﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:spout="http://www.spout.com/schemas/rss/core/2006" xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005">
  <channel>
    <cf:treatAs>list</cf:treatAs>
    <cf:listinfo>
      <cf:group element="type" label="Type" ns="http://www.spout.com/schemas/rss/core/2006" data-type="text" />
    </cf:listinfo>
    <title>Young Guns's Recent Activity - Spout</title>
    <link>http://www.spout.com/</link>
    <description>Recent community activity around Young Guns on Spout</description>
    <copyright>Copyright 2005-9 Spout, LLC</copyright>
    <generator>Spout RSS</generator>
    
    <item>
      <title>Film:Young Guns</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/films/Young_Guns/39358/default.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<table width='100%' style='font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><tr><td><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u08972drulo.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' /></td>
<td>
<strong>Title:</strong> Young Guns<br/>
<strong>Year:</strong> 1988<br/>
<strong>Director:</strong> Christopher Cain<br/>
<strong>Plot:</strong> In this Western based loosely on actual events and people, <a href="/players/P____89157/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Emilio Estevez</a> stars as William H. Bonney (aka Billy the Kid). Sought for a petty crime in Lincoln County, Billy is taken in by John Tunstall (Terrence Stamp), a British ranch owner seeking to make it in the cattle business. Tunstall employs a group of "regulators," comprised of wayward youths he's gathered over the years, to watch over his ranch; in turn, he teaches them how to read and reforms them into better men. Tunstall's business interests come into conflict with those of corrupt and murderous businessman Lawrence Murphy (<a href="/players/P____54755/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Jack Palance</a>), whose widespread connections make him a power to be reckoned with. When Tunstall won't budge from his right to pursue a living, Murphy's henchmen stage an ambush and kill him. This triggers a vow of vengeance from the quick-tempered Billy and his five fellow regulators, who are deputized to serve arrest warrants in the murder. However, when Billy decides to gun down the suspects instead of detaining them, his loyal pals become accessories in a vigilante spree to wipe the territory clean of Murphy and his web of conspirators. Soon, the supposed lawmen are on the run from bounty hunters, henchmen, and government soldiers, from all directions of the compass. This box-office hit also stars <a href="/players/P____65046/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Charlie Sheen</a>, <a href="/players/P____69200/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Kiefer Sutherland</a>, <a href="/players/P___106383/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Lou Diamond Phillips</a>, <a href="/players/P____51293/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Dermot Mulroney</a>, and <a href="/players/P____65582/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Casey Siemaszko</a>. ~ Derek Armstrong, All Movie Guide<br/>
<strong>Times Tagged:</strong> 12<br/>
<strong>Number of Lists:</strong> 15<br/>
<strong>Number of blog posts:</strong> 4<br/>
<strong>Number of discussion threads:</strong> 2<br/>
<strong>SpoutRating:</strong> 3<br/>
</td></tr></table>]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:09:13 GMT</pubDate><spout:Title>Young Guns</spout:Title><spout:Year>1988</spout:Year><spout:Director>Christopher Cain</spout:Director><spout:Plot>In this Western based loosely on actual events and people, &lt;a href="/players/P____89157/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Emilio Estevez&lt;/a&gt; stars as William H. Bonney (aka Billy the Kid). Sought for a petty crime in Lincoln County, Billy is taken in by John Tunstall (Terrence Stamp), a British ranch owner seeking to make it in the cattle business. Tunstall employs a group of "regulators," comprised of wayward youths he's gathered over the years, to watch over his ranch; in turn, he teaches them how to read and reforms them into better men. Tunstall's business interests come into conflict with those of corrupt and murderous businessman Lawrence Murphy (&lt;a href="/players/P____54755/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Jack Palance&lt;/a&gt;), whose widespread connections make him a power to be reckoned with. When Tunstall won't budge from his right to pursue a living, Murphy's henchmen stage an ambush and kill him. This triggers a vow of vengeance from the quick-tempered Billy and his five fellow regulators, who are deputized to serve arrest warrants in the murder. However, when Billy decides to gun down the suspects instead of detaining them, his loyal pals become accessories in a vigilante spree to wipe the territory clean of Murphy and his web of conspirators. Soon, the supposed lawmen are on the run from bounty hunters, henchmen, and government soldiers, from all directions of the compass. This box-office hit also stars &lt;a href="/players/P____65046/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Charlie Sheen&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="/players/P____69200/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Kiefer Sutherland&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="/players/P___106383/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Lou Diamond Phillips&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="/players/P____51293/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Dermot Mulroney&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="/players/P____65582/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Casey Siemaszko&lt;/a&gt;. ~ Derek Armstrong, All Movie Guide</spout:Plot><spout:TimesTagged>12</spout:TimesTagged><spout:taglevel>Tag Target (&gt;10)</spout:taglevel><spout:Numberoflists>15</spout:Numberoflists><spout:NumberOfBlogPosts>4</spout:NumberOfBlogPosts><spout:NumberOfDiscussionThreads>2</spout:NumberOfDiscussionThreads><spout:SpoutRating>3</spout:SpoutRating><spout:FilmCoverURL>http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u08972drulo.jpg</spout:FilmCoverURL><spout:SpoutFilmDetailURL>http://www.spout.com/films/Young_Guns/39358/default.aspx</spout:SpoutFilmDetailURL><spout:type>Film</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: 10 Small Roles for Big Stars</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2008/8/7/33699.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u08972drulo.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/9325/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog on spout.com</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 8/7/2008 2:00:31 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> We’re less than a week away from the release of Tropic Thunder, and as the reviews and puff pieces make their way onto the web, there’s one thing clearly uniting the media’s coverage: talk of Tom Cruise’s appearance in a small role as a Hollywood studio boss. Everyone seems to agree that he steals the show and that his performance — or the joke surrounding it — is one of the comedy’s major highlights, if not the actual best part.
Of course, we can expect a good cameo from Cruise every now and then. He showed up for a bit part in Young Guns and played himself as playing “Austin Powers” in Austin Powers in Goldmember. But from what it sounds like, his role in Tropic Thunder is featured for longer than might qualify as a cameo. Some are regardless referring to the performance as an “extended cameo”, and in theory it certainly fits in with the huge crop of so-called “ironic cameos” that have become popular in movies and TV in the last ten years.
Still, despite my not having yet seen the movie, I’m thinking that Tom Cruise’s involvement in Tropic Thunder is more like the following list, which consists of merely small roles filled by big stars. You might consider some of them to be technically cameos, especially the ones that aren’t integral to the plot and/or call attention to themselves. But with each of the roles I’ve included, I consider them to be either the best part of their respective movies or at least a major highlight, which is how Cruise’s appearance is being touted. Anyway, forgive me for trying to come up with something different than simply a best cameo list, even if the focus here seems less than clear.




10. Marlon Brando as “Jor-El” in Superman - He was probably paid too much for the part, especially if all the trivia surrounding his involvement (reading his lines off baby Superman’s diaper; desiring that only his voice be used; demanding to be paid double if any footage was to be used in the sequel) is true, but it’s pretty cool having Brando appear at the beginning of what I still consider to be the best superhero comic book adaptation of all time (sorry Dark Knight fans). He’s not the best thing about the movie, but he’s an immediate highlight. As for his payment (reportedly $3.7 million), Warner Bros. has leveled out his worth a little by featuring him in the Donner cut of Superman II and in Bryan Singer’s Superman Returns — a movie that also creatively employs Brando’s On the Waterfront costar Eva Marie Saint appropriately as Superman’s adopted mother.



9. Drew Barrymore as “Casey Becker” in Scream - Having your biggest star killed in the opening scene is kinda like having your best action sequence at the head of the movie (a la Bad Boys II), but fortunately the rest of the first Scream is pretty good, and Barrymore’s (don’t call it a cameo) part doesn’t overshadow the movie too much. In a way, since this wasn’t a sequel yet the movie was a bit of a parody of all slasher movies, the familiarity of Becker’s face could be taken to be akin to how, often, horror sequels begin by killing off the heroine of the previous installment in the first few minutes.

8. Arnold Schwarzenegger as “Prince Hapi” in Around the World in 80 Days - There isn’t much to enjoy about Frank Coraci’s 2004 version of the Jules Verne tale, especially since there appears to be a lot of missed opportunities in terms of guest appearances (Wikipedia counts 45 “cameos” in the 1956 version; I count maybe 10 that could be considered “cameos” in the newer movie). Therefore, Schwarzenegger’s hilarious appearance as a lecherous Turkish prince — one of his last roles filmed before becoming Governor of California — is one of the few highlights, if not the sole highlight (personally, I enjoy Jackie Chan in anything, and I liked more of this movie than most people did). The role is especially funny and creepy if you’ve ever seen that old footage of Schwarzenegger being sleazy at Carnival in Rio.



7. Orson Welles as “Unicron” in Transformers: The Movie - Welles’ voice had been overpowering in films before — he had a good side career going throughout his life as a narrator — but considering this was ridiculously his final performance and considering he easily overshadowed his fellow celebrity voice lenders (including otherwise commanding vocal talents Leonard Nimoy, Robert Stack and Casey Kasem), his part completely dominates the movie, both diegetically and extradiegetically.



6. Bruce Willis as “Harry Rydell” in Fast Food Nation - Far and away the only good part of Richard Linklater’s botched attempt to dramatize Eric Schlosser’s non-fiction classic (I consider the book a kind of bible since it inspired me to give up fast food and subsequently lose 60lbs., so it pains me even more to think about Schlosser being a co-writer and producer of the movie), and not just because of his oft-quoted line about how we all have to eat a little shit from time to time. His whole characterization of the cynical meat supplier is brilliant, enough that he unfortunately makes the rest of the movie play even less interesting that it already is.

5. Charlie Sheen as “Charlie” in Being John Malkovich - I wanted to stay away from roles in which actors play themselves, mainly because that’s a big percentage of the ironic cameo stuff that’s so overused these days. However, Sheen’s part here is a little more than a mere cameo. And it’s kind of an ironic parody of the ironic cameo, even as it predates a lot of these cameos in Entourage and Extras and the like (by crediting the role as “Charlie” rather than “as himself”, it’s also a precursor to the more exaggerated than exaggerated “Neil Patrick Harris” character of the Harold and Kumar films). Perhaps intended to redirect the audience’s perspective on John Malkovich’s titular character, which is up until Sheen’s entrance possibly accepted as an authentic self-portrayal, the overstatement of the role raises the already ingeniously funny film up another notch to put it at the level of best comedies ever made.



4. Matt Damon as “Donny” in Eurotrip - I’ve actually never seen Eurotrip, but I hear there’s no reason to watch it other than to see Damon’s bit role as the singer of a pop punk band (the otherwise real Lustra). And I’ve seen that on YouTube, so I’m good. Even more than Cruise and some of the others, Damon seems to love doing guest stints in movies and on TV (he’s also given us the only reasons to ever watch Jimmy Kimmel). Some of his other small roles and cameos can be found in Youth Without Youth, Confessions of a Dangerous Mind, Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back, Finding Forrester, Jersey Girl and The Majestic (the last in voice only).

3. Sean Connery as “King Richard” in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves - After making us suffer through Kevin Costner’s terrible performance in the lead role, the producers of this disappointing version of the classic legend actually rub it in how bad their casting choice was by sneaking Connery in at the last minute. Of course, despite the way his appearance increases our dissatisfaction with the rest of the movie, he’s still the highlight. Especially since he’s immediately followed by that awful Bryan Adams song playing over the credits.

2. Alec Baldwin as “Blake” in Glengarry Glen Ross - Sure, the rest of the film is really good, mostly because of the stellar cast filling out the rest of the ensemble, but the first thing you remember about this David Mamet adaptation is Baldwin’s monologue. It’s good enough that I almost also included on this list the Blake-inspired character from Boiler Room as played by Ben Affleck. But it’s also too good to actually accept Affleck’s ripoff as being in the same league.


1. Gene Hackman as “Blindman” in Young Frankenstein - I’m in the minority as far as my appreciation of Mel Brooks’ parody of James Whale’s Frankenstein films. I think it’s really funny, but I don’t think it’s one of the funniest movies I’ve ever seen. Yet the few minutes that Hackman is on screen always leave me in tears, enough that I wholeheartedly accept the movie’s status as one of the greatest comedies ever made.
 Originally posted on:SpoutBlog<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:00:31 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>SpoutBlog</spout:postby><spout:postto>SpoutBlog on spout.com</spout:postto><spout:postdate>8/7/2008 2:00:31 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>We’re less than a week away from the release of Tropic Thunder, and as the reviews and puff pieces make their way onto the web, there’s one thing clearly uniting the media’s coverage: talk of Tom Cruise’s appearance in a small role as a Hollywood studio boss. Everyone seems to agree that he steals the show and that his performance — or the joke surrounding it — is one of the comedy’s major highlights, if not the actual best part.
Of course, we can expect a good cameo from Cruise every now and then. He showed up for a bit part in Young Guns and played himself as playing “Austin Powers” in Austin Powers in Goldmember. But from what it sounds like, his role in Tropic Thunder is featured for longer than might qualify as a cameo. Some are regardless referring to the performance as an “extended cameo”, and in theory it certainly fits in with the huge crop of so-called “ironic cameos” that have become popular in movies and TV in the last ten years.
Still, despite my not having yet seen the movie, I’m thinking that Tom Cruise’s involvement in Tropic Thunder is more like the following list, which consists of merely small roles filled by big stars. You might consider some of them to be technically cameos, especially the ones that aren’t integral to the plot and/or call attention to themselves. But with each of the roles I’ve included, I consider them to be either the best part of their respective movies or at least a major highlight, which is how Cruise’s appearance is being touted. Anyway, forgive me for trying to come up with something different than simply a best cameo list, even if the focus here seems less than clear.




10. Marlon Brando as “Jor-El” in Superman - He was probably paid too much for the part, especially if all the trivia surrounding his involvement (reading his lines off baby Superman’s diaper; desiring that only his voice be used; demanding to be paid double if any footage was to be used in the sequel) is true, but it’s pretty cool having Brando appear at the beginning of what I still consider to be the best superhero comic book adaptation of all time (sorry Dark Knight fans). He’s not the best thing about the movie, but he’s an immediate highlight. As for his payment (reportedly $3.7 million), Warner Bros. has leveled out his worth a little by featuring him in the Donner cut of Superman II and in Bryan Singer’s Superman Returns — a movie that also creatively employs Brando’s On the Waterfront costar Eva Marie Saint appropriately as Superman’s adopted mother.



9. Drew Barrymore as “Casey Becker” in Scream - Having your biggest star killed in the opening scene is kinda like having your best action sequence at the head of the movie (a la Bad Boys II), but fortunately the rest of the first Scream is pretty good, and Barrymore’s (don’t call it a cameo) part doesn’t overshadow the movie too much. In a way, since this wasn’t a sequel yet the movie was a bit of a parody of all slasher movies, the familiarity of Becker’s face could be taken to be akin to how, often, horror sequels begin by killing off the heroine of the previous installment in the first few minutes.

8. Arnold Schwarzenegger as “Prince Hapi” in Around the World in 80 Days - There isn’t much to enjoy about Frank Coraci’s 2004 version of the Jules Verne tale, especially since there appears to be a lot of missed opportunities in terms of guest appearances (Wikipedia counts 45 “cameos” in the 1956 version; I count maybe 10 that could be considered “cameos” in the newer movie). Therefore, Schwarzenegger’s hilarious appearance as a lecherous Turkish prince — one of his last roles filmed before becoming Governor of California — is one of the few highlights, if not the sole highlight (personally, I enjoy Jackie Chan in anything, and I liked more of this movie than most people did). The role is especially funny and creepy if you’ve ever seen that old footage of Schwarzenegger being sleazy at Carnival in Rio.



7. Orson Welles as “Unicron” in Transformers: The Movie - Welles’ voice had been overpowering in films before — he had a good side career going throughout his life as a narrator — but considering this was ridiculously his final performance and considering he easily overshadowed his fellow celebrity voice lenders (including otherwise commanding vocal talents Leonard Nimoy, Robert Stack and Casey Kasem), his part completely dominates the movie, both diegetically and extradiegetically.



6. Bruce Willis as “Harry Rydell” in Fast Food Nation - Far and away the only good part of Richard Linklater’s botched attempt to dramatize Eric Schlosser’s non-fiction classic (I consider the book a kind of bible since it inspired me to give up fast food and subsequently lose 60lbs., so it pains me even more to think about Schlosser being a co-writer and producer of the movie), and not just because of his oft-quoted line about how we all have to eat a little shit from time to time. His whole characterization of the cynical meat supplier is brilliant, enough that he unfortunately makes the rest of the movie play even less interesting that it already is.

5. Charlie Sheen as “Charlie” in Being John Malkovich - I wanted to stay away from roles in which actors play themselves, mainly because that’s a big percentage of the ironic cameo stuff that’s so overused these days. However, Sheen’s part here is a little more than a mere cameo. And it’s kind of an ironic parody of the ironic cameo, even as it predates a lot of these cameos in Entourage and Extras and the like (by crediting the role as “Charlie” rather than “as himself”, it’s also a precursor to the more exaggerated than exaggerated “Neil Patrick Harris” character of the Harold and Kumar films). Perhaps intended to redirect the audience’s perspective on John Malkovich’s titular character, which is up until Sheen’s entrance possibly accepted as an authentic self-portrayal, the overstatement of the role raises the already ingeniously funny film up another notch to put it at the level of best comedies ever made.



4. Matt Damon as “Donny” in Eurotrip - I’ve actually never seen Eurotrip, but I hear there’s no reason to watch it other than to see Damon’s bit role as the singer of a pop punk band (the otherwise real Lustra). And I’ve seen that on YouTube, so I’m good. Even more than Cruise and some of the others, Damon seems to love doing guest stints in movies and on TV (he’s also given us the only reasons to ever watch Jimmy Kimmel). Some of his other small roles and cameos can be found in Youth Without Youth, Confessions of a Dangerous Mind, Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back, Finding Forrester, Jersey Girl and The Majestic (the last in voice only).

3. Sean Connery as “King Richard” in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves - After making us suffer through Kevin Costner’s terrible performance in the lead role, the producers of this disappointing version of the classic legend actually rub it in how bad their casting choice was by sneaking Connery in at the last minute. Of course, despite the way his appearance increases our dissatisfaction with the rest of the movie, he’s still the highlight. Especially since he’s immediately followed by that awful Bryan Adams song playing over the credits.

2. Alec Baldwin as “Blake” in Glengarry Glen Ross - Sure, the rest of the film is really good, mostly because of the stellar cast filling out the rest of the ensemble, but the first thing you remember about this David Mamet adaptation is Baldwin’s monologue. It’s good enough that I almost also included on this list the Blake-inspired character from Boiler Room as played by Ben Affleck. But it’s also too good to actually accept Affleck’s ripoff as being in the same league.


1. Gene Hackman as “Blindman” in Young Frankenstein - I’m in the minority as far as my appreciation of Mel Brooks’ parody of James Whale’s Frankenstein films. I think it’s really funny, but I don’t think it’s one of the funniest movies I’ve ever seen. Yet the few minutes that Hackman is on screen always leave me in tears, enough that I wholeheartedly accept the movie’s status as one of the greatest comedies ever made.
 Originally posted on:SpoutBlog</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: Multiple reviews for which I could think of no clever title</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/dibot/archive/2008/3/16/26271.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u08972drulo.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/17539/default.aspx'>dibot</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/dibot/default.aspx'>dibot Blog</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 3/16/2008 11:51:28 AM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> I found the directing as well as the camera work interesting in The Diving Bell and the Butterfly. The point-of-view shots were especially claustrophobic and an inventive way of putting us in the place of Jean-Dominique Bauby, the French editor of Elle magazine, whose stroke left him paralyzed except for one eyelid. It&#39;s a good movie, but I didn&#39;t think it was great. To me, the idea of it seems better than the actual film.  Death at a Funeral is one of the funniest movies I&#39;ve seen in a long time. A British comedy that focuses on a family gathering for a funeral, this film has lots of laughs as well as touching moments. My favorite bits involve Alan Tudyk (Wash from &quot;Firefly&quot;). He ends up taking some acid mislabeled as valium before the service, and hijinks ensue. Definitely see this.  To investigate the phenomenon that is Tyler Perry, I checked out Why Did I Get Married? And wondered why did I bother? Four couples meet once a year for a retreat where they work on their relationships. Two of the men cheat on their wives, the other two don&#39;t, but think it&#39;s funny. The wives are alternately abrasive harpies or wishy-washy doormats. All of the characters are flat and say the most ludicrous things. Best line, &quot;Get your wife!&quot; uttered quite a bit. In the end, the wives have to change or be subdued by the husbands just do what they want. I was a bit disappointed for all of the praise Perry receives to be given this mess. Maybe his other films are better?  Young Guns may have been really cool back in 1988, but I just found it silly now. Emilio Estevez (&quot;Bobby&quot;) stars as Billy the Kid and his steely, bug-eyed stare is supposed to pass for intense. Though the cast is a six degrees dream, featuring everyone from Jack Palance (&quot;Back When We Were Grownups&quot;) to Dermot Mulroney (&quot;Georgia Rule&quot;), the only believable actor is Kiefer Sutherland (&quot;The Sentinel&quot;). All the deaths are in slow-mo and the music is often inappropriate or just lame. Frankly, I was disappointed.  The Beast Must Die! is a sort of Agatha Christie &quot;And Then There Were None,&quot; except set in the 70s and someone is a werewolf instead of just a murderer. A wealthy black man invites several guests to his estate where  he traps them for the three days of the full moon. For some very circumstantial reasons, he believes one of them is a werewolf and has installed various types of surveillance equipment to help him hunt the beast. I couldn&#39;t really get into this, but my husband thought it was cool.<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:51:28 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>dibot</spout:postby><spout:postto>dibot Blog</spout:postto><spout:postdate>3/16/2008 11:51:28 AM</spout:postdate><spout:body>I found the directing as well as the camera work interesting in The Diving Bell and the Butterfly. The point-of-view shots were especially claustrophobic and an inventive way of putting us in the place of Jean-Dominique Bauby, the French editor of Elle magazine, whose stroke left him paralyzed except for one eyelid. It&amp;#39;s a good movie, but I didn&amp;#39;t think it was great. To me, the idea of it seems better than the actual film.  Death at a Funeral is one of the funniest movies I&amp;#39;ve seen in a long time. A British comedy that focuses on a family gathering for a funeral, this film has lots of laughs as well as touching moments. My favorite bits involve Alan Tudyk (Wash from &amp;quot;Firefly&amp;quot;). He ends up taking some acid mislabeled as valium before the service, and hijinks ensue. Definitely see this.  To investigate the phenomenon that is Tyler Perry, I checked out Why Did I Get Married? And wondered why did I bother? Four couples meet once a year for a retreat where they work on their relationships. Two of the men cheat on their wives, the other two don&amp;#39;t, but think it&amp;#39;s funny. The wives are alternately abrasive harpies or wishy-washy doormats. All of the characters are flat and say the most ludicrous things. Best line, &amp;quot;Get your wife!&amp;quot; uttered quite a bit. In the end, the wives have to change or be subdued by the husbands just do what they want. I was a bit disappointed for all of the praise Perry receives to be given this mess. Maybe his other films are better?  Young Guns may have been really cool back in 1988, but I just found it silly now. Emilio Estevez (&amp;quot;Bobby&amp;quot;) stars as Billy the Kid and his steely, bug-eyed stare is supposed to pass for intense. Though the cast is a six degrees dream, featuring everyone from Jack Palance (&amp;quot;Back When We Were Grownups&amp;quot;) to Dermot Mulroney (&amp;quot;Georgia Rule&amp;quot;), the only believable actor is Kiefer Sutherland (&amp;quot;The Sentinel&amp;quot;). All the deaths are in slow-mo and the music is often inappropriate or just lame. Frankly, I was disappointed.  The Beast Must Die! is a sort of Agatha Christie &amp;quot;And Then There Were None,&amp;quot; except set in the 70s and someone is a werewolf instead of just a murderer. A wealthy black man invites several guests to his estate where  he traps them for the three days of the full moon. For some very circumstantial reasons, he believes one of them is a werewolf and has installed various types of surveillance equipment to help him hunt the beast. I couldn&amp;#39;t really get into this, but my husband thought it was cool.</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: Re:Re:Re:Re:Behaviour &amp; Censorship</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/groups/Violence_on_film/Re_Re_Re_Re_Behaviour_Censorship/494/21304/1/ShowPost.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u08972drulo.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/5711/default.aspx'>Dr_Gor</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/groups/Violence_on_film/494/discussions.aspx'>Violence on film</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 10/30/2007 6:02:28 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong>    &#39;Laws&#39;, Rizzo?   That is not what seperates men from beasts.   &#39;Laws&#39; were created as more of a &#39;code-of-conduct&#39; among very primative people eons ago so they could live together without butchering each other.   MANY so called &#39;animals&#39; adhere to the same, or a very similar, &#39;code-of-conduct&#39;.   Wolves for example or lions or seals or dolphins or prairie-dogs...   they all have one thing in common,  they must work together in order to survive.   Their so called &#39;laws&#39; enable them to do this....   We are no different.   I guess the big difference is that we are a bit too smart for ourselves and we have WAY too many ludicrous &#39;laws&#39; for our own good!   Our prisons are overflowing because of all of these &#39;laws&#39; and the world is really no better off for it...   I would suggest that you watch  Planet Of The Apes  one more time and you might want to throw in  The Lord Of The Flies  and  The Warriors  as well...   not to mention MANY old westerns that deal directly with this subject matter!   Young Guns  anyone?   This country was founded on violence and lawlessness ...   that is what we are.   Not unlike Australia!                                                               &lt;  GOR  &gt;<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:02:28 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>Dr_Gor</spout:postby><spout:postto>Violence on film</spout:postto><spout:postdate>10/30/2007 6:02:28 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>   &amp;#39;Laws&amp;#39;, Rizzo?   That is not what seperates men from beasts.   &amp;#39;Laws&amp;#39; were created as more of a &amp;#39;code-of-conduct&amp;#39; among very primative people eons ago so they could live together without butchering each other.   MANY so called &amp;#39;animals&amp;#39; adhere to the same, or a very similar, &amp;#39;code-of-conduct&amp;#39;.   Wolves for example or lions or seals or dolphins or prairie-dogs...   they all have one thing in common,  they must work together in order to survive.   Their so called &amp;#39;laws&amp;#39; enable them to do this....   We are no different.   I guess the big difference is that we are a bit too smart for ourselves and we have WAY too many ludicrous &amp;#39;laws&amp;#39; for our own good!   Our prisons are overflowing because of all of these &amp;#39;laws&amp;#39; and the world is really no better off for it...   I would suggest that you watch  Planet Of The Apes  one more time and you might want to throw in  The Lord Of The Flies  and  The Warriors  as well...   not to mention MANY old westerns that deal directly with this subject matter!   Young Guns  anyone?   This country was founded on violence and lawlessness ...   that is what we are.   Not unlike Australia!                                                               &amp;lt;  GOR  &amp;gt;</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: Re:Re:Re:Behaviour &amp; Censorship</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/groups/Violence_on_film/Re_Re_Re_Behaviour_Censorship/494/21264/1/ShowPost.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u08972drulo.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/5353/default.aspx'>Risselada</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/groups/Violence_on_film/494/discussions.aspx'>Violence on film</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 10/29/2007 12:14:54 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> If we are just animals then why do we have any laws!  Other animals don&#39;t have laws.  Then again they don&#39;t have any rights either.  Although some animals do seem to have social structure.<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:14:54 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>Risselada</spout:postby><spout:postto>Violence on film</spout:postto><spout:postdate>10/29/2007 12:14:54 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>If we are just animals then why do we have any laws!  Other animals don&amp;#39;t have laws.  Then again they don&amp;#39;t have any rights either.  Although some animals do seem to have social structure.</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: B4 24 - The Passion of Kiefer Sutherland</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/marymcilwain/archive/2007/7/13/13858.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u08972drulo.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/49916/default.aspx'>marymcilwain</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/marymcilwain/default.aspx'>Dollar Video Curator</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 7/13/2007 4:00:23 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> Kiefer Sutherland is a passionate man. Indeed, how could anyone who has ever sat through one episode of 24, with Kiefer alternating between his soft intense snarl, and his flat-out crazed roaring ever accuse him of passionlessness? We suspect the war on terror would have ended in early 2002, had the government actually employed such a solider. Imagine Kiefer, staggering over the rocky mountain passes of Afghanistan, sneaking up on Taliban fighters, MacGyver-ing some torture devise out of his personal, stand-by nipple clamps and some rogue lightning, while grabbing them by their scruffy necks and growling, “I need you to take me to Bin Laden, and I need you to do it NOW.”     But what of the early years? Has Kiefer always been so intense, or has his life as a Federal Counter-Terrorism Field Op hardened his demeanor, forcing him to put aside all of his own interests, for the good of all of us ungrateful, unpatriotic, and clueless Angelinos?     Let us take a look and rate: Lost Boys, Young Guns, Flatliners    The Lost Boys  Kiefer leads a pack of swellheaded vampires and is looking to expand the family.  They may indeed appear to be a harmless bunch of pseudo rock star wannabes, guilty only of raiding a high school band uniform store for their wears, but it is  leadership that keeps them in check.Kiefer first targets the young Jason Patric as a food source, but quickly comes to realize he was in error by initially deciding to sacrifice such a strong addition. Was it Jason's willingness to participate in a motorcycle race? Or was it his eagerness to eat worms, maggots and drink blood?  His inability to resist the monotonous chanting of “Join Us”? Whatever the case, Kiefer knows a good bet when he sees it.  This of course sets Kiefer in opposition to young heart throbs, Coreys Haim and Feldman. He must have known what he was up against by antagonizing the impenetratible force-field that was “The Coreys.” But stick to his vampiric ideals he does, even to his death, as is forced-through “by stereo.”    Passion rating: 4 fangs.Youthful passion and belief in one’s chosen life style more than adequately displayed, misguided as it may be.    Young Guns  Starring as cowboy and plagiarizing poet Josiah Gordon “Doc” Scurlock, Kiefer here is one of Billy the Kids’ gang from imagined beginnings. He steals the show by demonstrating his understated sensitivity whilst swimming in a sea of testosterone.   Doc is quick on the draw in a fight, always there for a pal, and damn if he can’t sweep a Celestial woman off her feet with some lifted Shakespeare or Edgar Allen Poe.  His flower bunch may be withered, but it is the thought that counts, and fresh flowers are particularly hard to come by in the wilds of eastern New Mexico, we can attest. He may not always agree with the gang mentality, but he’ll be there, stepping in where needed, most of the time.      Passion rating: 3 1/2 wilted flower petals.Passion for the lady strongly represented, but not equally so for the boys. Dicks should at least be on equal footing with chicks.    Flatliners  Kiefer’s passion is contagious in Flatliners, as he infects four of his fellow med students with a lust to discover what lay beyond the grave.  These five doctors in training decide to step on God’s toes and kill themselves, relying on their fellow egomaniacal students to bring them back to life, for the greater good of finding out what exactly happens.  Passion? Oh yes. When the group discovers they have brought their haunted pasts into the present, Kiefer’s not too proud to get his ass kicked by some kid. Repeatedly. It’s all for the good of the plot after all, and far be it from Kiefer to ever stray from the object of his character’s intensity.        Passion rating: 5 heart blips.Angry, narcissistic and with a God-complex to boot, followed by vulnerability and humble acceptance of the Universe? Kiefer, you had us at “Today is a good day to die.”    Conclusion: 24 ain’t got nothing new.  Originally posted on:Dollar Video Curator<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:00:23 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>marymcilwain</spout:postby><spout:postto>Dollar Video Curator</spout:postto><spout:postdate>7/13/2007 4:00:23 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>Kiefer Sutherland is a passionate man. Indeed, how could anyone who has ever sat through one episode of 24, with Kiefer alternating between his soft intense snarl, and his flat-out crazed roaring ever accuse him of passionlessness? We suspect the war on terror would have ended in early 2002, had the government actually employed such a solider. Imagine Kiefer, staggering over the rocky mountain passes of Afghanistan, sneaking up on Taliban fighters, MacGyver-ing some torture devise out of his personal, stand-by nipple clamps and some rogue lightning, while grabbing them by their scruffy necks and growling, “I need you to take me to Bin Laden, and I need you to do it NOW.”     But what of the early years? Has Kiefer always been so intense, or has his life as a Federal Counter-Terrorism Field Op hardened his demeanor, forcing him to put aside all of his own interests, for the good of all of us ungrateful, unpatriotic, and clueless Angelinos?     Let us take a look and rate: Lost Boys, Young Guns, Flatliners    The Lost Boys  Kiefer leads a pack of swellheaded vampires and is looking to expand the family.  They may indeed appear to be a harmless bunch of pseudo rock star wannabes, guilty only of raiding a high school band uniform store for their wears, but it is  leadership that keeps them in check.Kiefer first targets the young Jason Patric as a food source, but quickly comes to realize he was in error by initially deciding to sacrifice such a strong addition. Was it Jason's willingness to participate in a motorcycle race? Or was it his eagerness to eat worms, maggots and drink blood?  His inability to resist the monotonous chanting of “Join Us”? Whatever the case, Kiefer knows a good bet when he sees it.  This of course sets Kiefer in opposition to young heart throbs, Coreys Haim and Feldman. He must have known what he was up against by antagonizing the impenetratible force-field that was “The Coreys.” But stick to his vampiric ideals he does, even to his death, as is forced-through “by stereo.”    Passion rating: 4 fangs.Youthful passion and belief in one’s chosen life style more than adequately displayed, misguided as it may be.    Young Guns  Starring as cowboy and plagiarizing poet Josiah Gordon “Doc” Scurlock, Kiefer here is one of Billy the Kids’ gang from imagined beginnings. He steals the show by demonstrating his understated sensitivity whilst swimming in a sea of testosterone.   Doc is quick on the draw in a fight, always there for a pal, and damn if he can’t sweep a Celestial woman off her feet with some lifted Shakespeare or Edgar Allen Poe.  His flower bunch may be withered, but it is the thought that counts, and fresh flowers are particularly hard to come by in the wilds of eastern New Mexico, we can attest. He may not always agree with the gang mentality, but he’ll be there, stepping in where needed, most of the time.      Passion rating: 3 1/2 wilted flower petals.Passion for the lady strongly represented, but not equally so for the boys. Dicks should at least be on equal footing with chicks.    Flatliners  Kiefer’s passion is contagious in Flatliners, as he infects four of his fellow med students with a lust to discover what lay beyond the grave.  These five doctors in training decide to step on God’s toes and kill themselves, relying on their fellow egomaniacal students to bring them back to life, for the greater good of finding out what exactly happens.  Passion? Oh yes. When the group discovers they have brought their haunted pasts into the present, Kiefer’s not too proud to get his ass kicked by some kid. Repeatedly. It’s all for the good of the plot after all, and far be it from Kiefer to ever stray from the object of his character’s intensity.        Passion rating: 5 heart blips.Angry, narcissistic and with a God-complex to boot, followed by vulnerability and humble acceptance of the Universe? Kiefer, you had us at “Today is a good day to die.”    Conclusion: 24 ain’t got nothing new.  Originally posted on:Dollar Video Curator</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: B4 24 - The Passion of Kiefer Sutherland</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/marymcilwain/archive/2007/6/26/12277.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u08972drulo.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/49916/default.aspx'>marymcilwain</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/marymcilwain/default.aspx'>Dollar Video Curator</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 6/26/2007 6:35:35 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> Kiefer Sutherland is a passionate man. Indeed, how could anyone who has ever sat through one episode of 24, with Kiefer alternating between his soft intense snarl, and his flat-out crazed roaring ever accuse him of passionlessness? We suspect the war on terror would have ended in early 2002, had the government actually employed such a solider. Imagine Kiefer, staggering over the rocky mountain passes of Afghanistan, sneaking up on Taliban fighters, MacGyver-ing some torture devise out of his personal, stand-by nipple clamps and some rogue lightning, while grabbing them by their scruffy necks and growling, “I need you to take me to Bin Laden, and I need you to do it NOW.”     But what of the early years? Has Kiefer always been so intense, or has his life as a Federal Counter-Terrorism Field Op hardened his demeanor, forcing him to put aside all of his own interests, for the good of all of us ungrateful, unpatriotic, and clueless Angelinos?     Let us take a look and rate: Lost Boys, Young Guns, Flatliners    The Lost Boys  Kiefer leads a pack of swellheaded vampires and is looking to expand the family.  They may indeed appear to be a harmless bunch of pseudo rock star wannabes, guilty only of raiding a high school band uniform store for their wears, but it is  leadership that keeps them in check.Kiefer first targets the young Jason Patric as a food source, but quickly comes to realize he was in error by initially deciding to sacrifice such a strong addition. Was it Jason's willingness to participate in a motorcycle race? Or was it his eagerness to eat worms, maggots and drink blood?  His inability to resist the monotonous chanting of “Join Us”? Whatever the case, Kiefer knows a good bet when he sees it.  This of course sets Kiefer in opposition to young heart throbs, Coreys Haim and Feldman. He must have known what he was up against by antagonizing the impenetratible force-field that was “The Coreys.” But stick to his vampiric ideals he does, even to his death, as is forced-through “by stereo.”    Passion rating: 4 fangs.Youthful passion and belief in one’s chosen life style more than adequately displayed, misguided as it may be.    Young Guns  Starring as cowboy and plagiarizing poet Josiah Gordon “Doc” Scurlock, Kiefer here is one of Billy the Kids’ gang from imagined beginnings. He steals the show by demonstrating his understated sensitivity whilst swimming in a sea of testosterone.   Doc is quick on the draw in a fight, always there for a pal, and damn if he can’t sweep a Celestial woman off her feet with some lifted Shakespeare or Edgar Allen Poe.  His flower bunch may be withered, but it is the thought that counts, and fresh flowers are particularly hard to come by in the wilds of eastern New Mexico, we can attest. He may not always agree with the gang mentality, but he’ll be there, stepping in where needed, most of the time.      Passion rating: 3 1/2 wilted flower petals.Passion for the lady strongly represented, but not equally so for the boys. Dicks should at least be on equal footing with chicks.    Flatliners  Kiefer’s passion is contagious in Flatliners, as he infects four of his fellow med students with a lust to discover what lay beyond the grave.  These five doctors in training decide to step on God’s toes and kill themselves, relying on their fellow egomaniacal students to bring them back to life, for the greater good of finding out what exactly happens.  Passion? Oh yes. When the group discovers they have brought their haunted pasts into the present, Kiefer’s not too proud to get his ass kicked by some kid. Repeatedly. It’s all for the good of the plot after all, and far be it from Kiefer to ever stray from the object of his character’s intensity.        Passion rating: 5 heart blips.Angry, narcissistic and with a God-complex to boot, followed by vulnerability and humble acceptance of the Universe? Kiefer, you had us at “Today is a good day to die.”    Conclusion: 24 ain’t got nothing new.  Originally posted on:Dollar Video Curator<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:35:35 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>marymcilwain</spout:postby><spout:postto>Dollar Video Curator</spout:postto><spout:postdate>6/26/2007 6:35:35 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>Kiefer Sutherland is a passionate man. Indeed, how could anyone who has ever sat through one episode of 24, with Kiefer alternating between his soft intense snarl, and his flat-out crazed roaring ever accuse him of passionlessness? We suspect the war on terror would have ended in early 2002, had the government actually employed such a solider. Imagine Kiefer, staggering over the rocky mountain passes of Afghanistan, sneaking up on Taliban fighters, MacGyver-ing some torture devise out of his personal, stand-by nipple clamps and some rogue lightning, while grabbing them by their scruffy necks and growling, “I need you to take me to Bin Laden, and I need you to do it NOW.”     But what of the early years? Has Kiefer always been so intense, or has his life as a Federal Counter-Terrorism Field Op hardened his demeanor, forcing him to put aside all of his own interests, for the good of all of us ungrateful, unpatriotic, and clueless Angelinos?     Let us take a look and rate: Lost Boys, Young Guns, Flatliners    The Lost Boys  Kiefer leads a pack of swellheaded vampires and is looking to expand the family.  They may indeed appear to be a harmless bunch of pseudo rock star wannabes, guilty only of raiding a high school band uniform store for their wears, but it is  leadership that keeps them in check.Kiefer first targets the young Jason Patric as a food source, but quickly comes to realize he was in error by initially deciding to sacrifice such a strong addition. Was it Jason's willingness to participate in a motorcycle race? Or was it his eagerness to eat worms, maggots and drink blood?  His inability to resist the monotonous chanting of “Join Us”? Whatever the case, Kiefer knows a good bet when he sees it.  This of course sets Kiefer in opposition to young heart throbs, Coreys Haim and Feldman. He must have known what he was up against by antagonizing the impenetratible force-field that was “The Coreys.” But stick to his vampiric ideals he does, even to his death, as is forced-through “by stereo.”    Passion rating: 4 fangs.Youthful passion and belief in one’s chosen life style more than adequately displayed, misguided as it may be.    Young Guns  Starring as cowboy and plagiarizing poet Josiah Gordon “Doc” Scurlock, Kiefer here is one of Billy the Kids’ gang from imagined beginnings. He steals the show by demonstrating his understated sensitivity whilst swimming in a sea of testosterone.   Doc is quick on the draw in a fight, always there for a pal, and damn if he can’t sweep a Celestial woman off her feet with some lifted Shakespeare or Edgar Allen Poe.  His flower bunch may be withered, but it is the thought that counts, and fresh flowers are particularly hard to come by in the wilds of eastern New Mexico, we can attest. He may not always agree with the gang mentality, but he’ll be there, stepping in where needed, most of the time.      Passion rating: 3 1/2 wilted flower petals.Passion for the lady strongly represented, but not equally so for the boys. Dicks should at least be on equal footing with chicks.    Flatliners  Kiefer’s passion is contagious in Flatliners, as he infects four of his fellow med students with a lust to discover what lay beyond the grave.  These five doctors in training decide to step on God’s toes and kill themselves, relying on their fellow egomaniacal students to bring them back to life, for the greater good of finding out what exactly happens.  Passion? Oh yes. When the group discovers they have brought their haunted pasts into the present, Kiefer’s not too proud to get his ass kicked by some kid. Repeatedly. It’s all for the good of the plot after all, and far be it from Kiefer to ever stray from the object of his character’s intensity.        Passion rating: 5 heart blips.Angry, narcissistic and with a God-complex to boot, followed by vulnerability and humble acceptance of the Universe? Kiefer, you had us at “Today is a good day to die.”    Conclusion: 24 ain’t got nothing new.  Originally posted on:Dollar Video Curator</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:awesome</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/awesome/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/awesome/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>awesome</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 187</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 158</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 291</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:23:33 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>187</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>158</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>291</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:murder</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/murder/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/murder/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>murder</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 8748</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 157</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 831</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:42:29 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>8748</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>157</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>831</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:friendship</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/friendship/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/friendship/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>friendship</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 6791</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 154</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 980</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:42:20 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>6791</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>154</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>980</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:revenge</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/revenge/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/revenge/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>revenge</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 5189</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 145</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 489</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:13:41 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>5189</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>145</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>489</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:death</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/death/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/death/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>death</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 4306</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 140</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 526</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:27:13 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>4306</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>140</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>526</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:teenagers</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/teenagers/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/teenagers/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>teenagers</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 3025</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 97</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 399</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:42:10 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>3025</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>97</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>399</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:western</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/western/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/western/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>western</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 93</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 64</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 136</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 05:09:54 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>93</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>64</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>136</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:gangster</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/gangster/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/gangster/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>gangster</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 4065</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 60</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 145</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 01:37:08 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>4065</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>60</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>145</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:silly</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/silly/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/silly/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>silly</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 57</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 36</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 75</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:13:04 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>57</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>36</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>75</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:cowboy</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/cowboy/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/cowboy/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>cowboy</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 2758</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 28</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 44</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:42:21 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>2758</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>28</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>44</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:criminal</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/criminal/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/criminal/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>criminal</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 3388</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 27</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 56</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:02:59 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>3388</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>27</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>56</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:law</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/law/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/law/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>law</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 232</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 16</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 26</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:59:00 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>232</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>16</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>26</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:weapons</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/weapons/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/weapons/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>weapons</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 1335</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 16</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 35</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:54:00 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>1335</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>16</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>35</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:ontherun</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/ontherun/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/ontherun/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>ontherun</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 1546</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 15</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 37</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:02:37 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>1546</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>15</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>37</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:cowboys</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/cowboys/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/cowboys/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>cowboys</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 13</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 10</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 15</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:59:01 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>13</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>10</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>15</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
  </channel>
</rss>