﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:spout="http://www.spout.com/schemas/rss/core/2006" xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005">
  <channel>
    <cf:treatAs>list</cf:treatAs>
    <cf:listinfo>
      <cf:group element="type" label="Type" ns="http://www.spout.com/schemas/rss/core/2006" data-type="text" />
    </cf:listinfo>
    <title>Rosemary's Baby's Recent Activity - Spout</title>
    <link>http://www.spout.com/</link>
    <description>Recent community activity around Rosemary's Baby on Spout</description>
    <copyright>Copyright 2005-9 Spout, LLC</copyright>
    <generator>Spout RSS</generator>
    
    <item>
      <title>Film:Rosemary's Baby</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/films/Rosemary_s_Baby/366384/default.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<table width='100%' style='font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><tr><td><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/images/no_image.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' /></td>
<td>
<strong>Title:</strong> Rosemary's Baby<br/>
<strong>Year:</strong> 2009<br/>
<strong>Plot:</strong> <a href="http://www.spout.com/players/P___203853/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Michael Bay</a>'s Platinum Dunes adds <a href="http://www.spout.com/players/P___106743/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Roman Polanski</a>'s 1968 horror classic Rosemary's Baby to their remake plate with this Paramount Pictures production. The plot focuses on a woman who's unsuspectedly carrying the spawn of Satan due to a deal made between her husband and their sinister elderly neighbors. ~ Jeremy Wheeler, All Movie Guide<br/>
<strong>Number of Lists:</strong> 1<br/>
<strong>Number of blog posts:</strong> 2<br/>
</td></tr></table>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:29:51 GMT</pubDate><spout:Title>Rosemary's Baby</spout:Title><spout:Year>2009</spout:Year><spout:Plot>&lt;a href="http://www.spout.com/players/P___203853/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Michael Bay&lt;/a&gt;'s Platinum Dunes adds &lt;a href="http://www.spout.com/players/P___106743/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Roman Polanski&lt;/a&gt;'s 1968 horror classic Rosemary's Baby to their remake plate with this Paramount Pictures production. The plot focuses on a woman who's unsuspectedly carrying the spawn of Satan due to a deal made between her husband and their sinister elderly neighbors. ~ Jeremy Wheeler, All Movie Guide</spout:Plot><spout:Numberoflists>1</spout:Numberoflists><spout:NumberOfBlogPosts>2</spout:NumberOfBlogPosts><spout:FilmCoverURL>http://www.spout.com/images/no_image.jpg</spout:FilmCoverURL><spout:SpoutFilmDetailURL>http://www.spout.com/films/Rosemary_s_Baby/366384/default.aspx</spout:SpoutFilmDetailURL><spout:type>Film</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: Re:The Wicker Man</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/pulpfiction1975-66/archive/2008/9/11/35048.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/5353/default.aspx'>Risselada</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/pulpfiction1975-66/default.aspx'>PulpFiction1975</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 9/12/2008 9:29:51 AM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> SPOILERS [quote user="SkyPilot"]Okay, possibly bad news: they're remaking Rosemary's Baby. I read so many disappointed reviews of the Nic Cage Wicker Man that I decided to skip it.[/quote] You can look up some clips of Nicholas Cage in the 2006 Wicker Man on youtube.  They are absurd!  He also beats the crap out of a bunch of defenseless women, one time while he is wearing a bear suit! Make sure you find the clip with THE BEEEEES!  AUGH THEY ARE IN MY EYES!!!!!!<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:29:51 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>Risselada</spout:postby><spout:postto>PulpFiction1975</spout:postto><spout:postdate>9/12/2008 9:29:51 AM</spout:postdate><spout:body>SPOILERS [quote user="SkyPilot"]Okay, possibly bad news: they're remaking Rosemary's Baby. I read so many disappointed reviews of the Nic Cage Wicker Man that I decided to skip it.[/quote] You can look up some clips of Nicholas Cage in the 2006 Wicker Man on youtube.  They are absurd!  He also beats the crap out of a bunch of defenseless women, one time while he is wearing a bear suit! Make sure you find the clip with THE BEEEEES!  AUGH THEY ARE IN MY EYES!!!!!!</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: Re:The Wicker Man</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/pulpfiction1975-66/archive/2008/9/11/35036.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/2470/default.aspx'>SkyPilot</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/pulpfiction1975-66/default.aspx'>PulpFiction1975</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 9/11/2008 9:57:54 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> [quote user="Risselada"] I was still terrified after I figured out that he was the one they were going to sacrifice.  I didn't know he would get burned alive though.  And the figure they put him in was just real creepy. It aggrivates me for the same reasons you say it "gets under your skin".  What do you mean exactly when you say it get under your skin?  Is that a pleasant feeling or not? Maybe it's hard for me to believe that a group of people who had never sacrificed another human being before (even if they had sacrified animals) would be so willing to do it.  And take so much pleasure in doing it!  And at the same time it's not that hard for me to believe, and the fact that I can almost believe it makes me feel even more sick. [/quote] Oh, I totally misunderstood you Rizzo! I thought you were aggravated or frustrated by the movie's style or something. Instead it sounds like we had really similar reactions. By "getting under my skin" I meant that I found it demented and creepy, but also somewhat believable. All the elements work together to make it a really memorable film for me. I've heard Rosemary's Baby creates a similar feel in the viewer, so I have to see that. Does Wicker Man remind you guys of anything else? Okay, possibly bad news: they're remaking Rosemary's Baby. I read so many disappointed reviews of the Nic Cage Wicker Man that I decided to skip it.<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:57:54 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>SkyPilot</spout:postby><spout:postto>PulpFiction1975</spout:postto><spout:postdate>9/11/2008 9:57:54 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>[quote user="Risselada"] I was still terrified after I figured out that he was the one they were going to sacrifice.  I didn't know he would get burned alive though.  And the figure they put him in was just real creepy. It aggrivates me for the same reasons you say it "gets under your skin".  What do you mean exactly when you say it get under your skin?  Is that a pleasant feeling or not? Maybe it's hard for me to believe that a group of people who had never sacrificed another human being before (even if they had sacrified animals) would be so willing to do it.  And take so much pleasure in doing it!  And at the same time it's not that hard for me to believe, and the fact that I can almost believe it makes me feel even more sick. [/quote] Oh, I totally misunderstood you Rizzo! I thought you were aggravated or frustrated by the movie's style or something. Instead it sounds like we had really similar reactions. By "getting under my skin" I meant that I found it demented and creepy, but also somewhat believable. All the elements work together to make it a really memorable film for me. I've heard Rosemary's Baby creates a similar feel in the viewer, so I have to see that. Does Wicker Man remind you guys of anything else? Okay, possibly bad news: they're remaking Rosemary's Baby. I read so many disappointed reviews of the Nic Cage Wicker Man that I decided to skip it.</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:cult</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/cult/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/cult/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>cult</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 449</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 71</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 162</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:20:54 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>449</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>71</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>162</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:pregnancy</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/pregnancy/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/pregnancy/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>pregnancy</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 1306</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 44</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 110</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:22:12 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>1306</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>44</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>110</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:paranoia</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/paranoia/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/paranoia/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>paranoia</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 236</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 32</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 52</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:07:45 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>236</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>32</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>52</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:antichrist</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/antichrist/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/antichrist/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>antichrist</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 38</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 6</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 10</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 16:03:42 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>38</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>6</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>10</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:dealwiththedevil</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/dealwiththedevil/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/dealwiththedevil/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>dealwiththedevil</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 117</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 2</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 3</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:02:19 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>117</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>2</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>3</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:satanism</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/satanism/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/satanism/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>satanism</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 181</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 2</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 2</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:07:10 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>181</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>2</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>2</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:unbornchild</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/unbornchild/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/unbornchild/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>unbornchild</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 16</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 1</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 1</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:01:45 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>16</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>1</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>1</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
  </channel>
</rss>