list http://www.spout.com/ Recent community activity around Strike on Spout Copyright 2005-9 Spout, LLC Spout RSS http://www.spout.com/images/SpoutLogoRSS.jpg http://www.spout.com/ 136 30 http://www.spout.com/films/Strike/43297/default.aspx Title: Strike
Year: 1924
Director: Sergei Eisenstein
Plot: The first full-length feature project of pantheon Russian filmmaker Sergei Eisenstein, Strike is a government-commissioned celebration of the unrealized 1905 Bolshevik revolution. The story is set in motion by a series of outrages and humiliations perpetrated on the workers of a metalworks plant. The Czarist regime is unsympathetic to the workers, characteristically helping the plant owners to subjugate the hapless victims. Finally, the workers revolt, staging an all-out strike. Here is where Eisenstein's theory of "the montage of shocks" was given its first major workout. While the notion of juxtaposing short, separate images to heighten tension and excitement was not new, Eisenstein was the first to fully understand the value of using sudden-shock images (a bloody face, a fired weapon, a descending club) to make his dramatic and sociological points. Playing to mixed reviews and small audiences in Russia, Strike proved a success worldwide, assuring Eisenstein complete creative freedom on his next project, the immortal Potemkin. ~ Hal Erickson, All Movie Guide
Times Tagged: 13
Number of Lists: 3
Number of blog posts: 3
Number of discussion threads: 1
SpoutRating: 3
]]>Mon, 11 May 2009 01:04:50 GMTStrike1924Sergei EisensteinThe first full-length feature project of pantheon Russian filmmaker <a href="/players/P____88777/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Sergei Eisenstein</a>, Strike is a government-commissioned celebration of the unrealized 1905 Bolshevik revolution. The story is set in motion by a series of outrages and humiliations perpetrated on the workers of a metalworks plant. The Czarist regime is unsympathetic to the workers, characteristically helping the plant owners to subjugate the hapless victims. Finally, the workers revolt, staging an all-out strike. Here is where Eisenstein's theory of "the montage of shocks" was given its first major workout. While the notion of juxtaposing short, separate images to heighten tension and excitement was not new, Eisenstein was the first to fully understand the value of using sudden-shock images (a bloody face, a fired weapon, a descending club) to make his dramatic and sociological points. Playing to mixed reviews and small audiences in Russia, Strike proved a success worldwide, assuring Eisenstein complete creative freedom on his next project, the immortal Potemkin. ~ Hal Erickson, All Movie Guide13Tag Target (>10)3313http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t07232w32fq.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/Strike/43297/default.aspxFilm http://www.spout.com/blogs/risselada/archive/2009/2/10/40380.aspx Post By: Risselada
Post To: Risselada Blog
Post Date: 2/10/2009 2:21:55 PM
Body: This blog entry is part of my “movie year countdown”. To read more about that check out my first Spout filmblog entry. Stachka (Strike) I think I may have seen enough old Russian films now to realize I'm just not going to get a lot of enjoyment or interest out of them. I've been watching them because of their reverence in the world of cinema history. Many Russian filmmakers of the 20s were considered to be pioneers of editing theory. If you want a lot of wild montage and cuts you can see it with these guys. Many people have criticized what's called MTV style of editing to contributing to recent society’s attention deficit disorders, but if you look back to these films it's not much different. Now some of these films of course had different goals. I think you could call a lot of this stuff by Eisenstein propaganda. And certainly The Man With a Movie Camera which I saw recently was trying to redefine what film and art could be. I remember rating Eisenstien's Battleship Potemkin higher when I watched it, but maybe I just felt embarrassed to rate it any less. I wonder how I'll feel if I watch it again now that I've gone through a few more silent films. I'm sure there's something important historically for what these filmmakers showed the world that film could do, but even with that knowledge I'm not overly excited to see many more. Rating: 5/10
]]>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:21:55 GMTRisseladaRisselada Blog2/10/2009 2:21:55 PMThis blog entry is part of my &ldquo;movie year countdown&rdquo;. To read more about that check out my first Spout filmblog entry. Stachka (Strike) I think I may have seen enough old Russian films now to realize I'm just not going to get a lot of enjoyment or interest out of them. I've been watching them because of their reverence in the world of cinema history. Many Russian filmmakers of the 20s were considered to be pioneers of editing theory. If you want a lot of wild montage and cuts you can see it with these guys. Many people have criticized what's called MTV style of editing to contributing to recent society&rsquo;s attention deficit disorders, but if you look back to these films it's not much different. Now some of these films of course had different goals. I think you could call a lot of this stuff by Eisenstein propaganda. And certainly The Man With a Movie Camera which I saw recently was trying to redefine what film and art could be. I remember rating Eisenstien's Battleship Potemkin higher when I watched it, but maybe I just felt embarrassed to rate it any less. I wonder how I'll feel if I watch it again now that I've gone through a few more silent films. I'm sure there's something important historically for what these filmmakers showed the world that film could do, but even with that knowledge I'm not overly excited to see many more. Rating: 5/10 http://www.spout.com/groups/Movie_Games/Re_Cause_Effect/598/33823/1/ShowPost.aspx Post By: leeroy711
Post To: Movie Games
Post Date: 8/10/2008 4:51:12 PM
Body: [quote user="unclefestering"] [quote user="leeroy711"] The Russian Navy refuses to fire on the Battleship Potemkin. Lenin uses the Battleship Potemkin story to fuel the October revolution of 1917 which puts power in the hands of the Bolsheviks. They form the Soviet Union, which Stalin takes control over. After WWII, the USSR takes over East Germany. The communist state of East Germany (later declared sovereign by USSR) creates the Stasi (secret police of East Germany) dissenters of the State and the Socialist Unity Party were questioned, jailed and/or beaten until the accusers heard what the wanted to hear such as in the film, The Lives Of Others. Allright so, you could have probably fit about 2 or 3 movies in between those two but I would say this was a pretty good example of cause and effect. [/quote] I would prefer to see the upside of cause and effect in this situation: The Lives of Others shows the enormous overhead that the East German government has to deal with in order keep its citizens under constant control bankrupts the country and forces the government to fall and gives its people true, capitalist freedoms, although some perfer to dream of a perfect socialist society in Good Bye, Lenin!. [/quote] I thought of including that one too. I loved Good Bye Lenin!. We could just make an entire cause & effect time line starting with Battleship Potemkin and Strike and ending with Good Bye, Lenin!. That way I could fit all sorts of my favorite movies like The Tunnel in there.
]]>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:51:12 GMTleeroy711Movie Games8/10/2008 4:51:12 PM[quote user="unclefestering"] [quote user="leeroy711"] The Russian Navy refuses to fire on the Battleship Potemkin. Lenin uses the Battleship Potemkin story to fuel the October revolution of 1917 which puts power in the hands of the Bolsheviks. They form the Soviet Union, which Stalin takes control over. After WWII, the USSR takes over East Germany. The communist state of East Germany (later declared sovereign by USSR) creates the Stasi (secret police of East Germany) dissenters of the State and the Socialist Unity Party were questioned, jailed and/or beaten until the accusers heard what the wanted to hear such as in the film, The Lives Of Others. Allright so, you could have probably fit about 2 or 3 movies in between those two but I would say this was a pretty good example of cause and effect. [/quote] I would prefer to see the upside of cause and effect in this situation: The Lives of Others shows the enormous overhead that the East German government has to deal with in order keep its citizens under constant control bankrupts the country and forces the government to fall and gives its people true, capitalist freedoms, although some perfer to dream of a perfect socialist society in Good Bye, Lenin!. [/quote] I thought of including that one too. I loved Good Bye Lenin!. We could just make an entire cause &amp; effect time line starting with Battleship Potemkin and Strike and ending with Good Bye, Lenin!. That way I could fit all sorts of my favorite movies like The Tunnel in there. http://www.spout.com/blogs/cinemarian/archive/2008/5/12/28803.aspx Post By: CinemaRian
Post To: CinemaRian Blog
Post Date: 5/12/2008 11:23:26 PM
Body: Strike is the kind of movie that confounds star ratings. On one hand, I feel I should give it four stars because it is a film of ceaseless ambition and great visual poetry. On the other, it is dense, confusing and esoteric, without any compelling human characters to care about. I am giving it three because no serious cineastes should avoid a film this impressive, I am unsure as to how many will actually "like" it. I have said that the movie is confusing, but it doesn't appear to be. Let me explain. On one level, the movie is simple- Russian workers plan to strike after one of them is falsely accused of a crime and commits suicide, and the upper classes try to stop them. But to keep track of the dozens of characters, the exact sequence of events and the various visual and historical metaphors that Eisenstien uses. I turned on the DVD commentary track by a Russian film historian to see if it might help me and instead realized how little of the film I was getting. I might be able to better appreciate this film with years of study on Eisenstien and the intricacies of the Russian Revolution and the events that lead up to it, but for the average filmgoer this is going to come off as a beautiful "huh?" And make no mistake, the movie is gorgeous. As a visual stylist, there were only four contemporaries that he could be compared to- Griffith, Murneau, Lang and Keaton. The Image Entertainment DVD is in great shape and it's easy just to stare in wonder at the visuals and montage (a term that the director invented). Whether you are going to be moved by the plight of the workers is another matter- it's appeal as propaganda is limited because its transparently obvious- the workers are near saints and everyone else are cartoonish villains. If you are into movies, you cannot avoid the magical works of Sergei Eisenstien, but this is not the place to start. His best and most accessible film is Alexander Nevsky, which features one of the best battle sequences ever filmed. In a way, Strike is to movies what Fininian's Wake is to novels- you know it's good and the guy who made is obviously a genius, but is the end result worth the time it will take understand it? Strike (1924)
]]>Tue, 13 May 2008 03:23:26 GMTCinemaRianCinemaRian Blog5/12/2008 11:23:26 PMStrike is the kind of movie that confounds star ratings. On one hand, I feel I should give it four stars because it is a film of ceaseless ambition and great visual poetry. On the other, it is dense, confusing and esoteric, without any compelling human characters to care about. I am giving it three because no serious cineastes should avoid a film this impressive, I am unsure as to how many will actually "like" it. I have said that the movie is confusing, but it doesn't appear to be. Let me explain. On one level, the movie is simple- Russian workers plan to strike after one of them is falsely accused of a crime and commits suicide, and the upper classes try to stop them. But to keep track of the dozens of characters, the exact sequence of events and the various visual and historical metaphors that Eisenstien uses. I turned on the DVD commentary track by a Russian film historian to see if it might help me and instead realized how little of the film I was getting. I might be able to better appreciate this film with years of study on Eisenstien and the intricacies of the Russian Revolution and the events that lead up to it, but for the average filmgoer this is going to come off as a beautiful "huh?" And make no mistake, the movie is gorgeous. As a visual stylist, there were only four contemporaries that he could be compared to- Griffith, Murneau, Lang and Keaton. The Image Entertainment DVD is in great shape and it's easy just to stare in wonder at the visuals and montage (a term that the director invented). Whether you are going to be moved by the plight of the workers is another matter- it's appeal as propaganda is limited because its transparently obvious- the workers are near saints and everyone else are cartoonish villains. If you are into movies, you cannot avoid the magical works of Sergei Eisenstien, but this is not the place to start. His best and most accessible film is Alexander Nevsky, which features one of the best battle sequences ever filmed. In a way, Strike is to movies what Fininian's Wake is to novels- you know it's good and the guy who made is obviously a genius, but is the end result worth the time it will take understand it? Strike (1924) http://www.spout.com/blogs/risselada/archive/2007/2/17/5581.aspx Post By: Risselada
Post To: Risselada Blog
Post Date: 2/17/2007 11:57:00 AM
Body: Here’s the dilemma. I have a list of well over three thousand movies I want to see saved on IMDB. I have a subscription to Netflix and recently every time I return a DVD it has been an extremely arduous task to make the decision as to which movie I should see next. In an effort to narrow down my choices and make the process of choosing slightly less overwhelming I have devised a system, almost a bit of a game for me. Here’s how it goes.For my first film selection, I have narrowed the options down to only films that were released in the year 2006. Then after I have watched that movie, my next selection would have to be a film released in 2005. Then I would see a film from 2004, then 2003, etc. The process of deciding is still laborious, but actually quite a bit more exciting. (I'm going by IMDB as my source for release years)I have already been making a list and have also already begun watching the films. I decided this might be a good time to start fooling around with this spoutblog I have until now left unutilized. So I’ll try to start writing a little blurb or so about each movie I watch in this process.My only limitation here is of course movies that are available on Netflix. Which sadly excludes several I know are available on DVD, and have been longing to see for a long time, but Netflix just doesn’t seem to have available. It’d sort of annoying how they do list quite a few movies that that you can put in your queue under “saved”, yet they obviously do not have available. I have countless movies in that unavailable but saved queue, and I’m not sure that a single one has ever become available. What’s the point I wonder.But if anyone has any recommendations, I'll take that into consideration. THANK YOU!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------New addition to this post:Today is Tuesday March 13, and I have completed a preliminary list of all of the movie I will be watching. Unfortunately many of them were not available on Netflix. I will hunt those down some day. I'm don't doubt that as I make my way through the list I will make a few more changes depending on my mood and other factors, but for now, here it is:1. Art School Confidential (2006)2. The Comedians of Comedy (2005)3. The Passion of the Christ (2004)4. Ruang rak noi nid mahasan (Last Life in the Universe) (2003)5. Im toten Winkel - Hitlers Sekretärin (Blind Spot. Hitler's Secretary) (2002)6. El Espinazo del diablo (The Devil's Backbone) (2001)7. Werckmeister harmóniák (Werckmeister Harmonies) (2000)8. The Virgin Suicides (1999)9. Buffalo '66 (1998)10. In the Company of Men (1997)11. Hard Core Logo (1996)12. Welcome to the Dollhouse (1995)13. Hoop Dreams (1994)14. Short Cuts (1993)15. In the Soup (1992)16. Surviving Desire (1991)17. Misery (1990)18. Der Siebente Kontinent (The Seventh Continent) (1989)19. Topio stin omichli (Landscape in the Mist) (1988)20. Evil Dead II (1987)21. Ying hung boon sik (1986)22. Sans toit ni loi (Vagabond) (1985)23. Sixteen Candles (1984)24. Videodrome (1983)25. Chan Is Missing (1982)26. Coup de torchon (1981)27. The Ninth Configuration (1980)28. Hardcore (1979)29. Halloween (1978)30. Pumping Iron (1977)31. Logan's Run (1976)32. Tommy (1975)33. The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (1974)34. The Exorcist (1973)35. Kozure Ôkami: Kowokashi udekashi tsukamatsuru (Lone Wolf and Cub: Sword of Vengeance) (1972)36. Get Carter (1971)37. Il Conformista (The Conformist) (1970)38. Hsia nu (A Touch of Zen) (1969)39. Fando y Lis (1968)40. Dutchman (1967)41. Kenka erejii (Fighting Elegy) (1966)42. Rekopis znaleziony w Saragossie (The Saragossa Manuscript) (1965)43. Sei donne per l'assassino (Blood and Black Lace) (1964)44. The Great Escape (1963)45. Cape Fear (1962)46. Yojimbo (1961)47. Plein soleil (Purple Noon) (1960)48. Some Like It Hot (1959)49. Mon oncle (1958)50. Sweet Smell of Success (1957)51. Biruma no tategoto (The Burmese Harp) (1956)52. Rebel Without a Cause (1955)53. Gojira (Godzilla) (1954)54. Ugetsu monogatari (1953)55. Ikiru (1952)56. A Streetcar Named Desire (1951)57. D.O.A. (1950)58. White Heat (1949)59. Rope (1948)60. Born to Kill (1947)61. Black Narcissus (1946)62. And Then There Were None (1945)63. The Miracle of Morgan's Creek (1944)64. Le Corbeau (1943)65. Cat People (1942)66. The Wolf Man (1941)67. Road to Singapore (1940)68. Gone with the Wind (1939)69. The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938)70. Drôle de drame ou L'étrange aventure de Docteur Molyneux (1937)71. Flash Gordon (1936/I)72. Triumph des Willens (Triumph of the Will) (1935)73. The Thin Man (1934)74. The Invisible Man (1933)75. Trouble in Paradise (1932)76. City Lights (1931)77. Der Blaue Engel (The Blue Angel) (1930)78. Chelovek s kino-apparatom (The Man with a Movie Camera) (1929)79. La Chute de la maison Usher (The Fall of the House of Usher) (1928)80. The King of Kings (1927)81. Die Abenteuer des Prinzen Achmed (The Adventures of Prince Achmed) (1926)82. Stachka (Strike) (1925)83. The Thief of Bagdad (1924)84. The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1923)85. Häxan (1922)86. Seven Years Bad Luck (1921)87. Der Golem, wie er in die Welt kam (1920)88. Blind Husbands (1919)
]]>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:57:00 GMTRisseladaRisselada Blog2/17/2007 11:57:00 AMHere&rsquo;s the dilemma. I have a list of well over three thousand movies I want to see saved on IMDB. I have a subscription to Netflix and recently every time I return a DVD it has been an extremely arduous task to make the decision as to which movie I should see next. In an effort to narrow down my choices and make the process of choosing slightly less overwhelming I have devised a system, almost a bit of a game for me. Here&rsquo;s how it goes.For my first film selection, I have narrowed the options down to only films that were released in the year 2006. Then after I have watched that movie, my next selection would have to be a film released in 2005. Then I would see a film from 2004, then 2003, etc. The process of deciding is still laborious, but actually quite a bit more exciting. (I&#39;m going by IMDB as my source for release years)I have already been making a list and have also already begun watching the films. I decided this might be a good time to start fooling around with this spoutblog I have until now left unutilized. So I&rsquo;ll try to start writing a little blurb or so about each movie I watch in this process.My only limitation here is of course movies that are available on Netflix. Which sadly excludes several I know are available on DVD, and have been longing to see for a long time, but Netflix just doesn&rsquo;t seem to have available. It&rsquo;d sort of annoying how they do list quite a few movies that that you can put in your queue under &ldquo;saved&rdquo;, yet they obviously do not have available. I have countless movies in that unavailable but saved queue, and I&rsquo;m not sure that a single one has ever become available. What&rsquo;s the point I wonder.But if anyone has any recommendations, I&#39;ll take that into consideration. THANK YOU!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------New addition to this post:Today is Tuesday March 13, and I have completed a preliminary list of all of the movie I will be watching. Unfortunately many of them were not available on Netflix. I will hunt those down some day. I&#39;m don&#39;t doubt that as I make my way through the list I will make a few more changes depending on my mood and other factors, but for now, here it is:1. Art School Confidential (2006)2. The Comedians of Comedy (2005)3. The Passion of the Christ (2004)4. Ruang rak noi nid mahasan (Last Life in the Universe) (2003)5. Im toten Winkel - Hitlers Sekret&auml;rin (Blind Spot. Hitler&#39;s Secretary) (2002)6. El Espinazo del diablo (The Devil&#39;s Backbone) (2001)7. Werckmeister harm&oacute;ni&aacute;k (Werckmeister Harmonies) (2000)8. The Virgin Suicides (1999)9. Buffalo &#39;66 (1998)10. In the Company of Men (1997)11. Hard Core Logo (1996)12. Welcome to the Dollhouse (1995)13. Hoop Dreams (1994)14. Short Cuts (1993)15. In the Soup (1992)16. Surviving Desire (1991)17. Misery (1990)18. Der Siebente Kontinent (The Seventh Continent) (1989)19. Topio stin omichli (Landscape in the Mist) (1988)20. Evil Dead II (1987)21. Ying hung boon sik (1986)22. Sans toit ni loi (Vagabond) (1985)23. Sixteen Candles (1984)24. Videodrome (1983)25. Chan Is Missing (1982)26. Coup de torchon (1981)27. The Ninth Configuration (1980)28. Hardcore (1979)29. Halloween (1978)30. Pumping Iron (1977)31. Logan&#39;s Run (1976)32. Tommy (1975)33. The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (1974)34. The Exorcist (1973)35. Kozure &Ocirc;kami: Kowokashi udekashi tsukamatsuru (Lone Wolf and Cub: Sword of Vengeance) (1972)36. Get Carter (1971)37. Il Conformista (The Conformist) (1970)38. Hsia nu (A Touch of Zen) (1969)39. Fando y Lis (1968)40. Dutchman (1967)41. Kenka erejii (Fighting Elegy) (1966)42. Rekopis znaleziony w Saragossie (The Saragossa Manuscript) (1965)43. Sei donne per l&#39;assassino (Blood and Black Lace) (1964)44. The Great Escape (1963)45. Cape Fear (1962)46. Yojimbo (1961)47. Plein soleil (Purple Noon) (1960)48. Some Like It Hot (1959)49. Mon oncle (1958)50. Sweet Smell of Success (1957)51. Biruma no tategoto (The Burmese Harp) (1956)52. Rebel Without a Cause (1955)53. Gojira (Godzilla) (1954)54. Ugetsu monogatari (1953)55. Ikiru (1952)56. A Streetcar Named Desire (1951)57. D.O.A. (1950)58. White Heat (1949)59. Rope (1948)60. Born to Kill (1947)61. Black Narcissus (1946)62. And Then There Were None (1945)63. The Miracle of Morgan&#39;s Creek (1944)64. Le Corbeau (1943)65. Cat People (1942)66. The Wolf Man (1941)67. Road to Singapore (1940)68. Gone with the Wind (1939)69. The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938)70. Dr&ocirc;le de drame ou L&#39;&eacute;trange aventure de Docteur Molyneux (1937)71. Flash Gordon (1936/I)72. Triumph des Willens (Triumph of the Will) (1935)73. The Thin Man (1934)74. The Invisible Man (1933)75. Trouble in Paradise (1932)76. City Lights (1931)77. Der Blaue Engel (The Blue Angel) (1930)78. Chelovek s kino-apparatom (The Man with a Movie Camera) (1929)79. La Chute de la maison Usher (The Fall of the House of Usher) (1928)80. The King of Kings (1927)81. Die Abenteuer des Prinzen Achmed (The Adventures of Prince Achmed) (1926)82. Stachka (Strike) (1925)83. The Thief of Bagdad (1924)84. The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1923)85. H&auml;xan (1922)86. Seven Years Bad Luck (1921)87. Der Golem, wie er in die Welt kam (1920)88. Blind Husbands (1919) http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/war/MemberTagFilms.aspxwar
Number of films tagged: 6176

Number of people who tagged: 180

Number of times used: 607

]]>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:50:24 GMT6176180607Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/brilliant/MemberTagFilms.aspxbrilliant
Number of films tagged: 179

Number of people who tagged: 137

Number of times used: 285

]]>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:28:43 GMT179137285Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/drama/MemberTagFilms.aspxdrama
Number of films tagged: 525

Number of people who tagged: 102

Number of times used: 624

]]>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:39:10 GMT525102624Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/suicide/MemberTagFilms.aspxsuicide
Number of films tagged: 1828

Number of people who tagged: 80

Number of times used: 185

]]>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:40:50 GMT182880185Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/revolution/MemberTagFilms.aspxrevolution
Number of films tagged: 1036

Number of people who tagged: 42

Number of times used: 68

]]>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:32:33 GMT10364268Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/silent/MemberTagFilms.aspxsilent
Number of films tagged: 311

Number of people who tagged: 34

Number of times used: 192

]]>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:46:08 GMT31134192Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/soldier/MemberTagFilms.aspxsoldier
Number of films tagged: 1749

Number of people who tagged: 18

Number of times used: 46

]]>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:51:21 GMT17491846Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/attack/MemberTagFilms.aspxattack
Number of films tagged: 1035

Number of people who tagged: 17

Number of times used: 31

]]>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:41:19 GMT10351731Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/strike/MemberTagFilms.aspxstrike
Number of films tagged: 5

Number of people who tagged: 5

Number of times used: 5

]]>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:29:22 GMT555Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/againstallodds/MemberTagFilms.aspxagainstallodds
Number of films tagged: 969

Number of people who tagged: 4

Number of times used: 5

]]>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:04:30 GMT96945Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/worker/MemberTagFilms.aspxworker
Number of films tagged: 341

Number of people who tagged: 3

Number of times used: 3

]]>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:02:02 GMT34133Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/Factor/MemberTagFilms.aspxFactor
Number of films tagged: 2

Number of people who tagged: 2

Number of times used: 2

]]>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:44:42 GMT222Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/workers/MemberTagFilms.aspxworkers
Number of films tagged: 2

Number of people who tagged: 2

Number of times used: 2

]]>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:44:42 GMT222Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/collectivism/MemberTagFilms.aspxcollectivism
Number of films tagged: 1

Number of people who tagged: 1

Number of times used: 1

]]>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:46:20 GMT111Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/extremely-inventive/MemberTagFilms.aspxextremely-inventive
Number of films tagged: 1

Number of people who tagged: 1

Number of times used: 1

]]>Fri, 18 May 2007 22:22:58 GMT111Tag