﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:spout="http://www.spout.com/schemas/rss/core/2006" xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005">
  <channel>
    <cf:treatAs>list</cf:treatAs>
    <cf:listinfo>
      <cf:group element="type" label="Type" ns="http://www.spout.com/schemas/rss/core/2006" data-type="text" />
    </cf:listinfo>
    <title>The Absent-Minded Professor's Recent Activity - Spout</title>
    <link>http://www.spout.com/</link>
    <description>Recent community activity around The Absent-Minded Professor on Spout</description>
    <copyright>Copyright 2005-9 Spout, LLC</copyright>
    <generator>Spout RSS</generator>
    
    <item>
      <title>Film:The Absent-Minded Professor</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/films/The_Absent_Minded_Professor/334/default.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<table width='100%' style='font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><tr><td><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t34744xcva0.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' /></td>
<td>
<strong>Title:</strong> The Absent-Minded Professor<br/>
<strong>Year:</strong> 1961<br/>
<strong>Director:</strong> Robert Stevenson<br/>
<strong>Plot:</strong> One of Disney's most entertaining forays into live-action, this hit family comedy stars <a href="/players/P____44291/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Fred MacMurray</a> as a college professor so forgetful that he missed his own wedding twice. He creates an extremely resilient flying rubber, dubbed "Flubber," and manages to make his old Model-T bounce all the way to Washington, DC, where it is mistaken for a UFO, as well as helping the college basketball team win the big game with Flubber-powered sneakers. MacMurray is a lot of fun in the title role, ably supported by a cast including <a href="/players/P____38495/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Tommy Kirk</a>, <a href="/players/P____77747/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Keenan Wynn</a> and <a href="/players/P_____1365/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Leon Ames</a>, although the central romance between MacMurray and huffy bride-to-be <a href="/players/P____54075/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Nancy Olson</a> gets a bit annoying in its repetitiveness. In all, however, this is one of the best children's films of the '60s, and is highly recommended. A sequel, <a href=/films/32018/default.aspx style='text-decoration:underline'>Son of Flubber</a>, followed, with a remake simply titled <a href=/films/114693/default.aspx style='text-decoration:underline'>Flubber</a> appearing in 1997. ~ Robert Firsching, All Movie Guide<br/>
<strong>Times Tagged:</strong> 33<br/>
<strong>Number of Lists:</strong> 17<br/>
<strong>Number of blog posts:</strong> 1<br/>
<strong>Number of discussion threads:</strong> 1<br/>
<strong>SpoutRating:</strong> 3<br/>
</td></tr></table>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:43:00 GMT</pubDate><spout:Title>The Absent-Minded Professor</spout:Title><spout:Year>1961</spout:Year><spout:Director>Robert Stevenson</spout:Director><spout:Plot>One of Disney's most entertaining forays into live-action, this hit family comedy stars &lt;a href="/players/P____44291/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Fred MacMurray&lt;/a&gt; as a college professor so forgetful that he missed his own wedding twice. He creates an extremely resilient flying rubber, dubbed "Flubber," and manages to make his old Model-T bounce all the way to Washington, DC, where it is mistaken for a UFO, as well as helping the college basketball team win the big game with Flubber-powered sneakers. MacMurray is a lot of fun in the title role, ably supported by a cast including &lt;a href="/players/P____38495/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Tommy Kirk&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="/players/P____77747/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Keenan Wynn&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="/players/P_____1365/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Leon Ames&lt;/a&gt;, although the central romance between MacMurray and huffy bride-to-be &lt;a href="/players/P____54075/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Nancy Olson&lt;/a&gt; gets a bit annoying in its repetitiveness. In all, however, this is one of the best children's films of the '60s, and is highly recommended. A sequel, &lt;a href=/films/32018/default.aspx style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Son of Flubber&lt;/a&gt;, followed, with a remake simply titled &lt;a href=/films/114693/default.aspx style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Flubber&lt;/a&gt; appearing in 1997. ~ Robert Firsching, All Movie Guide</spout:Plot><spout:TimesTagged>33</spout:TimesTagged><spout:taglevel>Tag Target (&gt;10)</spout:taglevel><spout:Numberoflists>17</spout:Numberoflists><spout:NumberOfBlogPosts>1</spout:NumberOfBlogPosts><spout:NumberOfDiscussionThreads>1</spout:NumberOfDiscussionThreads><spout:SpoutRating>3</spout:SpoutRating><spout:FilmCoverURL>http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t34744xcva0.jpg</spout:FilmCoverURL><spout:SpoutFilmDetailURL>http://www.spout.com/films/The_Absent_Minded_Professor/334/default.aspx</spout:SpoutFilmDetailURL><spout:type>Film</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: 10 Disney Classics That Need to Be Remade</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2009/3/13/41014.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t34744xcva0.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/9325/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog on spout.com</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 3/13/2009 3:00:43 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> Even if you love the original Escape to Witch Mountain, you have to welcome a remake. The 1975 sci-fi Disney film has some very dated special effects — though the visible wires used to “levitate” a handgun and a harmonica give it a campy charm — and it’s not exactly the well-respected classic that The Black Hole or Old Yeller is, anyway. So, better a remake (or “modern re-imagining”) of a slightly beloved movie, which has already been redone once, to give The Rock another fulfillment of his Disney contract and utilize all the “perfect” digital effects now available.
While it seems that eventually all Disney live-action classics will be remade, potentially rendering obsolete the careers of Dean Jones, Kevin Corcoran and those ugly kids from Mary Poppins, there are some that may, like Witch Mountain, deserve to be recycled. Disney has previously erred in reworking films like The Absent-Minded Professor (Robin Williams is no Fred MacMurray) and The Shaggy Dog (Tim Allen is no MacMurray, either, nor even is he Tommy Kirk), and it’s mistakenly producing new versions of Swiss Family Robinson and 20,000 Leauges Under the Sea. But there are so many other films, most forgotten, that would better lend themselves to remakes.
Here we’ve selected 10 such classics, all but one live-action features, and we welcome you to suggest any others you may wish to see updated and/or re-imagined.



The Apple Dumpling Gang (1975)
With the western genre not quite dead anymore, it would be nice for Disney to bring back the comedy western. Of course, The Apple Dumpling Gang could be modernized, too. Either way, the story of three orphan children who enlist two bumbling bank robbers to steal their gold nugget would delight a new generation of kids who might not necessarily appreciate Don Knotts the way we did. Cast Jim Carrey in the Knotts role and Jack Black as his partner (originally played by Tim Conway), have them try to outdo each other’s slapstick performance, and you’ve got a huge family hit.



The Black Cauldron (1985)
This animated feature was so unpopular that it pretty much ruined the reputation of Walt Disney Pictures for a few years. Rated PG, and way too dark even for the studio that brought us Pinocchio, the adaptation of Lloyd Alexander’s fantasy novel had initially been threatened with a PG-13 or R rating. Nearly 25 years later, kids are a little tougher and could easily tolerate a live-action version that’s somewhere akin to Lord of the Rings, Pirates of the Caribbean and The Phantom Menace (a CGI “Gurgi” would be very similar to Jar-Jar Binks). Tim Burton should obviously direct the film, because he worked as an artist on the original, and he’s currently working for Disney anyway.



The Cat from Outer Space (1978)
Few people seem to hold this movie in high regards, despite audience’s apparent favor for talking animals and stupid sci-fi plots. But a modernized telling of a feline alien’s visit to Earth could be a blockbuster by being even worse than the original. Add more slapstick (in an LOLCats sort of way) and more special effects and this could make even more money than E.T., which seriously seemed derivative of The Cat from Outer Space anyway. And after this becomes a hit, Disney should continue digging in its catbox and remake the very strange and very obscure Three Lives of Thomasina.



Darby O’Gill and the Little People (1959)
If Hollywood can dare redo Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, then Disney can surely remake Darby O’Gill and the Little People without too much protest. And like Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, this remake shall retain the source novel’s title. Of course, Darby O’Gill and the Good People does sound a little plain, so maybe getting right to the idea with Darby O’Gill and the Leprechauns as a title would be better. In any event, Sean Connery should come out of retirement to switch roles and play the titular old man who meets a bunch of Leprechauns. And perhaps Daniel Craig for Connery’s original role? Okay, new title: James Bond and the Other James Bond in Little People Are Forever (or Little People Never Die, or some other combo of 007 title referencing Leprechaun’s immortality). If this does well, Disney can also go ahead and redo the little-people-filled The Gnome-Mobile.



In Search of the Castaways (1962)
Here’s the genius idea Hollywood’s been seeking for almost 50 years: remake the Jules Verne adaptation In Search of the Castaways, a musical adventure with tons of disaster film elements and a perfect role for Miley Cyrus (isn’t she this generation’s Hayley Mills, in a way?), who could sing a new version of “Castaway.” The ice slide scene would be great in 3-D, by the way.



Midnight Madness (1980)
Remaking this cult classic might upset a few fans, but even those of us who love the original should be able to appreciate an updated version if it’s done right. There could always be more scavenger hunt movies, whether they’re fresh or recycled. And if Disney can find enough good, young character actors to fill the teams, nobody should even miss Eddie Deezen, David Naughton or Stephen Furst. Have Judd Apatow produce the thing and cast all his regulars, for instance. Paul Reubens (Pee-Wee Herman) should reprise his role, though.



The Million Dollar Duck (1971)
This family comedy about a duck that lays golden eggs is not very good, and it probably didn’t help its box office that a better film featuring golden-egg-laying fowl (Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory) opened on the very same day. But a good remake of bad movie isn’t a bad idea, and in this economy the story of a struggling family that gets a burst of financial luck (via strange science) might work as a relevant fantasy.



Toby Tyler, or Ten Weeks with a Circus (1960)
This forgotten Kevin Corcoran + monkey classic is kind of like Coraline, but there’s more circus stuff, the kid’s parents don’t suck (though he’s told they don’t love him), there’s a primate friend instead of a talking cat (though both animals are classic Disney devices) and it’s live-action and not 3-D. Do children still dream of running away to the circus? If not, then a remake of this movie could both reinstate that wish and present it as a terrible substitute for a real family all in the course of 90 minutes.



The Ugly Dachshund (1966)
Between the success of Marley and Me and news of an upcoming Marmaduke movie, it may just be the perfect time for a remake of a movie about a disastrous Great Dane who thinks he’s a little wiener dog. Put Brad Pitt and Anglina Jolie in the Dean Jones and Suzanne Pleshette roles and you’ll really, really piss off Team Jennifer by out-grossing last Christmas’ biggest hit.



The World’s Greatest Athlete (1973)
The story of an African who is brought to the U.S. to be a college track star may not seem like a big idea for a movie in the 21st century. But make that African a Tarzan-like white kid who can outrun a cheetah (and who isn’t The Flash) and you’ll have people laughing your film out of theaters. Or, you’ll somehow have a monster hit. Either way, we wish Disney would have the balls to remake this unrealistic movie, especially if they can get Usain Bolt to be the protagonist’s main competition. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:00:43 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>SpoutBlog</spout:postby><spout:postto>SpoutBlog on spout.com</spout:postto><spout:postdate>3/13/2009 3:00:43 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>Even if you love the original Escape to Witch Mountain, you have to welcome a remake. The 1975 sci-fi Disney film has some very dated special effects — though the visible wires used to “levitate” a handgun and a harmonica give it a campy charm — and it’s not exactly the well-respected classic that The Black Hole or Old Yeller is, anyway. So, better a remake (or “modern re-imagining”) of a slightly beloved movie, which has already been redone once, to give The Rock another fulfillment of his Disney contract and utilize all the “perfect” digital effects now available.
While it seems that eventually all Disney live-action classics will be remade, potentially rendering obsolete the careers of Dean Jones, Kevin Corcoran and those ugly kids from Mary Poppins, there are some that may, like Witch Mountain, deserve to be recycled. Disney has previously erred in reworking films like The Absent-Minded Professor (Robin Williams is no Fred MacMurray) and The Shaggy Dog (Tim Allen is no MacMurray, either, nor even is he Tommy Kirk), and it’s mistakenly producing new versions of Swiss Family Robinson and 20,000 Leauges Under the Sea. But there are so many other films, most forgotten, that would better lend themselves to remakes.
Here we’ve selected 10 such classics, all but one live-action features, and we welcome you to suggest any others you may wish to see updated and/or re-imagined.



The Apple Dumpling Gang (1975)
With the western genre not quite dead anymore, it would be nice for Disney to bring back the comedy western. Of course, The Apple Dumpling Gang could be modernized, too. Either way, the story of three orphan children who enlist two bumbling bank robbers to steal their gold nugget would delight a new generation of kids who might not necessarily appreciate Don Knotts the way we did. Cast Jim Carrey in the Knotts role and Jack Black as his partner (originally played by Tim Conway), have them try to outdo each other’s slapstick performance, and you’ve got a huge family hit.



The Black Cauldron (1985)
This animated feature was so unpopular that it pretty much ruined the reputation of Walt Disney Pictures for a few years. Rated PG, and way too dark even for the studio that brought us Pinocchio, the adaptation of Lloyd Alexander’s fantasy novel had initially been threatened with a PG-13 or R rating. Nearly 25 years later, kids are a little tougher and could easily tolerate a live-action version that’s somewhere akin to Lord of the Rings, Pirates of the Caribbean and The Phantom Menace (a CGI “Gurgi” would be very similar to Jar-Jar Binks). Tim Burton should obviously direct the film, because he worked as an artist on the original, and he’s currently working for Disney anyway.



The Cat from Outer Space (1978)
Few people seem to hold this movie in high regards, despite audience’s apparent favor for talking animals and stupid sci-fi plots. But a modernized telling of a feline alien’s visit to Earth could be a blockbuster by being even worse than the original. Add more slapstick (in an LOLCats sort of way) and more special effects and this could make even more money than E.T., which seriously seemed derivative of The Cat from Outer Space anyway. And after this becomes a hit, Disney should continue digging in its catbox and remake the very strange and very obscure Three Lives of Thomasina.



Darby O’Gill and the Little People (1959)
If Hollywood can dare redo Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, then Disney can surely remake Darby O’Gill and the Little People without too much protest. And like Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, this remake shall retain the source novel’s title. Of course, Darby O’Gill and the Good People does sound a little plain, so maybe getting right to the idea with Darby O’Gill and the Leprechauns as a title would be better. In any event, Sean Connery should come out of retirement to switch roles and play the titular old man who meets a bunch of Leprechauns. And perhaps Daniel Craig for Connery’s original role? Okay, new title: James Bond and the Other James Bond in Little People Are Forever (or Little People Never Die, or some other combo of 007 title referencing Leprechaun’s immortality). If this does well, Disney can also go ahead and redo the little-people-filled The Gnome-Mobile.



In Search of the Castaways (1962)
Here’s the genius idea Hollywood’s been seeking for almost 50 years: remake the Jules Verne adaptation In Search of the Castaways, a musical adventure with tons of disaster film elements and a perfect role for Miley Cyrus (isn’t she this generation’s Hayley Mills, in a way?), who could sing a new version of “Castaway.” The ice slide scene would be great in 3-D, by the way.



Midnight Madness (1980)
Remaking this cult classic might upset a few fans, but even those of us who love the original should be able to appreciate an updated version if it’s done right. There could always be more scavenger hunt movies, whether they’re fresh or recycled. And if Disney can find enough good, young character actors to fill the teams, nobody should even miss Eddie Deezen, David Naughton or Stephen Furst. Have Judd Apatow produce the thing and cast all his regulars, for instance. Paul Reubens (Pee-Wee Herman) should reprise his role, though.



The Million Dollar Duck (1971)
This family comedy about a duck that lays golden eggs is not very good, and it probably didn’t help its box office that a better film featuring golden-egg-laying fowl (Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory) opened on the very same day. But a good remake of bad movie isn’t a bad idea, and in this economy the story of a struggling family that gets a burst of financial luck (via strange science) might work as a relevant fantasy.



Toby Tyler, or Ten Weeks with a Circus (1960)
This forgotten Kevin Corcoran + monkey classic is kind of like Coraline, but there’s more circus stuff, the kid’s parents don’t suck (though he’s told they don’t love him), there’s a primate friend instead of a talking cat (though both animals are classic Disney devices) and it’s live-action and not 3-D. Do children still dream of running away to the circus? If not, then a remake of this movie could both reinstate that wish and present it as a terrible substitute for a real family all in the course of 90 minutes.



The Ugly Dachshund (1966)
Between the success of Marley and Me and news of an upcoming Marmaduke movie, it may just be the perfect time for a remake of a movie about a disastrous Great Dane who thinks he’s a little wiener dog. Put Brad Pitt and Anglina Jolie in the Dean Jones and Suzanne Pleshette roles and you’ll really, really piss off Team Jennifer by out-grossing last Christmas’ biggest hit.



The World’s Greatest Athlete (1973)
The story of an African who is brought to the U.S. to be a college track star may not seem like a big idea for a movie in the 21st century. But make that African a Tarzan-like white kid who can outrun a cheetah (and who isn’t The Flash) and you’ll have people laughing your film out of theaters. Or, you’ll somehow have a monster hit. Either way, we wish Disney would have the balls to remake this unrealistic movie, especially if they can get Usain Bolt to be the protagonist’s main competition. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: Re: fun sci-fi</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/groups/sci_fi/Re_fun_sci_fi/4/34192/1/ShowPost.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t34744xcva0.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/2470/default.aspx'>SkyPilot</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/groups/sci_fi/4/discussions.aspx'>sci-fi</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 8/20/2008 4:00:18 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong>   [quote user="bishop"]shaggy dog?  wtf? i should ban you from sci-fi for even mentioning that movie. you just lost 4 sci-fi points.[/quote] I'd love to see the points scale, because I'm about to go down a bunch: The Absent-Minded Professor and the remake  Flubber The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes and the remake The Nutty Professor and Eddie Murphy's remake (which reminds me of the recent Meet Dave) The Love Bug and all the sequels, remakes starring Herbie The Strongest Man in the World (what, no remake?) This got me thinking about bishop's original question:  "why is it that so many sci-fi movies are either creepy, dramatic or dark? whatever happened to just plain fun sci-fi?" Good question. But let's be honest here, none of the movies mentioned here mentioned here are gleaming examples of great filmmaking, right? Maybe Time Bandits is a counter-example; I'm not sure because I only know this film by reputation. Don't get me wrong, some of these movies are a ton of fun (especially Ghostbusters), and some are considered classics in their own way (the original Nutty Professor and Spaceballs) but I find most of these movies to be inconsistent and draggy. Largely lacking  in distinguishing style, too -- a scene in the middle of say, Flubber, could be taken from any zany comedy. I feel differently watching any scene from Blade Runner or Alien. The aesthetics of those movies are so distinctive. Turning to any scene at random is like meeting a kid and instantly figuring out who his parents are.          <br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:00:18 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>SkyPilot</spout:postby><spout:postto>sci-fi</spout:postto><spout:postdate>8/20/2008 4:00:18 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>  [quote user="bishop"]shaggy dog?  wtf? i should ban you from sci-fi for even mentioning that movie. you just lost 4 sci-fi points.[/quote] I'd love to see the points scale, because I'm about to go down a bunch: The Absent-Minded Professor and the remake  Flubber The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes and the remake The Nutty Professor and Eddie Murphy's remake (which reminds me of the recent Meet Dave) The Love Bug and all the sequels, remakes starring Herbie The Strongest Man in the World (what, no remake?) This got me thinking about bishop's original question:  "why is it that so many sci-fi movies are either creepy, dramatic or dark? whatever happened to just plain fun sci-fi?" Good question. But let's be honest here, none of the movies mentioned here mentioned here are gleaming examples of great filmmaking, right? Maybe Time Bandits is a counter-example; I'm not sure because I only know this film by reputation. Don't get me wrong, some of these movies are a ton of fun (especially Ghostbusters), and some are considered classics in their own way (the original Nutty Professor and Spaceballs) but I find most of these movies to be inconsistent and draggy. Largely lacking  in distinguishing style, too -- a scene in the middle of say, Flubber, could be taken from any zany comedy. I feel differently watching any scene from Blade Runner or Alien. The aesthetics of those movies are so distinctive. Turning to any scene at random is like meeting a kid and instantly figuring out who his parents are.          </spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:Classic</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/Classic/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/Classic/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>Classic</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 816</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 312</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 1453</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:54:36 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>816</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>312</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>1453</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:family</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/family/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/family/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>family</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 6288</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 226</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 1138</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:09:21 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>6288</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>226</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>1138</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:Great</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/Great/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/Great/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>Great</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 231</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 202</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 371</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:11:49 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>231</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>202</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>371</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:children</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/children/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/children/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>children</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 212</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 66</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 270</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:28:15 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>212</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>66</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>270</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:school</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/school/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/school/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>school</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 1231</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 56</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 130</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:49:18 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>1231</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>56</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>130</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:wedding</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/wedding/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/wedding/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>wedding</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 853</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 44</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 148</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:32:02 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>853</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>44</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>148</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:secrets</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/secrets/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/secrets/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>secrets</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 1384</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 43</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 100</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:32:11 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>1384</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>43</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>100</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:childhood</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/childhood/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/childhood/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>childhood</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 499</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 38</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 93</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:42:53 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>499</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>38</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>93</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:car</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/car/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/car/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>car</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 1316</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 32</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 99</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:32:16 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>1316</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>32</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>99</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:scientist</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/scientist/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/scientist/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>scientist</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 1408</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 31</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 77</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:47:27 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>1408</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>31</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>77</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:sports</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/sports/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/sports/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>sports</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 3350</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 27</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 102</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:50:43 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>3350</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>27</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>102</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:basketball</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/basketball/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/basketball/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>basketball</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 652</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 24</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 58</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:53:45 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>652</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>24</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>58</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:professor</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/professor/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/professor/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>professor</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 742</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 22</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 39</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:30:14 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>742</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>22</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>39</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:science</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/science/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/science/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>science</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 259</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 21</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 63</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:08:49 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>259</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>21</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>63</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:flying</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/flying/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/flying/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>flying</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 276</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 17</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 34</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:06:11 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>276</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>17</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>34</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
  </channel>
</rss>