list http://www.spout.com/ Recent community activity around Legally Blonde on Spout Copyright 2005-9 Spout, LLC Spout RSS http://www.spout.com/images/SpoutLogoRSS.jpg http://www.spout.com/ 136 30 http://www.spout.com/films/Legally_Blonde/193043/default.aspx Title: Legally Blonde
Year: 2001
Director: Robert Luketic
Plot: Reese Witherspoon stars in this romantic comedy, the feature film debut of award-winning Australian director Robert Luketic. As a ravishing Miss Hawaiian Tropic, sorority president, and calendar girl, Elle Woods (Witherspoon) is a big hit on the campus of her sun-drenched Los Angeles college. She's also got the perfect boyfriend in Warner Huntington III (Matthew Davis), a wealthy East Coast blue blood. Fearing that his snooty friends and family will never accept the bubble-headed Elle, however, Warner dumps her before heading off to graduate law school at Harvard University. Determined to win back her man, Elle enrolls in the same imposing institution, quickly becoming an object of scorn and ridicule, especially to Warner's old prep school flame (Selma Blair). Despite her penchant for malls, makeup, and tanning, Elle is no dummy and is soon showing elite Ivy League snobs a thing or two about class, self-confidence, and courtroom victory. ~ Karl Williams, All Movie Guide
Times Tagged: 45
Number of Lists: 52
Number of blog posts: 4
Number of discussion threads: 2
SpoutRating: 3
]]>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:27:26 GMTLegally Blonde2001Robert Luketic<a href="/players/P____77086/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Reese Witherspoon</a> stars in this romantic comedy, the feature film debut of award-winning Australian director Robert Luketic. As a ravishing Miss Hawaiian Tropic, sorority president, and calendar girl, Elle Woods (Witherspoon) is a big hit on the campus of her sun-drenched Los Angeles college. She's also got the perfect boyfriend in Warner Huntington III (<a href="/players/P___277848/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Matthew Davis</a>), a wealthy East Coast blue blood. Fearing that his snooty friends and family will never accept the bubble-headed Elle, however, Warner dumps her before heading off to graduate law school at Harvard University. Determined to win back her man, Elle enrolls in the same imposing institution, quickly becoming an object of scorn and ridicule, especially to Warner's old prep school flame (<a href="/players/P___232175/default.aspx" style='text-decoration:underline'>Selma Blair</a>). Despite her penchant for malls, makeup, and tanning, Elle is no dummy and is soon showing elite Ivy League snobs a thing or two about class, self-confidence, and courtroom victory. ~ Karl Williams, All Movie Guide45Tag Target (>10)52423http://www.spout.com/ProductImages/u43990bde8w.jpghttp://www.spout.com/films/Legally_Blonde/193043/default.aspxFilm http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2008/11/10/37144.aspx Post By: SpoutBlog
Post To: SpoutBlog on spout.com
Post Date: 11/10/2008 11:00:47 AM
Body: As Chris briefly noted earlier this morning, MGM has confirmed last week’s CNET rumors and announced that they’re slowly rolling some of their feature film library on to YouTube. But the New York Times story about this, by Brad Stone and the always-skeptical Brooks Barnes, warns us not to get too excited — because MGM certainly isn’t. “The initial lineup may not be all that compelling,” the authors admit — highlights include full-length streams of Bulletproof Monk and clips from Legally Blonde — but this may be because MGM doesn’t feel compelled to give YouTube the good stuff. Noting that many studios are cranky about YouTube’s past perceived leinance on copyright enforcement (a perception which they’re now vigorously trying to reverse), dissatisfied with the overall look and feel of the site and skeptical over its as-yet-unproven potential as a revenue generator, the authors quote MGM’s bet-hedging co-president, Jim Packer: But he did not see putting a significant part of the studio’s catalog on the site anytime soon.“We will have some long-form videos up on YouTube, but I don’t think that’s the platform to have 30 or 40 movies up at once,” Mr. Packer said. “I feel much more comfortable doing that on a site like Hulu.” One of Hulu’s obvious advantages is that there’s no non-professional/user-generated content to compete with, which makes it a playing field much more familiar to mainstream distributors. So why put a hand in YouTube at all? It’s like they know they should court YouTube (think about the marketshare left abandoned on the table if they don’t), but they’re just not that attracted to her. YouTube is the girl that MGM (and other studios) are going to call once a month and take out to a sub-par restaurant, just so that they can keep her in the game in case there’s an unforeseen catastrophe somewhere down the road. Until then, they’re saving all their love for Hulu. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog
]]>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:00:47 GMTSpoutBlogSpoutBlog on spout.com11/10/2008 11:00:47 AMAs Chris briefly noted earlier this morning, MGM has confirmed last week’s CNET rumors and announced that they’re slowly rolling some of their feature film library on to YouTube. But the New York Times story about this, by Brad Stone and the always-skeptical Brooks Barnes, warns us not to get too excited — because MGM certainly isn’t. “The initial lineup may not be all that compelling,” the authors admit — highlights include full-length streams of Bulletproof Monk and clips from Legally Blonde — but this may be because MGM doesn’t feel compelled to give YouTube the good stuff. Noting that many studios are cranky about YouTube’s past perceived leinance on copyright enforcement (a perception which they’re now vigorously trying to reverse), dissatisfied with the overall look and feel of the site and skeptical over its as-yet-unproven potential as a revenue generator, the authors quote MGM’s bet-hedging co-president, Jim Packer: But he did not see putting a significant part of the studio’s catalog on the site anytime soon.“We will have some long-form videos up on YouTube, but I don’t think that’s the platform to have 30 or 40 movies up at once,” Mr. Packer said. “I feel much more comfortable doing that on a site like Hulu.” One of Hulu’s obvious advantages is that there’s no non-professional/user-generated content to compete with, which makes it a playing field much more familiar to mainstream distributors. So why put a hand in YouTube at all? It’s like they know they should court YouTube (think about the marketshare left abandoned on the table if they don’t), but they’re just not that attracted to her. YouTube is the girl that MGM (and other studios) are going to call once a month and take out to a sub-par restaurant, just so that they can keep her in the game in case there’s an unforeseen catastrophe somewhere down the road. Until then, they’re saving all their love for Hulu. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog http://www.spout.com/blogs/karina/archive/2008/11/10/37143.aspx Post By: Karina
Post To: Karina on SpoutBlog
Post Date: 11/10/2008 10:00:52 AM
Body: As Chris briefly noted earlier this morning, MGM has confirmed last week’s CNET rumors and announced that they’re slowly rolling some of their feature film library on to YouTube. But the New York Times story about this, by Brad Stone and the always-skeptical Brooks Barnes, warns us not to get too excited — because MGM certainly isn’t. “The initial lineup may not be all that compelling,” the authors admit — highlights include full-length streams of Bulletproof Monk and clips from Legally Blonde — but this may be because MGM doesn’t feel compelled to give YouTube the good stuff. Noting that many studios are cranky about YouTube’s past perceived leinance on copyright enforcement (a perception which they’re now vigorously trying to reverse), dissatisfied with the overall look and feel of the site and skeptical over its as-yet-unproven potential as a revenue generator, the authors quote MGM’s bet-hedging co-president, Jim Packer: But he did not see putting a significant part of the studio’s catalog on the site anytime soon.“We will have some long-form videos up on YouTube, but I don’t think that’s the platform to have 30 or 40 movies up at once,” Mr. Packer said. “I feel much more comfortable doing that on a site like Hulu.” One of Hulu’s obvious advantages is that there’s no non-professional/user-generated content to compete with, which makes it a playing field much more familiar to mainstream distributors. So why put a hand in YouTube at all? It’s like they know they should court YouTube (think about the marketshare left abandoned on the table if they don’t), but they’re just not that attracted to her. YouTube is the girl that MGM (and other studios) are going to call once a month and take out to a sub-par restaurant, just so that they can keep her in the game in case there’s an unforeseen catastrophe somewhere down the road. Until then, they’re saving all their love for Hulu. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth
]]>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:00:52 GMTKarinaKarina on SpoutBlog11/10/2008 10:00:52 AMAs Chris briefly noted earlier this morning, MGM has confirmed last week’s CNET rumors and announced that they’re slowly rolling some of their feature film library on to YouTube. But the New York Times story about this, by Brad Stone and the always-skeptical Brooks Barnes, warns us not to get too excited — because MGM certainly isn’t. “The initial lineup may not be all that compelling,” the authors admit — highlights include full-length streams of Bulletproof Monk and clips from Legally Blonde — but this may be because MGM doesn’t feel compelled to give YouTube the good stuff. Noting that many studios are cranky about YouTube’s past perceived leinance on copyright enforcement (a perception which they’re now vigorously trying to reverse), dissatisfied with the overall look and feel of the site and skeptical over its as-yet-unproven potential as a revenue generator, the authors quote MGM’s bet-hedging co-president, Jim Packer: But he did not see putting a significant part of the studio’s catalog on the site anytime soon.“We will have some long-form videos up on YouTube, but I don’t think that’s the platform to have 30 or 40 movies up at once,” Mr. Packer said. “I feel much more comfortable doing that on a site like Hulu.” One of Hulu’s obvious advantages is that there’s no non-professional/user-generated content to compete with, which makes it a playing field much more familiar to mainstream distributors. So why put a hand in YouTube at all? It’s like they know they should court YouTube (think about the marketshare left abandoned on the table if they don’t), but they’re just not that attracted to her. YouTube is the girl that MGM (and other studios) are going to call once a month and take out to a sub-par restaurant, just so that they can keep her in the game in case there’s an unforeseen catastrophe somewhere down the road. Until then, they’re saving all their love for Hulu. Originally posted on:SpoutBlog » Karina Longworth http://www.spout.com/groups/Top_5/Re_Top_5_Guilty_Pleasure_films/190/30848/1/ShowPost.aspx Post By: nikolarulz
Post To: Top 5
Post Date: 6/8/2008 12:58:16 PM
Body: Ooh, fun topic! 1. The Next Best Thing - Seriously, this is a bad movie... But there is something about Madonna and Rupert Everett that I just can't help but love! :) 2. Legally Blonde 1 & 2 - Reese Witherspoon is so charming, and she IS this movie - although it's a corny chick-flick. 3. Cruel Intentions - No comment. Although it is not a necessarily bad movie, I feel like I'm constantly over-rating it. 4. Mr. & Mrs. Smith - Obviously. 5. Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle - I can't help but like the angels!
]]>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:58:16 GMTnikolarulzTop 56/8/2008 12:58:16 PMOoh, fun topic! 1. The Next Best Thing - Seriously, this is a bad movie... But there is something about Madonna and Rupert Everett that I just can't help but love! :) 2. Legally Blonde 1 &amp; 2 - Reese Witherspoon is so charming, and she IS this movie - although it's a corny chick-flick. 3. Cruel Intentions - No comment. Although it is not a necessarily bad movie, I feel like I'm constantly over-rating it. 4. Mr. &amp; Mrs. Smith - Obviously. 5. Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle - I can't help but like the angels! http://www.spout.com/blogs/lovethebestyears/archive/2007/8/16/18260.aspx Post By: lovethebestyears
Post To: lovethebestyears Blog
Post Date: 8/16/2007 11:23:01 PM
Body: Ive seen this movie literally a little over 10 times. It's really just a fun movie & witherspoon's character is particularly likeable. The story is genuine while the love story is classic. I especially love the song, "Perfect Day" that the movie opens & ends with. :D
]]>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 03:23:01 GMTlovethebestyearslovethebestyears Blog8/16/2007 11:23:01 PMIve seen this movie literally a little over 10 times. It&#39;s really just a fun movie &amp; witherspoon&#39;s character is particularly likeable. The story is genuine while the love story is classic. I especially love the song, &quot;Perfect Day&quot; that the movie opens &amp; ends with. :D http://www.spout.com/blogs/enaretea/archive/2007/5/4/8114.aspx Post By: enaretea
Post To: enaretea Blog
Post Date: 5/4/2007 2:37:00 AM
Body: I watched The Devil Wears Prada a few weekends ago with my wife. We both loved it. Meryl Streep was excellent and Anne Hathaway.... what a fox! I just loved her in this movie. She is totally the girl-next-door and the vixen from down the street rolled up in one. The plot of the movie is predictable, but, like Legally Blonde (one of my darling wife's favourites), it has an irresistable charm. Is this the best movie ever made about fashion? I only have the awful Prêt-à-Porter to compare it to, so I would say that it is. Plus, it has Anne Hathaway in it. Did I mention her yet? Anne Hathaway... I bet Shakespeare wishes he'd waited 600 years instead of settling for the first Anne Hathaway that came along. She's beautiful, talented, great big eyes, amazing smile... I'm embarrassing myself. I'll stop.
]]>Fri, 04 May 2007 06:37:00 GMTenareteaenaretea Blog5/4/2007 2:37:00 AMI watched The Devil Wears Prada a few weekends ago with my wife. We both loved it. Meryl Streep was excellent and Anne Hathaway.... what a fox! I just loved her in this movie. She is totally the girl-next-door and the vixen from down the street rolled up in one. The plot of the movie is predictable, but, like Legally Blonde (one of my darling wife&#39;s favourites), it has an irresistable charm. Is this the best movie ever made about fashion? I only have the awful Pr&ecirc;t-&agrave;-Porter to compare it to, so I would say that it is. Plus, it has Anne Hathaway in it. Did I mention her yet? Anne Hathaway... I bet Shakespeare wishes he&#39;d waited 600 years instead of settling for the first Anne Hathaway that came along. She&#39;s beautiful, talented, great big eyes, amazing smile... I&#39;m embarrassing myself. I&#39;ll stop. http://www.spout.com/groups/Best_movie_quotes/Re_Guess_The_Movie_Quote/17/2327/1/ShowPost.aspx Post By: pippin06
Post To: Best movie quotes
Post Date: 8/11/2006 3:09:12 PM
Body: Is the game done? I have no idea for this, but I'll take a wild guess. Is it...Legally Blonde?
]]>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:09:12 GMTpippin06Best movie quotes8/11/2006 3:09:12 PMIs the game done? I have no idea for this, but I'll take a wild guess. Is it...Legally Blonde? http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/love/MemberTagFilms.aspxlove
Number of films tagged: 12479

Number of people who tagged: 338

Number of times used: 1481

]]>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:51:34 GMT124793381481Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/romance/MemberTagFilms.aspxromance
Number of films tagged: 7163

Number of people who tagged: 169

Number of times used: 1005

]]>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:16:35 GMT71631691005Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/friendship/MemberTagFilms.aspxfriendship
Number of films tagged: 6791

Number of people who tagged: 154

Number of times used: 980

]]>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:42:20 GMT6791154980Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/teenagers/MemberTagFilms.aspxteenagers
Number of films tagged: 3025

Number of people who tagged: 97

Number of times used: 399

]]>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:42:10 GMT302597399Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/Guilty-Pleasure/MemberTagFilms.aspxGuilty-Pleasure
Number of films tagged: 102

Number of people who tagged: 61

Number of times used: 152

]]>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:55:42 GMT10261152Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/school/MemberTagFilms.aspxschool
Number of films tagged: 1231

Number of people who tagged: 56

Number of times used: 130

]]>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:49:18 GMT123156130Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/and/MemberTagFilms.aspxand
Number of films tagged: 59

Number of people who tagged: 53

Number of times used: 64

]]>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:54:50 GMT595364Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/lawyer/MemberTagFilms.aspxlawyer
Number of films tagged: 1764

Number of people who tagged: 35

Number of times used: 82

]]>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:55:09 GMT17643582Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/California/MemberTagFilms.aspxCalifornia
Number of films tagged: 84

Number of people who tagged: 25

Number of times used: 91

]]>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:42:04 GMT842591Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/Different/MemberTagFilms.aspxDifferent
Number of films tagged: 50

Number of people who tagged: 23

Number of times used: 52

]]>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:29:57 GMT502352Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/Pink/MemberTagFilms.aspxPink
Number of films tagged: 12

Number of people who tagged: 17

Number of times used: 21

]]>Fri, 01 May 2009 22:51:47 GMT121721Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/outcast/MemberTagFilms.aspxoutcast
Number of films tagged: 134

Number of people who tagged: 16

Number of times used: 21

]]>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 07:38:20 GMT1341621Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/blonde/MemberTagFilms.aspxblonde
Number of films tagged: 10

Number of people who tagged: 9

Number of times used: 13

]]>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:19:11 GMT10913Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/sorority/MemberTagFilms.aspxsorority
Number of films tagged: 43

Number of people who tagged: 9

Number of times used: 14

]]>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:38:51 GMT43914Tag http://www.spout.com/members/0/tags/fishoutofwater/MemberTagFilms.aspxfishoutofwater
Number of films tagged: 119

Number of people who tagged: 6

Number of times used: 12

]]>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:14:49 GMT119612Tag