﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:spout="http://www.spout.com/schemas/rss/core/2006" xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005">
  <channel>
    <cf:treatAs>list</cf:treatAs>
    <cf:listinfo>
      <cf:group element="type" label="Type" ns="http://www.spout.com/schemas/rss/core/2006" data-type="text" />
    </cf:listinfo>
    <title>Bad Lieutenant's Recent Activity - Spout</title>
    <link>http://www.spout.com/</link>
    <description>Recent community activity around Bad Lieutenant on Spout</description>
    <copyright>Copyright 2005-9 Spout, LLC</copyright>
    <generator>Spout RSS</generator>
    
    <item>
      <title>Film:Bad Lieutenant</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/films/Bad_Lieutenant/2188/default.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<table width='100%' style='font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><tr><td><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t15887bf6jy.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' /></td>
<td>
<strong>Title:</strong> Bad Lieutenant<br/>
<strong>Year:</strong> 1992<br/>
<strong>Director:</strong> Abel Ferrara<br/>
<strong>Plot:</strong> If police lieutenent <a href="/players/P____37381/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Harvey Keitel</a>'s life could get any more sordid, he could probably sell tickets. The least of his vices is gambling, which has gotten him in dutch with the mob. He abuses his body with drugs and his soul with hookers, and now he's turned to exploiting teenage girls for sex. Keitel is forced to reassess his life while investigating the rape of a nun. Director <a href="/players/P____89631/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Abel Ferrara</a> cowrote the screenplay with Zoe Lund, who as Zoe Tamerlis starred in Ferrara's cult classic Ms. 45. A soundtrack tune by rapper Schoolly D, which was included in the initial release of Bad Lieutenant, featured a sample from Led Zepplin which was used without permission; the song has since been excised from the soundtrack. ~ Hal Erickson, All Movie Guide<br/>
<strong>Times Tagged:</strong> 11<br/>
<strong>Number of Lists:</strong> 14<br/>
<strong>Number of blog posts:</strong> 13<br/>
<strong>SpoutRating:</strong> 3<br/>
</td></tr></table>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:15:49 GMT</pubDate><spout:Title>Bad Lieutenant</spout:Title><spout:Year>1992</spout:Year><spout:Director>Abel Ferrara</spout:Director><spout:Plot>If police lieutenent &lt;a href="/players/P____37381/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Harvey Keitel&lt;/a&gt;'s life could get any more sordid, he could probably sell tickets. The least of his vices is gambling, which has gotten him in dutch with the mob. He abuses his body with drugs and his soul with hookers, and now he's turned to exploiting teenage girls for sex. Keitel is forced to reassess his life while investigating the rape of a nun. Director &lt;a href="/players/P____89631/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'&gt;Abel Ferrara&lt;/a&gt; cowrote the screenplay with Zoe Lund, who as Zoe Tamerlis starred in Ferrara's cult classic Ms. 45. A soundtrack tune by rapper Schoolly D, which was included in the initial release of Bad Lieutenant, featured a sample from Led Zepplin which was used without permission; the song has since been excised from the soundtrack. ~ Hal Erickson, All Movie Guide</spout:Plot><spout:TimesTagged>11</spout:TimesTagged><spout:taglevel>Tag Target (&gt;10)</spout:taglevel><spout:Numberoflists>14</spout:Numberoflists><spout:NumberOfBlogPosts>13</spout:NumberOfBlogPosts><spout:SpoutRating>3</spout:SpoutRating><spout:FilmCoverURL>http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t15887bf6jy.jpg</spout:FilmCoverURL><spout:SpoutFilmDetailURL>http://www.spout.com/films/Bad_Lieutenant/2188/default.aspx</spout:SpoutFilmDetailURL><spout:type>Film</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: director introductions - Abel Ferrara - Bad Lieutenant</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/risselada/archive/2009/10/6/44133.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t15887bf6jy.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/5353/default.aspx'>Risselada</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/risselada/default.aspx'>Risselada Blog</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 10/6/2009 2:24:41 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> This is the first film I've seen by director Abel Ferrara Bad Lieutenant A film where you MUST sit through all of the sin and degradation to the end of the film before you make any judgments.  It's not an extremely advanced or complex view of redemption, but I found it to be a powerful one. *SPOILERS*  After watching this guy consumed by every kind of vice and self humiliation which we know must have taken a lifetime to get to, we get to watch his utter confusion and anger at a nun and her forgiveness.  The moment of him screaming and swearing at the silent image of Jesus standing in front of him in the church aisle, pleasing with him for help and swearing at him for his apparent lack of answer.  We see slowly afterwards that the answers of such moments are not always an open and verbal response, but can be just as compelling and clear. I'm a sucker for these films where there's some good deed, divine revelation, or realization just before a characters death.  Check out the films of Robert Bresson. I have a coworker who is convinced of Ferrara's genius.  Although some of his other titles sound a lot more schlocky, I'm ready to see if they can surprise me as much as this film. Rating: 9/10<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:24:41 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>Risselada</spout:postby><spout:postto>Risselada Blog</spout:postto><spout:postdate>10/6/2009 2:24:41 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>This is the first film I've seen by director Abel Ferrara Bad Lieutenant A film where you MUST sit through all of the sin and degradation to the end of the film before you make any judgments.  It's not an extremely advanced or complex view of redemption, but I found it to be a powerful one. *SPOILERS*  After watching this guy consumed by every kind of vice and self humiliation which we know must have taken a lifetime to get to, we get to watch his utter confusion and anger at a nun and her forgiveness.  The moment of him screaming and swearing at the silent image of Jesus standing in front of him in the church aisle, pleasing with him for help and swearing at him for his apparent lack of answer.  We see slowly afterwards that the answers of such moments are not always an open and verbal response, but can be just as compelling and clear. I'm a sucker for these films where there's some good deed, divine revelation, or realization just before a characters death.  Check out the films of Robert Bresson. I have a coworker who is convinced of Ferrara's genius.  Although some of his other titles sound a lot more schlocky, I'm ready to see if they can surprise me as much as this film. Rating: 9/10</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: Re:The Worst movies I have seen this past year.</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/groups/Worst_Movie_Ever/Re_The_Worst_movies_I_have_seen_this_past_year/104/43782/1/ShowPost.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t15887bf6jy.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/5353/default.aspx'>Risselada</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/groups/Worst_Movie_Ever/104/discussions.aspx'>Worst Movie Ever</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 9/3/2009 1:03:51 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> [quote user="whoo69"] You said it, esp. with Clockwork Orange.  I could not STAND that piece of shit they call a "film."  What's the appeal?  It's idiotic.  I couldn't even watch the whole thing.  I watched like 20 minutes of it before I kept fast-fowarding, trying to find a really good part, and then I just got frustrated and sent it back to Netflix.  It seems to me the people who act like Clockwork Orange or Requiem are "classics" are morons or sheep or both, just trying to fit in and sound smart. But I don't know why you said Dirty Harry.  That was a pretty sweet movie.  Vigilante justice kicks ass!  I'd like to kill all the guilty inmates on death row and get it over with, instead of endless appeals and all that bullshit.  Even if action isn't your thing, how can you say Dirty Harry is "one of the worst" you've seen? I had absolutely no desire to see The Condemned.  None of the WWE films appeal to me.  See No Evil looked stupid, too.  It'd at least be a REAL horror film if they made it when Kane still wore his mask.  Behind Enemy Lines: Colombia sounds absolutely fucking horrible.  Who the fuck would watch such a shitty movie??  Why Colombia?  I don't give a fuck about the goddamn FARC.  Fuck em and fuck Colombia!  I'm totally against the DEA's Plan Colombia nonsense. And what did Mr. Kennedy, one of the worst wrestlers of all time, do to deserve his own movie?  I thought WWE Films only gives movies to big wrestling stars in the co.  Or at least they should.  2001: A Space Oddysey just sounds ridiculous.  I've no desire to see it anytime soon.  Stanley Kubrick is kind of a hit-and-miss director.  Some of his movies, like Dr. Strangelove and Fullmetal Jacket, are ok, but others like Clockwork Orange are a bunch of bullshit.  Plus, Kubrick's films just don't take things seriously enough for me, oftentimes.  He treats filmmaking as one big joke.  I'm glad the fucker's dead.  I mean, why is the year 2001 in the title of his movie, esp. since he made it like in the 80s, didn't he?  Was he expecting 2001 to be a GREAT year for space exploration?  [/quote] Wow, you've got a lot of anger in ya! I would be interested in discussing A Clockwork Orange with you, but it's not really fair to judge a movie that you have only seen 20 minutes of.  ESPECIALLY A Clockwork Orange!!!  There really is a reason for what you see at the beginning.  I have seen plenty of movies that I didn't like for most of it until the very end.  Sometimes you have to sit through a lot of crap to get to the great stuff at the end, and then you find out that the stuff wasn't crap.  Because when you view it through the context of the whole film, it was essential. For instance, last night I just saw Bad Lieutenant.  I liked the movie pretty well, but after a while felt like it was getting a little tedious.  Then the movie took a direction that I totally didn't expect and I reevaluated what I just had seen in a totally new light. A good film is a complete work from beginning to end and cannot just be watched in parts, thus I would never stop a move in the middle or judge it until I had watched it in it's entirety.<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:03:51 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>Risselada</spout:postby><spout:postto>Worst Movie Ever</spout:postto><spout:postdate>9/3/2009 1:03:51 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>[quote user="whoo69"] You said it, esp. with Clockwork Orange.  I could not STAND that piece of shit they call a "film."  What's the appeal?  It's idiotic.  I couldn't even watch the whole thing.  I watched like 20 minutes of it before I kept fast-fowarding, trying to find a really good part, and then I just got frustrated and sent it back to Netflix.  It seems to me the people who act like Clockwork Orange or Requiem are "classics" are morons or sheep or both, just trying to fit in and sound smart. But I don't know why you said Dirty Harry.  That was a pretty sweet movie.  Vigilante justice kicks ass!  I'd like to kill all the guilty inmates on death row and get it over with, instead of endless appeals and all that bullshit.  Even if action isn't your thing, how can you say Dirty Harry is "one of the worst" you've seen? I had absolutely no desire to see The Condemned.  None of the WWE films appeal to me.  See No Evil looked stupid, too.  It'd at least be a REAL horror film if they made it when Kane still wore his mask.  Behind Enemy Lines: Colombia sounds absolutely fucking horrible.  Who the fuck would watch such a shitty movie??  Why Colombia?  I don't give a fuck about the goddamn FARC.  Fuck em and fuck Colombia!  I'm totally against the DEA's Plan Colombia nonsense. And what did Mr. Kennedy, one of the worst wrestlers of all time, do to deserve his own movie?  I thought WWE Films only gives movies to big wrestling stars in the co.  Or at least they should.  2001: A Space Oddysey just sounds ridiculous.  I've no desire to see it anytime soon.  Stanley Kubrick is kind of a hit-and-miss director.  Some of his movies, like Dr. Strangelove and Fullmetal Jacket, are ok, but others like Clockwork Orange are a bunch of bullshit.  Plus, Kubrick's films just don't take things seriously enough for me, oftentimes.  He treats filmmaking as one big joke.  I'm glad the fucker's dead.  I mean, why is the year 2001 in the title of his movie, esp. since he made it like in the 80s, didn't he?  Was he expecting 2001 to be a GREAT year for space exploration?  [/quote] Wow, you've got a lot of anger in ya! I would be interested in discussing A Clockwork Orange with you, but it's not really fair to judge a movie that you have only seen 20 minutes of.  ESPECIALLY A Clockwork Orange!!!  There really is a reason for what you see at the beginning.  I have seen plenty of movies that I didn't like for most of it until the very end.  Sometimes you have to sit through a lot of crap to get to the great stuff at the end, and then you find out that the stuff wasn't crap.  Because when you view it through the context of the whole film, it was essential. For instance, last night I just saw Bad Lieutenant.  I liked the movie pretty well, but after a while felt like it was getting a little tedious.  Then the movie took a direction that I totally didn't expect and I reevaluated what I just had seen in a totally new light. A good film is a complete work from beginning to end and cannot just be watched in parts, thus I would never stop a move in the middle or judge it until I had watched it in it's entirety.</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: Nic Cage Back to Insane Work as Usual. Today in Film Bloggery 03/27/09</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2009/3/27/41301.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t15887bf6jy.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/9325/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog on spout.com</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 3/27/2009 5:00:55 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> This has been quite the week for me to wish Nicolas Cage still made good movies. Besides crying over the fact that his latest sci-fi action thriller involving disaster prophesy was #1 at the box office despite being panned by critics, some of my unrelated experiences over the past seven days have coincidentally included the following: watching Wild at Heart for the first time; learning from locals that Moonstruck was partly shot in my neighborhood; discussing, at a party, not only the merits of The Rock, but also its qualifications for inclusion in the Criterion catalog. I’m now thinking I should stay home tonight and watch a marathon of Raising Arizona, Face/Off and Adaptation.
Or, maybe I can just lay back and think about how Disney’s The Sorcerer’s Apprentice is going to be Cage’s return to quality. I know, I know, those of you who didn’t stop reading at my profession of love for The Rock are now wondering if I’m crazy. “Certainly this movie is going to be terrible,” you’re saying to yourself (as you plan your derisive comment). And besides, Herzog’s Bad Lieutenant “remake” shall be his next good film. Well, maybe, but after seeing the new production photos from Apprentice circulating the net (originating at JustJared), I’m prophesizing that the Fantasia-inspired film will be the Moonstruck to Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans‘ Raising Arizona, or the Face/Off to Lieutenant’s Con Air, or the Adaptation to Lieutenant’s Windtalkers. Perhaps I am soiling my reputation by confessing my overextending appreciation of Cage’s career, but you have to respect a guy who allows himself to look and be so ridiculous for his art.
The rest of the film blogosphere’s responses to the photos after the jump:


As usual, Dan Hopper at Best Week Ever has the best jokes: “…on the set of his new movie Something Surely Worth Seing Dangerous. He’s about to change out of his normal clothes and hairpiece and into his costume (zuhhhh-zinggg!!!).”
Pajiba headlines that this could be Cage’s “Most Hilarious Role Ever.” Let’s hope so.
Mark at I Watch Stuff compares the look to WWE wrestler The Undertaker and Sega video game character Chakan: The Forever Man.
Cinematical’s Elizabeth Rappe sees Cage instead as “apparently ripping his look off Hugh Jackman’s Gabriel Van Helsing” in the site’s “LOL of the Day” post. “The only thing that has me curious about this movie,” she adds, “is how Baruchel ends up as his apprentice. Because if I was approached by a ‘magician’ who looked like that, I’d run screaming the other way.”
Rob Bricken at Topless Robot agrees with Rappe’s comparison but seems a tad more hopeful of the film:
I admit, despite my utter hatred and fear of Jerry Bruckheimer movies, I did really enjoy the first Pirates of the Carribbean movie. And I love Fantasia, so I’ll — very regretfully — be giving this a shot. But the fact that Cage is dressed exactly like Hugh Jackman in Van Helsing means I probably won’t be watching sober.

Jeremy at We Are Movie Geeks also agrees: “Looks like Cage is trying out for ‘Van Helsing 2.’”
Mike Sampson at JoBlo.com sees Cage more as a “geriatric Criss Angel” and tells us how to respect this film:
if I hear any “raping my childhood” crap, I’m gonna reach through the computer screen and smack you across the head. This movie has nothing to do with the Mickey Mouse cartoon. The story is a German poem written by Goethe. Get that in your head now and you’ll be OK.

Somehow Josh Radde at Film School Rejects thinks Cage “appears to be doing his best Kris Kristofferson,” before once again concentrating on the actor’s hair:
Add this hairdo to the pretty amazing collection of Cage ‘Dos so far. In fact, Rotten Tomatoes created a game linking a pic of his hair to the movie it appears in and it’ll surprise you how many twisted coifs this man has sported over the years.

The typically optimistic Alex Billington of FirstShowing.net argues on Cage’s behalf:
I would say, don’t be so quick to judge these and Cage’s new hairdo and leather outfit, but I’m sure you’ve already made up your mind. I don’t know if these will help Cage any more, or potentially ruin him entirely again, but honestly, I’m still looking forward to The Sorcerer’s Apprentice.

And Sean at FilmDrunk also defends the powers of Cage, at least as box office gold: “In all seriousness though, you can make fun of Nicolas Cage all you want, but if the past has taught us anything it is that America loves his movies. National Treasure + Harry Potter = $$$.”

In additional Nic Cage-is-nuts bloggery from today:

Graeme McMillan at io9 shares the actor’s recent statements regarding his preference for science fiction, abandonment of gratuitous violence and overall desire to go more “into the abstract”:
Does this mean that Cage sees science fiction as a gateway drug to take audiences into indulgently abstract movies? I hope so, if only because I’d love to see just how abstract the man behind Ghost Rider, Bangkok Dangerous and Adaptation can get when he puts his mind to it.

 Originally posted on:SpoutBlog<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:00:55 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>SpoutBlog</spout:postby><spout:postto>SpoutBlog on spout.com</spout:postto><spout:postdate>3/27/2009 5:00:55 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>This has been quite the week for me to wish Nicolas Cage still made good movies. Besides crying over the fact that his latest sci-fi action thriller involving disaster prophesy was #1 at the box office despite being panned by critics, some of my unrelated experiences over the past seven days have coincidentally included the following: watching Wild at Heart for the first time; learning from locals that Moonstruck was partly shot in my neighborhood; discussing, at a party, not only the merits of The Rock, but also its qualifications for inclusion in the Criterion catalog. I’m now thinking I should stay home tonight and watch a marathon of Raising Arizona, Face/Off and Adaptation.
Or, maybe I can just lay back and think about how Disney’s The Sorcerer’s Apprentice is going to be Cage’s return to quality. I know, I know, those of you who didn’t stop reading at my profession of love for The Rock are now wondering if I’m crazy. “Certainly this movie is going to be terrible,” you’re saying to yourself (as you plan your derisive comment). And besides, Herzog’s Bad Lieutenant “remake” shall be his next good film. Well, maybe, but after seeing the new production photos from Apprentice circulating the net (originating at JustJared), I’m prophesizing that the Fantasia-inspired film will be the Moonstruck to Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans‘ Raising Arizona, or the Face/Off to Lieutenant’s Con Air, or the Adaptation to Lieutenant’s Windtalkers. Perhaps I am soiling my reputation by confessing my overextending appreciation of Cage’s career, but you have to respect a guy who allows himself to look and be so ridiculous for his art.
The rest of the film blogosphere’s responses to the photos after the jump:


As usual, Dan Hopper at Best Week Ever has the best jokes: “…on the set of his new movie Something Surely Worth Seing Dangerous. He’s about to change out of his normal clothes and hairpiece and into his costume (zuhhhh-zinggg!!!).”
Pajiba headlines that this could be Cage’s “Most Hilarious Role Ever.” Let’s hope so.
Mark at I Watch Stuff compares the look to WWE wrestler The Undertaker and Sega video game character Chakan: The Forever Man.
Cinematical’s Elizabeth Rappe sees Cage instead as “apparently ripping his look off Hugh Jackman’s Gabriel Van Helsing” in the site’s “LOL of the Day” post. “The only thing that has me curious about this movie,” she adds, “is how Baruchel ends up as his apprentice. Because if I was approached by a ‘magician’ who looked like that, I’d run screaming the other way.”
Rob Bricken at Topless Robot agrees with Rappe’s comparison but seems a tad more hopeful of the film:
I admit, despite my utter hatred and fear of Jerry Bruckheimer movies, I did really enjoy the first Pirates of the Carribbean movie. And I love Fantasia, so I’ll — very regretfully — be giving this a shot. But the fact that Cage is dressed exactly like Hugh Jackman in Van Helsing means I probably won’t be watching sober.

Jeremy at We Are Movie Geeks also agrees: “Looks like Cage is trying out for ‘Van Helsing 2.’”
Mike Sampson at JoBlo.com sees Cage more as a “geriatric Criss Angel” and tells us how to respect this film:
if I hear any “raping my childhood” crap, I’m gonna reach through the computer screen and smack you across the head. This movie has nothing to do with the Mickey Mouse cartoon. The story is a German poem written by Goethe. Get that in your head now and you’ll be OK.

Somehow Josh Radde at Film School Rejects thinks Cage “appears to be doing his best Kris Kristofferson,” before once again concentrating on the actor’s hair:
Add this hairdo to the pretty amazing collection of Cage ‘Dos so far. In fact, Rotten Tomatoes created a game linking a pic of his hair to the movie it appears in and it’ll surprise you how many twisted coifs this man has sported over the years.

The typically optimistic Alex Billington of FirstShowing.net argues on Cage’s behalf:
I would say, don’t be so quick to judge these and Cage’s new hairdo and leather outfit, but I’m sure you’ve already made up your mind. I don’t know if these will help Cage any more, or potentially ruin him entirely again, but honestly, I’m still looking forward to The Sorcerer’s Apprentice.

And Sean at FilmDrunk also defends the powers of Cage, at least as box office gold: “In all seriousness though, you can make fun of Nicolas Cage all you want, but if the past has taught us anything it is that America loves his movies. National Treasure + Harry Potter = $$$.”

In additional Nic Cage-is-nuts bloggery from today:

Graeme McMillan at io9 shares the actor’s recent statements regarding his preference for science fiction, abandonment of gratuitous violence and overall desire to go more “into the abstract”:
Does this mean that Cage sees science fiction as a gateway drug to take audiences into indulgently abstract movies? I hope so, if only because I’d love to see just how abstract the man behind Ghost Rider, Bangkok Dangerous and Adaptation can get when he puts his mind to it.

 Originally posted on:SpoutBlog</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: Bad Lieutenant Remake Still Sparking Baroque Threats From Ferrara</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/karina/archive/2008/10/15/36363.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t15887bf6jy.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/19702/default.aspx'>Karina</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/karina/default.aspx'>Karina on SpoutBlog</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 10/15/2008 1:01:30 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> Hell hath no fury like Abel Ferrara underpaid for his intellectual property. In an lengthy interview with Nick Dawson for the FILMMAKER Blog (pegged to the long-awaited US first run of Ferrara’s 2005 film Mary, which starts at Anthology Film Archives on Friday), the filmmaker has more complaints about the Nicolas Cage-starring, Werner Herzog-directed remake of Bad Lieutenant. The big problem seems to be that rather than offer Ferrara and his crew a big (or, biggish), Ed Pressman and the producers of the remake simply paid Ferrara “twenty grand” and shut him out. My favorite quotes from the interview, taken out of context:

“I can’t believe Nic Cage is trying to play that part. I mean, if the kid needed the money… It’s like Harvey Keitel said, “If the guy needed the money, if he came to us and said, ‘My career’s on the rocks,’ I’d cut him a break.”
“I’m not doing the prequel to Aguirre: the Wrath of God, OK? Let me put it that way.”
“Give us $8 million, we’ll come up with something. They give me twenty grand and say, “Go fuck yourself.” Gimme a break!”
“Ed Pressman sucks cock in hell, period. You can print that.”
There’s much, much more here. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:01:30 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>Karina</spout:postby><spout:postto>Karina on SpoutBlog</spout:postto><spout:postdate>10/15/2008 1:01:30 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>Hell hath no fury like Abel Ferrara underpaid for his intellectual property. In an lengthy interview with Nick Dawson for the FILMMAKER Blog (pegged to the long-awaited US first run of Ferrara’s 2005 film Mary, which starts at Anthology Film Archives on Friday), the filmmaker has more complaints about the Nicolas Cage-starring, Werner Herzog-directed remake of Bad Lieutenant. The big problem seems to be that rather than offer Ferrara and his crew a big (or, biggish), Ed Pressman and the producers of the remake simply paid Ferrara “twenty grand” and shut him out. My favorite quotes from the interview, taken out of context:

“I can’t believe Nic Cage is trying to play that part. I mean, if the kid needed the money… It’s like Harvey Keitel said, “If the guy needed the money, if he came to us and said, ‘My career’s on the rocks,’ I’d cut him a break.”
“I’m not doing the prequel to Aguirre: the Wrath of God, OK? Let me put it that way.”
“Give us $8 million, we’ll come up with something. They give me twenty grand and say, “Go fuck yourself.” Gimme a break!”
“Ed Pressman sucks cock in hell, period. You can print that.”
There’s much, much more here. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: Bad Lieutenant Remake Still Sparking Baroque Threats From Ferrara</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2008/10/15/36362.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t15887bf6jy.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/9325/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog on spout.com</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 10/15/2008 1:01:13 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> Hell hath no fury like Abel Ferrara underpaid for his intellectual property. In an lengthy interview with Nick Dawson for the FILMMAKER Blog (pegged to the long-awaited US first run of Ferrara’s 2005 film Mary, which starts at Anthology Film Archives on Friday), the filmmaker has more complaints about the Nicolas Cage-starring, Werner Herzog-directed remake of Bad Lieutenant. The big problem seems to be that rather than offer Ferrara and his crew a big (or, biggish), Ed Pressman and the producers of the remake simply paid Ferrara “twenty grand” and shut him out. My favorite quotes from the interview, taken out of context:

“I can’t believe Nic Cage is trying to play that part. I mean, if the kid needed the money… It’s like Harvey Keitel said, “If the guy needed the money, if he came to us and said, ‘My career’s on the rocks,’ I’d cut him a break.”
“I’m not doing the prequel to Aguirre: the Wrath of God, OK? Let me put it that way.”
“Give us $8 million, we’ll come up with something. They give me twenty grand and say, “Go fuck yourself.” Gimme a break!”
“Ed Pressman sucks cock in hell, period. You can print that.”
There’s much, much more here. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:01:13 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>SpoutBlog</spout:postby><spout:postto>SpoutBlog on spout.com</spout:postto><spout:postdate>10/15/2008 1:01:13 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>Hell hath no fury like Abel Ferrara underpaid for his intellectual property. In an lengthy interview with Nick Dawson for the FILMMAKER Blog (pegged to the long-awaited US first run of Ferrara’s 2005 film Mary, which starts at Anthology Film Archives on Friday), the filmmaker has more complaints about the Nicolas Cage-starring, Werner Herzog-directed remake of Bad Lieutenant. The big problem seems to be that rather than offer Ferrara and his crew a big (or, biggish), Ed Pressman and the producers of the remake simply paid Ferrara “twenty grand” and shut him out. My favorite quotes from the interview, taken out of context:

“I can’t believe Nic Cage is trying to play that part. I mean, if the kid needed the money… It’s like Harvey Keitel said, “If the guy needed the money, if he came to us and said, ‘My career’s on the rocks,’ I’d cut him a break.”
“I’m not doing the prequel to Aguirre: the Wrath of God, OK? Let me put it that way.”
“Give us $8 million, we’ll come up with something. They give me twenty grand and say, “Go fuck yourself.” Gimme a break!”
“Ed Pressman sucks cock in hell, period. You can print that.”
There’s much, much more here. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: Emma Stone in a Bathing Suit. Clip of the Day.</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/karina/archive/2008/10/7/36012.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t15887bf6jy.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/19702/default.aspx'>Karina</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/karina/default.aspx'>Karina on SpoutBlog</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 10/7/2008 3:01:35 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> 
Mean Magazine Presents Emma Stone from Mean Magazine on Vimeo.
Yesterday, MEAN Magazine released (or, sent out a press release about) their latest viral video, a “remake” of Bad Lieutenant starring SNL’s Bill Hader (”Eat your heart out, Werner Herzog,” reads the explanatory title card.) It’s okay. The best part is Hader’s final, weepy line, “I’m such a bad lieutenant!”
But more interesting is a MEAN video that I missed, the above “Emma Stone in Busby Berkeley 2.0.” With Stone (Jonah Hill’s love interest from Superbad) wearing a vintage bathing suit and staring coquettishly at the camera amidst digital kaleodoscopic chaos, it’s less Busby Berkely than a retro-porn spin on Esther Williams. But it’s pretty! Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:01:35 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>Karina</spout:postby><spout:postto>Karina on SpoutBlog</spout:postto><spout:postdate>10/7/2008 3:01:35 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>
Mean Magazine Presents Emma Stone from Mean Magazine on Vimeo.
Yesterday, MEAN Magazine released (or, sent out a press release about) their latest viral video, a “remake” of Bad Lieutenant starring SNL’s Bill Hader (”Eat your heart out, Werner Herzog,” reads the explanatory title card.) It’s okay. The best part is Hader’s final, weepy line, “I’m such a bad lieutenant!”
But more interesting is a MEAN video that I missed, the above “Emma Stone in Busby Berkeley 2.0.” With Stone (Jonah Hill’s love interest from Superbad) wearing a vintage bathing suit and staring coquettishly at the camera amidst digital kaleodoscopic chaos, it’s less Busby Berkely than a retro-porn spin on Esther Williams. But it’s pretty! Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: Emma Stone in a Bathing Suit. Clip of the Day.</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2008/10/7/36011.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t15887bf6jy.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/9325/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog on spout.com</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 10/7/2008 3:01:22 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> 
Mean Magazine Presents Emma Stone from Mean Magazine on Vimeo.
Yesterday, MEAN Magazine released (or, sent out a press release about) their latest viral video, a “remake” of Bad Lieutenant starring SNL’s Bill Hader (”Eat your heart out, Werner Herzog,” reads the explanatory title card.) It’s okay. The best part is Hader’s final, weepy line, “I’m such a bad lieutenant!”
But more interesting is a MEAN video that I missed, the above “Emma Stone in Busby Berkeley 2.0.” With Stone (Jonah Hill’s love interest from Superbad) wearing a vintage bathing suit and staring coquettishly at the camera amidst digital kaleodoscopic chaos, it’s less Busby Berkely than a retro-porn spin on Esther Williams. But it’s pretty! Originally posted on:SpoutBlog<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:01:22 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>SpoutBlog</spout:postby><spout:postto>SpoutBlog on spout.com</spout:postto><spout:postdate>10/7/2008 3:01:22 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>
Mean Magazine Presents Emma Stone from Mean Magazine on Vimeo.
Yesterday, MEAN Magazine released (or, sent out a press release about) their latest viral video, a “remake” of Bad Lieutenant starring SNL’s Bill Hader (”Eat your heart out, Werner Herzog,” reads the explanatory title card.) It’s okay. The best part is Hader’s final, weepy line, “I’m such a bad lieutenant!”
But more interesting is a MEAN video that I missed, the above “Emma Stone in Busby Berkeley 2.0.” With Stone (Jonah Hill’s love interest from Superbad) wearing a vintage bathing suit and staring coquettishly at the camera amidst digital kaleodoscopic chaos, it’s less Busby Berkely than a retro-porn spin on Esther Williams. But it’s pretty! Originally posted on:SpoutBlog</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: 10 Best Masturbation Scenes</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2008/8/1/33404.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t15887bf6jy.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/9325/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog on spout.com</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 8/1/2008 2:01:40 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> 
Andrew Sarris may be one of the most influential American film critics, but here’s a claim, located within his recent review of In Search of a Midnight Kiss, that may not hold up to some of his better-remembered theories: “Even when we confront 40-year-old virgins of either gender, movies refuse to show them compensating for the lack of a sexual partner. There is lasting shame involved in this spectacle.”
Not to ever, ever profess superiority over Sarris, but I’ve nonetheless compiled today’s list as a way of proving the man wrong. There are actually tons and tons of masturbation scenes found in non-porn movies, from the low brow to the high brow, from as indirect as the boy wizard playing with his wand under the covers in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban to as direct as the non-simulated masturbation in Michael Winterbottom’s 9 Songs and John Cameron Mitchell’s Shortbus (which would probably feature my #1 pick, from the sound of it, if I ever bothered to see it).
The following 10 films are some of the most memorable masturbation scenes, excluding any movies that might be considered examples of, in Sarris’ words, “the fringe exploitation genres” (I’ve even gone so far as to leave out mainstream horror like The Exorcist, considering it’s crucifix masturbation is far from the self-pleasuring moments Sarris is clearly interested in). Oh, and I’ve attempted to chart these films artistically from lowbrow to high.

10. Fast Times at Ridgemont High - Everybody remembers this scene because of the fantasy: Phoebe Cates emerges from a swimming pool in slow motion and removes her bikini top. And then Cates’ character walks in on the fantasizer, Judge Reinhold, for one of the most awkward moments in the history of awkward comedy. There’s been plenty of uncomfortable scenes of guys being caught in the act, including those moments in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Little Children and the most obvious masturbation movie, American Pie.
9. Léolo - Speaking of masturbating with food, not even pie-fucking beats the scene in this French-Canadian gem in which our young titular hero decides that his real father is a man who jerked off with a tomato, which later impregnated Léolo’s mother when she fell onto it. There are other less memorable masturbation scenes involving liver and chicken, too. Yum!
8. Spanking the Monkey - I always found the masturbation scenes in this movie so interesting because of how clean a “job” Ray Aibelli (Jeremy Davies) does with his personal business. I guess when you’re probably fantasizing about your mother, your mind is dirty enough, and so (seemingly) uncomfortably jacking off while sitting on a toilet is the best way to go. But couldn’t he just do it in the shower, like Kevin Spacey in American Beauty? I’m surprised that Sarris forgot about this one, since the title alone refers to the act.
7. The Squid and the Whale - If I have to select one movie involving a little kid masturbating (and writing this sentence has already got me feeling immensely ashamed), I pick this one over Todd Solondz’ Happiness (”I came!”), because while both scenes in question are quite disturbing, the one featuring the real-life son of Kevin Kline and Phoebe Cates jerking off in a library and then wiping his hands off on some books is at least a little amusing. A lot amusing if you take into account his mother’s appearance in movie #10 above. And if you need another little kid masturbating movie to choose from (I’m not judging), Babel has one too.
6. But I’m a Cheerleader - That Natasha Lyonne sure loves to masturbate! is a quick response to the realization that she pleasures herself in both this film and the earlier Slums of Beverly Hills. The reason that this movie is the more significant of the two is because the masturbation scene is very tastefully done, and yet in its original form, it controversially garnered the film an NC-17 rating, only because, as argued in the documentary This Film is Not Yet Rated, it deals with both homosexual desire and female sexuality. The main evidence: American Pie was released in the same year with an R rating.
5. Mulholland Drive - A less beautiful yet no less exploitive depiction of female masturbation occurs in David Lynch’s enigmatic film. Despite the fact that guys tend to enjoy watching a girl pleasure herself, only the most sadistic of men could be turned on by Naomi Watts crying and painfully attempting to get off.
4. Bad Lieutenant - When I first heard about the scene in which Harvey Keitel’s corrupt cop masturbates in front of two teens in a car he pulls over, I thought it had to be the most debauched scene in film history. Of course, I was only 15 when it came out and wasn’t yet familiar with a lot of cinema. By the time I actually bothered to watch the scene many years later, it was less shocking than I expected. Still, as far as depraved things a character can do in a movie — at least in theory — it’s up there, and it’s certainly one of the first scenes that comes to mind when I think of movie masturbation.
3. Amarcord - Oh, right, here’s another movie with little kids masturbating. But it’s a Fellini movie, so obviously it’s incomparable to the three referenced earlier. Although an amusing scene, featuring a bunch of kids masturbating in unison in a car, it’s much less disturbing, as it simply displays the act as a part of growing up.
2. Being There - “I like to watch.” Hopefully you’ve seen this wonderful film, and that’s all I need to say. But just in case you’re not familiar, here’s the scene: Eve Rand (Shirley MacLaine) attempts to seduce the rather simple Chauncey Gardner (Peter Sellers), who responds by saying, “I like to watch.” Of course, he means the television, but Eve takes the statement to mean he wants to watch her pleasure herself. And so she proceeds to humiliate herself on the floor while Chauncey hilariously takes enjoys an exercise show on the TV.
1. Adaptation - Really, the whole movie is one big masturbation scene. There is a literal masturbation scene, though, in which Charlie (Nicolas Cage) fantasizes about Susan Orlean (Meryl Streep), and it’s pretty good on its own. But it takes the top spot for affirming that screenwriter Charlie Kauffman created the literary equivalent of beating off. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:01:40 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>SpoutBlog</spout:postby><spout:postto>SpoutBlog on spout.com</spout:postto><spout:postdate>8/1/2008 2:01:40 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>
Andrew Sarris may be one of the most influential American film critics, but here’s a claim, located within his recent review of In Search of a Midnight Kiss, that may not hold up to some of his better-remembered theories: “Even when we confront 40-year-old virgins of either gender, movies refuse to show them compensating for the lack of a sexual partner. There is lasting shame involved in this spectacle.”
Not to ever, ever profess superiority over Sarris, but I’ve nonetheless compiled today’s list as a way of proving the man wrong. There are actually tons and tons of masturbation scenes found in non-porn movies, from the low brow to the high brow, from as indirect as the boy wizard playing with his wand under the covers in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban to as direct as the non-simulated masturbation in Michael Winterbottom’s 9 Songs and John Cameron Mitchell’s Shortbus (which would probably feature my #1 pick, from the sound of it, if I ever bothered to see it).
The following 10 films are some of the most memorable masturbation scenes, excluding any movies that might be considered examples of, in Sarris’ words, “the fringe exploitation genres” (I’ve even gone so far as to leave out mainstream horror like The Exorcist, considering it’s crucifix masturbation is far from the self-pleasuring moments Sarris is clearly interested in). Oh, and I’ve attempted to chart these films artistically from lowbrow to high.

10. Fast Times at Ridgemont High - Everybody remembers this scene because of the fantasy: Phoebe Cates emerges from a swimming pool in slow motion and removes her bikini top. And then Cates’ character walks in on the fantasizer, Judge Reinhold, for one of the most awkward moments in the history of awkward comedy. There’s been plenty of uncomfortable scenes of guys being caught in the act, including those moments in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Little Children and the most obvious masturbation movie, American Pie.
9. Léolo - Speaking of masturbating with food, not even pie-fucking beats the scene in this French-Canadian gem in which our young titular hero decides that his real father is a man who jerked off with a tomato, which later impregnated Léolo’s mother when she fell onto it. There are other less memorable masturbation scenes involving liver and chicken, too. Yum!
8. Spanking the Monkey - I always found the masturbation scenes in this movie so interesting because of how clean a “job” Ray Aibelli (Jeremy Davies) does with his personal business. I guess when you’re probably fantasizing about your mother, your mind is dirty enough, and so (seemingly) uncomfortably jacking off while sitting on a toilet is the best way to go. But couldn’t he just do it in the shower, like Kevin Spacey in American Beauty? I’m surprised that Sarris forgot about this one, since the title alone refers to the act.
7. The Squid and the Whale - If I have to select one movie involving a little kid masturbating (and writing this sentence has already got me feeling immensely ashamed), I pick this one over Todd Solondz’ Happiness (”I came!”), because while both scenes in question are quite disturbing, the one featuring the real-life son of Kevin Kline and Phoebe Cates jerking off in a library and then wiping his hands off on some books is at least a little amusing. A lot amusing if you take into account his mother’s appearance in movie #10 above. And if you need another little kid masturbating movie to choose from (I’m not judging), Babel has one too.
6. But I’m a Cheerleader - That Natasha Lyonne sure loves to masturbate! is a quick response to the realization that she pleasures herself in both this film and the earlier Slums of Beverly Hills. The reason that this movie is the more significant of the two is because the masturbation scene is very tastefully done, and yet in its original form, it controversially garnered the film an NC-17 rating, only because, as argued in the documentary This Film is Not Yet Rated, it deals with both homosexual desire and female sexuality. The main evidence: American Pie was released in the same year with an R rating.
5. Mulholland Drive - A less beautiful yet no less exploitive depiction of female masturbation occurs in David Lynch’s enigmatic film. Despite the fact that guys tend to enjoy watching a girl pleasure herself, only the most sadistic of men could be turned on by Naomi Watts crying and painfully attempting to get off.
4. Bad Lieutenant - When I first heard about the scene in which Harvey Keitel’s corrupt cop masturbates in front of two teens in a car he pulls over, I thought it had to be the most debauched scene in film history. Of course, I was only 15 when it came out and wasn’t yet familiar with a lot of cinema. By the time I actually bothered to watch the scene many years later, it was less shocking than I expected. Still, as far as depraved things a character can do in a movie — at least in theory — it’s up there, and it’s certainly one of the first scenes that comes to mind when I think of movie masturbation.
3. Amarcord - Oh, right, here’s another movie with little kids masturbating. But it’s a Fellini movie, so obviously it’s incomparable to the three referenced earlier. Although an amusing scene, featuring a bunch of kids masturbating in unison in a car, it’s much less disturbing, as it simply displays the act as a part of growing up.
2. Being There - “I like to watch.” Hopefully you’ve seen this wonderful film, and that’s all I need to say. But just in case you’re not familiar, here’s the scene: Eve Rand (Shirley MacLaine) attempts to seduce the rather simple Chauncey Gardner (Peter Sellers), who responds by saying, “I like to watch.” Of course, he means the television, but Eve takes the statement to mean he wants to watch her pleasure herself. And so she proceeds to humiliate herself on the floor while Chauncey hilariously takes enjoys an exercise show on the TV.
1. Adaptation - Really, the whole movie is one big masturbation scene. There is a literal masturbation scene, though, in which Charlie (Nicolas Cage) fantasizes about Susan Orlean (Meryl Streep), and it’s pretty good on its own. But it takes the top spot for affirming that screenwriter Charlie Kauffman created the literary equivalent of beating off. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: 10 More ’90s Indies to Franchise</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2008/6/5/30563.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t15887bf6jy.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/9325/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/default.aspx'>SpoutBlog on spout.com</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 6/5/2008 3:01:05 PM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> Now that we know, courtesy of Stu at Defamer, that Werner Herzog’s remake of Abel Ferrara’s Bad Lieutenant is not so much a remake as it is like a new entry into a franchise, a la the James Bond movies, we at SpoutBlog wonder what other ’90s indie favorites could be continued with similar yet “completely different” installments.
I remember back in the day thinking that Clerks should be a franchise, each film focusing on a different crappy job experience, but now that Clerks II has come and gone, that idea will likely never be realized. Of course, the concept of sequels unrelated to the original aren’t new — just look at any sequel title substituting the number 2 (or II) with the word Too. But nevertheless, here’s a few suggestions for other crazy foreign auteurs to take into consideration:

Kids - Looking back, Larry Clark’s then-shocking debut is pretty tame. Nowadays you see teens doing worse things on commercial television. So, how about someone makes another Kids movie every decade or so to expose us to the latest generation of teenagers and how appallingly different they are from the previous generation. It would be like Apted’s Up documentaries, except it wouldn’t follow the same people.

Slacker - This is Karina’s suggestion, off the top of her head, so I’ll give her credit. She likes the idea of Linklater revisiting the concept behind his monumental indie, but having it set in other cities, a la The Real World. Unlike the premise of the next Real World, though, I’d be much more excited about a Slacker Brooklyn.
Leaving Las Vegas - While we’re on the idea of transplanting locations, and because Herzog is setting his Bad Lieutenant in New Orleans rather than New York, let’s mention some films whose remakes sequels next installments could feature title changes depending on their location changes. Leaving Boston might not have the same ring to it, though. What about King of New York redone as King of St. Louis? Of course, Abel Ferrara is already turning King of New York into a franchise with Pericle il Nero, a prequel that isn’t quite a prequel (strange that he would have a problem with Herzog’s film, then).
Swingers - This one is easy. Take some hot new subculture/dance craze/music scene and exploit it, so none of the original followers like it anymore and all of the new followers can be labeled posers (no, of course I’m not bitter). Swingers wasn’t the first movie to do it; Saturday Night Fever and probably a few ’50s rock ‘n’ roll movies were viewed the same way. I wonder what scene is cool with the alternative kids these days …
The Big One - Following the success of Roger and Me, Michael Moore made this documentary in which he attempts to get interviews with other corporate heads. But now his films are mostly political and there’s less attention paid towards companies like General Motors and Nike. Sure, we’ve since seen some worthy substitutes, including The Corporation, Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room and Super Size Me, but I’d like Moore to return to his hunting of the villains of capitalism and give up on his pursuit of 9/11 answers.
Breaking the Waves - Surely most movie execs were shocked at how unsexy Von Trier’s film was. After all, the story of a crippled man who sends his wife out to sleep with men for his vicarious benefit sounds like an erotic, softcore, Skinamax kind of thing. So, when do we get Breaking the Waves Too, about another crippled man with a much younger, hotter wife (just FYI, I personally have always had a crush on Emily Watson)? And since it will be have to be direct-to-video will it still need to avoid the nauseating shaky cam that made so many people sick in the theater?
Sling Blade - Having recently seen Robert Duvall in the 1972 film Tomorrow, I now know that Billy Bob Thornton’s “Karl Childers” is not that unique a character. For the next installment, I’d like to see Karl (well, a character like Karl) and his southern gothic story set in New York City. It would make about as much sense as Bad Lieutenant being set in NOLA.
Being John Malkovich - Who hasn’t wanted a franchise in which each installment goes inside the head of a different cult-figure actor? Even if it would ruin the original just a little big, I’d love Being Jeff Goldblum or Being Christopher Walken. The latter would be enormously popular.
Kolya - This Oscar-winning foreign film showed us that heartwarming tales of old, curmudgeonly Sean Connery lookalikes who learn to love the young child they’re forced to take care of are universal. But I’d like to see the same plot in other countries besides Czechoslovakia, just to be sure.
Waiting for Guffman - Oh wait, Christopher Guest has been continually remaking this movie, only without association. Never mind.
 Originally posted on:SpoutBlog<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:01:05 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>SpoutBlog</spout:postby><spout:postto>SpoutBlog on spout.com</spout:postto><spout:postdate>6/5/2008 3:01:05 PM</spout:postdate><spout:body>Now that we know, courtesy of Stu at Defamer, that Werner Herzog’s remake of Abel Ferrara’s Bad Lieutenant is not so much a remake as it is like a new entry into a franchise, a la the James Bond movies, we at SpoutBlog wonder what other ’90s indie favorites could be continued with similar yet “completely different” installments.
I remember back in the day thinking that Clerks should be a franchise, each film focusing on a different crappy job experience, but now that Clerks II has come and gone, that idea will likely never be realized. Of course, the concept of sequels unrelated to the original aren’t new — just look at any sequel title substituting the number 2 (or II) with the word Too. But nevertheless, here’s a few suggestions for other crazy foreign auteurs to take into consideration:

Kids - Looking back, Larry Clark’s then-shocking debut is pretty tame. Nowadays you see teens doing worse things on commercial television. So, how about someone makes another Kids movie every decade or so to expose us to the latest generation of teenagers and how appallingly different they are from the previous generation. It would be like Apted’s Up documentaries, except it wouldn’t follow the same people.

Slacker - This is Karina’s suggestion, off the top of her head, so I’ll give her credit. She likes the idea of Linklater revisiting the concept behind his monumental indie, but having it set in other cities, a la The Real World. Unlike the premise of the next Real World, though, I’d be much more excited about a Slacker Brooklyn.
Leaving Las Vegas - While we’re on the idea of transplanting locations, and because Herzog is setting his Bad Lieutenant in New Orleans rather than New York, let’s mention some films whose remakes sequels next installments could feature title changes depending on their location changes. Leaving Boston might not have the same ring to it, though. What about King of New York redone as King of St. Louis? Of course, Abel Ferrara is already turning King of New York into a franchise with Pericle il Nero, a prequel that isn’t quite a prequel (strange that he would have a problem with Herzog’s film, then).
Swingers - This one is easy. Take some hot new subculture/dance craze/music scene and exploit it, so none of the original followers like it anymore and all of the new followers can be labeled posers (no, of course I’m not bitter). Swingers wasn’t the first movie to do it; Saturday Night Fever and probably a few ’50s rock ‘n’ roll movies were viewed the same way. I wonder what scene is cool with the alternative kids these days …
The Big One - Following the success of Roger and Me, Michael Moore made this documentary in which he attempts to get interviews with other corporate heads. But now his films are mostly political and there’s less attention paid towards companies like General Motors and Nike. Sure, we’ve since seen some worthy substitutes, including The Corporation, Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room and Super Size Me, but I’d like Moore to return to his hunting of the villains of capitalism and give up on his pursuit of 9/11 answers.
Breaking the Waves - Surely most movie execs were shocked at how unsexy Von Trier’s film was. After all, the story of a crippled man who sends his wife out to sleep with men for his vicarious benefit sounds like an erotic, softcore, Skinamax kind of thing. So, when do we get Breaking the Waves Too, about another crippled man with a much younger, hotter wife (just FYI, I personally have always had a crush on Emily Watson)? And since it will be have to be direct-to-video will it still need to avoid the nauseating shaky cam that made so many people sick in the theater?
Sling Blade - Having recently seen Robert Duvall in the 1972 film Tomorrow, I now know that Billy Bob Thornton’s “Karl Childers” is not that unique a character. For the next installment, I’d like to see Karl (well, a character like Karl) and his southern gothic story set in New York City. It would make about as much sense as Bad Lieutenant being set in NOLA.
Being John Malkovich - Who hasn’t wanted a franchise in which each installment goes inside the head of a different cult-figure actor? Even if it would ruin the original just a little big, I’d love Being Jeff Goldblum or Being Christopher Walken. The latter would be enormously popular.
Kolya - This Oscar-winning foreign film showed us that heartwarming tales of old, curmudgeonly Sean Connery lookalikes who learn to love the young child they’re forced to take care of are universal. But I’d like to see the same plot in other countries besides Czechoslovakia, just to be sure.
Waiting for Guffman - Oh wait, Christopher Guest has been continually remaking this movie, only without association. Never mind.
 Originally posted on:SpoutBlog</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Post: Bad Lieutenant Remake: Abel Ferrara Says, ‘Don’t Count On It.’</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/blogs/karina/archive/2008/5/23/29810.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div><img align='left' src='http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/t15887bf6jy.jpg' hspace='10' style='height:80px;' />
<strong>Post By:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/members/19702/default.aspx'>Karina</a><br/>
<strong>Post To:</strong> <a href='http://www.spout.com/blogs/karina/default.aspx'>Karina on SpoutBlog</a><br/>
<strong>Post Date:</strong> 5/23/2008 11:01:17 AM<br/>
<strong>Body:</strong> “Did everybody see the film?” Abel Ferrara cried at the jump of the Cannes press conference for Chelsea on the Rocks, compulsively putting on and pulling off a pair of black wraparound sunglasses, sipping on a can of Budweiser. Several journalists coughed in response. Said Ferrara: “What is this, avian flu? Everybody cough, yeah. We got a Howard Hughes complex as it is.”
The press conference as a whole was a woozy, half-sickly, half-populated affair…maybe typical of anything involving Ferrara meeting journalists, but definitely emblematic of the Festival itself at this point. But! But! Ferrara twice talked about Werner Herzog’s alleged Nicolas Cage-starring remake of his Bad Lieutenant––once in response to a question from a reporter, and once just because he apparently felt like he needed to vent.

First, Farrara tagged a comment about the remake on to his answer to a question about working outside the Hollywood system. “As far as remakes go, Harvey [Weinstein? Not mentioned in this Variety story in connection to the project. Keitel, who starred in the original? Hmmmm....] begged me not to say anything mean, or stupid. [pause] But I wish these people die in Hell. I hope they’re all in the same streetcar, and it blows up.”
Later, a different journalist mentioned the remake in the run-up to answering a different question, and Ferrara interrupted.
“It hasn’t been remade yet.”
“But it will be,” the reporter said.
Ferrara shook his head before putting it in his hands. “Don’t count on it.”
Other highlights of the session: When asked to explain “the difference between  New York and Los Angeles intellectually speaking,” Dennis Hopper responded, “New York is speed, Los Angeles is qualudes.” Then, this exchange between Hopper and Ferrara:
“I’m about to do a big Hollywood film,” Ferrara says, laughing.
“Yeah, me too!” Dennis Hopper is also laughing.
“We’re fighting over the same job,” says Ferrara. They’re cracking up now.
Hopper: “Yeah, they’re really knocking down our doors!”
“We’re gonna remake John Ford’s The Searchers,” Ferrara says, now seeming serious. Then he and Hopper crack up again. “Who’s gonna play the Indians? Are there any comanches left, or are they all dealing cards?”
Ferrara continues, this time without laughter. “I’m as Hollywood as it comes, and I grew up in Peekskill. It doesn’t matter where the movies are made. I used to say it’s about getting the movies made, and getting them distributed, but I’ve given up on the second half of that.” Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth<br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:01:17 GMT</pubDate><spout:postby>Karina</spout:postby><spout:postto>Karina on SpoutBlog</spout:postto><spout:postdate>5/23/2008 11:01:17 AM</spout:postdate><spout:body>“Did everybody see the film?” Abel Ferrara cried at the jump of the Cannes press conference for Chelsea on the Rocks, compulsively putting on and pulling off a pair of black wraparound sunglasses, sipping on a can of Budweiser. Several journalists coughed in response. Said Ferrara: “What is this, avian flu? Everybody cough, yeah. We got a Howard Hughes complex as it is.”
The press conference as a whole was a woozy, half-sickly, half-populated affair…maybe typical of anything involving Ferrara meeting journalists, but definitely emblematic of the Festival itself at this point. But! But! Ferrara twice talked about Werner Herzog’s alleged Nicolas Cage-starring remake of his Bad Lieutenant––once in response to a question from a reporter, and once just because he apparently felt like he needed to vent.

First, Farrara tagged a comment about the remake on to his answer to a question about working outside the Hollywood system. “As far as remakes go, Harvey [Weinstein? Not mentioned in this Variety story in connection to the project. Keitel, who starred in the original? Hmmmm....] begged me not to say anything mean, or stupid. [pause] But I wish these people die in Hell. I hope they’re all in the same streetcar, and it blows up.”
Later, a different journalist mentioned the remake in the run-up to answering a different question, and Ferrara interrupted.
“It hasn’t been remade yet.”
“But it will be,” the reporter said.
Ferrara shook his head before putting it in his hands. “Don’t count on it.”
Other highlights of the session: When asked to explain “the difference between  New York and Los Angeles intellectually speaking,” Dennis Hopper responded, “New York is speed, Los Angeles is qualudes.” Then, this exchange between Hopper and Ferrara:
“I’m about to do a big Hollywood film,” Ferrara says, laughing.
“Yeah, me too!” Dennis Hopper is also laughing.
“We’re fighting over the same job,” says Ferrara. They’re cracking up now.
Hopper: “Yeah, they’re really knocking down our doors!”
“We’re gonna remake John Ford’s The Searchers,” Ferrara says, now seeming serious. Then he and Hopper crack up again. “Who’s gonna play the Indians? Are there any comanches left, or are they all dealing cards?”
Ferrara continues, this time without laughter. “I’m as Hollywood as it comes, and I grew up in Peekskill. It doesn’t matter where the movies are made. I used to say it’s about getting the movies made, and getting them distributed, but I’ve given up on the second half of that.” Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth</spout:body></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:murder</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/murder/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/murder/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>murder</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 8748</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 157</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 830</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:57:25 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>8748</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>157</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>830</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:drugs</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/drugs/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/drugs/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>drugs</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 1643</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 130</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 488</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:36:00 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>1643</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>130</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>488</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:sex</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/sex/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/sex/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>sex</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 2414</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 126</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 548</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:50:42 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>2414</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>126</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>548</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:drama</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/drama/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/drama/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>drama</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 525</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 102</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 624</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:39:10 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>525</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>102</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>624</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:weird</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/weird/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/weird/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>weird</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 90</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 83</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 131</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:57:36 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>90</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>83</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>131</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:violence</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/violence/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/violence/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>violence</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 952</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 82</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 240</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:34:09 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>952</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>82</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>240</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:thriller</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/thriller/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/thriller/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>thriller</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 199</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 74</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 244</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:33:53 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>199</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>74</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>244</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:crime</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/crime/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/crime/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>crime</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 401</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 70</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 303</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:51:32 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>401</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>70</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>303</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:religion</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/religion/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/religion/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>religion</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 1123</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 67</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 176</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:31:00 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>1123</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>67</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>176</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:rape</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/rape/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/rape/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>rape</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 1050</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 54</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 124</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:36:01 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>1050</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>54</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>124</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:depression</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/depression/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/depression/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>depression</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 462</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 51</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 87</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:57:50 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>462</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>51</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>87</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:baseball</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/baseball/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/baseball/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>baseball</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 914</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 42</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 84</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:28:02 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>914</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>42</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>84</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:gambling</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/gambling/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/gambling/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>gambling</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 1082</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 38</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 81</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:03:25 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>1082</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>38</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>81</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:police</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/police/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/police/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>police</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 3104</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 37</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 172</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:56:49 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>3104</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>37</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>172</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
    <item>
      <title>Spout Tag:alcoholism</title>
      <link>http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/alcoholism/MemberTagFilms.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[<div style='display:block;height:120px;width:400px;font:10px/10px Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;'><a href='/members/0/tags/alcoholism/MemberTagFilms.aspx'>alcoholism</a>
<strong><br/> Number of films tagged:</strong> 1151</br><br/>
<strong>Number of people who tagged:</strong> 35</br><br/>
<strong>Number of times used:</strong> 64</br><br/>
</div>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:16:58 GMT</pubDate><spout:numFilms>1151</spout:numFilms><spout:numPeople>35</spout:numPeople><spout:timesUsed>64</spout:timesUsed><spout:type>Tag</spout:type></item>
  </channel>
</rss>