list http://www.spout.com/ Recent community activity around Take the Money and Run on Spout Copyright 2005-9 Spout, LLC Spout RSS http://www.spout.com/images/SpoutLogoRSS.jpg http://www.spout.com/ 136 30 http://www.spout.com/films/Take_the_Money_and_Run/34010/default.aspx Title: Take the Money and Run
Year: 1969
Director: Woody Allen
Plot: When Woody Allen's fans refer to his "earlier, funnier" pictures, they often cite his directorial debut as a shining example. Co-written by Allen and Mickey Rose, this side-splitting takeoff of crime documentaries stars Allen as Virgil Starkwell, a sweetly inept career criminal. The film's most celebrated sequence involves Virgil's inability to write coherent holdup notes ("I have a gub"), but others include Virgil's losing battle with a recalcitrant coke machine and his misguided effort to emulate John Dillinger by carving a gun out of a bar of soap (his weapon disintegrates in a heavy rain). As was often the case in Allen's early films, not all the gags work, but for the most part, Take the Money and Run is a delight, enhanced by the on-target supporting performances of Janet Margolin, Marcel Hillaire, and (uncredited) Louise Lasser, as well as the energetic musical score of Marvin Hamlisch. ~ Hal Erickson, All Movie Guide
Times Tagged: 5
Number of Lists: 16
Number of blog posts: 3
Number of discussion threads: 1
SpoutRating: 3
]]>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 05:49:13 GMTTake the Money and Run1969Woody AllenWhen <a href="/players/P____79388/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Woody Allen</a>'s fans refer to his "earlier, funnier" pictures, they often cite his directorial debut as a shining example. Co-written by Allen and Mickey Rose, this side-splitting takeoff of crime documentaries stars Allen as Virgil Starkwell, a sweetly inept career criminal. The film's most celebrated sequence involves Virgil's inability to write coherent holdup notes ("I have a gub"), but others include Virgil's losing battle with a recalcitrant coke machine and his misguided effort to emulate John Dillinger by carving a gun out of a bar of soap (his weapon disintegrates in a heavy rain). As was often the case in Allen's early films, not all the gags work, but for the most part, Take the Money and Run is a delight, enhanced by the on-target supporting performances of <a href="/players/P____45416/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Janet Margolin</a>, <a href="/players/P____32360/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Marcel Hillaire</a>, and (uncredited) <a href="/players/P____40680/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Louise Lasser</a>, as well as the energetic musical score of <a href="/players/P____93262/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Marvin Hamlisch</a>. ~ Hal Erickson, All Movie Guide5Slightly Tagged (1-5)16313http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t44112vfuf0.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/Take_the_Money_and_Run/34010/default.aspxFilm http://www.spout.com/blogs/bigjefflebowski/archive/2008/3/1/25761.aspx Post By: BigJeffLebowski
Post To: BigJeffLebowski Blog
Post Date: 3/1/2008 3:26:51 PM
Body: "If you haven't seen it, please do."-Richard Dawkins, parenthetically discussing Monty Python's The Meaning of Life in his book The God Delusion. If Monty Python's The Meaning of Life is remembered less fondly than their earlier classics Monty Python and the Holy Grail and The Life of Brian, this is not to say that the film has fewer laughs or that the point of Monty Python's satire has in any way been blunted. Granted, the humor is arguably the Pythons' most vulgar and can at times come across as crude. But watching The Meaning of Life a quarter of a century after its release, what remains shocking is not the wealth of projectile vomit, naked breasts, or children singing about sperm; what continues to alienate and to offend is the film's surprisingly direct attack on what it considers a terribly misguided society. And the worst offender? Christian ideology and rhetoric.The Pythons -- Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones, and Michael Palin -- were always practitioners of silly sophistication, and their combination of the intellectual and the low brow is one of the many factors that has assured them a wide and varied audience. Few performers have the confidence, the skill, and the intelligence to pull off this Trojan Horse; Steve Martin's signature arrow-through-the-head belied a deeply philosophical bent, and few would find in Take the Money and Run evidence of the mature filmmaker Woody Allen would become over the next decade. But it can be argued that no one has been more innovative, more inspired, and more inspiring than Monty Python.It is in The Meaning of Life, their last film, that the Pythons most fully indulge their dual passions for both silliness and sophistication. It has been argued that by this late point in their career, the Pythons' well was running dry; of this I remain unconvinced. To its credit, The Meaning of Life is the most technically proficient of the Monty Python films, and though its momentum does wane due to its episodic nature, revisiting the sketch format of "Monty Python's Flying Circus" allows the film to throw a few punches it may have pulled were it constrained to a plot.Also to the film's credit, even without a single unified narrative running through it, The Meaning of Life is no less thematically coherent than Holy Grail or The Life of Brian. Lurking beneath the anarchic surface is an unexpectedly intelligent and barbed attack on consumerism, religion, and other modern social maladies that ultimately clutter, confuse, and complicate our lives. What materializes through the grotesquerie is a strong call for logic and science; I believe that this subtly didactic tone and blatant disdain for abuses of commerce and faith (which could be misread as elitism) is the main reason The Meaning of Life is so often overlooked in the Python oeuvre.Granted, this film doesn't mark the first time the Pythons have levelled some blows at organized religion, but it may be the first time they have allowed a whiff of malice to creep in. It would not be entirely erroneous to reason that if an anti-Christian sensibility were solely to blame for The Meaning of Life's somewhat besmirched reputation, then the near-universally praised The Life of Brian should have similar detractors. While there are those who consider The Life of Brian a deeply insensitive and offensive work, they are considerably fewer and represent a much smaller, much more specific demographic. Why is this?Whether consciously or unconsciously, the Pythons seem to have been using The Life of Brian as a test to see just how much they could get away with. It is clearly their most crafted film, a necessity given its subject matter. But while The Life of Brian may represent the culmination of a lot of the Pythons' subtextual themes and deals far more overtly with the Christian mythology, it does so in a largely joking, nudging way. If one were so inclined, he or she could easily watch and enjoy The Life of Brian without subscribing to (or even acknowledging) its critical, subversive ideology. Perhaps this is the key to great satire, to be able to hide your teeth in a smile. Regardless, it would be far more difficult for a devout theist to enjoy The Meaning of Life, which frequently seems dissatisfied merely pointing out the faulty logic of pious rhetoric, preferring instead to (literally) sing and dance around the point. There is no context to soften the blow as there is in The Life of Brian; you can almost hear the Pythons laughing at their audience even as they laugh with them, insisting, "You think this is nonsense? You should see yourselves!"To this end, what many find offensive I find refreshing. I respect an artist who can make big ideas palatable for the general public. While many young people may not know of Russell's teapot, they may have instead heard of The Flying Spaghetti Monster or The Invisible Pink Unicorn. What these two symbols of modern day Atheism/Skepticism have in common with Monty Python is a belief that the manifestations of religious fundamentalism are so ludicrous, so fantastical, and so willfully offensive to logic that they can only be responded to with nonsense of equal measure; anyone who ignores reason will not be swayed by it, no matter how sound.An unfortunate reality is that disciples will not always take the right lessons from their masters. Just as the church often perverts the religion it sets out to uphold, so too have subsequent filmmakers and comedians taken the Pythons' willingness to push the boundaries of taste but have ignored or left behind their intelligence and sense of purpose. The Pythons are a bright bunch and are undoubtedly reluctant fathers to the gross-out school of comedic one-upmanship which has flourished in their wake. And so before you criticize The Meaning of Life for excess, for vulgarity, and for abuse of power with deleterious intent, consider first that its targets are guilty of the same (and to a much greater degree). At least Monty Python have taken the time and the care to look behind the curtain before it is hung.
]]>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 20:26:51 GMTBigJeffLebowskiBigJeffLebowski Blog3/1/2008 3:26:51 PM&quot;If you haven&#39;t seen it, please do.&quot;-Richard Dawkins, parenthetically discussing Monty Python&#39;s The Meaning of Life in his book The God Delusion. If Monty Python&#39;s The Meaning of Life is remembered less fondly than their earlier classics Monty Python and the Holy Grail and The Life of Brian, this is not to say that the film has fewer laughs or that the point of Monty Python&#39;s satire has in any way been blunted. Granted, the humor is arguably the Pythons&#39; most vulgar and can at times come across as crude. But watching The Meaning of Life a quarter of a century after its release, what remains shocking is not the wealth of projectile vomit, naked breasts, or children singing about sperm; what continues to alienate and to offend is the film&#39;s surprisingly direct attack on what it considers a terribly misguided society. And the worst offender? Christian ideology and rhetoric.The Pythons -- Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones, and Michael Palin -- were always practitioners of silly sophistication, and their combination of the intellectual and the low brow is one of the many factors that has assured them a wide and varied audience. Few performers have the confidence, the skill, and the intelligence to pull off this Trojan Horse; Steve Martin&#39;s signature arrow-through-the-head belied a deeply philosophical bent, and few would find in Take the Money and Run evidence of the mature filmmaker Woody Allen would become over the next decade. But it can be argued that no one has been more innovative, more inspired, and more inspiring than Monty Python.It is in The Meaning of Life, their last film, that the Pythons most fully indulge their dual passions for both silliness and sophistication. It has been argued that by this late point in their career, the Pythons&#39; well was running dry; of this I remain unconvinced. To its credit, The Meaning of Life is the most technically proficient of the Monty Python films, and though its momentum does wane due to its episodic nature, revisiting the sketch format of &quot;Monty Python&#39;s Flying Circus&quot; allows the film to throw a few punches it may have pulled were it constrained to a plot.Also to the film&#39;s credit, even without a single unified narrative running through it, The Meaning of Life is no less thematically coherent than Holy Grail or The Life of Brian. Lurking beneath the anarchic surface is an unexpectedly intelligent and barbed attack on consumerism, religion, and other modern social maladies that ultimately clutter, confuse, and complicate our lives. What materializes through the grotesquerie is a strong call for logic and science; I believe that this subtly didactic tone and blatant disdain for abuses of commerce and faith (which could be misread as elitism) is the main reason The Meaning of Life is so often overlooked in the Python oeuvre.Granted, this film doesn&#39;t mark the first time the Pythons have levelled some blows at organized religion, but it may be the first time they have allowed a whiff of malice to creep in. It would not be entirely erroneous to reason that if an anti-Christian sensibility were solely to blame for The Meaning of Life&#39;s somewhat besmirched reputation, then the near-universally praised The Life of Brian should have similar detractors. While there are those who consider The Life of Brian a deeply insensitive and offensive work, they are considerably fewer and represent a much smaller, much more specific demographic. Why is this?Whether consciously or unconsciously, the Pythons seem to have been using The Life of Brian as a test to see just how much they could get away with. It is clearly their most crafted film, a necessity given its subject matter. But while The Life of Brian may represent the culmination of a lot of the Pythons&#39; subtextual themes and deals far more overtly with the Christian mythology, it does so in a largely joking, nudging way. If one were so inclined, he or she could easily watch and enjoy The Life of Brian without subscribing to (or even acknowledging) its critical, subversive ideology. Perhaps this is the key to great satire, to be able to hide your teeth in a smile. Regardless, it would be far more difficult for a devout theist to enjoy The Meaning of Life, which frequently seems dissatisfied merely pointing out the faulty logic of pious rhetoric, preferring instead to (literally) sing and dance around the point. There is no context to soften the blow as there is in The Life of Brian; you can almost hear the Pythons laughing at their audience even as they laugh with them, insisting, &quot;You think this is nonsense? You should see yourselves!&quot;To this end, what many find offensive I find refreshing. I respect an artist who can make big ideas palatable for the general public. While many young people may not know of Russell&#39;s teapot, they may have instead heard of The Flying Spaghetti Monster or The Invisible Pink Unicorn. What these two symbols of modern day Atheism/Skepticism have in common with Monty Python is a belief that the manifestations of religious fundamentalism are so ludicrous, so fantastical, and so willfully offensive to logic that they can only be responded to with nonsense of equal measure; anyone who ignores reason will not be swayed by it, no matter how sound.An unfortunate reality is that disciples will not always take the right lessons from their masters. Just as the church often perverts the religion it sets out to uphold, so too have subsequent filmmakers and comedians taken the Pythons&#39; willingness to push the boundaries of taste but have ignored or left behind their intelligence and sense of purpose. The Pythons are a bright bunch and are undoubtedly reluctant fathers to the gross-out school of comedic one-upmanship which has flourished in their wake. And so before you criticize The Meaning of Life for excess, for vulgarity, and for abuse of power with deleterious intent, consider first that its targets are guilty of the same (and to a much greater degree). At least Monty Python have taken the time and the care to look behind the curtain before it is hung. http://www.spout.com/groups/Top_5/Re_Re_Re_Top_5_Heist_Films/190/24458/1/ShowPost.aspx Post By: Puhnner
Post To: Top 5
Post Date: 1/28/2008 2:41:16 PM
Body: ok, maybe these are not the best, but:Take the Money and Run ( I still laugh my ass off each time I see it, especially the scene where the teller and then everyone in the bank argues about what Woody's 'stick-up' note actually says )The Getaway ( although the book is much better ) The Master Touch with Kirk Douglas; surprisingly great, unintentionally hilarious, and with blinking light type 'state of the art' technology The LookoutPoint Blank
]]>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:41:16 GMTPuhnnerTop 51/28/2008 2:41:16 PMok, maybe these are not the best, but:Take the Money and Run ( I still laugh my ass off each time I see it, especially the scene where the teller and then everyone in the bank argues about what Woody&#39;s &#39;stick-up&#39; note actually says )The Getaway ( although the book is much better ) The Master Touch with Kirk Douglas; surprisingly great, unintentionally hilarious, and with blinking light type &#39;state of the art&#39; technology The LookoutPoint Blank http://www.spout.com/blogs/bitelittledogy4/archive/2008/1/10/23701.aspx Post By: bitelittledogy4
Post To: bitelittledogy4 Blog
Post Date: 1/10/2008 12:08:50 AM
Body: My favorite Woody Allen film, I love watching this movie!!!!!
]]>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:08:50 GMTbitelittledogy4bitelittledogy4 Blog1/10/2008 12:08:50 AMMy favorite Woody Allen film, I love watching this movie!!!!! http://www.spout.com/blogs/jakestevens/archive/2007/10/10/20587.aspx Post By: JakeStevens
Post To: JakeStevens Blog
Post Date: 10/10/2007 3:07:39 PM
Body: I found the rare Anchor Bay Widescreen release of this film at CD/DVD Exchange the other day and quickly bought it. I don't see how anyone couldn't like Woody Allen films - they're quirky and witty and silly...different strokes for different folks, I guess. This being his first writer/actor/director film, he looks very young and the sarcasm is laid on thick. Told in documentary style, it's an obvious first attempt at what he would later perfect with Zelig. Not a bad beginning to a long career.
]]>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:07:39 GMTJakeStevensJakeStevens Blog10/10/2007 3:07:39 PMI found the rare Anchor Bay Widescreen release of this film at CD/DVD Exchange the other day and quickly bought it. I don&#39;t see how anyone couldn&#39;t like Woody Allen films - they&#39;re quirky and witty and silly...different strokes for different folks, I guess. This being his first writer/actor/director film, he looks very young and the sarcasm is laid on thick. Told in documentary style, it&#39;s an obvious first attempt at what he would later perfect with Zelig. Not a bad beginning to a long career. http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/prison/MemberTagFilms.aspxprison
Number of films tagged: 2437

Number of people who tagged: 62

Number of times used: 167

]]>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:02:27 GMT243762167Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/robbery/MemberTagFilms.aspxrobbery
Number of films tagged: 3798

Number of people who tagged: 42

Number of times used: 103

]]>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:33:51 GMT379842103Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/criminal/MemberTagFilms.aspxcriminal
Number of films tagged: 3388

Number of people who tagged: 27

Number of times used: 56

]]>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:02:59 GMT33882756Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/neurotic/MemberTagFilms.aspxneurotic
Number of films tagged: 100

Number of people who tagged: 26

Number of times used: 39

]]>Tue, 19 May 2009 05:57:03 GMT1002639Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/mockumentary/MemberTagFilms.aspxmockumentary
Number of films tagged: 28

Number of people who tagged: 25

Number of times used: 35

]]>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:38:42 GMT282535Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/cello/MemberTagFilms.aspxcello
Number of films tagged: 71

Number of people who tagged: 7

Number of times used: 7

]]>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:42:49 GMT7177Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/bankrobbery/MemberTagFilms.aspxbankrobbery
Number of films tagged: 383

Number of people who tagged: 6

Number of times used: 10

]]>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:03:15 GMT383610Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/convict/MemberTagFilms.aspxconvict
Number of films tagged: 452

Number of people who tagged: 6

Number of times used: 11

]]>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:04:22 GMT452611Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/inmate/MemberTagFilms.aspxinmate
Number of films tagged: 268

Number of people who tagged: 5

Number of times used: 5

]]>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:02:37 GMT26855Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/gynecologist/MemberTagFilms.aspxgynecologist
Number of films tagged: 38

Number of people who tagged: 4

Number of times used: 4

]]>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:02:25 GMT3844Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/virgil/MemberTagFilms.aspxvirgil
Number of films tagged: 1

Number of people who tagged: 1

Number of times used: 1

]]>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 23:31:29 GMT111Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/ineptness/MemberTagFilms.aspxineptness
Number of films tagged: 23

Number of people who tagged: 0

Number of times used: 0

]]>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:02:29 GMT2300Tag