list http://www.spout.com/ Recent community activity around Final Destination 3 on Spout Copyright 2005-9 Spout, LLC Spout RSS http://www.spout.com/images/SpoutLogoRSS.jpg http://www.spout.com/ 136 30 http://www.spout.com/films/Final_Destination_3/260193/default.aspx Title: Final Destination 3
Year: 2006
Director: James Wong
Plot: Death once again shows he's determined to get what he wants in this teen-centric thriller. Wendy (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) is a high school student hanging out with her friends at an amusement park one night when they decide to ride on the roller coaster. Wendy, however, has a premonition that something horrible will happen, and finds a way to save herself shortly before the ride goes off the rails, killing most of its passengers, including her boyfriend, Jason (Jesse Moss), and best friend, Carrie (Gina Holden). However, while Wendy may have survived the night at the park, she soon discovers that a malevolent spirit is following her and her classmates as they begin dying in strange and horrible ways. Wendy learns that a series of snapshots taken that evening give clues to the mayhem that followed her pals, and she teams up with Kevin (Ryan Merriman), Carrie's sweetheart, to try to warn the potential victims about the fates soon to befall them. Final Destination 3 was directed and co-scripted by James Wong, who also helmed the first two films in the franchise. ~ Mark Deming, All Movie Guide
Times Tagged: 16
Number of Lists: 28
Number of blog posts: 6
SpoutRating: 3
]]>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:31:17 GMTFinal Destination 32006James WongDeath once again shows he's determined to get what he wants in this teen-centric thriller. Wendy (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) is a high school student hanging out with her friends at an amusement park one night when they decide to ride on the roller coaster. Wendy, however, has a premonition that something horrible will happen, and finds a way to save herself shortly before the ride goes off the rails, killing most of its passengers, including her boyfriend, Jason (Jesse Moss), and best friend, Carrie (<a href="/players/P___431485/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Gina Holden</a>). However, while Wendy may have survived the night at the park, she soon discovers that a malevolent spirit is following her and her classmates as they begin dying in strange and horrible ways. Wendy learns that a series of snapshots taken that evening give clues to the mayhem that followed her pals, and she teams up with Kevin (Ryan Merriman), Carrie's sweetheart, to try to warn the potential victims about the fates soon to befall them. Final Destination 3 was directed and co-scripted by James Wong, who also helmed the first two films in the franchise. ~ Mark Deming, All Movie Guide16Tag Target (>10)2863http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t79527m5cty.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/Final_Destination_3/260193/default.aspxFilm http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2008/2/27/25652.aspx Post By: SpoutBlog
Post To: SpoutBlog on spout.com
Post Date: 2/27/2008 5:00:38 PM
Body: When I was a kid, I assumed all third installments in a horror series had to capitalize on the ability to turn the “3″ in the title into “3-D.” Now, looking back, I only really remember (and can only find proof of) Jaws 3-D, Friday the 13th 3-D and Amityville 3-D. But that isn’t stopping me from assuming Hollywood will once again abuse the gimmick. And judging by today’s news from Disney that the third installment of Step Up will be in 3D (and is tentatively titled simply, appropriately and marketably Step Up 3-D), the integrity of digital 3D — as the hope for the future of exhibition rather than as another passing fad — is on its way down. Of course, we’re in a big 3D trend right now, whether it continues as something more than that or not, and it at least makes sense for Hollywood to make decisions like this, and obviously it’s more logical as far as the title is concerned. I know that Toy Story 3 will be appropriately in 3D, too. Others will likely follow, and it’s better than the confusing mis-step that has been occurring lately with non-threequel sequels (and non-sequels). Upcoming sequels Shrek 4 and Final Destination 4 will also be released in digital 3D, but titularly that’s confusing (especially because of DreamWorks’ direct-to-video release Shrek 4-D, aka Shrek 3-D). Fortunately for the former, it currently has a less-confusing title of Shrek Goes Fourth. As for Final Destination, New Line had once intended for the third installment to be appropriately a 3D film and be titled Final Destination 3-D. So it is fair that the studio had previously had the idea. But what will it be called? (more…) Originally posted on:SpoutBlog
]]>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:00:38 GMTSpoutBlogSpoutBlog on spout.com2/27/2008 5:00:38 PM When I was a kid, I assumed all third installments in a horror series had to capitalize on the ability to turn the “3″ in the title into “3-D.” Now, looking back, I only really remember (and can only find proof of) Jaws 3-D, Friday the 13th 3-D and Amityville 3-D. But that isn’t stopping me from assuming Hollywood will once again abuse the gimmick. And judging by today’s news from Disney that the third installment of Step Up will be in 3D (and is tentatively titled simply, appropriately and marketably Step Up 3-D), the integrity of digital 3D — as the hope for the future of exhibition rather than as another passing fad — is on its way down. Of course, we’re in a big 3D trend right now, whether it continues as something more than that or not, and it at least makes sense for Hollywood to make decisions like this, and obviously it’s more logical as far as the title is concerned. I know that Toy Story 3 will be appropriately in 3D, too. Others will likely follow, and it’s better than the confusing mis-step that has been occurring lately with non-threequel sequels (and non-sequels). Upcoming sequels Shrek 4 and Final Destination 4 will also be released in digital 3D, but titularly that’s confusing (especially because of DreamWorks’ direct-to-video release Shrek 4-D, aka Shrek 3-D). Fortunately for the former, it currently has a less-confusing title of Shrek Goes Fourth. As for Final Destination, New Line had once intended for the third installment to be appropriately a 3D film and be titled Final Destination 3-D. So it is fair that the studio had previously had the idea. But what will it be called? (more…) Originally posted on:SpoutBlog http://www.spout.com/blogs/blessed/archive/2008/1/3/23482.aspx Post By: Blessed
Post To: Blessed Blog
Post Date: 1/3/2008 6:22:00 PM
Body: Great movie
]]>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:22:00 GMTBlessedBlessed Blog1/3/2008 6:22:00 PMGreat movie http://www.spout.com/blogs/filmafic06/archive/2007/9/30/20257.aspx Post By: filmafic06
Post To: filmafic06 Blog
Post Date: 9/30/2007 1:03:04 PM
Body: More malevolent inanimate objects, more gratuitous violence (and nudity), more unrealistic death scenes, so repetitive it's no longer shocking.
]]>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:03:04 GMTfilmafic06filmafic06 Blog9/30/2007 1:03:04 PMMore malevolent inanimate objects, more gratuitous violence (and nudity), more unrealistic death scenes, so repetitive it&#39;s no longer shocking. http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2007/7/24/15679.aspx Post By: SpoutBlog
Post To: SpoutBlog on spout.com
Post Date: 7/24/2007 10:00:37 AM
Body: Here are the facts: the Adam Sandler gay-sham com I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry won the weekend box office derby, pulling in about $35 million to Harry Potter and The What Kind Of Magical Scrape Have These Spooky Kids Conjured Up Now?!?’s $32 million. $35 million is a significant opening take, and it would not have been possible to rack up if Sandler’s base audience had been turned off by the pic’s pro-gay tolerance theme. Not only was the gay marriage thing not a problem–it might have been a plus. Just look at the numbers: Adam Sandler fans are more likely to rush out opening weekend see their guy pretend to pretend to be gay, than watch him in a serious film about post-9/11 ennui…by a factor of seven. And now, here’s the spin: Jeff Wells, LAist and the New York Times think Mr. Potter’s 58% weekend-to-weekend decline may have been the result of Harry Potter overload. LAist has the better quip: “My guess is that the release of Deathly Hallows cost Order of the Phoenix a second consecutive weekend crown (I still can’t believe that Voldermort turned out to be Harry’s father!).” I honestly can’t tell if Nikki Finke is being sarcastic when she writes, “There’d been speculation whether the new Harry Potter book would cut into the franchise’s movie ticket sales. Nah!” I can tell you that she definitely loses points for using the term “fivequel.” Meanwhile, Box Office Mojo couldn’t really care less about gay marriage vs. boy wizardry–for these datamasters, it’s all about Hairspray. Brandon Gray devotes the opening four paragraphs of a 7-graph writeup to the musical, which broke records for its genre. Gray notes that even adjusting for inflation, Hairspray’s $28 million opening easily beat the record for the best musical opening weekend ever previously held by The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas. And it’s not just good news for song-and-dance lovers–New Line needed this hit. “It marks New Line’s first $20 million-plus launch since Wedding Crashers two years ago and breaks the distributor’s losing streak that had persisted since Final Destination 3 in February 2006.” More spin: Transformers is still doing okay — Comics2Film A victory for homophobia? — Lou Lemenick …or one for Jessica Biel’s butt? –Obsessed with Film Originally posted on:Spoutblog
]]>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:00:37 GMTSpoutBlogSpoutBlog on spout.com7/24/2007 10:00:37 AMHere are the facts: the Adam Sandler gay-sham com I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry won the weekend box office derby, pulling in about $35 million to Harry Potter and The What Kind Of Magical Scrape Have These Spooky Kids Conjured Up Now?!?’s $32 million. $35 million is a significant opening take, and it would not have been possible to rack up if Sandler’s base audience had been turned off by the pic’s pro-gay tolerance theme. Not only was the gay marriage thing not a problem–it might have been a plus. Just look at the numbers: Adam Sandler fans are more likely to rush out opening weekend see their guy pretend to pretend to be gay, than watch him in a serious film about post-9/11 ennui…by a factor of seven. And now, here’s the spin: Jeff Wells, LAist and the New York Times think Mr. Potter’s 58% weekend-to-weekend decline may have been the result of Harry Potter overload. LAist has the better quip: “My guess is that the release of Deathly Hallows cost Order of the Phoenix a second consecutive weekend crown (I still can’t believe that Voldermort turned out to be Harry’s father!).” I honestly can’t tell if Nikki Finke is being sarcastic when she writes, “There’d been speculation whether the new Harry Potter book would cut into the franchise’s movie ticket sales. Nah!” I can tell you that she definitely loses points for using the term “fivequel.” Meanwhile, Box Office Mojo couldn’t really care less about gay marriage vs. boy wizardry–for these datamasters, it’s all about Hairspray. Brandon Gray devotes the opening four paragraphs of a 7-graph writeup to the musical, which broke records for its genre. Gray notes that even adjusting for inflation, Hairspray’s $28 million opening easily beat the record for the best musical opening weekend ever previously held by The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas. And it’s not just good news for song-and-dance lovers–New Line needed this hit. “It marks New Line’s first $20 million-plus launch since Wedding Crashers two years ago and breaks the distributor’s losing streak that had persisted since Final Destination 3 in February 2006.” More spin: Transformers is still doing okay — Comics2Film A victory for homophobia? — Lou Lemenick …or one for Jessica Biel’s butt? –Obsessed with Film Originally posted on:Spoutblog http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2007/7/23/15618.aspx Post By: SpoutBlog
Post To: SpoutBlog on spout.com
Post Date: 7/23/2007 11:56:42 AM
Body: Here are the facts: the Adam Sandler gay-sham com I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry won the weekend box office derby, pulling in about $35 million to Harry Potter and The What Kind Of Magical Scrape Have These Spooky Kids Conjured Up Now?!?'s $32 million. $35 million is a significant opening take, and it would not have been possible to rack up if Sandler's base audience had been turned off by the pic's pro-gay tolerance theme. Not only was the gay marriage thing not a problem--it might have been a plus. Just look at the numbers: Adam Sandler fans are more likely to rush out opening weekend see their guy pretend to pretend to be gay, than watch him in a serious film about post-9/11 ennui...by a factor of seven. And now, here's the spin: Jeff Wells, LAist and the New York Times think Mr. Potter's 58% weekend-to-weekend decline may have been the result of Harry Potter overload. LAist has the better quip: "My guess is that the release of Deathly Hallows cost Order of the Phoenix a second consecutive weekend crown (I still can't believe that Voldermort turned out to be Harry's father!)." I honestly can't tell if Nikki Finke is being sarcastic when she writes, "There'd been speculation whether the new Harry Potter book would cut into the franchise's movie ticket sales. Nah!" I can tell you that she definitely loses points for using the term "fivequel." Meanwhile, Box Office Mojo couldn't really care less about gay marriage vs. boy wizardry--for these datamasters, it's all about Hairspray. Brandon Gray devotes the opening four paragraphs of a 7-graph writeup to the musical, which broke records for its genre. Gray notes that even adjusting for inflation, Hairspray's $28 million opening easily beat the record for the best musical opening weekend ever previously held by The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas. And it's not just good news for song-and-dance lovers--New Line needed this hit. "It marks New Line's first $20 million-plus launch since Wedding Crashers two years ago and breaks the distributor's losing streak that had persisted since Final Destination 3 in February 2006." More spin: Transformers is still doing okay -- Comics2Film A victory for homophobia? -- Lou Lemenick ...or one for Jessica Biel's butt? --Obsessed with Film Originally posted on:SpoutBlog
]]>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:56:42 GMTSpoutBlogSpoutBlog on spout.com7/23/2007 11:56:42 AMHere are the facts: the Adam Sandler gay-sham com I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry won the weekend box office derby, pulling in about $35 million to Harry Potter and The What Kind Of Magical Scrape Have These Spooky Kids Conjured Up Now?!?'s $32 million. $35 million is a significant opening take, and it would not have been possible to rack up if Sandler's base audience had been turned off by the pic's pro-gay tolerance theme. Not only was the gay marriage thing not a problem--it might have been a plus. Just look at the numbers: Adam Sandler fans are more likely to rush out opening weekend see their guy pretend to pretend to be gay, than watch him in a serious film about post-9/11 ennui...by a factor of seven. And now, here's the spin: Jeff Wells, LAist and the New York Times think Mr. Potter's 58% weekend-to-weekend decline may have been the result of Harry Potter overload. LAist has the better quip: "My guess is that the release of Deathly Hallows cost Order of the Phoenix a second consecutive weekend crown (I still can't believe that Voldermort turned out to be Harry's father!)." I honestly can't tell if Nikki Finke is being sarcastic when she writes, "There'd been speculation whether the new Harry Potter book would cut into the franchise's movie ticket sales. Nah!" I can tell you that she definitely loses points for using the term "fivequel." Meanwhile, Box Office Mojo couldn't really care less about gay marriage vs. boy wizardry--for these datamasters, it's all about Hairspray. Brandon Gray devotes the opening four paragraphs of a 7-graph writeup to the musical, which broke records for its genre. Gray notes that even adjusting for inflation, Hairspray's $28 million opening easily beat the record for the best musical opening weekend ever previously held by The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas. And it's not just good news for song-and-dance lovers--New Line needed this hit. "It marks New Line's first $20 million-plus launch since Wedding Crashers two years ago and breaks the distributor's losing streak that had persisted since Final Destination 3 in February 2006." More spin: Transformers is still doing okay -- Comics2Film A victory for homophobia? -- Lou Lemenick ...or one for Jessica Biel's butt? --Obsessed with Film Originally posted on:SpoutBlog http://www.spout.com/blogs/malvin-r/archive/2007/2/24/5756.aspx Post By: malvin-r
Post To: malvin-r Blog
Post Date: 2/24/2007 3:35:17 PM
Body: this is the best movie yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
]]>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:35:17 GMTmalvin-rmalvin-r Blog2/24/2007 3:35:17 PMthis is the best movie yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/murder/MemberTagFilms.aspxmurder
Number of films tagged: 8748

Number of people who tagged: 157

Number of times used: 830

]]>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:57:25 GMT8748157830Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/revenge/MemberTagFilms.aspxrevenge
Number of films tagged: 5189

Number of people who tagged: 145

Number of times used: 489

]]>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:13:41 GMT5189145489Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/death/MemberTagFilms.aspxdeath
Number of films tagged: 4306

Number of people who tagged: 140

Number of times used: 526

]]>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:27:13 GMT4306140526Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/disturbing/MemberTagFilms.aspxdisturbing
Number of films tagged: 283

Number of people who tagged: 119

Number of times used: 394

]]>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:55:54 GMT283119394Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/highschool/MemberTagFilms.aspxhighschool
Number of films tagged: 864

Number of people who tagged: 81

Number of times used: 291

]]>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:23:33 GMT86481291Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/blood/MemberTagFilms.aspxblood
Number of films tagged: 382

Number of people who tagged: 64

Number of times used: 155

]]>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:50:21 GMT38264155Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/nudity/MemberTagFilms.aspxnudity
Number of films tagged: 297

Number of people who tagged: 31

Number of times used: 99

]]>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:36:31 GMT2973199Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/pain/MemberTagFilms.aspxpain
Number of films tagged: 127

Number of people who tagged: 28

Number of times used: 69

]]>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:09:20 GMT1272869Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/accident/MemberTagFilms.aspxaccident
Number of films tagged: 1329

Number of people who tagged: 27

Number of times used: 62

]]>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:32:36 GMT13292762Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/massacre/MemberTagFilms.aspxmassacre
Number of films tagged: 277

Number of people who tagged: 21

Number of times used: 46

]]>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:55:55 GMT2772146Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/camera/MemberTagFilms.aspxcamera
Number of films tagged: 178

Number of people who tagged: 18

Number of times used: 30

]]>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:03:25 GMT1781830Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/carnival/MemberTagFilms.aspxcarnival
Number of films tagged: 372

Number of people who tagged: 15

Number of times used: 19

]]>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:03:15 GMT3721519Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/internet/MemberTagFilms.aspxinternet
Number of films tagged: 219

Number of people who tagged: 13

Number of times used: 29

]]>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:08:41 GMT2191329Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/bloodgutsandgorecom/MemberTagFilms.aspxbloodgutsandgorecom
Number of films tagged: 240

Number of people who tagged: 5

Number of times used: 283

]]>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:17:40 GMT2405283Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/clairvoyance/MemberTagFilms.aspxclairvoyance
Number of films tagged: 61

Number of people who tagged: 2

Number of times used: 2

]]>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:02:14 GMT6122Tag