, which featured a bumbling police inspector instead of a bumbling spy. The recent remake of The Pink Panther already showed us that some characters should really be forever remembered by their most iconic portrayer. In this case Steve Martin was nothing compared to Peter Sellers, while in the case of Get Smart, Steve Carell is only muddying the memory of Don Adams. Even if he does a good job, he’s just not the real Maxwell Smart. He should just be in another lame generic spy spoof instead.
Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgandy - Want to see Steve Carell act clueless? Watch Anchorman again, because he can’t top his performance as Brick Tamland. “I love lamp.”
The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad! - The show Police Squad was in a way like Get Smart, only with a clueless detective rather than a clueless spy (I guess it could be seen as more like The Pink Panther then?). Fortunately that series only took a few years to spin-off a feature film, and thanks to the genius of Jim Abrahams and the Zucker Bros., who are almost equal in spoofing ability to Mel Brooks, it is funnier than any single episode or film of Get Smart can be without Brooks’ involvement.
Spy Hard - Leslie Nielsen starred as the bumbling detective in the Naked Gun movies and then later played a bumbling spy in this spoof. The result: if Nielsen hadn’t already supplanted the Maxwell Smart character earlier, he did so here, even if really, really poorly.
The Man Who Knew Too Little - More clueless spy stuff, this one an underrated movie starring Bill Murray. It actually made less money than The Nude Bomb (even without an inflation adjustment), but I enjoyed it a lot, probably more than I’ll enjoy Get Smart.
Johnny English - Yep, I’m still just listing the other recent spy spoofs. But, really, there’s a point. When even Rowan Atkinson has done the bumbling spy bit, it’s time to hang up on the idea.
I Spy - Did I already point out that #s 6-10 are more spy comedies? And there’s a lot that I’m not even including! This one is significant because it’s also based on a hit TV series. And it was a huge bomb.
Spies Like Us - The thing I like best about the original Get Smart, as well as a number of the films on this list, is that the incompetent hero isn’t really aware of how incompetent he really is. The best movie to utilize this premise, though, has to be Spies Like Us. But that movie came out toward the end of the Cold War, when spy stuff was seeming ridiculously outdated. Comparatively, Get Smart arrives post 9/11, when the fact that American intelligence is incompetent is not so funny anymore. I think that now audiences would much prefer to see more serious spy films, like the Bond reboot Casino Royale (note the significance of this film being kind of a remake of a Bond parody) and the Bourne Identity franchise.
 Originally posted on:SpoutBlog<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:01:14 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>SpoutBlog</spout:postby><spout:postto>SpoutBlog on spout.com</spout:postto><spout:postdate>6/16/2008 5:01:14 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>The best time for a Get Smart movie would have been the late ’60s, when the original television series was still on the air. In fact, there was a theatrical Get Smart film in the works during the run of the show, but it was canceled when the theatrical release of Munster, Go Home! bombed at the box office. Many years later, in 1980, a Get Smart feature titled The Nude Bomb was released to theaters, but it also performed poorly.
Now we’re getting a remake version starring Steve Carell in the role that was so iconically defined by the late Don Adams. Will it do the show justice? Reportedly the budget was $80 million, a significant amount of which was probably put towards pointless effects. But the best thing Warner Bros. could have done with that money is to give a large amount to series creators Mel Brooks and Buck Henry, who probably even today could churn out a better script than Failure to Launch scribes Tom J. Astle and Matt Ember.
Despite its lack of original Get Smart talent, though, it could still be marginally funny. Yet the real problem is that it may be too outdated and obsolete for audiences to care. In the four decades since the show went off the air, there has been plenty of similar-themed movies, from spy spoofs to films with bumbling heroes. The following ten titles are the best evidence of why this new Get Smart movie is completely unnecessary:

Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery - It’s interesting that Get Smart is going up against a Mike Myers movie this weekend, because in a way it’s also going up against Myers’ Austin Powers movies, as well. Sure, spy parodies have been around in spades since around the time of the first James Bond movie, but nothing has been as popular as this series, which of course includes the much bigger-grossing sequels, Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me and Austin Powers in Goldmember.

Inspector Gadget - The original animated series was based on Get Smart and even featured the voice of Don Adams. Also like Get Smart, it was remade into a feature film with a different cast. However, it did find room to employ both Adams (as the voice of the dog, Brain) and Andy Dick (who had played Maxwell Smart’s son in a 1990s Get Smart series). Regardless, it was still a failure, both in terms of its box office gross and the way it ruined our childhood memory of the beloved cartoon. Perhaps if the Get Smart movie is good enough, then it could make up for Inspector Gadget (and its sequel), but it would have to be really, really good.
The Pink Panther - You might say that Get Smart came about as a response to both the Bond films and the original Pink Panther movies, which featured a bumbling police inspector instead of a bumbling spy. The recent remake of The Pink Panther already showed us that some characters should really be forever remembered by their most iconic portrayer. In this case Steve Martin was nothing compared to Peter Sellers, while in the case of Get Smart, Steve Carell is only muddying the memory of Don Adams. Even if he does a good job, he’s just not the real Maxwell Smart. He should just be in another lame generic spy spoof instead.
Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgandy - Want to see Steve Carell act clueless? Watch Anchorman again, because he can’t top his performance as Brick Tamland. “I love lamp.”
The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad! - The show Police Squad was in a way like Get Smart, only with a clueless detective rather than a clueless spy (I guess it could be seen as more like The Pink Panther then?). Fortunately that series only took a few years to spin-off a feature film, and thanks to the genius of Jim Abrahams and the Zucker Bros., who are almost equal in spoofing ability to Mel Brooks, it is funnier than any single episode or film of Get Smart can be without Brooks’ involvement.
Spy Hard - Leslie Nielsen starred as the bumbling detective in the Naked Gun movies and then later played a bumbling spy in this spoof. The result: if Nielsen hadn’t already supplanted the Maxwell Smart character earlier, he did so here, even if really, really poorly.
The Man Who Knew Too Little - More clueless spy stuff, this one an underrated movie starring Bill Murray. It actually made less money than The Nude Bomb (even without an inflation adjustment), but I enjoyed it a lot, probably more than I’ll enjoy Get Smart.
Johnny English - Yep, I’m still just listing the other recent spy spoofs. But, really, there’s a point. When even Rowan Atkinson has done the bumbling spy bit, it’s time to hang up on the idea.
I Spy - Did I already point out that #s 6-10 are more spy comedies? And there’s a lot that I’m not even including! This one is significant because it’s also based on a hit TV series. And it was a huge bomb.
Spies Like Us - The thing I like best about the original Get Smart, as well as a number of the films on this list, is that the incompetent hero isn’t really aware of how incompetent he really is. The best movie to utilize this premise, though, has to be Spies Like Us. But that movie came out toward the end of the Cold War, when spy stuff was seeming ridiculously outdated. Comparatively, Get Smart arrives post 9/11, when the fact that American intelligence is incompetent is not so funny anymore. I think that now audiences would much prefer to see more serious spy films, like the Bond reboot Casino Royale (note the significance of this film being kind of a remake of a Bond parody) and the Bourne Identity franchise.
 Originally posted on:SpoutBlog</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: Casino Royale (1967, Great Britain, Various Directors) *1/2</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/cinemarian/archive/2008/5/13/28857.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u45259vekps.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/131080/default.aspx'>CinemaRian</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/cinemarian/default.aspx'>CinemaRian Blog</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 5/13/2008 4:32:16 AM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> Aside from Whirlpool, I've been on a real losing streak when it comes to movies.  Although I've seen a lot of bad ones latley, Casino Royale is in a class of its own.  You just look at the scren and go "what the f*** were they thinking?"  And despite having four of my favorite performers ever: (Peter Sellers, Orson Welles, Woody Allen and Jean-Paul Belmondo), the film wastes all of their talent and really blows. The movie belongs to one of the oddest of movie genres, the epic comedy.  These gargauntuan bearers of mirth were popular in the 60's after the sucess of Stanley Kramer's It's a Mad, Mad, Mad Mad World.  Although mostly forgotten now, it was fashionable to take an all star cast put them into a very long comedy with lots of stunt work.  Not only did the genre die out, few of them seem funny today-which is certainly true of Casino Royale. That novel was the only James Bond book by Ian Fleming not to be bought by Albert R. Broccoli, and thus was never (until 2006) shot as a straight Bond film.  After Sean Connery refused to apper in the film, the producer, Charles Feldman, decided that it would work better as a parody, with five different directors (John Huston, Kenneth Hughes, Joseph McGrath, Robert Parrish and Val Guest) and lots of stars (in addition to the ones I already mentioned, there's David Niven, William Holden, Deborah Kerr, Ursula Andress, George Raft, Charles Boyer, Jacquline Bisset, and Huston himself).  But this was clearly a case of too many cooks spoiling the platter, as the move is impossible to follow and makes no sense.  Everything is so confusing that it's hard to tell which director's sequence ends where.  Although there are a few occasional laughs (Welles shines in a rare comedic part as a gambler and Sellers is brillant as usual), most of the film is devoted to the lowest kind of comedy.  The film is sped up so that people run fast, Niven drives an old car really fast, people bump into each other, and on and on.  We have a self conciously "funny" music from Bert Bacherach and Allen is totally wasted a nerd who jumps around a lot and gestures frantically, with little dialouge. I did get to the end of the movie, although I had to split it out over the week.  But I wish that this collasal waste of money had never been made (it went so far over budget that it was one of the most expensive films ever produced up to that point), and so did probably every one who was involved with it.  Well, except for the producer, as it made a lot of money.  But it still sucks. Casino Royale (1967)<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 08:32:16 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>CinemaRian</spout:postby><spout:postto>CinemaRian Blog</spout:postto><spout:postdate>5/13/2008 4:32:16 AM</spout:postdate><spout:body>Aside from Whirlpool, I've been on a real losing streak when it comes to movies.  Although I've seen a lot of bad ones latley, Casino Royale is in a class of its own.  You just look at the scren and go "what the f*** were they thinking?"  And despite having four of my favorite performers ever: (Peter Sellers, Orson Welles, Woody Allen and Jean-Paul Belmondo), the film wastes all of their talent and really blows. The movie belongs to one of the oddest of movie genres, the epic comedy.  These gargauntuan bearers of mirth were popular in the 60's after the sucess of Stanley Kramer's It's a Mad, Mad, Mad Mad World.  Although mostly forgotten now, it was fashionable to take an all star cast put them into a very long comedy with lots of stunt work.  Not only did the genre die out, few of them seem funny today-which is certainly true of Casino Royale. That novel was the only James Bond book by Ian Fleming not to be bought by Albert R. Broccoli, and thus was never (until 2006) shot as a straight Bond film.  After Sean Connery refused to apper in the film, the producer, Charles Feldman, decided that it would work better as a parody, with five different directors (John Huston, Kenneth Hughes, Joseph McGrath, Robert Parrish and Val Guest) and lots of stars (in addition to the ones I already mentioned, there's David Niven, William Holden, Deborah Kerr, Ursula Andress, George Raft, Charles Boyer, Jacquline Bisset, and Huston himself).  But this was clearly a case of too many cooks spoiling the platter, as the move is impossible to follow and makes no sense.  Everything is so confusing that it's hard to tell which director's sequence ends where.  Although there are a few occasional laughs (Welles shines in a rare comedic part as a gambler and Sellers is brillant as usual), most of the film is devoted to the lowest kind of comedy.  The film is sped up so that people run fast, Niven drives an old car really fast, people bump into each other, and on and on.  We have a self conciously "funny" music from Bert Bacherach and Allen is totally wasted a nerd who jumps around a lot and gestures frantically, with little dialouge. I did get to the end of the movie, although I had to split it out over the week.  But I wish that this collasal waste of money had never been made (it went so far over budget that it was one of the most expensive films ever produced up to that point), and so did probably every one who was involved with it.  Well, except for the producer, as it made a lot of money.  But it still sucks. Casino Royale (1967)</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: Fully Bonded</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/hairylime/archive/2007/2/5/5270.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u45259vekps.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/6355/default.aspx'>HairyLime</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/hairylime/default.aspx'>HairyLime Blog</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 2/5/2007 11:24:00 AM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> I have to admit, I have been away from the Bond franchise for some time. The last one I saw was &#39;Goldeneye&#39;, and while I thought it was a cut above the previous few entries, I was getting a little tired of the concept, thinking "how long can they keep milking this?" -- Well we had heard that this new Bond Daniel Craig was worth a look, so we ventured out to our local multiplex to check him out around December. Additionally, the &#39;Encore&#39; channel started running all the old Bonds around the New Year (and if you got the &#39;on demand&#39; option with your cable service, you could watch all of them at your leisure in widescreen no less!), so around here, we&#39;ve been thoroughly drenched in Bond for the past few months. This weekend, we were snowed in and watched one of the more recent Pierce Brosnan entries, so with all this is mind, I thought I&#39;d do an overview of the 007 pantheon (at least the ones I&#39;ve seen, who knows how many times by now).I have to start by qualifying some of my prejudices about the series. I cut a lot of slack for the early ones. Budgets were low, the mindsets were different, audiences weren&#39;t quite so demanding of constant &#39;bang for the buck&#39; as they are today. Sean Connery is still the favorite, and I will never understand how Roger Moore survived as long as he did.Dr. No (1962) - The franchise started the year I was born, but I didn&#39;t actually see this film until the mid-eighties video boom. Recently revisited it thanks to the Encore channel last month. Sean Connery sets the standard for the cool playboy secret agent, handles himself well in fights, makes snappy double entendres and Ursula Andress in her bikini and knife-belt combo is probably the most iconic of &#39;Bond girls&#39;. Action-wise, the film is a little slow, but it has the proto-typical &#39;evil genius&#39; and &#39;hidden island lair&#39;. From Russia With Love (1963) - Haven&#39;t seen this one since the seventies, so its not fair to review this one. I seem to remember Robert Shaw was an impressive baddie, and the weird little woman with the pointy shoes was probably the model for the female evil sidekick character in the &#39;Austin Powers&#39; movies.Goldfinger (1964) - Good villain, wierd henchman (with a lethal bowler hat no less), and Bond girl with the best name ("Pussy Galore") - Great car, good memorable lines "I expect you to die, Mr. Bond!" and the best of the theme songs.Thunderball (1965) - Remade as &#39;Never Say Never Again&#39; in the eighties. Never a good idea to include scuba chase scenes, they really slow down the action. Good Tom Jones theme song. Haven&#39;t seen this one since the eighties, so I&#39;ll pass on more comments.You Only Live Twice (1967) - The goofiest of the Sean Connery films. Check out Bond in Japanese makeup made to pass as a native. Very cliche villain and volcano hideaway which was probably the model for Dr. Evil in the &#39;Austin Powers&#39; films. Bond flies around in a mini helicopter with 4 distinct weapons onboard, and is chased by and dispatches - you guessed it - 4 helicopters. You can usually tell how weak the franchise is getting by how many techno gadgets get introduced.Casino Royale (1967) - A testament to how stale the franchise was becoming, it was ripe for lampoon. Not worth a look, this is a total mess. But maybe worth a peek at the final reel just to catch Woody Allen&#39;s bit as the evil &#39;James Bond Jr.&#39;On Her Majesty&#39;s Secret Service (1969) - Saw this for the first time last month. Not as bad as I was expecting. Telly Savalas makes a rather lame villain which is probably the biggest flaw. Diana Rigg is appealling and a nice tough mate for James. George Lazenby is a little on the dry side, but handles himself well, has a lot of good one liners. Ski chase scenes aplenty (and we&#39;ll be getting many more of them in the future, unfortunately).Diamonds Are Forever (1971) - Connery comes back, looking a little pudgy, but still holding his own. This one has my favorite Bond double entendre when he comments on Jill St. John&#39;s wig change : "as long as the cuffs and collars match" - colorful villainous henchmen, just bordering on spoofery, the usual evil genius villain with an exotic hideaway that needs to be stormed. Not bad, but needs fresh ideas badly.Live and Let Die (1973) - Enter Roger Moore. Great theme song. Colorful villains and voodoo setting. A nice boat chase. Overall though, this Bond seems to play everything a little too much for laughs. A constant smirk on his face and the fact that he never looked believable in the fight scenes always left me a little cold on Roger Moore.The Man With the Golden Gun (1974) - More silliness. Killer midgets, another boat chase with the same southern sherrif along for the ride. We are in serious &#39;sequel-itis&#39; territory now. Just treading water.The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) - Tried watching this one last month, couldn&#39;t get interested. &#39;Jaws&#39; makes his first appearance. It just keeps getting more and more ridiculous. Moonraker (1979) - More &#39;Jaws&#39;. Slow motion outer space climax (pardon the pun). Tied for a three way "worst bond film ever" award.For Your Eyes Only (1981) - Almost palatable Roger Moore bond. (more skiing though - probably easier to hide the stunt man beneath all the protective gear). Topol makes a good ally/sidekick. Revenge seeking crossbow weilding bond girl is a nice touch.Octopussy (1983) - More silliness.  Maud Adams again for some reason (wasn&#39;t she killed off in &#39;Golden Gun&#39;?) Girly Circus Troupe. Ok. (three way "worst bond film ever" winner)Never Say Never Again (1983) - To underscore how badly the franchise needs a facelift, but not quite the facelift it needed, Sean Connery goes back at it again in this &#39;unofficial&#39; remake of &#39;Thunderball&#39;. Beats the current &#39;official&#39; Bond movies hands down, but still needs a younger actor in the role. Good villain turn by Klaus Maria Brandauer. A View To a Kill (1985) - Badly in need of a makeover now. Roger Moore is looking quite old and frail by this time and the pairings with the young girls is starting to earn catcalls. Grace Jones and Christopher Walken and Duran Duran title song. (three way "worst bond film ever" winner)The Living Daylights (1987) - Timothy Dalton takes over. While he has a good British theatrical delivery and seems to have a lot of severe intensity, he strikes me as being a bit of a 98 lb weakling in the brawn department. &#39;AIDS awareness Bond&#39; spends much more time out of bed in the next few movies and more time with small potatoes bad guys and outlandish action sequences. An improvement on Roger Moore at any rate.Licence to Kill (1989) - Revisited last month. Good final chase scene (if not a little improbable - semi trucks doing wheelies?) - Grim determined Timothy Dalton goes on a revenge spree and brings Q along for the ride. Good creepy villain. Funny cameo by Wayne Newton as a new age guru.Goldeneye (1995) - Pierce Brosnan takes over. Refreshing to see the sex jokes back in the mix. Good over the top action sequences (love the tank chase scene). Bond is back in a good way. But oddly enough its not enough to sustain my interest and I end up missing the next three at the theater. Nice touch bringing in Judi Dench as M. Tomorrow Never Dies (1997) - haven&#39;t seen it yetThe World Is Not Enough (1999) - Saw this one last weekend. Good villain, good &#39;bad bond girl&#39; - extremely silly &#39;good bond girl&#39; (who buys Denise Richards as a nuclear scientist?) - Good enough Bond flick, but we seem to be getting back to a bit of Roger Moore-ishness in the spoof/seriousness ratio.Die Another Day (2002) - haven&#39;t seen it yetCasino Royale (2006) - Wow. Bond taken a bit more seriously ala &#39;Batman Begins&#39;. Daniel Craig actually looks like he can &#39;take a licking and keep on ticking&#39;. And I love the &#39;Bond with an attitude&#39; persona he puts forward, reminds me of Connery in his youth. Favorite line: Bond: "give me a vodka martini" Bartender: "shaken or stirred?" Bond: "do I look like I give a damn?" - And doesn&#39;t everyone need a car with a built-in defibulator?Looking forward to where this goes next... addendum: A few other &#39;Spy Films&#39; that might help take away the bad taste of &#39;too much Bond&#39; - "The Spy Who Came In From the Cold" with Richard Burton, "Three Days of the Condor" with Robert Redford, and recently "The Constant Gardener" with Ralph Fiennes -- they treat the &#39;glamorous world of spy-dom&#39; with a generous dose of skepticism and a refreshingly bleak world view.  <br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:24:00 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>HairyLime</spout:postby><spout:postto>HairyLime Blog</spout:postto><spout:postdate>2/5/2007 11:24:00 AM</spout:postdate><spout:body>I have to admit, I have been away from the Bond franchise for some time. The last one I saw was &amp;#39;Goldeneye&amp;#39;, and while I thought it was a cut above the previous few entries, I was getting a little tired of the concept, thinking "how long can they keep milking this?" -- Well we had heard that this new Bond Daniel Craig was worth a look, so we ventured out to our local multiplex to check him out around December. Additionally, the &amp;#39;Encore&amp;#39; channel started running all the old Bonds around the New Year (and if you got the &amp;#39;on demand&amp;#39; option with your cable service, you could watch all of them at your leisure in widescreen no less!), so around here, we&amp;#39;ve been thoroughly drenched in Bond for the past few months. This weekend, we were snowed in and watched one of the more recent Pierce Brosnan entries, so with all this is mind, I thought I&amp;#39;d do an overview of the 007 pantheon (at least the ones I&amp;#39;ve seen, who knows how many times by now).I have to start by qualifying some of my prejudices about the series. I cut a lot of slack for the early ones. Budgets were low, the mindsets were different, audiences weren&amp;#39;t quite so demanding of constant &amp;#39;bang for the buck&amp;#39; as they are today. Sean Connery is still the favorite, and I will never understand how Roger Moore survived as long as he did.Dr. No (1962) - The franchise started the year I was born, but I didn&amp;#39;t actually see this film until the mid-eighties video boom. Recently revisited it thanks to the Encore channel last month. Sean Connery sets the standard for the cool playboy secret agent, handles himself well in fights, makes snappy double entendres and Ursula Andress in her bikini and knife-belt combo is probably the most iconic of &amp;#39;Bond girls&amp;#39;. Action-wise, the film is a little slow, but it has the proto-typical &amp;#39;evil genius&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;hidden island lair&amp;#39;. From Russia With Love (1963) - Haven&amp;#39;t seen this one since the seventies, so its not fair to review this one. I seem to remember Robert Shaw was an impressive baddie, and the weird little woman with the pointy shoes was probably the model for the female evil sidekick character in the &amp;#39;Austin Powers&amp;#39; movies.Goldfinger (1964) - Good villain, wierd henchman (with a lethal bowler hat no less), and Bond girl with the best name ("Pussy Galore") - Great car, good memorable lines "I expect you to die, Mr. Bond!" and the best of the theme songs.Thunderball (1965) - Remade as &amp;#39;Never Say Never Again&amp;#39; in the eighties. Never a good idea to include scuba chase scenes, they really slow down the action. Good Tom Jones theme song. Haven&amp;#39;t seen this one since the eighties, so I&amp;#39;ll pass on more comments.You Only Live Twice (1967) - The goofiest of the Sean Connery films. Check out Bond in Japanese makeup made to pass as a native. Very cliche villain and volcano hideaway which was probably the model for Dr. Evil in the &amp;#39;Austin Powers&amp;#39; films. Bond flies around in a mini helicopter with 4 distinct weapons onboard, and is chased by and dispatches - you guessed it - 4 helicopters. You can usually tell how weak the franchise is getting by how many techno gadgets get introduced.Casino Royale (1967) - A testament to how stale the franchise was becoming, it was ripe for lampoon. Not worth a look, this is a total mess. But maybe worth a peek at the final reel just to catch Woody Allen&amp;#39;s bit as the evil &amp;#39;James Bond Jr.&amp;#39;On Her Majesty&amp;#39;s Secret Service (1969) - Saw this for the first time last month. Not as bad as I was expecting. Telly Savalas makes a rather lame villain which is probably the biggest flaw. Diana Rigg is appealling and a nice tough mate for James. George Lazenby is a little on the dry side, but handles himself well, has a lot of good one liners. Ski chase scenes aplenty (and we&amp;#39;ll be getting many more of them in the future, unfortunately).Diamonds Are Forever (1971) - Connery comes back, looking a little pudgy, but still holding his own. This one has my favorite Bond double entendre when he comments on Jill St. John&amp;#39;s wig change : "as long as the cuffs and collars match" - colorful villainous henchmen, just bordering on spoofery, the usual evil genius villain with an exotic hideaway that needs to be stormed. Not bad, but needs fresh ideas badly.Live and Let Die (1973) - Enter Roger Moore. Great theme song. Colorful villains and voodoo setting. A nice boat chase. Overall though, this Bond seems to play everything a little too much for laughs. A constant smirk on his face and the fact that he never looked believable in the fight scenes always left me a little cold on Roger Moore.The Man With the Golden Gun (1974) - More silliness. Killer midgets, another boat chase with the same southern sherrif along for the ride. We are in serious &amp;#39;sequel-itis&amp;#39; territory now. Just treading water.The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) - Tried watching this one last month, couldn&amp;#39;t get interested. &amp;#39;Jaws&amp;#39; makes his first appearance. It just keeps getting more and more ridiculous. Moonraker (1979) - More &amp;#39;Jaws&amp;#39;. Slow motion outer space climax (pardon the pun). Tied for a three way "worst bond film ever" award.For Your Eyes Only (1981) - Almost palatable Roger Moore bond. (more skiing though - probably easier to hide the stunt man beneath all the protective gear). Topol makes a good ally/sidekick. Revenge seeking crossbow weilding bond girl is a nice touch.Octopussy (1983) - More silliness.  Maud Adams again for some reason (wasn&amp;#39;t she killed off in &amp;#39;Golden Gun&amp;#39;?) Girly Circus Troupe. Ok. (three way "worst bond film ever" winner)Never Say Never Again (1983) - To underscore how badly the franchise needs a facelift, but not quite the facelift it needed, Sean Connery goes back at it again in this &amp;#39;unofficial&amp;#39; remake of &amp;#39;Thunderball&amp;#39;. Beats the current &amp;#39;official&amp;#39; Bond movies hands down, but still needs a younger actor in the role. Good villain turn by Klaus Maria Brandauer. A View To a Kill (1985) - Badly in need of a makeover now. Roger Moore is looking quite old and frail by this time and the pairings with the young girls is starting to earn catcalls. Grace Jones and Christopher Walken and Duran Duran title song. (three way "worst bond film ever" winner)The Living Daylights (1987) - Timothy Dalton takes over. While he has a good British theatrical delivery and seems to have a lot of severe intensity, he strikes me as being a bit of a 98 lb weakling in the brawn department. &amp;#39;AIDS awareness Bond&amp;#39; spends much more time out of bed in the next few movies and more time with small potatoes bad guys and outlandish action sequences. An improvement on Roger Moore at any rate.Licence to Kill (1989) - Revisited last month. Good final chase scene (if not a little improbable - semi trucks doing wheelies?) - Grim determined Timothy Dalton goes on a revenge spree and brings Q along for the ride. Good creepy villain. Funny cameo by Wayne Newton as a new age guru.Goldeneye (1995) - Pierce Brosnan takes over. Refreshing to see the sex jokes back in the mix. Good over the top action sequences (love the tank chase scene). Bond is back in a good way. But oddly enough its not enough to sustain my interest and I end up missing the next three at the theater. Nice touch bringing in Judi Dench as M. Tomorrow Never Dies (1997) - haven&amp;#39;t seen it yetThe World Is Not Enough (1999) - Saw this one last weekend. Good villain, good &amp;#39;bad bond girl&amp;#39; - extremely silly &amp;#39;good bond girl&amp;#39; (who buys Denise Richards as a nuclear scientist?) - Good enough Bond flick, but we seem to be getting back to a bit of Roger Moore-ishness in the spoof/seriousness ratio.Die Another Day (2002) - haven&amp;#39;t seen it yetCasino Royale (2006) - Wow. Bond taken a bit more seriously ala &amp;#39;Batman Begins&amp;#39;. Daniel Craig actually looks like he can &amp;#39;take a licking and keep on ticking&amp;#39;. And I love the &amp;#39;Bond with an attitude&amp;#39; persona he puts forward, reminds me of Connery in his youth. Favorite line: Bond: "give me a vodka martini" Bartender: "shaken or stirred?" Bond: "do I look like I give a damn?" - And doesn&amp;#39;t everyone need a car with a built-in defibulator?Looking forward to where this goes next... addendum: A few other &amp;#39;Spy Films&amp;#39; that might help take away the bad taste of &amp;#39;too much Bond&amp;#39; - "The Spy Who Came In From the Cold" with Richard Burton, "Three Days of the Condor" with Robert Redford, and recently "The Constant Gardener" with Ralph Fiennes -- they treat the &amp;#39;glamorous world of spy-dom&amp;#39; with a generous dose of skepticism and a refreshingly bleak world view.  </spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: 1967 - Year of the Definitive James Bond Movie</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/smithco/archive/2006/11/17/3719.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u45259vekps.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/4054/default.aspx'>smithco</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/smithco/default.aspx'>My Ponderings on Cinema</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 11/17/2006 2:37:00 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> Hopefully the recent release of the new Casino Royale will prompt some to watch the 1967 version.  Considering that so many Bond "fans" try to cover up the existence of this old classic, it may be that it stays buried.  What a tragedy.You see, the 1967 production of Casino Royale is actually an art film.  But it's an art film that is under no circumstances to be taken seriously.  Every step of the way, the film is a strange combination of comedy, surreality, and just plain confusion, all built upon the improbability of the James Bond mythos.  But, that's actually the point of the film.  The whole thing is an exercise in craziness.  The goal was to take the user from the comfortable convention of the English gentleman spy into a world that completely fails to hold any coherency.  It does so slowly, at a walking pace.  The layers of incomprehension are slowly added and woven in, all using the suspension of disbelief needed to enter into Bond's world in the first place.All too often Casino Royale is dismissed, but it is a great and entertaining film.  Just remember that there will always be this accomplishment in cinematic lunacy hidden under the new, far less imaginative, version of Casino Royale.  Remember the zaniness.<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:37:00 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>smithco</spout:postby><spout:postto>My Ponderings on Cinema</spout:postto><spout:postdate>11/17/2006 2:37:00 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>Hopefully the recent release of the new Casino Royale will prompt some to watch the 1967 version.  Considering that so many Bond "fans" try to cover up the existence of this old classic, it may be that it stays buried.  What a tragedy.You see, the 1967 production of Casino Royale is actually an art film.  But it's an art film that is under no circumstances to be taken seriously.  Every step of the way, the film is a strange combination of comedy, surreality, and just plain confusion, all built upon the improbability of the James Bond mythos.  But, that's actually the point of the film.  The whole thing is an exercise in craziness.  The goal was to take the user from the comfortable convention of the English gentleman spy into a world that completely fails to hold any coherency.  It does so slowly, at a walking pace.  The layers of incomprehension are slowly added and woven in, all using the suspension of disbelief needed to enter into Bond's world in the first place.All too often Casino Royale is dismissed, but it is a great and entertaining film.  Just remember that there will always be this accomplishment in cinematic lunacy hidden under the new, far less imaginative, version of Casino Royale.  Remember the zaniness.</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:Classic</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/Classic/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/Classic/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>Classic</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 816</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 312</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 1453</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:54:36 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>816</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>312</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>1453</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:Great</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/Great/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/Great/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>Great</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 231</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 203</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 371</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:11:49 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>231</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>203</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>371</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:art</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/art/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/art/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>art</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 674</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 66</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 116</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:09:48 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>674</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>66</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>116</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:spy</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/spy/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/spy/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>spy</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 366</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 46</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 97</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:24:02 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>366</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>46</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>97</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:espionage</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/espionage/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/espionage/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>espionage</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 2176</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 38</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 109</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:02:54 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>2176</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>38</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>109</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:gambling</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/gambling/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/gambling/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>gambling</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 1082</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 38</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 81</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:03:25 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>1082</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>38</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>81</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:casino</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/casino/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/casino/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>casino</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 228</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 23</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 31</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:33:19 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>228</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>23</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>31</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:poker</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/poker/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/poker/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>poker</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 144</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 18</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 21</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:20:32 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>144</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>18</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>21</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:English</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/English/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/English/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>English</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 16</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 14</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 17</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:42:33 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>16</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>14</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>17</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:retirement</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/retirement/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/retirement/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>retirement</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 326</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 8</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 11</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:01:55 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>326</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>8</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>11</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:gentleman</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/gentleman/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/gentleman/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>gentleman</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 79</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 1</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 1</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:02:35 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>79</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>1</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>1</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:lunacy</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/lunacy/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/lunacy/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>lunacy</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 1</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 1</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 1</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:51:21 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>1</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>1</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>1</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
  </channel>
</rss>