list http://www.spout.com/ Recent community activity around Tyson on Spout Copyright 2005-9 Spout, LLC Spout RSS http://www.spout.com/images/SpoutLogoRSS.jpg http://www.spout.com/ 136 30 http://www.spout.com/films/Tyson/330856/default.aspx Title: Tyson
Year: 2009
Director: James Toback
Plot: Assembled from over 30 hours of interviews with the controversial heavyweight champion, director James Toback takes the helm for a feature-length documentary exploring the life and career of self-destructive pugilist Mike Tyson. From his early years under the wing of famed boxing promoter Don King to his notorious match against Evander Holyfield and his conviction on sexual assault charges, Tyson's turbulent life is explored in the kind of comprehensive manner that could only have been made possible with the subject's willing participation. ~ Jason Buchanan, All Movie Guide
Times Tagged: 3
Number of Lists: 3
Number of blog posts: 8
Number of discussion threads: 2
SpoutRating: 3
]]>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:14:50 GMTTyson2009James TobackAssembled from over 30 hours of interviews with the controversial heavyweight champion, director <a href="http://www.spout.com/players/P___114247/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>James Toback</a> takes the helm for a feature-length documentary exploring the life and career of self-destructive pugilist <a href="http://www.spout.com/players/P____72322/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Mike Tyson</a>. From his early years under the wing of famed boxing promoter Don King to his notorious match against Evander Holyfield and his conviction on sexual assault charges, Tyson's turbulent life is explored in the kind of comprehensive manner that could only have been made possible with the subject's willing participation. ~ Jason Buchanan, All Movie Guide3Slightly Tagged (1-5)3823http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/s330856.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/Tyson/330856/default.aspxFilm http://www.spout.com/groups/Community_Recommendations/Re_Sundance_Documentaries/643/40032/1/ShowPost.aspx Post By: rjsprague
Post To: Community Recommendations
Post Date: 1/28/2009 3:37:45 PM
Body: [quote user="mercurial"] Tyson Never was into boxing and frankly any mention of the guy creeps me out, but it might be interesting to hear some of the wacky stuff he has to talk about. Art & Copy I'm thinking it's gonna be like Mad Men, but less sex. The September Issue Again, like The Devil Wears Prada, but less sex. We Live In Public Crazy rich people are always interesting to watch. When You're Strange Love The Doors and Tom DiCillo so I'm hoping this will be good. [/quote] Interesting choices. I also was fascinated by the Tyson doc. I was equally interested in When You're Strange and It Might Get Loud, but not enough to put them above my other selections. There is something about the whole environmental doc that seems to get me. I guess I feel that it is somehow related to some kind of apocryphal literature I've read, or something.
]]>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:37:45 GMTrjspragueCommunity Recommendations1/28/2009 3:37:45 PM[quote user="mercurial"] Tyson Never was into boxing and frankly any mention of the guy creeps me out, but it might be interesting to hear some of the wacky stuff he has to talk about. Art &amp; Copy I'm thinking it's gonna be like Mad Men, but less sex. The September Issue Again, like The Devil Wears Prada, but less sex. We Live In Public Crazy rich people are always interesting to watch. When You're Strange Love The Doors and Tom DiCillo so I'm hoping this will be good. [/quote] Interesting choices. I also was fascinated by the Tyson doc. I was equally interested in When You're Strange and It Might Get Loud, but not enough to put them above my other selections. There is something about the whole environmental doc that seems to get me. I guess I feel that it is somehow related to some kind of apocryphal literature I've read, or something. http://www.spout.com/groups/Community_Recommendations/Re_Sundance_Documentaries/643/39934/1/ShowPost.aspx Post By: mercurial
Post To: Community Recommendations
Post Date: 1/26/2009 7:01:54 PM
Body: Tyson Never was into boxing and frankly any mention of the guy creeps me out, but it might be interesting to hear some of the wacky stuff he has to talk about. Art & Copy I'm thinking it's gonna be like Mad Men, but less sex. The September Issue Again, like The Devil Wears Prada, but less sex. We Live In Public Crazy rich people are always interesting to watch. When You're Strange Love The Doors and Tom DiCillo so I'm hoping this will be good.
]]>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:01:54 GMTmercurialCommunity Recommendations1/26/2009 7:01:54 PMTyson Never was into boxing and frankly any mention of the guy creeps me out, but it might be interesting to hear some of the wacky stuff he has to talk about. Art &amp; Copy I'm thinking it's gonna be like Mad Men, but less sex. The September Issue Again, like The Devil Wears Prada, but less sex. We Live In Public Crazy rich people are always interesting to watch. When You're Strange Love The Doors and Tom DiCillo so I'm hoping this will be good. http://www.spout.com/blogs/karina/archive/2009/1/12/39391.aspx Post By: Karina
Post To: Karina on SpoutBlog
Post Date: 1/12/2009 11:01:06 AM
Body: Here’s our running tally of each of the distribution deals announced just before, throughout the course of, and just after the 2009 Sundance Film Festival. We will update this post whenever new information comes in, so bookmark it and keep checking back for the newest latest. Title Distributor Rights Bought More Info Tyson Sony Classics US Theatrical Variety Amreeka Entertainment One Canada, international Hollywood Reporter Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth
]]>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:01:06 GMTKarinaKarina on SpoutBlog1/12/2009 11:01:06 AMHere’s our running tally of each of the distribution deals announced just before, throughout the course of, and just after the 2009 Sundance Film Festival. We will update this post whenever new information comes in, so bookmark it and keep checking back for the newest latest. Title Distributor Rights Bought More Info Tyson Sony Classics US Theatrical Variety Amreeka Entertainment One Canada, international Hollywood Reporter Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2009/1/12/39390.aspx Post By: SpoutBlog
Post To: SpoutBlog on spout.com
Post Date: 1/12/2009 11:00:51 AM
Body: Here’s our running tally of each of the distribution deals announced just before, throughout the course of, and just after the 2009 Sundance Film Festival. We will update this post whenever new information comes in, so bookmark it and keep checking back for the newest latest. Title Distributor Rights Bought More Info Tyson Sony Classics US Theatrical Variety Amreeka Entertainment One Canada, international Hollywood Reporter Originally posted on:SpoutBlog
]]>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:00:51 GMTSpoutBlogSpoutBlog on spout.com1/12/2009 11:00:51 AMHere’s our running tally of each of the distribution deals announced just before, throughout the course of, and just after the 2009 Sundance Film Festival. We will update this post whenever new information comes in, so bookmark it and keep checking back for the newest latest. Title Distributor Rights Bought More Info Tyson Sony Classics US Theatrical Variety Amreeka Entertainment One Canada, international Hollywood Reporter Originally posted on:SpoutBlog http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2008/5/30/30171.aspx Post By: SpoutBlog
Post To: SpoutBlog on spout.com
Post Date: 5/30/2008 9:01:04 AM
Body: Interview with Chris Bell who made Bigger, Stronger, Faster –opening tonight. A doc going way beyond body building into the essence of an unspoken American pastime: Cheating. Karina reports back on Cannes and everything the media missed that it shouldn’t have: Tyson, Frontier of Dawn and Everything is Fine. (Subscribe to FilmCouch–Spout’s weekly movie podcast–in the iTunes store or to our RSS feed and an episode will download each Friday) FilmCouch #72 - Karina on Cannes, Kevin on steroids Bigger, Stronger, Faster; Tyson; Frontier of Dawn; Everything is Fine Originally posted on:SpoutBlog
]]>Fri, 30 May 2008 13:01:04 GMTSpoutBlogSpoutBlog on spout.com5/30/2008 9:01:04 AM Interview with Chris Bell who made Bigger, Stronger, Faster –opening tonight. A doc going way beyond body building into the essence of an unspoken American pastime: Cheating. Karina reports back on Cannes and everything the media missed that it shouldn’t have: Tyson, Frontier of Dawn and Everything is Fine. (Subscribe to FilmCouch–Spout’s weekly movie podcast–in the iTunes store or to our RSS feed and an episode will download each Friday) FilmCouch #72 - Karina on Cannes, Kevin on steroids Bigger, Stronger, Faster; Tyson; Frontier of Dawn; Everything is Fine Originally posted on:SpoutBlog http://www.spout.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/5/30/30170.aspx Post By: paul
Post To: paul on spout.com
Post Date: 5/30/2008 9:00:41 AM
Body: Interview with Chris Bell who made Bigger, Stronger, Faster –opening tonight. A doc going way beyond body building into the essence of an unspoken American pastime: Cheating. Karina reports back on Cannes and everything the media missed that it shouldn’t have: Tyson, Frontier of Dawn and Everything is Fine. (Subscribe to FilmCouch–Spout’s weekly movie podcast–in the iTunes store or to our RSS feed and an episode will download each Friday) FilmCouch #72 - Karina on Cannes, Kevin on steroids Bigger, Stronger, Faster; Tyson; Frontier of Dawn; Everything is Fine Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Paul Moore
]]>Fri, 30 May 2008 13:00:41 GMTpaulpaul on spout.com5/30/2008 9:00:41 AM Interview with Chris Bell who made Bigger, Stronger, Faster –opening tonight. A doc going way beyond body building into the essence of an unspoken American pastime: Cheating. Karina reports back on Cannes and everything the media missed that it shouldn’t have: Tyson, Frontier of Dawn and Everything is Fine. (Subscribe to FilmCouch–Spout’s weekly movie podcast–in the iTunes store or to our RSS feed and an episode will download each Friday) FilmCouch #72 - Karina on Cannes, Kevin on steroids Bigger, Stronger, Faster; Tyson; Frontier of Dawn; Everything is Fine Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Paul Moore http://www.spout.com/blogs/karina/archive/2008/5/27/30019.aspx Post By: Karina
Post To: Karina on SpoutBlog
Post Date: 5/27/2008 1:00:56 PM
Body: On the flight home from Cannes on Sunday, I sat next to a prominent female film critic who, like me, had major problems with James Toback’s much-praised Tyson. Particularly concerned about the section of the film where Mike Tyson tells “his side of the story” in regards to the rape that sent him to prison, she predicted that the film’s eventual distributor, Sony Classics, would likely have to tweak the Cannes cut in order to avoid a libel suit. But a story on the boxing site The Sweet Science indicates that might not be the only spot where Toback and Tyson fudge the truth. The film virtually cuts straight from the death of Tyson’s former mentor Cus D’A,ato to his years working under the eye of Don King. Steve Lott, Tyson’s assistant manager from 1985 to 1988, sites numerous places where Tyson “lies” in Tyson, and accuses Toback of glossing over the years in which Lott worked with the boxer in order to better support the case that Tyson was “has demons, that he was a thug, that he was crazy.” Lott says the Tyson he knew was “neither an addict, nor a hoodlum, nor a manic depressive…[but] ‘the golden boy of corporate America’,” and that his life only started to spin out of control when Don King and Robin Givens stepped in. He also claims Tyson lies in the film about being forced to sign a contract when he was underage: “I have the contract right here,’’ Lott said. “Mike Tyson was 18 when he signed that contract, not 16. He’s saying these lies for two reasons. The effect of Don King and all those years of him telling Mike it was the white guys who screwed him and the fact that Jimmy [Jacobs] is dead and can’t defend himself. I defy anyone to come out of the woodwork and say something bad that Jim did to Mike Tyson.’’ Of course, it’s possible that there’s a touch of sour grapes to Lott’s protests. The obvious (and admitted by Tyson) goal of Tyson––and the main reason why I find it so reprehensible––is to rehab Tyson’s image to the point where, as the Sweet Science story puts it, he can become “a product America will once again buy.” Lott apparently tried to do this himself two years ago: Lott said he met with [licensing agent Harlan] Werner two years ago to discuss his ideas of how to help his old friend. He suggested he first get rid of the face tattoo he began to wear late in his boxing career and then do a series of exhibitions for the troops in Iraq followed by similar fund raising appearances in the U.S. for various fire and police departments. In perhaps the only interesting stylistic element of the film, Toback uses overlapping voiceover and split screens to draw attention to where Tyson repeats and/or contradicts himself om various topics. Maybe this becomes a question of documentary ethics: is a filmmaker even responsible for “lies” told by his subject, if he draws attention to the fact that said subject is the world’s most unreliable narrator? Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth
]]>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:00:56 GMTKarinaKarina on SpoutBlog5/27/2008 1:00:56 PMOn the flight home from Cannes on Sunday, I sat next to a prominent female film critic who, like me, had major problems with James Toback’s much-praised Tyson. Particularly concerned about the section of the film where Mike Tyson tells “his side of the story” in regards to the rape that sent him to prison, she predicted that the film’s eventual distributor, Sony Classics, would likely have to tweak the Cannes cut in order to avoid a libel suit. But a story on the boxing site The Sweet Science indicates that might not be the only spot where Toback and Tyson fudge the truth. The film virtually cuts straight from the death of Tyson’s former mentor Cus D’A,ato to his years working under the eye of Don King. Steve Lott, Tyson’s assistant manager from 1985 to 1988, sites numerous places where Tyson “lies” in Tyson, and accuses Toback of glossing over the years in which Lott worked with the boxer in order to better support the case that Tyson was “has demons, that he was a thug, that he was crazy.” Lott says the Tyson he knew was “neither an addict, nor a hoodlum, nor a manic depressive…[but] ‘the golden boy of corporate America’,” and that his life only started to spin out of control when Don King and Robin Givens stepped in. He also claims Tyson lies in the film about being forced to sign a contract when he was underage: “I have the contract right here,’’ Lott said. “Mike Tyson was 18 when he signed that contract, not 16. He’s saying these lies for two reasons. The effect of Don King and all those years of him telling Mike it was the white guys who screwed him and the fact that Jimmy [Jacobs] is dead and can’t defend himself. I defy anyone to come out of the woodwork and say something bad that Jim did to Mike Tyson.’’ Of course, it’s possible that there’s a touch of sour grapes to Lott’s protests. The obvious (and admitted by Tyson) goal of Tyson––and the main reason why I find it so reprehensible––is to rehab Tyson’s image to the point where, as the Sweet Science story puts it, he can become “a product America will once again buy.” Lott apparently tried to do this himself two years ago: Lott said he met with [licensing agent Harlan] Werner two years ago to discuss his ideas of how to help his old friend. He suggested he first get rid of the face tattoo he began to wear late in his boxing career and then do a series of exhibitions for the troops in Iraq followed by similar fund raising appearances in the U.S. for various fire and police departments. In perhaps the only interesting stylistic element of the film, Toback uses overlapping voiceover and split screens to draw attention to where Tyson repeats and/or contradicts himself om various topics. Maybe this becomes a question of documentary ethics: is a filmmaker even responsible for “lies” told by his subject, if he draws attention to the fact that said subject is the world’s most unreliable narrator? Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2008/5/27/30018.aspx Post By: SpoutBlog
Post To: SpoutBlog on spout.com
Post Date: 5/27/2008 1:00:43 PM
Body: On the flight home from Cannes on Sunday, I sat next to a prominent female film critic who, like me, had major problems with James Toback’s much-praised Tyson. Particularly concerned about the section of the film where Mike Tyson tells “his side of the story” in regards to the rape that sent him to prison, she predicted that the film’s eventual distributor, Sony Classics, would likely have to tweak the Cannes cut in order to avoid a libel suit. But a story on the boxing site The Sweet Science indicates that might not be the only spot where Toback and Tyson fudge the truth. The film virtually cuts straight from the death of Tyson’s former mentor Cus D’A,ato to his years working under the eye of Don King. Steve Lott, Tyson’s assistant manager from 1985 to 1988, sites numerous places where Tyson “lies” in Tyson, and accuses Toback of glossing over the years in which Lott worked with the boxer in order to better support the case that Tyson was “has demons, that he was a thug, that he was crazy.” Lott says the Tyson he knew was “neither an addict, nor a hoodlum, nor a manic depressive…[but] ‘the golden boy of corporate America’,” and that his life only started to spin out of control when Don King and Robin Givens stepped in. He also claims Tyson lies in the film about being forced to sign a contract when he was underage: “I have the contract right here,’’ Lott said. “Mike Tyson was 18 when he signed that contract, not 16. He’s saying these lies for two reasons. The effect of Don King and all those years of him telling Mike it was the white guys who screwed him and the fact that Jimmy [Jacobs] is dead and can’t defend himself. I defy anyone to come out of the woodwork and say something bad that Jim did to Mike Tyson.’’ Of course, it’s possible that there’s a touch of sour grapes to Lott’s protests. The obvious (and admitted by Tyson) goal of Tyson––and the main reason why I find it so reprehensible––is to rehab Tyson’s image to the point where, as the Sweet Science story puts it, he can become “a product America will once again buy.” Lott apparently tried to do this himself two years ago: Lott said he met with [licensing agent Harlan] Werner two years ago to discuss his ideas of how to help his old friend. He suggested he first get rid of the face tattoo he began to wear late in his boxing career and then do a series of exhibitions for the troops in Iraq followed by similar fund raising appearances in the U.S. for various fire and police departments. In perhaps the only interesting stylistic element of the film, Toback uses overlapping voiceover and split screens to draw attention to where Tyson repeats and/or contradicts himself om various topics. Maybe this becomes a question of documentary ethics: is a filmmaker even responsible for “lies” told by his subject, if he draws attention to the fact that said subject is the world’s most unreliable narrator? Originally posted on:SpoutBlog
]]>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:00:43 GMTSpoutBlogSpoutBlog on spout.com5/27/2008 1:00:43 PMOn the flight home from Cannes on Sunday, I sat next to a prominent female film critic who, like me, had major problems with James Toback’s much-praised Tyson. Particularly concerned about the section of the film where Mike Tyson tells “his side of the story” in regards to the rape that sent him to prison, she predicted that the film’s eventual distributor, Sony Classics, would likely have to tweak the Cannes cut in order to avoid a libel suit. But a story on the boxing site The Sweet Science indicates that might not be the only spot where Toback and Tyson fudge the truth. The film virtually cuts straight from the death of Tyson’s former mentor Cus D’A,ato to his years working under the eye of Don King. Steve Lott, Tyson’s assistant manager from 1985 to 1988, sites numerous places where Tyson “lies” in Tyson, and accuses Toback of glossing over the years in which Lott worked with the boxer in order to better support the case that Tyson was “has demons, that he was a thug, that he was crazy.” Lott says the Tyson he knew was “neither an addict, nor a hoodlum, nor a manic depressive…[but] ‘the golden boy of corporate America’,” and that his life only started to spin out of control when Don King and Robin Givens stepped in. He also claims Tyson lies in the film about being forced to sign a contract when he was underage: “I have the contract right here,’’ Lott said. “Mike Tyson was 18 when he signed that contract, not 16. He’s saying these lies for two reasons. The effect of Don King and all those years of him telling Mike it was the white guys who screwed him and the fact that Jimmy [Jacobs] is dead and can’t defend himself. I defy anyone to come out of the woodwork and say something bad that Jim did to Mike Tyson.’’ Of course, it’s possible that there’s a touch of sour grapes to Lott’s protests. The obvious (and admitted by Tyson) goal of Tyson––and the main reason why I find it so reprehensible––is to rehab Tyson’s image to the point where, as the Sweet Science story puts it, he can become “a product America will once again buy.” Lott apparently tried to do this himself two years ago: Lott said he met with [licensing agent Harlan] Werner two years ago to discuss his ideas of how to help his old friend. He suggested he first get rid of the face tattoo he began to wear late in his boxing career and then do a series of exhibitions for the troops in Iraq followed by similar fund raising appearances in the U.S. for various fire and police departments. In perhaps the only interesting stylistic element of the film, Toback uses overlapping voiceover and split screens to draw attention to where Tyson repeats and/or contradicts himself om various topics. Maybe this becomes a question of documentary ethics: is a filmmaker even responsible for “lies” told by his subject, if he draws attention to the fact that said subject is the world’s most unreliable narrator? Originally posted on:SpoutBlog http://www.spout.com/blogs/karina/archive/2008/5/27/29998.aspx Post By: Karina
Post To: Karina on SpoutBlog
Post Date: 5/27/2008 10:01:28 AM
Body: Not content to let IFC walk off the Croisette as the big buying ballers of Cannes 2008, Sony Pictures Classics set a number of deals in the last days of the fest, including distribution pacts for the Israeli animated doc Waltz With Bashir, Lorna’s Silence by the Dardenne brothers, and James Toback’s Tyson. Meanwhile, the people at Magnolia have all but resigned themselves to distributing What Just Happened?, the Barry Levinson Cannes closer which they produced through 2929 Entertainment, but have been attempting to unload on another distributor since Sundance. Ewan McGregor will play Gore Vidal’s dad/Amelia Earhart’s lover in Amelia, a biopic set to star Hillary Swank as the famous missing aviatrix. Blah blah blah Indiana Jones, blah blah blah $311 million worldwide. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth
]]>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:01:28 GMTKarinaKarina on SpoutBlog5/27/2008 10:01:28 AM Not content to let IFC walk off the Croisette as the big buying ballers of Cannes 2008, Sony Pictures Classics set a number of deals in the last days of the fest, including distribution pacts for the Israeli animated doc Waltz With Bashir, Lorna’s Silence by the Dardenne brothers, and James Toback’s Tyson. Meanwhile, the people at Magnolia have all but resigned themselves to distributing What Just Happened?, the Barry Levinson Cannes closer which they produced through 2929 Entertainment, but have been attempting to unload on another distributor since Sundance. Ewan McGregor will play Gore Vidal’s dad/Amelia Earhart’s lover in Amelia, a biopic set to star Hillary Swank as the famous missing aviatrix. Blah blah blah Indiana Jones, blah blah blah $311 million worldwide. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2008/5/27/29997.aspx Post By: SpoutBlog
Post To: SpoutBlog on spout.com
Post Date: 5/27/2008 10:01:11 AM
Body: Not content to let IFC walk off the Croisette as the big buying ballers of Cannes 2008, Sony Pictures Classics set a number of deals in the last days of the fest, including distribution pacts for the Israeli animated doc Waltz With Bashir, Lorna’s Silence by the Dardenne brothers, and James Toback’s Tyson. Meanwhile, the people at Magnolia have all but resigned themselves to distributing What Just Happened?, the Barry Levinson Cannes closer which they produced through 2929 Entertainment, but have been attempting to unload on another distributor since Sundance. Ewan McGregor will play Gore Vidal’s dad/Amelia Earhart’s lover in Amelia, a biopic set to star Hillary Swank as the famous missing aviatrix. Blah blah blah Indiana Jones, blah blah blah $311 million worldwide. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog
]]>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:01:11 GMTSpoutBlogSpoutBlog on spout.com5/27/2008 10:01:11 AM Not content to let IFC walk off the Croisette as the big buying ballers of Cannes 2008, Sony Pictures Classics set a number of deals in the last days of the fest, including distribution pacts for the Israeli animated doc Waltz With Bashir, Lorna’s Silence by the Dardenne brothers, and James Toback’s Tyson. Meanwhile, the people at Magnolia have all but resigned themselves to distributing What Just Happened?, the Barry Levinson Cannes closer which they produced through 2929 Entertainment, but have been attempting to unload on another distributor since Sundance. Ewan McGregor will play Gore Vidal’s dad/Amelia Earhart’s lover in Amelia, a biopic set to star Hillary Swank as the famous missing aviatrix. Blah blah blah Indiana Jones, blah blah blah $311 million worldwide. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/boxing/MemberTagFilms.aspxboxing
Number of films tagged: 746

Number of people who tagged: 31

Number of times used: 55

]]>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:04:16 GMT7463155Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/Sundance/MemberTagFilms.aspxSundance
Number of films tagged: 154

Number of people who tagged: 24

Number of times used: 161

]]>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:57:41 GMT15424161Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/controversy/MemberTagFilms.aspxcontroversy
Number of films tagged: 271

Number of people who tagged: 5

Number of times used: 9

]]>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:02:40 GMT27159Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/sundance-2009/MemberTagFilms.aspxsundance-2009
Number of films tagged: 117

Number of people who tagged: 1

Number of times used: 117

]]>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:32:37 GMT1171117Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/the-sundance-film-festival/MemberTagFilms.aspxthe-sundance-film-festival
Number of films tagged: 117

Number of people who tagged: 1

Number of times used: 117

]]>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:32:37 GMT1171117Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/heavyweight/MemberTagFilms.aspxheavyweight
Number of films tagged: 88

Number of people who tagged: 0

Number of times used: 0

]]>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:02:22 GMT8800Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/sexualassault/MemberTagFilms.aspxsexualassault
Number of films tagged: 42

Number of people who tagged: 0

Number of times used: 0

]]>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:02:17 GMT4200Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/sportsstar/MemberTagFilms.aspxsportsstar
Number of films tagged: 204

Number of people who tagged: 0

Number of times used: 0

]]>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:01:21 GMT20400Tag