list http://www.spout.com/ Recent community activity around Predator on Spout Copyright 2005-9 Spout, LLC Spout RSS http://www.spout.com/images/SpoutLogoRSS.jpg http://www.spout.com/ 136 30 http://www.spout.com/films/Predator/27258/default.aspx Title: Predator
Year: 1987
Director: John McTiernan
Plot: Dutch (Arnold Schwarzenegger) has a code of honor which he will not violate, even when his life depends on it. Paradoxically, his code of honor gives him the backbone to survive as a military special forces operative when he is sent on a covert mission to rescue another group which was sent in to assist some nefarious U.S. government plan in a Latin American country. Once there, he encounters an old army buddy (Carl Weathers) who has gotten too deep in the CIA's good graces for Dutch's comfort. When he and his team go into the jungle to rescue the others, they get involved in a pitched battle with local guerillas, but they are more than capable of besting these vicious fighters. However, not long after that, they encounter signs that the equally capable men they were sent to rescue were all killed unawares and in an unusually gruesome fashion. Given their training, it should have been impossible for anyone to best all of these commando warriors. Soon, the men from Dutch's own team get picked off one by one, as they grow aware that they are up against something uncanny, not of this world, something that is hunting them for sport. Why? Because their skills make them worthy opponents for the perfectly camouflaged Predator. This carefully paced action movie was given poor reviews by many movie critics, but was sufficiently satisfying for its (largely male) audiences that a successful sequel (Predator 2) was released in 1990. ~ Clarke Fountain, All Movie Guide
Times Tagged: 35
Number of Lists: 65
Number of blog posts: 6
Number of discussion threads: 8
SpoutRating: 3
]]>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:43:58 GMTPredator1987John McTiernanDutch (<a href="/players/P___110501/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Arnold Schwarzenegger</a>) has a code of honor which he will not violate, even when his life depends on it. Paradoxically, his code of honor gives him the backbone to survive as a military special forces operative when he is sent on a covert mission to rescue another group which was sent in to assist some nefarious U.S. government plan in a Latin American country. Once there, he encounters an old army buddy (<a href="/players/P____75121/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Carl Weathers</a>) who has gotten too deep in the CIA's good graces for Dutch's comfort. When he and his team go into the jungle to rescue the others, they get involved in a pitched battle with local guerillas, but they are more than capable of besting these vicious fighters. However, not long after that, they encounter signs that the equally capable men they were sent to rescue were all killed unawares and in an unusually gruesome fashion. Given their training, it should have been impossible for anyone to best all of these commando warriors. Soon, the men from Dutch's own team get picked off one by one, as they grow aware that they are up against something uncanny, not of this world, something that is hunting them for sport. Why? Because their skills make them worthy opponents for the perfectly camouflaged Predator. This carefully paced action movie was given poor reviews by many movie critics, but was sufficiently satisfying for its (largely male) audiences that a successful sequel (<a href=/films/27259/default.aspx style='text-decoration:underline'>Predator 2</a>) was released in 1990. ~ Clarke Fountain, All Movie Guide35Tag Target (>10)65683http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u34485h5xfj.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/Predator/27258/default.aspxFilm http://www.spout.com/blogs/the_mow/archive/2009/4/29/41878.aspx Post By: The_MOW
Post To: The_MOW Blog
Post Date: 4/29/2009 12:05:55 PM
Body: "Dutch" (Arnold Schwarzenegger) leads a group of commandos into a dense Central American jungle to rescue hostages, which they learn have been slaughtered by their captors. They find the butchered remains of one of the ones sent in to rescue the hostages. They capture a female captor after destroying the encampment, and killing the majority of the captors and begin the journey back to where they are to meet with the helicopters that would pick them up to leave the area. It is then when they discover something is hunting them, something not from this Earth. First off, this movie is VERY bloody and graphic, and should not be viewed by young or impressionable children unless it is on broadcast television and edited for content and language. On the plus side, this movie is full of action. It also leaves little to no room for the audience to take a breath. One big problem, like most movies in this genre, is that the ones who don't survive have very little development. Some, more than others, got developed simply because they last longer in the film. In the special effects department, I am not a fan of the camouflage of the "Predator" (Kevin Peter Hall, who appears out of costume at the end of the movie in a cameo), to me it looked really bad. It could have added to the suspense if they didn't make it so visible to the audience. I am also not a fan of the heat-seeking visual effects for the shots meant to be from the "Predator's" point of view. The other visuals were pretty good. The jungle scenes were a bit cramped at times, which limited some camera angles, but gave you a sense of the characters feeling trapped. If you like action in your movies, then check out "Predator". But, in my opinion, this is not a science-fiction movie despite having an extra-terrestrial as the murderous creature. So, if you're a sci-fi fan, this movie might not be what you're looking for.
]]>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:05:55 GMTThe_MOWThe_MOW Blog4/29/2009 12:05:55 PM"Dutch" (Arnold Schwarzenegger) leads a group of commandos into a dense Central American jungle to rescue hostages, which they learn have been slaughtered by their captors. They find the butchered remains of one of the ones sent in to rescue the hostages. They capture a female captor after destroying the encampment, and killing the majority of the captors and begin the journey back to where they are to meet with the helicopters that would pick them up to leave the area. It is then when they discover something is hunting them, something not from this Earth. First off, this movie is VERY bloody and graphic, and should not be viewed by young or impressionable children unless it is on broadcast television and edited for content and language. On the plus side, this movie is full of action. It also leaves little to no room for the audience to take a breath. One big problem, like most movies in this genre, is that the ones who don't survive have very little development. Some, more than others, got developed simply because they last longer in the film. In the special effects department, I am not a fan of the camouflage of the "Predator" (Kevin Peter Hall, who appears out of costume at the end of the movie in a cameo), to me it looked really bad. It could have added to the suspense if they didn't make it so visible to the audience. I am also not a fan of the heat-seeking visual effects for the shots meant to be from the "Predator's" point of view. The other visuals were pretty good. The jungle scenes were a bit cramped at times, which limited some camera angles, but gave you a sense of the characters feeling trapped. If you like action in your movies, then check out "Predator". But, in my opinion, this is not a science-fiction movie despite having an extra-terrestrial as the murderous creature. So, if you're a sci-fi fan, this movie might not be what you're looking for. http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2008/12/12/38311.aspx Post By: SpoutBlog
Post To: SpoutBlog on spout.com
Post Date: 12/12/2008 3:00:58 PM
Body: After nearly four years of YouTube, I’ve had enough of abridged movies. You know, where a user edits together only the necessary plot points of a film for a video called “(movie title) in 60 seconds.” But I must make an exception for the British rap duo The Anomalies. Those guys (DJ Mayhem and MC Mouthmaster Murff, specifically) know how to do condensed classics right. By rapping the plot synopsis. Earlier this year, they released an abridged version of Predator with rhymed narration. It was pretty funny. Now, they’ve come out an even better rap for RoboCop. It’s longer, it has a steadier rhythm and it utilizes the film’s dialogue far better than the Predator rap did. Plus, it’s so comprehensive at 10 minutes that I wonder why the film ever needed to be 102 minutes. Seriously, are there any necessary scenes excluded? Too bad it takes 9 months for the guys to make something so brilliant. I’m anxious to see what movie they tackle next. Fortunately, I could watch this video over and over and over to tide me over. Check it out for yourself after the jump, and be warned that it features the film’s very NSFW language. [via Topless Robot] Originally posted on:SpoutBlog
]]>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:00:58 GMTSpoutBlogSpoutBlog on spout.com12/12/2008 3:00:58 PMAfter nearly four years of YouTube, I’ve had enough of abridged movies. You know, where a user edits together only the necessary plot points of a film for a video called “(movie title) in 60 seconds.” But I must make an exception for the British rap duo The Anomalies. Those guys (DJ Mayhem and MC Mouthmaster Murff, specifically) know how to do condensed classics right. By rapping the plot synopsis. Earlier this year, they released an abridged version of Predator with rhymed narration. It was pretty funny. Now, they’ve come out an even better rap for RoboCop. It’s longer, it has a steadier rhythm and it utilizes the film’s dialogue far better than the Predator rap did. Plus, it’s so comprehensive at 10 minutes that I wonder why the film ever needed to be 102 minutes. Seriously, are there any necessary scenes excluded? Too bad it takes 9 months for the guys to make something so brilliant. I’m anxious to see what movie they tackle next. Fortunately, I could watch this video over and over and over to tide me over. Check it out for yourself after the jump, and be warned that it features the film’s very NSFW language. [via Topless Robot] Originally posted on:SpoutBlog http://www.spout.com/blogs/jakestevens/archive/2008/11/6/37012.aspx Post By: JakeStevens
Post To: JakeStevens Blog
Post Date: 11/6/2008 1:16:11 AM
Body: In the same vein as the "Alien" franchise (which, ironically, the two film franchises would mesh with AVP and its sequel), this film sets up a man vs. alien premise which works extremely well. I've seen this film several times now (mostly thanks to cable television) and I've got to tell you, I enjoy it every time I see it. Schwarzenegger is in top form and director John McTiernan is able and keeps things moving. All in all, a great film for the action-lovers crowd. My one gripe is the cheesy "turn around and smile" ending credits, I definitely could have done without that :P.
]]>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 06:16:11 GMTJakeStevensJakeStevens Blog11/6/2008 1:16:11 AMIn the same vein as the "Alien" franchise (which, ironically, the two film franchises would mesh with AVP and its sequel), this film sets up a man vs. alien premise which works extremely well. I've seen this film several times now (mostly thanks to cable television) and I've got to tell you, I enjoy it every time I see it. Schwarzenegger is in top form and director John McTiernan is able and keeps things moving. All in all, a great film for the action-lovers crowd. My one gripe is the cheesy "turn around and smile" ending credits, I definitely could have done without that :P. http://www.spout.com/blogs/jj79/archive/2008/6/6/30689.aspx Post By: JJ79
Post To: JJ79 Blog
Post Date: 6/6/2008 3:09:54 PM
Body: Released: June 12, 1987Director: John McTiernan*****In the 1980's, there was one go-to guy for action spectacle: John McTiernan. With Predator, his second directing job (Die Hard is the third), he mimics Ridley Scott's 1979 Alien to such a large extent, one has to wonder if that the intention by writers Jim and John Thomas. It's not enough another small group of people are terrorized in a remote area with no hope of help, but the creature again comes from space. The difference? At least these men have weapons.Where Predator excels is in creating an action film with precious little dialogue to explain what is happening on screen. Most of what we get are raised eyebrows, slinking through the jungle or reconnaissance through the trees. No interest in understanding the Predator, to reason with it. Only to survive. It's a 1980's themed film without a doubt for that very reason. Shooting and asking questions later, if at all. But it also makes Predator a very different movie than Alien. Because of the relative lack of words, the appeal (or lackthereof) hinges on the actors and how well they inhabit their roles, not to mention the ability of McTiernan to capture every vital story point, creating tension without explanation. On all those counts, the film is a success. Buoyed by Arnold Schwarzenegger and Carl Weathers, each of the men has their own personality, stereotype or not. Even the relationship between the two leads is never fully explored-and it doesn't matter. A look of distrust or disgust between them is all that is needed. Ultimately, though, these are thinly drawn characters, nothing more than cannon fodder for the Predator.Onto McTiernan. He refuses to take the easy way out of filming, opting to get into the trenches with each of his cast members. Notice how close the camera gets to every actor at every single moment. There are precious few long or establishing shots, making the entire endeavor all the more intimate and confined. He relies on us seeing what each character sees to create the drama and uncertainty. The Predator also remains shrouded for a majority of the film, with the exception of one quick scene in broad daylight. It lends mystery to the man-killing creature, just as Scott did in his monster movie. (The history created for the Predator following this film-that of the Alien hunt-is subject to conjecture since a survivor says the Predator comes when the jungle gets hot, presumably every couple of years. There is no mention or notion of an Alien here, just an honorable Predator killing humans.)
]]>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:09:54 GMTJJ79JJ79 Blog6/6/2008 3:09:54 PMReleased: June 12, 1987Director: John McTiernan*****In the 1980's, there was one go-to guy for action spectacle: John McTiernan. With Predator, his second directing job (Die Hard is the third), he mimics Ridley Scott's 1979 Alien to such a large extent, one has to wonder if that the intention by writers Jim and John Thomas. It's not enough another small group of people are terrorized in a remote area with no hope of help, but the creature again comes from space. The difference? At least these men have weapons.Where Predator excels is in creating an action film with precious little dialogue to explain what is happening on screen. Most of what we get are raised eyebrows, slinking through the jungle or reconnaissance through the trees. No interest in understanding the Predator, to reason with it. Only to survive. It's a 1980's themed film without a doubt for that very reason. Shooting and asking questions later, if at all. But it also makes Predator a very different movie than Alien. Because of the relative lack of words, the appeal (or lackthereof) hinges on the actors and how well they inhabit their roles, not to mention the ability of McTiernan to capture every vital story point, creating tension without explanation. On all those counts, the film is a success. Buoyed by Arnold Schwarzenegger and Carl Weathers, each of the men has their own personality, stereotype or not. Even the relationship between the two leads is never fully explored-and it doesn't matter. A look of distrust or disgust between them is all that is needed. Ultimately, though, these are thinly drawn characters, nothing more than cannon fodder for the Predator.Onto McTiernan. He refuses to take the easy way out of filming, opting to get into the trenches with each of his cast members. Notice how close the camera gets to every actor at every single moment. There are precious few long or establishing shots, making the entire endeavor all the more intimate and confined. He relies on us seeing what each character sees to create the drama and uncertainty. The Predator also remains shrouded for a majority of the film, with the exception of one quick scene in broad daylight. It lends mystery to the man-killing creature, just as Scott did in his monster movie. (The history created for the Predator following this film-that of the Alien hunt-is subject to conjecture since a survivor says the Predator comes when the jungle gets hot, presumably every couple of years. There is no mention or notion of an Alien here, just an honorable Predator killing humans.) http://www.spout.com/groups/HORROR_MOVIES_101/Re_Re_Re_Top_31_Horror_films_of_the_past_31_years/222/23639/1/ShowPost.aspx Post By: Dr_Gor
Post To: HORROR MOVIES 101
Post Date: 1/8/2008 6:27:33 PM
Body: In the interest of science, and fairness, I will check out your list only after I have posted mine... might be interesting...
]]>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:27:33 GMTDr_GorHORROR MOVIES 1011/8/2008 6:27:33 PM In the interest of science, and fairness, I will check out your list only after I have posted mine... might be interesting... http://www.spout.com/blogs/windbreaker/archive/2007/11/11/21599.aspx Post By: Windbreaker
Post To: Windbreaker!
Post Date: 11/11/2007 3:35:19 PM
Body: Until the last 20 minutes, I was trying to figure out how Exit Wounds got its title. Some deep play on words like one of the bad guys introduced would be named John Exit? No, it's because of the nature of some key deaths at the end. You think you're in trouble when a pipe pokes you in the back? Not really... not until it plunges it's way through your mid-section and squirts out your belly button because you were falling from a helicopter onto a rooftop. Or a needle inserted into your throat? Not such a big deal when performed at a hospital to a cancer patient. But it does some damage when running face-first into a needle protruding from a wall and having it alter your hairline on the back of your neck.So what else is important about Exit Wounds? Definitely the star-power cameos of Bruce McGill and Bill Duke. These guys bring the combined credibility of Commando, Predator, Action Jackson, Bird on a Wire, Cliffhanger, Timecop, and many episodes of MacGyver.
]]>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 20:35:19 GMTWindbreakerWindbreaker!11/11/2007 3:35:19 PMUntil the last 20 minutes, I was trying to figure out how Exit Wounds got its title. Some deep play on words like one of the bad guys introduced would be named John Exit? No, it&#39;s because of the nature of some key deaths at the end. You think you&#39;re in trouble when a pipe pokes you in the back? Not really... not until it plunges it&#39;s way through your mid-section and squirts out your belly button because you were falling from a helicopter onto a rooftop. Or a needle inserted into your throat? Not such a big deal when performed at a hospital to a cancer patient. But it does some damage when running face-first into a needle protruding from a wall and having it alter your hairline on the back of your neck.So what else is important about Exit Wounds? Definitely the star-power cameos of Bruce McGill and Bill Duke. These guys bring the combined credibility of Commando, Predator, Action Jackson, Bird on a Wire, Cliffhanger, Timecop, and many episodes of MacGyver. http://www.spout.com/groups/Chicks_who_like_Flicks/Re_What_are_your_favorite_action_films_ladies/453/18775/1/ShowPost.aspx Post By: divinemsjunebug
Post To: Chicks who like Flicks
Post Date: 8/25/2007 9:25:12 PM
Body: Those are ALL great movies, I think I have just about every one of them in my collection. I also liked Predator, Predator vs. Alien (I know I'm weird), Aliens, True Lies, Mr. & Mrs. Smith...so many more.
]]>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:25:12 GMTdivinemsjunebugChicks who like Flicks8/25/2007 9:25:12 PMThose are ALL great movies, I think I have just about every one of them in my collection. I also liked Predator, Predator vs. Alien (I know I&#39;m weird), Aliens, True Lies, Mr. &amp; Mrs. Smith...so many more. http://www.spout.com/groups/Double_Feature/Re_Unlikely_Double_Features/426/17526/1/ShowPost.aspx Post By: joem18b
Post To: Double Feature
Post Date: 8/7/2007 2:08:34 PM
Body: [quote user="porcupine"] here's an example of a double feature that i think would bring out aspects of each film that wouldn't surface otherwise:Predator and Kindergarten Cop [/quote]Porcupine, if you put up a pair like that, you need to splain it. My first guess is that you had to help out in a kindergarten class one time and it totally freaked you out? (But no. If you were comparing kindergarten children to predators, like I hoped, you would have put the movies in the opposite order. So I guess this is like Fistful of Dollars and Bronco Billy or Terminator and Junior.)In which case I offer Going My Way and Bad Education.Perspectives on war:Letters from Iwo Jima and We Were SoldiersPaths of Glory and JarheadTimes change:Max and Der Untergang (Downfall)Pan's Labyrinth and L'Auberge Espagnole
]]>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:08:34 GMTjoem18bDouble Feature8/7/2007 2:08:34 PM[quote user="porcupine"] here&#39;s an example of a double feature that i think would bring out aspects of each film that wouldn&#39;t surface otherwise:Predator and Kindergarten Cop [/quote]Porcupine, if you put up a pair like that, you need to splain it. My first guess is that you had to help out in a kindergarten class one time and it totally freaked you out? (But no. If you were comparing kindergarten children to predators, like I hoped, you would have put the movies in the opposite order. So I guess this is like Fistful of Dollars and Bronco Billy or Terminator and Junior.)In which case I offer Going My Way and Bad Education.Perspectives on war:Letters from Iwo Jima and We Were SoldiersPaths of Glory and JarheadTimes change:Max and Der Untergang (Downfall)Pan&#39;s Labyrinth and L&#39;Auberge Espagnole http://www.spout.com/groups/Double_Feature/Re_Unlikely_Double_Features/426/17517/1/ShowPost.aspx Post By: porcupine
Post To: Double Feature
Post Date: 8/7/2007 12:34:20 PM
Body: The idea that the two movies somehow blend together is what i'm interested in. See Capote and Good Night on the same day might be a mistake, espeically if you're seeing them for the first time. i guess i'm interested in the home-brew double feature because it could be a way to get more out of the movies than you could get watching them separately, not less. kind of like combining flavors in a dish. just yesterday the guy working at the deli down the street told Paul and i to try honey on tuna. never would have thought of that.here's an example of a double feature that i think would bring out aspects of each film that wouldn't surface otherwise:Predator and Kindergarten Cop
]]>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:34:20 GMTporcupineDouble Feature8/7/2007 12:34:20 PMThe idea that the two movies somehow blend together is what i&#39;m interested in. See Capote and Good Night on the same day might be a mistake, espeically if you&#39;re seeing them for the first time. i guess i&#39;m interested in the home-brew double feature because it could be a way to get more out of the movies than you could get watching them separately, not less. kind of like combining flavors in a dish. just yesterday the guy working at the deli down the street told Paul and i to try honey on tuna. never would have thought of that.here&#39;s an example of a double feature that i think would bring out aspects of each film that wouldn&#39;t surface otherwise:Predator and Kindergarten Cop http://www.spout.com/groups/Top_5/Re_Top_5_Guilty_Pleasure_films/190/8443/1/ShowPost.aspx Post By: josephkuzma
Post To: Top 5
Post Date: 5/8/2007 11:32:23 PM
Body: My list is more guilty pleasures as actors, not films. I could probably make Top 5 lists out of each of these people and more... but here goes: 1. Sylvester Stallone: Rocky II, III & IV. I don't include the first because it's a great movie and I am not ashamed of liking it. I didn't include V because it's crap. And I haven't seen Rocky Balboa so I can't say one way or the other. Also Cop Land.2. Arnold Schwarzenegger's 80s (and early 90s) catalog defines guilty pleasure over and over. I hate that I like Twins, Terminator, The Running Man, Total Recall, Predator. However, I will proudly say that I like T2. Now if only T3 had been watchable...3. Keanu Reeves - Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure/Bogus Journey, Matrix: Reloaded/Revolutions (the first wasn't a guilty pleasure in my book), Point Break , Feeling Minnesota, My Own Private Idaho, The Devil's Advocate, The Watcher.I could almost combine 4 - 5 and some of them probably aren't guilty pleasures so much but I'm listing them anyways. Take them for what you will.4. John Candy - I can't help it. Uncle Buck, The Great Outdoors, Planes, Trains & Automobiles, Nothing But Trouble, Canadian Bacon? Brilliant.5. Dan Akroyd - Nothing But Trouble, Coneheads, Ghostbusters/Ghostbusters 2, Spies Like Us, Grosse Pointe Blank, Blues Brothers, Feeling Minnesota.
]]>Wed, 09 May 2007 03:32:23 GMTjosephkuzmaTop 55/8/2007 11:32:23 PMMy list is more guilty pleasures as actors, not films. I could probably make Top 5 lists out of each of these people and more... but here goes: 1. Sylvester Stallone: Rocky II, III &amp; IV. I don&#39;t include the first because it&#39;s a great movie and I am not ashamed of liking it. I didn&#39;t include V because it&#39;s crap. And I haven&#39;t seen Rocky Balboa so I can&#39;t say one way or the other. Also Cop Land.2. Arnold Schwarzenegger&#39;s 80s (and early 90s) catalog defines guilty pleasure over and over. I hate that I like Twins, Terminator, The Running Man, Total Recall, Predator. However, I will proudly say that I like T2. Now if only T3 had been watchable...3. Keanu Reeves - Bill &amp; Ted&#39;s Excellent Adventure/Bogus Journey, Matrix: Reloaded/Revolutions (the first wasn&#39;t a guilty pleasure in my book), Point Break , Feeling Minnesota, My Own Private Idaho, The Devil&#39;s Advocate, The Watcher.I could almost combine 4 - 5 and some of them probably aren&#39;t guilty pleasures so much but I&#39;m listing them anyways. Take them for what you will.4. John Candy - I can&#39;t help it. Uncle Buck, The Great Outdoors, Planes, Trains &amp; Automobiles, Nothing But Trouble, Canadian Bacon? Brilliant.5. Dan Akroyd - Nothing But Trouble, Coneheads, Ghostbusters/Ghostbusters 2, Spies Like Us, Grosse Pointe Blank, Blues Brothers, Feeling Minnesota. http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/Classic/MemberTagFilms.aspxClassic
Number of films tagged: 816

Number of people who tagged: 313

Number of times used: 1454

]]>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:30:46 GMT8163131454Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/revenge/MemberTagFilms.aspxrevenge
Number of films tagged: 5189

Number of people who tagged: 145

Number of times used: 489

]]>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:13:41 GMT5189145489Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/fantastic/MemberTagFilms.aspxfantastic
Number of films tagged: 106

Number of people who tagged: 74

Number of times used: 137

]]>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:19:21 GMT10674137Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/monster/MemberTagFilms.aspxmonster
Number of films tagged: 1143

Number of people who tagged: 41

Number of times used: 95

]]>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:22:02 GMT11434195Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/alien/MemberTagFilms.aspxalien
Number of films tagged: 81

Number of people who tagged: 38

Number of times used: 130

]]>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:16:33 GMT8138130Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/lies/MemberTagFilms.aspxlies
Number of films tagged: 187

Number of people who tagged: 32

Number of times used: 85

]]>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:57:25 GMT1873285Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/killing/MemberTagFilms.aspxkilling
Number of films tagged: 7191

Number of people who tagged: 31

Number of times used: 96

]]>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:01:54 GMT71913196Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/rescue/MemberTagFilms.aspxrescue
Number of films tagged: 4080

Number of people who tagged: 31

Number of times used: 142

]]>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:39:36 GMT408031142Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/military/MemberTagFilms.aspxmilitary
Number of films tagged: 1651

Number of people who tagged: 30

Number of times used: 96

]]>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:16:35 GMT16513096Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/jungle/MemberTagFilms.aspxjungle
Number of films tagged: 556

Number of people who tagged: 29

Number of times used: 51

]]>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:34:42 GMT5562951Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/army/MemberTagFilms.aspxarmy
Number of films tagged: 868

Number of people who tagged: 27

Number of times used: 77

]]>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:16:35 GMT8682777Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/community/MemberTagFilms.aspxcommunity
Number of films tagged: 743

Number of people who tagged: 21

Number of times used: 37

]]>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:02:59 GMT7432137Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/stalking/MemberTagFilms.aspxstalking
Number of films tagged: 490

Number of people who tagged: 18

Number of times used: 35

]]>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:13:40 GMT4901835Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/team/MemberTagFilms.aspxteam
Number of films tagged: 581

Number of people who tagged: 18

Number of times used: 33

]]>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:02:23 GMT5811833Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/attack/MemberTagFilms.aspxattack
Number of films tagged: 1035

Number of people who tagged: 17

Number of times used: 31

]]>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:41:19 GMT10351731Tag